Archives for category: Bill de Blasio

Robert Lubetsky and William Stroud published an article in the online Teachers College Record, offering advice for Mayor de Blasio. This is a shortened version of what appears on the TCR website. It was shortened by the authors.

Schooling in New York City – From Accountability to Revitalization
Robert Lubetsky​​
City College of New York
William Stroud​​​
Consortium for Policy Research in Education, Teachers College

 

Schooling in New York City – From Accountability to Revitalization

New York City Mayor, Bill De Blasio, in his inaugural speech stated simply: “When I said we would take dead aim at the Tale of Two Cities, I meant it.” In this, he recalled the openings lines of Charles Dickens’ masterpiece, which is worth quoting in full:

It was the best of times, it was the worst of times, it was the age of wisdom, it was the age of foolishness, it was the epoch of belief, it was the epoch of incredulity, it was the season of Light, it was the season of Darkness, it was the spring of hope, it was the winter of despair, we had everything before us, we had nothing before us, we were all going direct to Heaven, we were all going direct the other way- in short, the period was so far like the present period, that some of its noisiest authorities insisted on its being received, for good or for evil, in the superlative degree of comparison only (Dickens, 1858/2012, 1).

As a nation we have created at least two worlds of widely disparate educational quality. In order to redress these conditions, De Blasio has indicated an intention to rethink fundamental policies and initiatives of the Bloomberg years. These include an emphasis on standardized assessments, use of test scores to judge teachers, co-location of charter schools in existing public schools, annual school report cards, and the closing or reconstituting of schools that are not meeting expectations. On a constructive note, he has proposed an all day early childhood program and after school programs for middle school students. (Layton & Chandler, 2013). While these are positive steps toward improving educational experiences and outcomes for New York City public school students, we believe five crucial issues have received insufficient attention and should be addressed by the new administration. Each one has a profound impact on education in New York City. If addressed in a serious manner, we believe the effects could transform our city and its schools. Sustained efforts to grapple with these issues in New York would also inform the work of urban school districts across the country and lead to a renaissance in our schools. What are these critical issues?

  1. 1. Desegregate the schools:

New York City’s schools are among the most segregated in the United States. Half of the more than 1600 schools in New York City are over 90 percent black and Hispanic. Schools are more segregated than the neighborhoods where they are located (Fessenden, 2012). The Civil Rights Project at UCLA has documented how decisions for more than 100 years have led to more segregated schools and what negative impact this has on schooling and society (Orfield, et al. 1996). Sixty years after Brown versus the Board of Education, this is not just an embarrassment, it is shameful…

  1. 2. Professionalize teaching

There is a body of high quality research literature about what works to improve teaching and learning, under what conditions, and with what supports. We need to bridge the gap between the research and academic communities, and practitioners. Educators and policy makers can make better use of resources such as the Review of Educational Research, Best Evidence Encyclopedia, Best Evidence Synthesis, and the What Works Clearinghouse…

 

  1. 3. Involve our Communities

After 12 years of paternalistic rule, much of the public either feels disregarded (as others act on their behalf) or actively disrespected. Without reviewing the reasons for this, it is essential that the new Mayor and next Chancellor create specific structures and opportunities for community involvement in schools…

 

  1. 4. Support educational innovation.

Both of the present authors were principals of schools and have seen these schools turn from effective, cutting edge innovation to the pursuit of safer, less complex outcomes based on standardized assessment and accountability systems. To encourage and protect future centers of experimentation and innovation, structures must be created to allow schools to be freed from bureaucratic requirements to design and test new approaches to teaching and learning…

 

  1. 5. Link schools to the struggle to create a more just and ethical society.

All of these efforts will require recognizing that education can’t solve all of the problems created by poverty. While we believe that education is one component in a quest for a more just society, we also believe that the sloganeering that has occurred, “education is today’s civil rights issue,” obfuscates the regressive impact current economic policies have had on housing, wages, employment, poverty, and the quality of life in our city and in our nation. In 2011, 21 percent of children nationally were in poverty; an increase from 17% in 1990 (National Center for Education Statistics, 2012). In New York City nearly 46% of families are poor or near poor! (NYC Center for Economic Opportunity, April, 2013)

 

This is a time in our city when our public institutions are tilting towards the advantaged, and the evidence is overwhelming…

These goals are not utopian. But they require a bold vision, perseverance, strategic flexibility, and input from all of our communities; including the city’s university and research communities which are currently underutilized. What Mayoral control of education has made possible is a comprehensive, coordinated multi-dimensional attack on all of the issues that demand solution. Our way out of the current predicament will require inter-agency coordination, targeted efforts, and a revitalized citizenry – all of us working together on issues of neighborhood cooperation, school desegregation, educational innovation, professionalization of practice, and ultimately, the rebirth of schools as centers of democratic engagement.

http://www.tcrecord.org/Content.asp?ContentId=17374

Robert Lubetsky

City College of New York

William Stroud

Consortium for Policy Research in Education, Teachers College

During his campaign, Mayor Bill Di Blasio pledged to provide universal pre-kindergarten for all children whose families can’t afford it.

He said he would pay for UPK (universal pre-kindergarten) by imposing a modest tax increase on those with incomes over $500,000 a year. But he needs the support of Governor Cuomo and the State Legislature to raise taxes on the super-rich.

In the meanwhile, the Di Blasio administration has announced that it will redirect money from the city’s capital plan that was intended for charter schools to be used instead to begin UPK.

The Bloomberg administration made charters a high priority even though they enroll only 6% of the city’s children.

According to the report in the New York Times:

“The chancellor, Carmen Fariña, in describing the Education Department’s $12.8 billion capital plan, said she would seek to redirect $210 million that had been reserved for classroom space for charter schools and other nonprofit groups. The money, spread out over five years, would instead be used to create thousands of new prekindergarten seats, helping fulfill Mr. de Blasio’s signature campaign promise.

“The decision was an opening salvo in what many expect to be a long battle between the de Blasio administration and charter schools. The mayor is an unabashed critic of the schools, which are publicly financed but privately run. He has argued that the city should focus its resources on traditional public schools.”

The charter industry is outraged and is now angling to get permission to open pre-k programs.

Of course, if the charters maintain their typical practice of excluding children with disabilities and English learners, that would be disruptive for the UPK program.

The next contretemps between the Di Blasio administration and the charter industry will come when the administration reviews the decisions made in the waning days of the Bloomberg administration to open more charter schools in public school space. Chancellor Farina has said she will review each case on its merits, and Mayor Di Blasio has promised to listen to community sentiment.

Elected officials in NY are debating the cost of universal pre-K.

It was a central plank in Mayor Bill de Blasio’s campaign. He won in a landslide.

He wants to pay for it by a tiny tax increase on incomes over $500,000. This would add about $1,000 a year in new taxes, less than dinner for 2 at Per Se or other high-end restaurants of 1%.

Yet the pushback and debate about cost continues. See here.
And here. Everyone thinks it is a good idea, but no new taxes. That is the view of Governor Cuomo, who likes to be seen as a fiscal, pro-business, pro-corporate conservative.

However, let it be noted, It is good for business to have healthy, ready to learn children.

According to a survey published by The Economist, the US ranks 34th of 145 nations in supplying high quality child care.

Other nations recognize the long-term value of early childhood education, which grows more important as both parents work.

Yet we debate whether we can afford to do what research and experience demonstrate is good for children and for society.

When we went to war in Iraq and Adghanistan, did anyone worry about the billions and trillions it would cost? We made a bad bet.

Why not invest in our children? That’s a sure bet, and we can afford it.

This debate between Bruce Fuller of the University of California and me was just posted online by the New York Times.

Bruce takes the position that de Blasio and Farina should maintain some or many of the changes that Bloomberg made.

I argue that de Blasio has a mandate to stop closing schools, to get rid of the A-F grading system, to drop the failed Leadership Academy, and to drop the former administration’s attitude of hostility towards parents and educators. I also call for a revival of what was once a highly reputable research department, to take the place of the PR machine.

Feel free to make your comment on the NY Times website.

Marc Epstein, a teacher for many years at Jamaica High School (targeted for closure) here describes the Bloomberg years in New York City public schools and how difficult it will be to unravel the changes he imposed:

Bloomberg’s School Disaster

When Mayor-elect de Blasio announced Carmen Farina as his choice for schools chancellor and pointedly added that she was an educator, a metaphorical puff of white smoke appeared on the horizon for most of the city’s 75,000 schoolteachers.

That’s because after a succession of four chancellors over the past 13 years who had no professional education experience, it was if the Babylonian Captivity of the papacy had finally come to an end with Farina’s succession.

The hope is that Farina, with 40 years of experience that includes two decades in the classroom and another two decades holding administrative positions as principal, district superintendent, and deputy chancellor, has a fair idea of what has gone on in the school system over the past 12 years of mayoral control.

But there is also a fair amount of anxiety. The fear is that political forces outside of the school system reaching as far as the White House have a vested interest in seeing to it that unraveling public education continues unabated.

There’s even word from Valerie Strauss at the Washington Post that Secretary of Education Arne Duncan helped put the kibosh on one of the candidates on de Blasio’s short list for chancellor.

Within hours of the Farina appointment the editorialists began espousing their anti anti-Bloomberg position. Anyone who might seek to undo Bloomberg’s accomplishments is a regressive Neanderthal according to the Wall Street Journal, Daily News, and New York Post.

Should Farina maintain the status quo, the fate of public education in New York City will be sealed. What’s more, she will enjoy the accolades of the media, a media that has become heavily invested, both figuratively and literally, in the narrative put forth by Michael Bloomberg about business solutions and data driven decision-making.

That’s because Bloomberg, with his vast wealth intact, despite having spent more than $600 million dollars on his mayoralty, will continue to shape the narrative with commissioned dynastic histories and the use of his own news empire.

In addition, Rupert Murdoch and his Newscorp, which includes the Wall Street Journal and New York Post, are heavily invested in the “education revolution.” Murdoch boasts former chancellor Joel Klein as his vice-president in charge of education operations too.

So if this to be the party line, and Mayor de Blasio and Chancellor Farina want to begin undoing the damage of the past 12 years, they would do well to expose the train wreck that has become the New York City school system under Michael Bloomberg sooner rather than later.

For the past 12 years New Yorkers have been treated to a steady drumbeat over the airwaves and in print that posits that Mike Bloomberg was able to housebreak an unresponsive, unmanageable, sclerotic public school system and head it in the right direction.

He accomplished this by taking on the teachers union, introducing business-tested management techniques, creating a new kind of school principal purposefully chosen with little classroom experience, but trained in these business techniques, reconfiguring the school districts, closing failed schools and creating hundreds of new schools that offer a wide variety of school choices to parents who could shop schools to their heart’s content.

The numbers would determine all decision-making on the macro and micro level, because numbers don’t lie. Principals were given control over their budgets so they could run a school unencumbered for the first time.

And, every editorial page, intellectual journal, and radio wordsmith, bought Bloomberg’s spiel hook, line, and sinker. They’ve bought it despite irrefutable reports of poor student test performance, record numbers of students entering college unprepared, and an on-time graduation rate of 3% at New York’s community colleges. What’s more, they celebrate a budgeting system that gives the principals an incentive to hire younger, cheaper, inexperienced teachers, over more senior teachers that Bloomberg wants pushed out of the system.

The simple truth of the matter is that all of Bloomberg’s claims are counterintuitive. Numbers were manipulated in the service of his prejudices and ideology. The multiple reconfigurations of the state’s largest department actually destroyed institutional memory, and hence accountability.

State education laws regarding services are flouted with impunity. English language learners and more advanced ESL students are denied mandated instruction. The “litigate and be damned” attitude has defined the operatives at the Tweed Courthouse.

The only ones held culpable in Bloomberg’s education universe were the average teachers, and that was good enough for the pundits and Wall Street. But culpability should never be confused with accountability!

A young schoolgirl drowns on an improperly chaperoned field trip and the assistant principal who was supposed to go on the trip is let off the hook because he was busy with the school budget. Oh, there were no parental consent slips either.

Before Bloomberg, heads would have rolled possibly as high up as the chancellor, but for Joel Klein it was just another day at the beach.

A student becomes ill but is left unattended because there is no nurse in the building and the Dean’s office was instructed not to call 911 for fear that an emergency call would damage the school’s safety record being monitored in the new data driven accountability system.

It turns out the student suffered a stroke and was left permanently impaired. Her name disappeared from the enrollment list, and it was only because a lawsuit was brought against the city, and the illegal memo was leaked to the Daily News by someone in the school that the story saw the light of day.

An investigation was conducted. The chancellor promised a full report. But in Bloomberg’s universe, time heals all wounds. Nobody was held to account or lost their job. No report assigning responsibility was issued, and the city quietly settled the lawsuit.

Two weeks ago science experiment went terribly awry. All the facts aren’t in, but it appears all sorts of safety regulations were ignored.

But that’s to be expected when you have supervisors who haven’t been seasoned by years of experience or are petrified by honest reporting because they fear that bad news could lead to the demise of their school.

This has become a school system that simply can’t handle the truth. I’ve been writing about the schools for a decade, and for the first time my name has been sent to a conflicts of interest board about the content of my writing.

It’s not because I’ve become rich doing it, mind you. It’s because a thuggish ethos has became part of the DNA of the New York City schools and you speak your mind at your peril. Learning, inquiry, and dissent are being systematically flensed from the classroom and the schoolhouse in much the same manner it was done in totalitarian societies.

The net result is that the school system that Mayor de Blasio inherited is not a “mixed bag” of good innovations and things that need tinkering with, but a $25 billion dollar a year city department that is in a death spiral.

Large bureaucracies fight their battles with the tools they are given. Time and again history demonstrates that a bureaucracy can be bent to the will of the political forces running them in ways that are inimical to its mission and its very existence.

During the Korean War it seems that the generals running the war had far less intelligence capabilities at their disposal than they had when they were fighting WW II.

So what did they do?

An expert in army intelligence during this period once told me, “they fought the war they had with the tools that they were given. That’s the nature of bureaucratic organizations.”

Which brings me back to the New York City school system. My belief is that the breakdown in accountability, the widespread dissemination of doctored statistics, and the predisposition to hold the classroom teacher responsible for everything that has gone wrong in the schools has deeply compromised institutional memory. And without institutional memory, a bureaucracy of this breadth is doomed.

As a consequence, nothing short of a South African post-apartheid style commission that examines the past decade of mayoral control will suffice.

This is imperative because a well-funded chorus of writers and journalists continue to churn out a hagiography of the Bloomberg era, and portray it as a Golden Age of public education when all the evidence indicates that there has been no progress at great expense to the children and taxpayers of New York.

It should be composed on one level of well known people whose impartiality is beyond reproach and include representatives of all segments of the teaching, clerical, and administrative pool.

If the past 12 years are simply papered over, and Bloomberg’s gutting of the school system is treated as a “work in progress” that wasn’t completed because three terms as mayor didn’t give him enough time, then Farina and de Blasio will ensure that a once great system now at its tipping point, plunges over the public policy cliff.

Republican House Majority Leader Eric Cantor denounced Mayor Bill de Blasio’s announced plan to charge rent to charter schools using public space, if they can afford it. De Blasio responded sharply to Cantor’s criticism.

“Our committees in the House will remain vigilant in their efforts to ensure no one from the government stands in the school house door between any child and a good education,” said Cantor, in remarks at the Brookings Institution.

Asked what exactly the House would do in response to de Blasio, Cantor didn’t offer specifics, but said de Blasio’s policies put the nation’s largest school district “in conflict with federal programs that have been designed to help facilitate growth in public school choice.”

Cantor forgot about the alleged Republican belief in state and local control. Charters and vouchers matter more to Republicans than local control. He also forgot that voters in New York City made their choice by electing de Blasio, who beat his Republican opponent by 40 points. And one of the big issues between them was charter schools. De Blasio said he would impose a moratorium and charge rent, while Joe Lhota promised to increase the number of charters. The voters’ choice was overwhelming. Eric Cantor should let the voters of New York City govern themselves.

De Blasio made clear that he was not intimidated by Cantor’s threats and has no interest in taking advice from Eric Cantor.

“The Republican agenda in Washington doesn’t even scratch the surface of the inequities facing more than a million children in our public schools,” de Blasio said in a statement after Cantor’s remarks.

To learn more about why charters should pay rent, watch this brief segment on the Melissa Harris-Perry show where Leonie Haimson does a great job of explaining the issue.

Mercedes Schneider reviewed the tax records of Eva Moskowitz’s Success Academy and concluded that she could easily pay rent.

I am waiting for inauguration ceremonies to begin and just received this disturbing news.

According to Wash Post, Arne Duncan lobbied de Blasio to block choice of Joshua Starr, a vocal critic of high stakes testing.

The Wall Street Journal responded to Mayor-Elect Bill de Blasio’s choice of Carmen Farina as chancellor with bitterness. The editorial calls her “a competent steward of the failing status quo.” How could they overlook the fact that Mayor Michael Bloomberg has been the status quo for twelve years? How could they neglect that federal education policy–George W. Bush’s No Child Left Behind and Barack Obama’s Race to the Top–is the status quo? They are right that the status quo is failing. But how can they imagine that a man who has not yet taken office, a man who comes to the mayoralty after 20 years of Guiliani and Bloomberg is the status quo? A rational thinker might conclude that de Blasio represents a serious challenge to the status quo, which is very upsetting to the Wall Street Journal, defender of the status quo.

THE WALL STREET JOURNAL

Review & Outlook

The Inequality Contradiction

Mayor de Blasio’s schools chief is a competent steward of the failing status quo.

Dec. 30, 2013 6:59 p.m. ET
The Bill de Blasio era begins in New York City on New Year’s Day, and the new mayor is saying his main preoccupation will be reducing inequality. No doubt he means it, but his appointment Monday of Carmen Fariña as schools chancellor won’t do much for that cause.

Ms. Fariña is by all accounts a competent steward of the education status quo. Known as a fine teacher herself, the 70-year-old served for a time as a deputy chancellor during the Bloomberg era but wasn’t a reform leader. Mr. de Blasio made a point in his Monday remarks announcing her selection that she had retired because she was unhappy with the direction of the Bloomberg reforms.

Those radical reform ideas included more competition (charter schools) and more accountability (measuring school and teacher performance in part by how well students do on tests). Ms. Fariña is said to favor collaboration, rather than competition, among schools. Collaboration is a nice word, but it will achieve nothing if all it means is accommodating the demands of unions for less school choice and less accountability while demanding more money.

The contradiction of the liberal inequality agenda is that it ignores the single biggest obstacle to upward economic mobility—the failure of inner-city public schools. Mr. de Blasio built his “tale of two cities” mayoral campaign, much as President Obama has built his economic agenda, around income redistribution. Raise taxes and spread the wealth.

But no amount of wealth shifting will raise the lifetime prospects of kids who can’t read or can only do 8th-grade math before they drop out of school. The education reform agenda is about reducing income inequality the old-fashioned American way—upward mobility and economic opportunity. By accommodating the education status quo, Mr. de Blasio will make the income gap even larger.