Olivia Troye was Vice-President Pence’s national security advisor. She resigned in August 2020 and endorsed challenger Joe Biden. She now writes a blog where she comments on current issues. The blog is called Olivia of Troye.
In this post, she writes about open corruption and its danger to national security. Paying Trump family members to gain access to government policy.
She began:

I read this reporting twice. And then I sat with it.
Because once you strip away the crypto jargon, the shell companies, and the carefully lawyered denials, what’s left is something deeply unsettling—and profoundly dangerous for American governance.
Four days before Donald Trump was sworn back into office, lieutenants to an Abu Dhabi royal secretly signed a deal with the Trump family to purchase 49% of a Trump-linked company for $500 million. Not a hotel. Not a licensing deal. A major ownership stake in a company tied directly to the sitting president’s family.
The buyer wasn’t just a foreign investor. It was Sheikh Tahnoon bin Zayed Al Nahyan—the United Arab Emirates’ national security adviser, brother of the country’s president, and overseer of a vast intelligence, surveillance, and Artificial Intelligence (AI) empire that U.S. officials had already flagged as a national security risk.
Months later, the Trump administration approved unprecedented access for the UAE to hundreds of thousands of the most advanced American AI chips, technology that had previously been restricted over fears it could be diverted to China. This has been a concern inside national security circles for years. Now here we are.
Under the Biden administration, Tahnoon’s efforts to secure advanced U.S. AI chips were largely blocked. Intelligence officials and lawmakers, Republicans included, raised repeated concerns about his companies’ ties to Chinese firms, including Huawei.
After Trump’s election, the door reopened. Tahnoon met repeatedly with Trump, his Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff, and senior U.S. officials. He pledged massive investment in the United States. He was welcomed into the Oval Office and seated at White House dinners alongside cabinet members.
Two months later, the administration committed to giving the UAE access to roughly 500,000 advanced AI chips per year, enough to build one of the world’s largest AI data-center clusters. At this point, we have to stop pretending this is ambiguous. This is what corruption looks like in real time.
Not a bag of cash. Not a secret memo. But a foreign intelligence-linked official quietly purchasing leverage over the family of a sitting U.S. president, and then watching U.S. policy move in his favor.
That isn’t coincidence. It’s influence.
And when influence can be bought this way, American decision-making no longer belongs to the American people. It belongs to whoever can pay the most, hide it the best, and wait it out.
As someone who has worked inside the national security system, I want to be very clear: the risk here is serious.
Advanced AI chips aren’t just commercial products. They underpin surveillance systems, military capabilities, cyber operations, and global intelligence dominance. Decisions about who gets access to them are supposed to be driven by national security risk assessments, not private financial entanglements with the president’s family.
When those lines blur, national security becomes transactional. And once that happens, the damage doesn’t stay contained. It ripples through alliances and corrodes intelligence-sharing. Furthermore, it shatters America’s credibility when we warn the world about corruption and foreign influence.
This isn’t just corruption. It’s governance by auction.
Trump says he knew nothing about this deal. That doesn’t make it better. It makes it worse.
Whether through direct knowledge or willful blindness, the outcome is the same: a presidency structurally exposed to foreign money, foreign leverage, and foreign interests. Modern bribery doesn’t arrive in envelopes, it arrives through access and leverage. And it is the exposure of this country: its policy, its security, its future, to the highest bidder.
The post doesn’t end here. Open the link and continue reading this alarming post.

This is what’s so frustrating about this blog. You see the problem, but only one side of it, like the woman Oliver Sacks wrote about who could only see one half of the visual field.
Yes, our government is for sale – both parties and to the same bidders. This is not a new thing since Trump. The main qualification for getting backing from either the RNC or the DNC is the candidate’s ability to fundraise, not their policies, not their integrity, not their values, not their past actions. Obama ranted about Citizens United, but he never lifted a finger to do anything about it, nor has any Democratic president or congress since.
LikeLike
Your both siderism view that has done so much harm is not supported by facts.
The DNC funds incumbents. And the reason that AOC and members of the Squad won primaries is because they actually campaigned on something other than “both sides equally bad.”
The big money in the DNC wasn’t donating to Mamdani. But he won a Democratic primary because he actually had supporters who put their own sweat equity behind him instead of telling everyone they knew that all Dems are evil. AOC also won against a big money Dem. Graham Platner is winning in Maine (and hopefully won’t turn out to be another John Fetterman or Kyrsten Sinema).
The Republicans march in lockstep. Trump rules the Republican party, and Peter Thiel and the other right wing billionaires who hate progrressives and hate democracy itself are teed up to run one of their minions when Trump is gone.
But if you cared about money in politics and repealing Citizens United, as I did, you could have voted for the Democrat in 2016 when the Supreme Court was tied 4-4 with a vacant seat that would decide whether to have a far right or progressive Court.
A Democrat Supreme Court – especially one led by by the RBG for over 3 years! — 3 years of RBG leading a majority of justices! – would have gone a very long way in getting money out of politics. But if you don’t believe me, call my bluff, vote to give the Dems a huge majority in Congress with a Dem president and see what happens when the Dems finally have 5 Justices on the Supreme Court. You can say “I told you so” if it’s no better than the right wing fascist government we have now.
The corruption of money in politics in the Republican party is most similar to the corruption in Putin-led Russia. Trump isn’t as rich as Putin – yet – but may get there before he is out of office.
Politicians – whether Democratic Socialists or Republicans – are given opportunities due to their celebrity. I assume you don’t begrudge Democratic Socialists who become richer while in office. I don’t. But I also can distinguish between someone earning money because of their fame and politicians who are getting rich from corrupt taxpayer dollars and voting for policies that billionaires want. The Republicans under Trump are a lot more similar to Putin than to the Democrats.
LikeLike
NYCPSP,
Dienne made the following response to you. I accidentally deleted it.
“Graham Platner is a case in point . He got a totenkopf tattoo and then lied about not knowing what it was. He served as a Black Rock mercenary, has blamed women for their own rape and made homophobic comments. This is what the Democratic Party has become. It’s no surprise you support him.”
LikeLike
Thank you for letting me know her reply to me.
I don’t even support Graham Platner! I don’t vote in Maine, and I worry about him being another Fetterman or Sinema, but if I lived in Maine I would support whoever won the Dem primary. But since Schumer wants Janet Mills (who doesn’t seem to be especially rich, and would likely do a good job), I assumed that if Janet Mills won the primary, that would give dienne77 more ammunition to claim that Schumer used DNC money to make sure she won and defeated Platner.
Graham Platner is a typical Democrat?!!!? He’s “what the Democratic Party has become”?!
Say what?
I don’t know why dienne77 ignored the fact that AOC and the Squad, Mamdani, and other Dems have won without big money support. I guess she concedes the point.
Is Jill Stein what the left has become? Someone who only comes out when needed to spoil any attempt to defeat the far right authoritarian takeover of our country?
I don’t think so. But the real left are the people who are out there fighting and are either working within the Democratic party or working to defeat the authoritarian Republicans. Not working to defeat the Dems running against the authoritarian Republicans.
LikeLike
I have a close friend who lives in Maine. She strongly supports Graham Plattner. I don’t know much about him, so I have no dog in this fight. I’m eager to see Susan Collins defeated. I’m so tired of hearing her express
“Concern,” but then voting for Trump.
She could have blocked Kavanaugh but he privately told that he would never overturn Roe v. Wade. She voted to confirm. He lied or she was duped.
With Dienne, she is never “both sides.” She is always opposed to whatever Democrats do. She has a loathing for this country that makes me wonder why she hasn’t moved somewhere else. Her admiration for Putin and her rationalizations for whatever he does are endless. She recently said that the Russian people have never had such prosperity, that Putin is wildly popular (if so, why does he kill anyone who might challenge him?). I recall saying that Navalny put his life at risk by returning to Russia when he could have lived in exile. She said that Putin didn’t care what Navalny said or did because he was inconsequential to Putin. Of course, Navalny was murdered in a remote prison.
Don’t get me started on Ukraine. She believes that Putin sent troops in to conquer Ukraine because if it allied with the west, Russia would be extinguished. That’s sheer poppycock. The west wanted Russia to join the global economy and be a partner, not an adversary.
Putin has said that his goal is to reassemble the USSR. I believe him. He’s a killer and a despot.
She has a deepseated hatred of the U.S. and an equally passionate admiration for Putin.
Beyond my understanding.
LikeLike
If you’re trying to talk behind my back, it’s not working. You know I can see your lies and smears, right? But anyway, glad you admit that you support a nazi as long as he runs on the Democratic ticket.
LikeLike
I do not support anyone in Maine.
I hope Collins loses.
There you go, twisting words as usual.
Putin is a fascist. A murderer. Why do you defend him?
LikeLike
BTW, this: “Putin has said that his goal is to reassemble the USSR”
Citation needed.
LikeLike
As usual, rushing to defend Putin!
Putin’s statement in April 2005 that the collapse of the USSR was the greatest geopolitical disaster of the 20th century has been widely cited.
Eg:
Kremlin archive, addresses to the Federal Assembly, April 25, 2005
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2005/apr/26/russia.nickpatonwalsh
https://share.google/ghbhT3MqNyQSaEh6a
https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna7632057
LikeLike
LOL, where, specifically in that speech did he say he plans to rebuild the Soviet Union? He mourned the fall of the Soviet Union, yes. That’s not the same as saying he’ll rebuild it.
LikeLike
I and other people who hated the fascism and brutality of the USSR did not see its collapse as “the greatest geopolitical disaster of the 20th century.” I celebrated. I’d say that Workd War 1 and 2 were real geopolitical tragedies. The collapse of a tyranny is not a tragedy at all.
LikeLike
Okay, but that’s irrelevant to the discussion. The fact remains that Putin never said he’s rebuilding the Soviet Union.
LikeLike
Stop defending Putin. He’s a ruthless murderer. Of course, he is rebuilding the Soviet Empire. One by one, he is interfering in the elections of former Soviet satellites to help the most rightwing, antidemocratic candidate. As he helped Trump and as he is now helping Viktor Orban.
This exchange is boring. Consider it closed.
LikeLike
I’m only “defending” him to the point that you’re maligning him. He’s a human being, not Satan himself. He’s a mixture of good and bad, more bad than good because that’s what it takes to be a world leader. He’s no worse than any U.S. president, red or blue – in fact, he’s invaded and destroyed far fewer countries.
In any case, we’ll consider this a win for me, since you couldn’t find a quote of his where he specifically said he wanted to rebuild the Soviet Union, which is why you need to distract with fake accusations of me.
LikeLike
Putin is Satan himself.
LikeLike
It appears, in fact, he has said exactly the opposite. So please admit you were wrong. https://www.reuters.com/business/aerospace-defense/putin-does-not-want-restore-ussr-or-attack-nato-kremlin-says-2025-12-09/
LikeLike
Putin constantly lies. Like Trump. Remember when he insisted that he did not intend to invade Ukraine? You believed him.
Putin was a highly skilled KGB agent. He was trained to lie. Also to murder.
LikeLike
The point isn’t whether or not he lies. The point is that you specifically claimed he said he was going to rebuild the USSR, which he has not said. His words being twisted does not mean he said anything. He has denied he will rebuild the Soviet Union; he has not said that he will do so.
LikeLike
“The presidency is not a private business. U.S. foreign policy is not a commodity. And national security is not for sale.”
Unfortunately, unless we have strict rules with a way of enforcing them, the grift and national security risks may continue in the future. We can no longer depend on good character of a President to set aside his or her self-interests. We need explicit rules and consequences for infractions of those rules. In fact, we need more rules for all of our elected representatives in order to stamp out insider stock trading and buying elections, and we need to eliminate the corrupting influence of dark money in elections. We need a big blue majority to make any of these aspirations a reality.
LikeLiked by 1 person
THE U.S. SUPREME COURT hung the For Sale sign on all levels of American government back in 2010 when the Court issued its “Citizens United” ruling. Billionaires and corporations quickly bought everything, resulting in the inconvenient truth that AMERICA HAS BEEN AN OLIGARCHY FOR YEARS: After researching government laws passed since Citizens United, Princeton University researcher Martin Gilens and Northwestern University researcher Benjamin Page documented that the U.S. is no longer a representative republic because the government does not represent the interests of the majority of the country’s citizens, but is instead ruled by the rich and powerful. The researchers analyzed 1,800 U.S. policies enacted over a period of two decades and compared the laws and regulations that were passed to those favored by average Americans to those favored by wealthy Americans and corporations, and here’s what the research revealed: “EVEN WHEN A MAJORITY OF CITIZENS DISAGREES WITH ECONOMIC ELITES OR WITH ORGANIZED SPECIAL INTERESTS, ORDINARY CITIZENS GENERALLY LOSE.” That’s an oligarchy masquerading as a republic.
Today, America has the best government that money can buy and is serving the interests of corporations and billionaires, not We the People. Thing is, nearly 50% of Americans like it this way. Remember that when Benjamin Franklin was leaving Independence Hall after signing the Constitution, the wife of the mayor of Philadelphia stopped him and asked: “Well, Mr. Franklin, what type of government have you given us?”
Franklin’s response was: “A republic, Madam — if you can keep it.” Keeping a republic requires a lot of work, studying issues and candidates. Half of America today would rather just turn everything over to a “strongman” leader so that they can cruise social media. If you remember the long ago Pogo political cartoons that ran in those ancient things called “newspapers”, you might remember the warning written across the stern of Pogo’s little pirogue: “We have met the enemy, and he is us.”
LikeLiked by 1 person
In 2016, I attended a fundraiser for Hillary Clinton, and she said she would overturn Citizens United, if elected.
LikeLike
This is an excerpt from a Paul Krugman column from March 20, 2017:
But why did so many Americans vote for Mr. Trump, whose character flaws should have been obvious long before the election?
Catastrophic media failure and F.B.I. malfeasance played crucial roles. But my sense is that there’s also something going on in our society: Many Americans no longer seem to understand what a leader is supposed to sound like, mistaking bombast and belligerence for real toughness.
Why? Is it celebrity culture? Is it working-class despair, channeled into a desire for people who spout easy slogans?
The truth is that I don’t know. But we can at least hope that watching Mr. Trump in action will be a learning experience — not for him, because he never learns anything, but for the body politic. And maybe, just maybe, we’ll eventually put a responsible adult back in the White House.””
Well, we did elect Biden but then we got stupid again and too many Americans thought that Trump 2.0 was a good idea. The 2nd Trump incarnation is an utter horror show, nauseating comment after nauseating comment: his vile treatment of Zelensky in the golden encrusted office and his stupid Pearl Harbor comment to the Japanese PM, Sanae Takaichi.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you, Joe.
LikeLike
”Why? Is it celebrity culture? Is it working-class despair, channeled into a desire for people who spout easy slogans?”
Two very on target guesses. Add the effects of Citizens United and we’re off to the races, unfortunately.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Actually, it all started with the Powell Memo in 1971, which led to the formations of ALEC and the Heritage Foundation, as well as eventually Project 2025. See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lewis_F._Powell_Jr.#Powell_Memorandum_(1971). Citizen’s United cemented the momentum with lots of capital, first from here and now from abroad as well.
LikeLike
This also goes to show that there is WAY too much investment in and reliance on Ai, both in the US as well as in other countries. That’s because Ai is not always truthful and, most importantly, it’s much too likely to be used to share closely held secrets which put people and countries at risk!
LikeLike