Archives for category: ALEC

A coalition of civil rights groups, clergy, unions, and supporters of public education began protests against ALEC at the Palmer House, where ALEC plans to hold its 40th annual conference on Wednesday.

The coalition is called the Chicago Moral Monday Coalition.

ALEC sponsors model laws that are anti-immigrant, anti-union, anti-public education, and supportive of corporate interests. Go to this website to learn about ALEC laws to promote charters and vouchers and online schools, as well as to remove any requirements for teacher professionalism.

The bipartisan coalition determined to privatize American public education has a large tent indeed. It includes ALEC, President Obama, Secretary Duncan, Governor Bobby Jindal, former Governor Jeb Bush, Governor Scott Walker, and many more.

Not to be missed is Betsy DeVos, who founded the American Federation for Children and advocates tirelessly for vouchers. In 2012, AFS honored Scott Walker and Michelle Rhee. Here is an interview with Betsy DeVos.

North Carolina has earned the distinction of being ALEC’s playground so it is not surprising to learn that the General Assembly has voted to put armed guards in the schools, with the right to arrest students. .

Jacob Langberg asks these questions:

“Would you want armed former cops and soldiers patrolling your office? Your supermarket? Your place of worship? I wouldn’t. So why are policymakers putting them in schools? Can’t we all agree that schools should be supportive, loving, peaceful environments, and not violent, hostile, and intimidating places? Apparently not.”

Other districts worried about protecting students from outside intruders after the tragic shootings in Newtown, Connecticut. North Carolina decided the students were threatening.

Langberg writes:

“This is not an abstract fringe issue. It’s about how we want our public schools to look and feel – child-friendly and caring or hostile and punitive. It’s about refusing to sort youth into potential perpetrators and potential victims. It’s about terrorism against young people. Sadly, school resource officers, who hardly existed two decades ago, already seem normal to most young people. We must refuse to start down a path that will soon make armed militias in schools feel like commonplace.”

Ken Previti, a retired teacher, has been watching the evolution of school “reform,” and he wonders when the public will catch on to the schemes and fear-mongering. What is it all about? Sell-sell-sell.

Just doing what business does. Monetizing the children.

David Lentini is a lawyer and school board member in Maine. I am always happy to read his informed comments. In this one, he responds to an earlier post that explained that the radical group ALEC is trying to bypass and extinguish local school boards in their pursuit of privatization.

Lentini writes:

I’ve been sounding this alarm for a long time now; it’s good to see other, more expert, commentators reaching the same conclusion.

Still, as a school board member I also fear there are many ways boards will disappear ALEC or no. Too many boards are under siege trying to balance state and federal budget cuts, increasing child and family poverty, parents and unions with unrealistic expectations, and a “school-industrial complex” that has become the province of administrators and consultants who dominate discussions with technical gobbledegook. Boards are thus left with fighting nasty, frustrating battles and having little to no direct impact on setting educational policy.

This year, my board is losing two members who have lost patience with the process. Another member who was just re-elected has openly expressed regret for returning, and I doubt I’ll run for re-election. The trend over the decades to treat education as a science (which is false), the increasing centralization at the state and federal level created by more and more funded and un-funded mandates, and the inability of the public to really confuse education with jobs-training, will, I fear, kill local control sooner than later.

To keep our local boards, we then have to acknowledge that local control has a real function in defining education that must be respected. We need to remove the noise of the politicians and “experts” who hawk faddish policies, ideas, and technologies as educational silver bullets. Most of all, we need to return to an understanding of the function education that is broader than just “getting a good job”.

Education is about creating and maintaining a culture; that’s why local control is so important. Only local boards can identify and define the issues of their communities and define educational policies to meet those issues. The question is do we want to hold on to this vision?

Julie Underwood, dean of the school of education at the University of Wisconsin, has been watching ALEC, the American Legislative Exchange Council, and warns that their agenda includes the elimination of local school boards.

School boards are a basic democratic institution. Some 95% are elected. They hire and fire superintendents and set each district’s policy goals. Most people would see them as an expression of local control, a place where citizens may voice their views.

But ALEC has a radical agenda of privatization, and the school boards get in the way. ALEC would like to see more vouchers and charters, and the creation of unelected state boards that can override local decision-making.

It has been three years since the passage of “parent trigger” legislation in California, and the law has produced nothing but strife among parents, teachers, and administrators. Corporate reformers backed by billionaires like to say that “kids can’t wait,” but the hostile “trigger” creates strife and the illusion of change, not better schools.

Good schools have a strong collaborative spirit among administrators, teachers, parents, and students. All work together towards a common goal of educating the children. Whatever strengthens the spirit of teamwork strengthens the school and builds its capacity.

The “parent trigger” by definition is a hostile act. It creates division and conflict. It sets parents against parents. It sets parents against teachers. It sets parents against administrators. It is a “trigger” and triggers kill.

In the latest “victory” for Parent Revolution, the organization that has received millions from the Walton, Gates, and Broad Foundations, the principal of Wiegand Elementary School in Los Angeles was ousted. Now parents are holding counter-demonstrations, and accusations are flying.

It is noteworthy that when Parent Revolution tried and failed to convert McKinley Elementary School in Compton, California, to a charter, the charter opened nearby, but few of the McKinley parents transferred their children to it. Parent Revolution’s only “success” thus far was in Adelanto, where they gathered enough signatures to convert Desert Trails Elementary to a charter; when parents tried to remove their signatures from the petition, saying they had been duped, a judge denied them the right to do so. One of the parent leaders in Adelanto is now an employee of Parent Revolution. Many of those who signed the petition no longer have children in the school.

The legislature should scrap this pernicious law. To begin with, public schools don’t belong to the parents of children now enrolled. They belong to the public, whose taxes built them and maintain them. Only duly elected and appointed officials should be empowered to privatize public property or to fire the school’s leader. The law as presently written is vigilante justice, which is seldom just. It allows Parent Revolution to sign parents up through deceitful tactics and force changes that cripple school communities. It is no accident that the “trigger” idea has been embraced by the reactionary group ALEC, which would like to eliminate public education altogether.

The Louisiana blogs, which these days are the only place in that corrupt state to read honest and probing discourse, are buzzing with rumors that their state commissioner John White will soon leave for a job with Arne Duncan.

If true, he will not be missed. Jindal will find another reactionary ideologue to take White’s place and pursue the governor’s radical privatization agenda.

Why would Duncan want White? When Jindal chose White, Duncan called him “a visionary leader.” White would help Duncan prepare the nation for mass privatization. Sad to say, White and Duncan are on the same page. ALEC beams, as do all the other rightwing extremists to see this Democratic administration advancing its agenda–or doing nothing to impede it.

Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker is following the ALEC script:

More charters

More vouchers

Lower standards for entry into teaching

Did he ask the voters if they want to get rid of public education? No.

Ohio leaders–Governor John Kasich and the Legislature–are determined to privatize public education, demoralize teachers, and generate profits for entrepreneurs and campaign contributors. Here is the latest from Bill Phillis, who is leading a campaign to stop the destruction of public education in Ohio. A former deputy commissioner of education, he leads the Ohio Education and Adequacy Coalition.

Phillis writes:

FY2014-FY2015 State Budget Proposal: “Education Reform” process must change

May 23, 2013

The recently adopted “education reform” process seems to follow these steps:

· State officials assume that any deficiencies in student test scores, behavior, work force readiness, college readiness, etc. are due to the lack of competence and dedication of boards of education, administrators, educators and staff in the public common school. (Of course, some of them believe poverty and home environment do not influence test scores, behaviors, etc.)

· State officials are provided model reform legislation by the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) and seek advice from corporate leaders and others not working in the public common school system. A token representation of public education personnel may also be consulted.

· “Reforms” such as the parent trigger, vouchers, charter schools, mayoral control of schools, appointed commissions to assume part of the functions of boards of education, tuition tax credits, third grade guarantee, high stakes testing, replacement of teachers and administrators in “failing schools”, A-F report cards, etc. are enacted with the expectation that these quick fixes will work wonders.

· In all cases the local education community typically attempts to comply with the state’s reforms.

· When local educators and administrators don’t fully embrace these untested “reforms”, they are considered to be stuck in their old ways, resistant to change and not fit for the position they hold.

· Some state officials attempt to intimidate those who don’t “buy-in” to the ever changing “reform” ideas. Then local education personnel are told that they would buy-in if they really would take the time to understand the “reform.”

· When the “reform” measures don’t produce extraordinary results, the local education personnel are to blame and thus the system should be farmed out to the private sector.

Meaningful education reform involves a serious confrontation with all of the issues, particularly those associated with poverty and dysfunctional households. True reform is usually a costly endeavor which many state officials wish to ignore; thus, quick fixes-vouchers, charters, parent triggers, etc.-are put forth as the solution in lieu of dealing forthrightly with the funding necessary to effectuate improved outcomes.

In 1850 and 1851 some selected Ohio citizens came together as delegates to the Constitutional Convention that revised the 1802 Constitution. A majority of the delegates determined that the legislature had neglected public education and crafted the “thorough and efficient” mandate to state government.

In 1912 some selected citizens came together as delegates to another Constitutional Convention. The delegates crafted the “for the organization, administration and control of the public school system” constitutional provision which reinforced the “thorough and efficient clause.”

Subsequent to the 1912 amendment Governor Cox recommended and the legislature authorized the Ohio State School Survey Commission to study the public school system. This citizen commission issued a 300-page report laced with numerous recommendations. Governor Cox proclaimed November 14, 1913 as School Survey Day and convened the Educational Congress on December 5 and 6. The Congress was comprised of citizens from throughout the state. Four major “school reform” bills were passed in January 1914 as a result of these citizen-driven discussions and activities.

This citizen-driven process of “reform” served as a model in Ohio throughout the decades since 1912. However, in recent years, state officials have seemingly consulted an array of self-proclaimed experts and anti-public education activists but have neglected to seek counsel from those affected by state education policy decisions- Ohio citizens and public school personnel. It’s time to disengage ALEC and the advocates of privatization and engage Ohio citizens in education reform efforts.

William Phillis
Ohio E & A

This email was sent by ohioeanda@sbcglobal.net |
Ohio E & A | 100 S. 3rd Street |Columbus, Ohio