Archives for category: Charter Schools

 

The Michigan House passed a bill to let the charter sector—including for-profit charters and cyber charters—share in millage revenues. Voters no doubt think they are underwriting their local community public schools, but they will be paying for the privately managed charters if the State Senate agrees.

https://www.freep.com/story/news/education/2018/01/18/michigan-legislation-millage-charter-schools/1045504001/

Michigan charters are unusual in that they operate with little accountability. Some 80% of the state’s charters operate for profit.

In recent years, with the spread of charters, Michigan’s ranking on NAEP has fallen from the middle of the national rankings to near the bottom.

Michigan believes in investing in failure. Results don’t matter.

 

 

Readers of this blog are familiar with the story of ECOT, the mammoth virtual charter school in Ohio. It made over $1 Billion for the entrepreneur who founded it. But it seems to be slipping rapidly down the drain hole.

Mother Jones tells the story here in graphic detail. 

“Now, with ECOT imploding, some state politicians have floated the idea that Lager, who has made millions in profits off the school and come a long way from the Waffle House, should be personally held responsible for paying back some of the $80 million owed to the state. But while the coming days will reveal if the political will or mechanisms exist to make this happen, it’s unclear how he might ever be held accountable—because the real scandal is that ECOT grew up legally, with the support of state politicians and national GOP power brokers, and that in many ways it has served as a model for schools like it across the country. Now, the same districts ECOT pulled its funds from are scrambling to find a way to take in its former students, and Ohio is facing a reckoning, after nearly two decades when the state became one of the country’s freest laboratories for pro-charter policies. “Why did it take a generation and a half of kids to go through this crappy system for us to do something about it,” Stephen Dyer, a former Ohio state representative asked me in exasperation in December. “The reason is because a lot of money came in.”

This article was written in 2015 but it is as timely today as it was then. Maybe more timely, because in 2015, who would have dreamed that Betsy DeVos would soon be U.S. Secretary of Education?

The American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) is a bill mill founded in 1973 and funded by the Koch Brothers, the DeVos family, and major corporations. It operates secretively. It does not issue press releases. It churns out model laws that state legislators introduce into their own states to deregulate business and privatize the public sector for profit. It is a stealth political campaign to privatize everything for profit while classified by the IRS as a charity. Its members include one of every four state legislators in the nation. It’s corporate members include some of the nation’s pre-eminent businesses.

One of the major targets of ALEC is public education, because it is public. ALEC has model legislation for charter schools, vouchers, and cybercharters. It has Model legislation to eliminate collective bargaining and unions. It has Model legislation to lower standards for teachers and deregulate entry into teaching.

To learn more about ALEC, watch DeVos and read the website ALEC Exposed.

Alecexposed.com

Circulate this post and the links to everyone you know.

The Waltons are a singular American family. Not exactly like you or me, to be sure. They are, according to Forbes, the richest family in America, with a net worth of $140 billion or more.

They were recently praised by Trump for raising the minimum wage for their 1 million workers to $11 an hour. On the same day, however, they closed down 63 Sam’s Club warehouse stores, putting more than 11,000 people out of work without notice.

I wish any member of the Walton family would try to live for a month on only $11 an hour wages. However, since they are all heirs to their great fortune, it’s likely that none ever held a paying job where they had to show up every day.

Here is an article about them that appeared on the Walton Foundation blog.

While other billionaires have pledged to give away most of their money to charity, the Waltons decline to join them. They know money is power. Also, it means you never have to go to work.

Their primary takeover target is education.

“The largest chunk of the foundation’s retooled and accelerated giving plan — $1 billion over the next five years — will go to education. While family members still evangelize about the benefits of “school choice” for struggling families, they’ve fought enough battles over the past two decades to determine that simply providing parents a slate of options among traditional public schools, charter schools, and private institutions isn’t enough to improve student achievement.

“For school choice to succeed, the Waltons concluded, the foundation has to move beyond making start-up grants for charters and focus more on building a constituency of supporters in local school districts.”

Typically, that means they have to actually buy elections, although the article doesn’t put it quire like that.

Their passion is charter schools. This is a handy way to bust unions and advance the privatization of public education. The Waltons claim to have started one of every charter schools in the U.S.

“Some critics have complained that the Waltons have donated a relatively small percentage of their enormous wealth to charity. Still, their giving is so substantial in terms of raw dollars that other critics contend it gives them too much influence over public policy. In response, the family has sought safe havens: school districts where there are plenty of skilled teachers and administrators excited about new educational models. In those places, the foundation has courted local officials open to charter schools operating alongside traditional neighborhood schools.

“The new approach means the foundation will exit cities where charters have been a tough sell, including Phoenix, Chicago, and Albany, N.Y. Its roster of 13 target areas now includes New Orleans, Oakland, and San Antonio, where charters are seen as ripe for success.”

See, they just sit around and decide how to privatize the public schools in your community. Arkansas is one of the poorest states in the nation. Couldn’t they just concentrate on raising up the families in their own backyard?

 

Roxana Marachi writes about two proposals before the California State Board of Education today. Maybe the decision has already been made.

Question: Is it true that “anyone can open a charter school in California?”

Does it matter if the proposal comes from an organization that has previously failed?

Does it matter that no one knows who will actually run the school?

Do California taxpayers care how their money is spent?

Does the State Board of Educatuon have any quality standards?

Can convicted felons open charters?

Can maniacal parents home school their children and chain them to their beds?

Does California have any standards?

Or is it Betsy DeVos’ Dream State?

 

 

 

 

 

This article summarizes a year-long investigation Of Michigan charter schools by the Detroit Free Press.

Eighty percent operate for profit.

No accountability.

This is Betsy DeVos’s handiwork.

Michigan scores on NAEP plummeted since adoption of the DeVos plan of choice with no accountability.

 

Alan Singer reviews the New York Times list of failed corporate reformers to replace Carmen Farina.

https://www.dailykos.com/story/2018/1/18/1733788/-Times-Endorses-Anti-Fari-a-Candidates-for-NYC-School-Chancellor-Alan-Singer-on-the-Daily-Kos

John King? Chased out of New York State.

Jaime Aquino? In charge of the iPad disaster in Los Angeles.

John White? Tool of rightwing former Governor Bobby Jindal.

Has beens.

Hey, Bill, find someone who believes in public schools.

 

 

Thomas Ultican has put his research skills to work while reviewing the depredations of the corporate reform organization’s intent on destroying public education.

In this post, he analyzes the origins of TNTP, The New Teacher Project, a spin-off of Teach for America led initially by Michelle Rhee.

TNTP is a cash cow for ambitious reformers. It advances its self-interest by attacking experienced teachers.

TNPT is an integral part of the privatization movement. It ignores genuine scholarship and undermines teacher professionalism.

“TNTP is important for the DPE movement. It produces papers that undermine teacher professionalism and it works to circumvent proven teacher training led by universities. It also works to gain control of pedagogy in a way that narrows curriculum. Why? It is all about cutting costs and business transactions. It does not improve the quality of education in America; it harms it.”

 

John Oliver explores the seamy side of unregulated, unsupervised charter schools.

The charter school idea sounds good. They say they will “save” poor children from “failing public schools.” They say they will be “innovative” because of their autonomy. It is easy to make promises but hard to deliver on promises when 25 years have gone by without the miracle that was expected.

Supporters of public education have found it difficult to break through to the general public about the purpose of public schools (citizenship, not test scores), about the fact that charters select students and toss out the ones they don’t want, about the fact that charters drain students and resources from public schools.

John Oliver’s video about charter schools has been viewed more than 8 million times. That is the kind of public advocacy that the billionaires have not been able to buy.

 

 

 

Carol Burris, the amazing and talented executive director of the Network for Public Education, wrote this stunning investigative report on charter fraud in California. It is titled “Charters and Consequences.”

The report details the fraud and financial scams permitted by California’s weak charter law. So weak is that law that it not only tolerates fraud, it encourages it.

As you read the report, you will ask yourself why taxpayers are not outraged. They should be.