Every so often, I read a story about education that is truly annoying. The most recent one is in The Atlantic. It was written by Idrees Kahloon, a staff writer at the magazine. It is titled “America is Sliding Toward Illiteracy.” The subtitle is “Declining standards and low expectations are destroying American education.”
As a historian of American education, I have read the same story hundreds of times. In the 19th century, these warnings that children were not learning anything in school were commonplace. The cry of “crisis in the schools” appeared frequently in every decade of the 20th century. We are only 25 years into this century, and similar views appear in the popular press regularly.
Long ago, attacks on the schools were intended to produce more funding for them, or higher standards for those entering teaching..
Now they serve the purposes of those pushing privatization of public schools, those who are promoting vouchers, charters, homeschooling, and every other way of destroying public schools.
Test scores have fallen! The culprit? Smart phones! Social media! Low expectations! Low standards! Bad teachers! Bad Schools!
George W. Bush’s No Child Left Behind law of 2002 raised standards and expectations but it raised them absurdly high, to a literally unreachable goal. A rebellion formed among those who didn’t think it possible that “all students” would reach “proficiency” by 2014.
NCLB required that all students would be “proficient,” not just at grade level, by 2014. By NAEP standards, “proficient” does not mean grade level. It means “A” performance. In no other nation in the world are all students rated “proficient” on the NAEP scale. Nor has any district or state ever reached that goal.
But the Cassandras of American education have monopolized the podium for many years, wailing that we will be an impoverished third-world country if test scores don’t rise dramatically.
Think about it. The biggest explosion of doom-and-gloom was caused by the Reagan-era report called “A Nation at Risk” in 1983. It flatly predicted that our economy was imperiled by a “rising tide of mediocrity.” But what has happened since 1983? Our economy is booming, we have not been eclipsed by other nations. We continue to be a land of innovation, creativity, scientific and medical pre-eminence.
How is our nation’s success possible, given the cry for more than 40 years that our schools are hobbling our economy and compromising our future?
Instead of complaining about our schools and lambasting them nonstop, the critics should be complaining about poverty and inequality. These are the root causes of poor student outcomes.
If the critics are worried about our future, they should shout out against Trump’s orders to withhold funding for research in science and medicine. If they really wanted great schools, they would stop diverting public funds to nonpublic schools and homeschoolers–where there are low or no standards for teachers– and make sure that every student has certified, experienced teachers, small classes, and the amenities available in every school that are typically available only in wealthy suburban districts.
No, our kids are not sliding into stupidity. If you don’t agree, I dare you to take an eighth grade math test and release your scores. You will be surprised.
The greatest generation sits in our public high schools today, unless our government continues to impose moronic policies of choice and competition that have failed for the past thirty-five years.

I didn’t think I could like you more … but I was wrong!
LikeLiked by 4 people
You stole my comment!!!
LikeLike
Thank you, Steve.
LikeLike
lol
LikeLike
So many untrained people think they know more than teachers!!
When I was in 4th grade, after my mom married my step-father and, in the middle of the year, we moved so I went to a new public school, where my class was studying fractions, I was lost because we had not gotten to fractions yet at my previous school. My step-father decided I was dumb, often called me that and tutored me. When my folks went to parent night and he asked my teacher if I was dumb, she told him that I was average, and that “There’s nothing wrong with being average.”
My parents told me about it and I was so glad to hear that! Even though my step-father said she didn’t know what she was talking about and he continued to call me dumb for years afterwards, I believed my teacher and that helped me immensely!
So why do so many untrained people think they know more than teachers? I did my doctoral research on this: It’s primarily because they were students for years and observed teachers in that capacity daily.
Of course, they saw only what went on in front of the scene, and they had no clue about what occurred behind the scene, such as what teachers studied about learners, child development, individual and group differences, content knowledge, teaching methods etc., in order to be effective teachers.
The reality is that teachers know a whole lot more than those who have no training whatsoever and no classroom teaching experience.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I share your frustration with continuous bashing of public education. It should also be mentioned that the Atlantic article was written by an economist, not a scholarly educator. In education there are a multitude of variables the contribute to student performance. The NAEP may be a litmus test of student performance, but its results are often misinterpreted by journalists that do not know that “proficiency” equals above average, not the 50th percentile. Often those that bash public education are also those that favor the privatization of public resources and segregated schools that favor affluent white students. Public schools are intended to serve all students to the best of their ability without prejudice. They are a continuation of the belief that America is a land of opportunity for all of us. They are accountable and publicly managed by elected school board members. However, they require investment, and those that teach in them school should have access to ongoing teacher education to update their skills.
It is amazing how many articles of the school bashing variety have been written, but so few of write about the lack of success that privatization of education has wrought. Few write about the chaos, the disruption, the students that disappear into the void and the impact on families and communities. Few write about the waste, fraud and endless politicking associated with privatization. Nobody discusses that after the billions spent transferring money out of public schools, the overall results of charter schools are no real academic gain or benefit or that vouchers are a total waste of public funds.
The media generally reflect the interests of the super wealthy. That is one reason why there are many stories and tales of woe attached to public education, but so few stories of public school success. One big success that is rarely mentioned is that public schools have made an unsung contribution the this country economic growth and success. Mississippi may have made a few gains on a standardized test in one grade level because of improved phonics instruction, and that is great, but it is not a trend unless those improvements continue in middle school, high school and, most importantly, high school graduation rates. As a career educator that has administered many standardized tests, I know that it is easier to raise elementary school test scores than those in middle and high school as disadvantaged students have an easier time with a discrete skill such as phonics than comprehension, which requires prior knowledge and an enriched vocabulary.
The most efficient and rewarding for this country to improve academic outcomes is to provide more economic security for all people and invest in its public schools that offer opportunity for all and the efficiency of economy of scale as our founders intended. Public schools build stronger communities, and they are foundational to a functioning democracy.
LikeLiked by 2 people
The Network for Public Education documents the crimes, fraud, mismanagement etc of the privatized schools. Check out the website.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I share your frustration with continuous bashing of public education. It should also be mentioned that the Atlantic article was written by an economist, not a scholarly educator. In education there are a multitude of variables the contribute to student performance. The NAEP may be a litmus test of student performance, but its results are often misinterpreted by journalists that do not know that “proficiency” equals above average, not the 50th percentile. Often those that bash public education are also those that favor the privatization of public resources and segregated schools that favor affluent white students. Public schools are intended to serve all students to the best of their ability without prejudice. They are a continuation of the belief that America is a land of opportunity for all of us. They are accountable and publicly managed by elected school board members. However, they require investment, and those that teach in them school should have access to ongoing teacher education to update their skills.
It is amazing how many articles of the school bashing variety have been written, but so few of write about the lack of success that privatization of education has wrought. Few write about the chaos, the disruption, the students that disappear into the void and the impact on families and communities. Few write about the waste, fraud and endless politicking associated with privatization. Nobody discusses that after the billions spent transferring money out of public schools, the overall results of charter schools are no real academic gain or benefit or that vouchers are a total waste of public funds.
The media generally reflect the interests of the super wealthy. That is one reason why there are many stories and tales of woe attached to public education, but so few stories of public school success. One big success that is rarely mentioned is that public schools have made an unsung contribution the this country economic growth and success. Mississippi may have made a few gains on a standardized test in one grade level because of improved phonics instruction, and that is great, but it is not a trend unless those improvements continue in middle school, high school and, most importantly, high school graduation rates. As a career educator that has administered many standardized tests, I know that it is easier to raise elementary school test scores than those in middle and high school as disadvantaged students have an easier time with a discrete skill such as phonics than comprehension, which requires prior knowledge and an enriched vocabulary.
The most efficient and rewarding for this country to improve academic outcomes is to provide more economic security for all people and invest in its public schools that offer opportunity for all and the efficiency of economy of scale as our founders intended. Public schools build stronger communities, and they are foundational to a functioning democracy.
LikeLike
Over my tumultuous tenor as an elementary, middle, high school, continuation high school, and adult education teacher, I believe I had seen a wide spectrum of ways to educate and not educate students. I remember numerous times it was stated we had major problems. The kids all had to take a survey on bullying. They said, “Mr, Charvet, is there any way to answer NO on this test? I mean, I haven’t been bullied and all I can answer it is ike I have.” So, someone wanted a program implemented and no matter what, the survey was skewed to “create a problem.” Oh, yes, and I remember debating with the superintendent when he said, “We are going to bring in the best and brightest teachers (I think it was referring to Teach America) and then you will see real results — they will make these kids learn. Of course, I knew my students; at risk youth simply say, “No, not doing it and I don’t care” when they don’t believe in whatever a school or teacher is selling. But, when one can tell them the “why’s and how’s” of the application of learning and where it leads them, they buy in; they come to school and so forth. I saw great learning programs be applied and then when results didn’t happen in “five minutes” they abandoned the entire program. On the sly, I often using techniques that got results. More often than not, students were tested on subject areas they had never studied (we sometimes got a peak at the tests after swearing off our first born) to get an idea. I thought, “This wasn’t even close to what we had been studying; the verbiage isn’t even close to what they understand — I mean a “whole lotta stuff” that would set the kids up to fail. I remember my son told me, “Dad, on the AP test there were a lot of questions we were never taught. I was pissed. My teacher never covered that material.” And with my at risk kids, to be fair, they administered the same test as the comprehensive school, i.e., Algebra 2; Earth Science, and English 3 — our program didn’t work that way and most of our kids were in our program to recover credits in areas like: English 1 (most were emerging readers), basic science, basic history and so forth. I remember asking, “Did you study Algebra 2 this year?” “No.” “Well then you will do great on this test, right?” As Diane told me in a previous post, seniors blow the tests off because they are meaningless as they are focused on their AP, SAT, and ACT or military exams. So kids didn’t do well on a standardized test, but they sure could get jobs, rewire my room for Internet, fix electronic stuff, repair phones, and cars, and a host of other things. Nowadays, it is a different kind of smart and, of course, when you think about it, they are reading like crazy, just in a different way. For me, I had highly talented artists (who also got into studying art history as well), but yeah, art is never tested really — in fact, most of the things I taught were never tested just math and English mostly. So what I did didn’t really matter because it was never on a test. But what did matter was how successful my students became when they had to navigate the real world. How do I know? I live in the same town. They text me. I see their art shows and murals. And I see the businesses they own. But, silly me, I wasn’t “the best and brightest teacher” because our test scores were low. I mean, what does it mean to be educated?
LikeLike
Thanks, Rick.
Whatever it means to be educated is NOT measured by standardized tests.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Because standardized tests don’t “measure” anything.
LikeLike
Unless you didn’t have a tape measure and I believe they are “standard”
8 1/2 wide by 11 tall in inches. There were times when I needed something to use in a pinch. But,yeah, what do I know. Nice to hear from you Duane. How are your Predators doing?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Predators? Nah, been a Blues fan ever since they came into being in ’67. And right now it’s quite ugly, although the addition of Dvorsky and Rosen should help as last night showed.
LikeLike
Duane, sorry about that. Yeah, uh, Sharks fan here. And they don’t televise them.
LikeLike
It’s hard to find the Blues on tv. . . not that I have had any tv service anyway for the last 15 years or so. I go to a bar in Marthasville, MO if I want to watch one. Don’t drink booze anymore but I do try to buy an appetizer and then tip “appropriately”. Unfortunately the Blues don’t listen when I shout at them “Shoot the effin puck!!” At least we don’t have to put up with Foxtrax anymore.
LikeLike
Oh you mean like what the Sharks are known for: pass, pass, pass, uh, pass, lose the puck and other team scores. Geez, saw that for years. They may be better with the new kid, Cellibrini (sp?) but they are always blacked out here because I refuse to pay to watch them play. Ticket prices aren’t any cheaper. The SJ Barracuda AHL are pretty fun to see a game and ticket prices are affordable.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Our schools across the board have to be failing. After all 37% still support a criminal Fascist. Time to bring back corporal punishment for the parents.
The failure is in Civics and history not the 3 Rs
LikeLiked by 1 person
Joel,
The failure in civics and history might be attributed to NCLB. Starting in 2022, the only subjects that were tested were reading and math. Civics and history didn’t count.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Our problems long pre date NCLB.
I am not blaming teachers. Did we ever teach history”The Real History of The United States. Or did we teach a myth of who we aspired to be. Trump just made it okay to dismiss those aspirations
LikeLike
I found it ironic that Kahloon revisits the so-called Texas Miracle to show how inflated data and political hype distorted education policy—and then, in the same piece, seems to celebrate a new miracle in Mississippi. It’s the same old story: every decade or so, the press discovers a “model” state that supposedly cracked the code. And wouldn’t you know it—Mississippi is a non–teacher-union state.
Can we really say that Mississippi is outperforming Massachusetts when it still has some of the lowest test scores in the nation and nearly twice the poverty rate? But don’t worry, folks—that poverty rate is going down real soon, because Mississippi is on the right track.
I’ll go out on a limb and predict that, just like the Texas case, Mississippi’s so-called “miracle” education improvements may not, in fact, lift large numbers of poor students out of poverty in the near term.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Secretary McMahon recently called on California to follow Alabama’s model. The Southern Confederacy has risen again.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Nicholas Kristoff wrote a column about the “Mississippi miracle,” which I criticized. He said that it doesn’t take money to improve education, and Mississippi is proof.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Not to mention that MS does in fact $support the literacy program it started in 2013. $9.5 million the first year, later increased to $15 million annually. Sounds like a drop in the bucket, but if focused in early grades & most needed areas, covers an ample # of specialists/ coaches/ tutors I’ll bet.
LikeLiked by 1 person
last weekend we were camped near Hattiesburg where our daughter attends college. We met a former teacher who had yet again another Mississippi story about being discovered as a teacher who produced good test scores and who had now been driven out of the classroom by administrators loading her up with duties.
I have heard that tale more in the Miraculous state than anywhere else.
LikeLiked by 1 person
@Roy, funny but you jog my memory quite a bit. As I recall, any really good teacher who made connections with kids or went “above and beyond” and especially if kids really, really loved their classes and what they had to offer — I mean getting the best out of their students was shunned or made to feel they weren’t doing something right. I just ran into someone who told me, “They didn’t like any teacher being any better than the next or they liked congratulating their “pals” only. If you were not part of the “inner circle” see ya!
LikeLike
I remember distinctly feeling “slapped in the face” when the principal stated that the only thing that mattered was how we did on the California High School Exit Exam which only tested English and math. I said, “Then why don’t we shut down all our classes and do full cram sessions on English and math? I mean what you are telling me is what I teach, i.e., Science, art, American Government, and physical education don’t count, right?” And, yes, when I was asked to teach American Government I had no curriculum. Then one day an outdated set of textbooks arrived. I dug in. And as typical me, I found out a lot of things that were being hidden especially a Landmark Supreme Court Case, uh, Roe v. Wade. I would honestly say I taught my heart out with government and ended up receiving a history award (did not know there was one) from San Jose State where I sat next to John Carlos, Olympian. And went to Boston University and got sponsored by Mike Honda, my CA rep. So yeah, REAL government. In fact, many of my students became grassroots organizers and vote registrars Anyone who was 18 was registered to vote. These “at-risk” youth knew more about voting, propositions, and the Constitution than many adults. But, yeah, hey, it wasn’t on the test, so it didn’t matter, right?
LikeLiked by 1 person
At least Kahloon focuses on % Below Basic. The first ed commentator I have seen do so. Most simply weep that only 30% are NAEP-Proficient, as though the 36% from Basic to Proficient did not exist.
The other key to reading NAEP scores is to check the score trend from 4th grade to 8th grade (& when available, to 12th grade). High ed-achieving states show higher scores in higher grades, concomitant with shrinking % in the Below Basic category.
When the 2022 (post-pandemic) scores came out, ed reporters as a group blasted the 4pt loss in reading [less than 1% decline] and 9-pt loss in math [less than 2% decline]. Where in fact the concern should have been focused on long-time 30%-35% Below Basic sector increasing to 40%.
Of course Kahloon’s essay tanks completely starting at the point when it analyzes the effects of NCLB, and thereafter. Especially laughable: the approving nod to “A Nation at Risk” report– especially his claim it was produced “after another sustained decline in academic performance” (roundly debunked by statisticians).
LikeLiked by 1 person
sadly, one of the common sources I heard this tale from were the mouths of professors. So pervasive was the competition between departments in college that constantly there was this barrage of criticism leveled at teachers. This may have changed, but it amazes me that smart, well-educated people seem to need to raise their own self-image by derogatory remarks about teachers.
Because I knew and liked some of these professors, I sort of bought into their myth making pretty derp into my teaching career. One guy even went so far as to suggest that each generation muddied the pedagogical waters more than the last. He saw the nineteenth century as sort of an educational high water mark from which man had slowly descended.
LikeLike
Diane, it may be too early in November to nominate its Most Annoying Story About Schools, but I’m going to stick my neck out and guess the winner will be WaPo 11/3/25’s “We’re in an ‘education depression.’ This solution is a no-brainer.” by Arne Duncan and Jorge Elorza.
LikeLike
Ginny,
Anything written by Arne Duncan is a no-brainer.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I am grateful that I found this response. After seeing a clip on Social Media I Immediately researched Idrees Kahloon. My first thought is there is no way he’s an educator and he sounds like a pompous ass. Lo and behold he’s an economist. Shocker. I really enjoyed this blog and the information you provided. Thank you.
LikeLike