Reuters reported that the U.S. Supreme Court put a hold on a lower court’s order to fully fund the SNAP program, which provides food for low-income people. About one of every eight Americans will go hungry because of the Court’s order. The lower federal district court in Rhode Island ordered the administration to fully fund SNAP. An appeals court declined to overrule the Rhode Island order. The administration was willing to offer about half of the funds needed.
But Chief Justice John Roberts concluded there was no rush to feed hungry people. I bet he went home to a dinner of steak, potatoes, green beans, and salad, accompanied by a splendid Cabernet.
The New York Times, however, said it was Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson who halted the lower court order. She too had a grand meal tonight while 42 million Americans go hungry. Let’s see: filet of sole and salad with a bottle of Chardonnay.
Food stamps: Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson late Friday temporarily halted a lower court order that would have required the Trump administration to fund food stamps in full, fueling new uncertainty around the anti-hunger program’s immediate fate. The justice did not rule on the legality of the White House’s actions. Instead, she imposed a pause meant to give an appeals court more time to weigh the legal arguments raised by the government, as it seeks to withhold funding for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program during the shutdown. Some states had already said that they were preparing to send out full food stamp benefits.
Reuters reported:
WASHINGTON – The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday allowed President Donald Trump’s administration to withhold for now about $4 billion needed to fully fund a food aid program for 42 million low-income Americans this month amid the federal government shutdown.
The court’s action, known as an administrative stay, gives a lower court additional time to consider the administration’s formal request to only partially fund the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, known as SNAP or food stamps, for November. Chief Justice John Roberts, who issued the stay, set it to expire in two days.
The administration had filed an emergency request hours earlier asking the justices to put on hold a Rhode Island-based judge’s order that gave the administration until Friday to fully fund the program, which costs $8.5 billion to $9 billion per month.

Maybe another ruling could say that only the disabled, the elderly, and families with children who rely on SNAP to eat must be funded. That’s just about everyone who qualified for SNAP.
LikeLiked by 2 people
MAGAts want to add a work requirement for SNAP eligibility. Good luck forcing seniors and the disabled to get jobs before they’re allowed to eat– that’s just cruel!!!
LikeLiked by 2 people
39% of SNAP recipients are children.
19% are elderly, 60 or older
39% are ages 18-59
About 21 to 29% of those adults aged 18-59 who receive SNAP have a disability or work-limiting health condition.
Still, a A majority of adults, 70%, who receive SNAP benefits have jobs.
70% of 39% = 27.3%, which means a lot of adult disabled SNAP recipients who shouldn’t be working are working anyway regardless of their age or disability.
LikeLike
There are already work requirements for SNAP in every state. If a person cannot prove that he or she is too disabled to work, then he or she must meet the work and maximum income requirements.
LikeLike
Yes, I do know about the work requirements in place because I first got SNAP when I was homeless –and I had TWO jobs at the time: I taught at online universities, since I could not work in the field anymore, due to an ongoing and ever worsening digestive disorder.
My income was low and unpredictable then though, since at both schools, it was based on the number of students enrolled in my courses that completed a certain percent of the required work –and that fluctuated.
I did it for 12 years, including from a hotspot when I had to live in my car. I did that until my disorder got to be so bad that I couldn’t even work from home anymore (I could not be presentable live on Zoom at any given time). So I retired at age 68.
Based on what I’ve read about the new work requirements initiative, my concern is that they will somehow INCREASE them to include retired seniors and disabled people like me no matter what.
LikeLike
P.S. For years, my classes that were conducted through distance learning had all been asynchronous. However, due to COVID, most schools went to having synchronous classes, live on Zoom, and I just could not handle doing that –and still can’t now.
LikeLike
A work requirement for SNAP? Don’t we have child labor laws? Sounds like Dickens’ England. No food for you, old woman, until you have worked!
LikeLiked by 1 person
https://www.newsweek.com/snap-tracker-states-that-have-paid-benefits-november-11010336
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks for the article. It’s actually short on info though, because it says the state I live in dispersed SNAP but it didn’t indicate that it’s only a partial payment for the month, so I got less than a hundred dollars and I usually get $155 per month. As a retired (and disabled) senior who gets poverty level Social Security Retirement Income and lives in an expensive city, that is very low to me, but I’m glad to get anything at all.
I don’t know exactly how they calculate benefits, but within the past month, I read that the average SNAP benefit is $190 per month. I also recently read about a young married couple where the husband works, the wife doesn’t work but just had a baby, and they get $900 per month from SNAP, as well as a similar situation where the people get $700! (I don’t know where they live.) I’d be happy just to get the $190!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I just ordered groceries and it turned out that the amount of SNAP I got for this month was even less than I thought: I received only $56! Sheeesh!! What adult can live on that?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ugh. So I didn’t find out exactly how much SNAP I actually received this month until after I placed my grocery order and checked out –when I discovered that I have a total of $12.64 SNAP left now. (I forgot that I used up all the SNAP I had left from last month when I decided to reorder the Halloween candy I cancelled, so I would not disappoint the kids in my building.)
So if they don’t solve this matter and issue the rest of my SNAP this month, I won’t be eating much for quite awhile. That’s because I have HUGE utilities bills that I’ve still got to pay this month all by myself, such as for heating since it’s been cold here. (Yes, I do wear layers to keep warm.)
People who know nothing about what it’s like to have to live from low paycheck to low paycheck should not be in charge of running this country! (I’ve been saying this since Reagan.)
LikeLiked by 1 person
“We need to cut back” I heard them say. So they proceeded to make us bring our own water and such to district meetings while taking the cups out of the break room as well. Nice…
Just a thought…a way to make people really mad is to “starve them.” Then, there will be civil unrest (for sure) leading to martial law to control all of the people fighting to feed themselves. Oh what a wicked web they weave. Sickening. With the price of groceries (I am a very frugal shopper) is nearly $100 for basics and nothing fancy. But on a VERY HIGH note, I just went out to my gate and Diane — your book arrived! So excited. And, I do know the author!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Rick, I’m eager to get your reaction. Come to the next NPE conference and I’ll sign it.
LikeLike
this is, expected, as the supreme court justices are mostly of the Conservative/Republican “tilt”, that they’re more than likely, to strike down these welfare programs, because they live inside their tall ivory towers, and don’t have a single CLUE of how the bottom half lives, and besides, Trump only cares about putting the money in his own pockets (along with the pockets of the rich people that he knows), so naturally, he would want to, eliminate all these, welfare benefit programs.
LikeLiked by 2 people
The heartless cruelty of Roberts’s remark is incomprehensible to me.
He should read his Bible for dozens of references, too numerous to list, in both the Hebrew Bible/Old Testament and in the New Testament where there are commands to feed the hungry and to take care of the widow and orphan and alien among you because you were a stranger in Egypt.
Those are paraphrases from memory but below are a few of my favorites.
Sincerely, Roberta M. Eisenberg > Zechariah 7:10 https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Zechariah+7%3A10&version=ESV ESV > > Do not oppress the widow, the fatherless, the sojourner, or the poor, and let none of you devise evil against another in your heart.” > > > Jeremiah 5:28 https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Jeremiah+5%3A28&version=ESV ESV > > They have grown fat and sleek. They know no bounds in deeds of evil; they judge not with justice the cause of the fatherless, to make it prosper, and they do not defend the rights of the needy. > > Matthew 25:35 https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew+25%3A35&version=ESV ESV > > For I was hungry and you gave me food, I was thirsty and you gave me drink, I was a stranger and you welcomed me, > > Exodus 23:6 https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Exodus+23%3A6&version=ESV ESV > > “You shall not pervert the justice due to your poor in his lawsuit. > >
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you. Yes.
LikeLike
We’re in an age of cruelty. ________________________________
LikeLiked by 1 person
yes
LikeLike
They can slice it, shine it, ‘X’ it as much as they like.
The bottom line for these ‘Christians’ is they have no answer to Lord Jesus’ commentary
“Matthew 25 V31-46
31 When the Son of man shall come in his glory, and all the holy angels with him, then shall he sit upon the throne of his glory: 32 And before him shall be gathered all nations: and he shall separate them one from another, as a shepherd divideth his sheep from the goats: 33 And he shall set the sheep on his right hand, but the goats on the left. 34 Then shall the King say unto them on his right hand, Come, ye blessed of my Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world: 35 For I was an hungred, and ye gave me meat: I was thirsty, and ye gave me drink: I was a stranger, and ye took me in: 36 Naked, and ye clothed me: I was sick, and ye visited me: I was in prison, and ye came unto me. 37 Then shall the righteous answer him, saying, Lord, when saw we thee an hungred, and fed thee? or thirsty, and gave thee drink? 38 When saw we thee a stranger, and took thee in? or naked, and clothed thee? 39 Or when saw we thee sick, or in prison, and came unto thee? 40 And the King shall answer and say unto them, Verily I say unto you, Inasmuch as ye have done it unto one of the least of these my brethren, ye have done it unto me. 41 Then shall he say also unto them on the left hand, Depart from me, ye cursed, into everlasting fire, prepared for the devil and his angels: 42 For I was an hungred, and ye gave me no meat: I was thirsty, and ye gave me no drink: 43 I was a stranger, and ye took me not in: naked, and ye clothed me not: sick, and in prison, and ye visited me not. 44 Then shall they also answer him, saying, Lord, when saw we thee an hungred, or athirst, or a stranger, or naked, or sick, or in prison, and did not minister unto thee? 45 Then shall he answer them, saying, Verily I say unto you, Inasmuch as ye did it not to one of the least of these, ye did it not to me. 46 And these shall go away into everlasting punishment: but the righteous into life eternal.”
Squirm out of that one? They’d need a bus load of tame pastors and still come up so short it might be laughable if people weren’t suffering.
Roger
LikeLiked by 2 people
As correctly stated in the Reuters article to which this post links, it was not Chief “Justice” John Roberts who issued the administrative stay, but Associate Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson. This fact sounds devastatingly dispiriting on its face. You can exhale—it’s not. From today’s edition of Robert Hubbell’s newsletter: “The only reasonable explanation for Justice Jackson’s actions” is that “her order was likely a strategic move to give the First Circuit time to issue an opinion upholding the district court’s order compelling payment of FULL benefits.” See Hubbell, “Supreme Cruelty,” November 8, 2025, for more details, including some that I don’t yet understand. https://roberthubbell.substack.com/p/supreme-cruelty?publication_id=271358&post_id=178332824&isFreemail=true&r=a4fsu&triedRedirect=true
LikeLiked by 1 person
Kuo had some interesting comments
LikeLike
This reminds me of the old “welfare queen” narrative Ronald Reagan used to convince the public that massive welfare fraud was happening, even though the reality didn’t support it. Today we’re seeing a similar strategy with AI-generated “SNAP benefits queen” videos circulating on social media — one of which was even aired on Fox News — to create the impression of widespread abuse.
But here’s the key difference: the welfare programs targeted in the 1980s were not heavily used by Republican voters. SNAP is. The data is very clear that the counties most dependent on SNAP today are overwhelmingly rural, small-town, and post-industrial — and they vote Republican. Cutting SNAP now would directly harm the core of the current GOP coalition.
LikeLiked by 3 people
This one had me ranting as soon as I got the “breaking news” last night. Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr …
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’ve seen several sources knowledgeable about the machinations of legal appeals say that Justice Jackson did the best she could to protect vulnerable people while preventing the disaster of delays in sending out benefits even longer:
https://www.lawdork.com/p/trump-admin-goes-to-scotus-to-try
https://www.stevevladeck.com/p/190-snap-wtf
https://bsky.app/profile/mikesacks.bsky.social/post/3m53mtiou2s2m
LikeLiked by 1 person
But Chief Justice John Roberts concluded there was no rush to feed hungry people. I bet he went home to a dinner of steak, potatoes, green beans, and salad, accompanied by a splendid Cabernet.
Yup. Why? Because he is a pig.
LikeLiked by 1 person
with the moral compass of his kind
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hi Bob . . . this probably won’t get through–I’ve tried everything, and nothing works to be able to comment on Diane’s blog–but I feel the same way about Roberts. Part of the problem is that it’s “pulled a fast one” on SNAP recipients–bait and switch, catching them off guard. I am sickened by the whole thing. (Catherine Blanche King)
LikeLiked by 1 person
CBK! Where have you been? Never give up. I missed you!
LikeLiked by 2 people
Hi, Catherine, So glad to see you back! I had wondered where you were and missed seeing your posts.
I’ve also had issues around being able to post here and I worked on it a lot, so I don’t have those problems much now. Unfortunately though, I tried so many different things that I have no idea now what I did which finally made it work better for me. Hopefully, since your post went through this time, we will see more of you here in the future. All the best to you!
LikeLike
Same. Welcome back, CBK. And xoxoxo to you and ECE!
LikeLiked by 2 people
The food insecurity issue is part of the right’s provocative plan to perhaps cancel the midterms, especially since so many voters just rebuked their policies. Steve Bannon is worried about going to jail, but it is where the whole lot of them belong. The violent ICE attacks add fuel to the fire. Angry, frustrated people are more likely to act out, and that is what they want to see to give them justification for their devious plan.
The best thing we can do is help each other through this. I am helping a couple of local people with food, driving them to “gigs” and food banks as they do not have cars.
LikeLiked by 2 people