MSNBC broke the bombshell story: before the 2024 election, undercover FBI agents handed a paper bag with $50,000 cash to Tom Homan. They heard that Homan was soliciting bribes. The meeting was filmed.
The investigation of Homan for corrupt activities was quashed by Trump’s Department of Justice, presumably with the full knowledge of Attorney General Pam Bondi and FBI Director Kash Patel.
Carol Leonnig and Ken Dilanian of MSNBC reported:
In an undercover operation last year, the FBI recorded Tom Homan, now the White House border czar, accepting $50,000 in cash after indicating he could help the agents — who were posing as business executives — win government contracts in a second Trump administration, according to multiple people familiar with the probe and internal documents reviewed by MSNBC.
The FBI and the Justice Department planned to wait to see whether Homan would deliver on his alleged promise once he became the nation’s top immigration official. But the case indefinitely stalled soon after Donald Trump became president again in January, according to six sources familiar with the matter. In recent weeks, Trump appointees officially closed the investigation, after FBI Director Kash Patel requested a status update on the case, two of the people said.
It’s unclear what reasons FBI and Justice Department officials gave for shutting down the investigation. But a Trump Justice Department appointee called the case a “deep state” probe in early 2025 and no further investigative steps were taken, the sources say.
On Sept. 20, 2024, with hidden cameras recording the scene at a meeting spot in Texas, Homan accepted $50,000 in bills, according to an internal summary of the case and sources.
The federal investigation was launched in western Texas in the summer of 2024 after a subject in a separate investigation claimed Homan was soliciting payments in exchange for awarding contracts should Trump win the presidential election, according to an internal Justice Department summary of the probe reviewed by MSNBC and people familiar with the case. The U.S. Attorney’s office in the Western District of Texas, working with the FBI, asked the Justice Department’s Public Integrity Section to join its ongoing probe “into the Border Czar and former Acting Director of Immigration and Customs Enforcement Tom Homan and others based on evidence of payment from FBI undercover agents in exchange for facilitating future contracts related to border enforcement.”
Homan, who served as acting director of Immigration and Customs Enforcement early in Trump’s first term, openly claimed during the 2024 campaign that he would play a prominent role in carrying out Trump’s promised mass deportations.
Asked for comment about MSNBC’s exclusive reporting, the White House, the Justice Department and the FBI dismissed the investigation as politically motivated and baseless.

Send in the Troops to Collar White Collar Crime ❢ ❢ ❢ ❢
The White House Winks At It 😉 The GOP Loves It 😏
LikeLike
Seems to me as those troops could help in corralling the criminals in the White House and Congress, eh!
LikeLike
The meeting was filmed?!!
LikeLike
The meeting where undercover agents handed a brown paper bag containing $50,000 in cash to Homan was filmed.
LikeLike
People are just too brain dead to care. Check out this ridiculous exchange I just had with Robert Pondiscio.
https://x.com/rpondiscio/status/1969770931313598950?s=46
LikeLike
I am not on X, so I couldn’t read your exchange with Pondiscio, although I could see Chris Murphy’s post with the news clip and Robert Pondiscio’s nonsensical comment about it “We *really* need stop giving attention to politicians–left or right–who cannot form a sentence without catastrophizing rhetoric” in order to undermine Chris Murphy’s reasonable view without Pondiscio having to say anything critical about a Republican.
If you can copy and paste your exchange with him, I’d be interested in reading it.
I am absolutely certain that Pondiscio will have nothing to say about politicians “catastrophizing” Charlie Kirk’s death – at his funeral no less!
Robert Pondiscio (at least since I have paid attention) has always seemed to me to be someone who would never do anything that billionaires on the far right who generously fund his career might not like. I contrast him with people like John Merrow and Liz Cheney – 2 people whose views I don’t always agree with but who are willing to speak the truth without considering whether the powerful people who they agree with on other things will approve.
Pondiscio is the Susan Collins of education, occasionally giving his mild “both sides are sometimes bad but this person Trump hates is just horrible and people must not criticize this wonderful friend of Trump and must shut up”, because he knows the right wing billionaires who fund him won’t be bothered, knowing that Pondiscio will always obey their marching orders when they need him.
No doubt when authoritarians take over democracy, Pondiscio will give his Susan Collins excuse that he simply took them at their word that they wouldn’t.
Charlie Kirk said “Joe Biden is a bumbling, dementia-filled Alzheimer’s, corrupt, tyrant who should honestly be put in prison and/or given the death penalty for his crimes against America.”
That’s the guy who Pondiscio apparently supports being a role model for school children. Because to actually criticize someone whose ugly rhetoric encourages so much hate is not allowed if that person is a Trump loving Republican who the people who fund him want to to present as a truth-teller to students.
LikeLike
I’m not on Facebook. Can’t read anything posted there.
LikeLike
Can you post the exchange here, FLERP?
LikeLike
It’s not that interesting I suppose but since there are multiple requests, here it is.
https://ibb.co/HTVsF9Rh
LikeLike
His answers were evasive and excuses for illegal behavior.
Merrick Garland did not politicize the DOJ. You were right. He retained Trump’s FBI choice. There were no wholesale firings.
He should have prosecuted Jan 6 more vigorously.
LikeLike
Thank you flerp!. I did not realize that Pondiscio had posted a link from a right wing news source he trusts, the Washington Examiner.
It’s ironic that Pondiscio linked to a news story that demonstrates yet another time when it was REPUBLICANS who actually were “catastrophizing” something by mischaracterizing it to achieve their goal of garnering more outrage. At least if you believe Factcheck.org
https://www.factcheck.org/2022/04/attorney-general-never-called-concerned-parents-domestic-terrorists/
Of course the entire incident had nothing to do with Biden, but I read the Washington Examiner article and it wasn’t even clear that any legal threats against parents were made. There was an internal email discussion in the DOJ of whether what anti-mask parents were doing was threatening any group, and that was going to be studied. Even in the original memo that so riled up the right wing, Garland made it clear that anti-mask parents could express their opinions publicly.
Pondiscio writes that what the Biden DOJ did was to use their power to quash parents with dissenting views. Really?
Pondiscio is guilty of catastrophizing rhetoric himself – but he very carefully will only catastrophize rhetoric to empower Trump. Does he have any principles left at all? Or will he only find them when his billionaire funders decide they’ve had enough of Trumpism?
Very sad. He should take a lesson from John Merrow and Liz Cheney. Instead, Pondiscio is essentially siding with Trump by pushing the lie that whatever Trump does, “the other side” also did it in the past so it’s just business as usual.
He’s the Susan Collins of the education think tank business.
LikeLike
You are so right, NYCPSP!
Like Collins, he’s concerned but more disturbed by Garland than by Bondi. And of course he would never admit that this is the most corrupt administration in memory or that most of the Cabinet are woefully unqualified.
LikeLike
FLERP!,
Do you think the DOJ will ignore the Tom Homan bribery story and hope the public forgets about it? Is there some forum in which lawyers like Democracy Docket (Marc Elias) can sue and compel FOIA release of evidence?
LikeLike
I assume they will ignore it since they already made the decision to bury it.
Yes, you can sue to compel FOIA responses, but I assume DOJ would claim some kind of investigatory privilege and that courts would be inclined to defer to DOJ. If the Dems win the House, though. . .
LikeLike
Really undermines the public’s belief in the justice system
LikeLike
Trump is the most corrupt person to ever hold US office, says former Republican congressman Adam Kinzinger.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EZZq_jd8OZ4
LikeLike
Trump seems not care what the law says because he believes he is the law. Unfortunately, the rogue Supreme Court played a big part in nourishing that delusion in July of 2024 with their absolute immunity decision.
LikeLike
Kind of like giving absolute immunity to the Godfather
LikeLike
As AOC says, “who’s the illegal now, Tom?”
LikeLike
If you believe that the President can make a mockery of the law by using it to protect friends and punish enemies, then you do not believe in the rule of law.
If you believe that high tariffs are reasonable economic policy, then you do not believe in free markets.
If you believe that it’s OK for the federal government to field an army of armed, masked men, with a budget larger than that of the militaries of all but two nations, to round up citizens and noncitizens alike on any pretext, then you do not believe in small government, and you do not hold dear the core American value of individual liberty.
If you believe that it is appropriate for the President to pressure networks to fire comedians, then you do not believe in free speech.
It is long past time to take back the Republican Party from the morons. Eisenhower and Reagan are both turning in their graves.
LikeLiked by 1 person