This is an excerpt from Heather Cox Richardson’s latest dispatch. The beginning, which I skipped, is about other countries’ holding important men accountable: former Prince Andrew, for his association with Jeffrey Epstein; and the former President of South Korea, who was sentenced to life in prison, for leading an insurrection to take control of the government.
There’s an implicit lesson here about accountability and lack thereof. None of the powerful men who are named in the Epstein Files have been prosecuted in this country. The Department of Justice redacted many or most of their names to be sure they would not be held to account. Those who led the insurrection of 2021 were never held accountable. Its foot soldiers were tried and convicted, but have since been pardoned by the leader of the insurrection.
The part that I thought you would find interesting are the latest examples of Trump’s vaingloriouness.
Today Trump’s Commission of Fine Arts swore in two new members, including Chamberlain Harris, Trump’s 26-year-old executive assistant, who has no experience in the arts. Then the commission, now entirely made up of Trump appointees, approved Trump’s plans for a ballroom where the East Wing of the White House used to stand, although the chair did note that public comments about the project were over 99% negative.
According to CNN’s Sunlen Serfaty, Harris said the White House is the “greatest house in [the] world. We want this to be the greatest ballroom in the world.” Trump says the ballroom is being funded by private donations through the Trust for the National Mall, which is not required to disclose its donors.
Today workers hung a banner with a giant portrait of Trump on the Department of Justice building.
On Air Force One as Trump traveled to Georgia this afternoon for a speech on the economy, Peter Doocy of the Fox News Channel asked Trump about the arrest of Mountbatten-Windsor. “Do you think people in this country at some point, associates of Jeffrey Epstein, will wind up in handcuffs, too?”
Trump answered: “Well, you know I’m the expert in a way, because I’ve been totally exonerated. It’s very nice, I can actually speak about it very nicely. I think it’s a shame. I think it’s very sad. I think it’s so bad for the royal family. It’s very, very sad to me. It’s a very sad thing. When I see that, it’s a very sad thing. To see it, and to see what’s going on with his brother, who’s obviously coming to our country very soon and he’s a fantastic man. King. So I think it’s a very sad thing. It’s really interesting ‘cause nobody used to speak about Epstein when he was alive, but now they speak. But I’m the one that can talk about it because I’ve been totally exonerated. I did nothing. In fact, the opposite—he was against me. He was fighting me in the election, which I just found out from the last three million pages of documents.”
In fact, Trump has not been exonerated.
When he got to Georgia, Trump’s economic message was that “I’ve won affordability.” More to the point was his focus on his Big Lie that he won the 2020 election and that Congress must pass the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) America Act to secure elections. In fact, in solving a nonexistent problem, the law dramatically restricts voting. Republicans in the House have already passed it. If the Senate passes it, Trump told an audience in Rome, Georgia, “We’ll never lose a race. For 50 years, we won’t lose a race.”
Why did she say he was not exonerated? She may have been referring to this case or to the many photos of Epstein and Trump together, in some photos with young girls.

And in other news, water is wet.
LikeLike
The Supreme Court may be offering consumers and small businesses a bit of tariff relief as parts of the sweeping tariffs were recently struck down by them. https://www.npr.org/2026/02/20/nx-s1-5677609/tariffs-economy-trump-supreme-court
LikeLike
What is the status of the “Jane Doe” case provided in that last link?
LikeLike
I don’t know.
LikeLike
Apparently, the threats to kill the victim and her family if she told anything (as stated by her as well as her witness in the court filing) effectively scared her away, because she dropped the case the day after it was filed. (Maybe she was paid off, too.)
See: “Donald Trump sexual misconduct allegations.” Be sure to scroll down to “Accusations filed in court against Trump”, then listed under “Katie Johnson/Jane Doe (1994),” all located here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Trump_sexual_misconduct_allegations
LikeLike
I just found info on the Jane Doe case which indicates that it was dismissed here: https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-katie-johnson-allegations-sexual-assault-case-dismissed-1921051.
LikeLike
It’s not as simple as all that though, because the case was filed again and then dropped again, and she was subsequently never heard from again. So I’m still inclined to believe that it was not thoroughly resolved because she was scared off and/or paid off.
LikeLike
Trump is coming apart over Epstein. He grows more blithering with each revelation that crops up in Europe. The question remains: How will republicans seek to hold power past Trump?
LikeLiked by 1 person
How? Project 2025. The replacement is already there. . . JD (or whatever his first name is) Vance. He’s Thiel and Vought’s, both hardcore xtian nationalist theofascists, desired president. I’ve stated before that the OFCFPP would be gone by the end of the spring. . . preferably as far as the xtian reich wing is concerned some kind of untimely supposedly heroic death. It’s their only hope to continue in power after this year’s election.
LikeLiked by 1 person
About vance…
Vance is not Trump. However and whatever Trump holds over everyone is incomprehensible – but he does.
Most Senators and Representatives know better and have literally hidden from the press and public. If they hide, no one can question them face to face about his reckless irrational claims and heinous attacks, lies, and selection of incompetents. They will not follow Vance or any other gone-off-the-rails president.
And, they could all be voted out by constituents getting hosed on everything and they are silent and ignoring them.
The incompetents will be gone. They would jump off a bridge before going against him – or dare we say “drink the koolaid.” (If this mockery of governance has done anything it is gaining understanding about Jonestown).
LikeLiked by 1 person
As stated above, their answer is The SAVE America Act, which would limit voting to people with photo IDs that indicate citizenship by location of birth, as well as require only in-person voting, no mail-in ballots. Voter IDs today don’t typically have that info, so all this will prevent a huge number of people from voting (including seniors with mobility disorders like me).
No doubt this is why, as indicated above, Trump said, if the Senate passes that law, “We’ll never lose a race. For 50 years, we won’t lose a race.””
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/news/citizenship-voting-requirement-in-save-america-act-has-no-basis-in-the-constitution-and-ignores-precedent-that-only-states-decide-who-gets-to-vote/ar-AA1We2zl
LikeLike
States will really need to contest this bogus law in courts ASAP if/when the Senate passes it, and they CAN win it because it is states that actually have the power to set voting requirements, not the feds, according to Constitutional experts.
Clearly MAGATs are aiming to have an immediate impact on the 2026 vote, so that they can continue to control both houses of Congress –so judicial actions need to be taken by states VERY soon!
P.S. Citizenship status will have to be shown on photo voter IDs in the case of naturalized citizens as well.
LikeLike
The law says, “Individuals voting in federal elections must present an eligible photo identification document. An individual who votes by absentee ballot must submit a copy of their identification document with both the request for, and the submission of, the absentee ballot.”
By “absentee ballot” I assume they mean mail-in ballot. This would be VERY challenging for MANY women, if they’ve been married and/or their names have been legally changed! The mail-in ballot I was sent for the upcoming primary has no room to include all the documentation that people like me would have to provide!
LikeLike
Now imagine how long it would take to count votes and read all the required documentation that would be included with mail-in ballots!
And support for this is coming from the guy who complained that votes were not being counted fast enough before –and he wanted to make it a requirement that all vote tallies be completed the night of the election! (He can’t run again so he has no reason to care about all this now, of course.)
LikeLike
I think they called mail-in ballots “absentee ballots” just so they can get the tons of votes they rely on from the military, ICE and similar people who are deployed away from home.
LikeLike
Duane: I think your answer would have been my own. The question is whether the 2025 crowd can hold on long enough to become entrenched, or whether infighting will split it up
LikeLiked by 1 person
Roy, They are already entrenched. The xtian nationalist theofascists control many parts, local, state and federal, of our country. The money of those theofascists, especially Thiel and Vought will not be wasted as far as they are concerned. Until the xtian nutjobs are driven back under the rocks from which they came there will be serious issues that need to be “resolved” i.e., need to be mitigated so that those theofascists can’t harm more non-xtians.
Remember what Goldwater said: “Mark my word, if and when these preachers get control of the [Republican] party, and they’re sure trying to do so, it’s going to be a terrible damn problem. Frankly, these people frighten me. Politics and governing demand compromise. But these Christians believe they are acting in the name of God, so they can’t and won’t compromise. I know, I’ve tried to deal with them.”
Religious fundamentalists especially those of all three of Abrahamic origin are a deadly scourge upon the world. . . and have been for millennia.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Duane: hard to argue in this moment. Still, the most fervent opponent of MAGA I know is motivated by her Christianity. She is a minister who went to Minneapolis as an observer about the time of the second murder. She would second every point you made. She would argue that theofascism is fundamentally unchristian.
sometimes I think religion is just a convenient prop for beliefs held on other grounds. If you are a Christian held down for centuries by slavery in a hostile south, the Abrahamic religions resonated with you through the Exodus story. Let my people go. Islam seemed attractive to people bereft of their culture by Christians, self declared as they were. Forget that the Islamic traders were often slave traders, back through history, especially in East Africa.
Christianity has given us both Columbus, whose enslavment of the Arawaks was a written boast, and Bartolomeo de Las Casas, who argued for the reform of Spanish administrative practices, giving the rival English ammunition in their propaganda war.
It strikes me that the problem arises when a person moves from the personal practice of belief into the political practice of forcing beliefs on his fellows.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Any way I look at it, SAVE is VERY dangerous for democracy, as intended, since the point of it is to PREVENT people from voting. That’s not new for the GOP. In 1980, right wing Xtian nationalist Paul Weyrich, who co-founded the Heritage Foundation (which brought us Project 2025 and 2026) said, “I don’t want everybody to vote” So this is the point of everything that’s happening now –so that Republicans can rule America for the next “50 years” per the malignant narcissist this week. See Weyrich here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8GBAsFwPglw
LikeLike
And this is what Trump meant when, during a speech on July 26, 2024 at the Turning Point Believers’ Summit in West Palm Beach, Florida, he told Xtian supporters that if they voted for him in the 2024 election, they “won’t have to vote again.”
LikeLike
i.e., He knew in advance about the plan to enact the so-called SAVE legislation in order to prevent future voting…
LikeLike
For those unfamiliar with Paul Weyrich, he was the conservative white Protestant who coined the term “moral majority” during the Reagan era. He and his followers distinguished themselves as superior to all else –people of color, Catholics, women, etc. He assumed they were the majority, adhered to the Powell Memo, and he was involved in establishing the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC).
So, for decades they’ve been taking over states by pushing conservative laws from ALEC, including restricting voting rights. Some of the outcomes of all that included gerrymandering, limiting the number of poling places in certain communities, as well as outlawing the ability of people to even give water to voters who are thirsty and waiting in long lines.
Weyrich and his followers also just assumed that Jesus would approve of their version of morality, which promotes racism, sexism, xenophobia, as well as businesses over people (as per Powell). For them, discrimination and cruelty are methods of achieving dominance, power and money, so this period of history now is exactly where they aimed to be for the last 50 years.
LikeLike
What is happening today has actually been more like 55 years in the making, so for those who can’t recall it, didn’t live through it, did not learn about it or who just need a refresher, please see the following info regarding some of the key players:
Paul Weyrich: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Weyrich
The Heritage Foundation: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Heritage_Foundation
The Powell Memo: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lewis_F._Powell_Jr.#Powell_Memorandum_(1971)
The American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Legislative_Exchange_Council
LikeLike