After the election, I confidently predicted that Trump would never be able to get rid of the U.S. Department of Education. To eliminate a Department required Congressional approval, and I was confident that Trump would never get that. He would need 60 votes, not 51, and he would never get them. There might even be Republicans voting to keep the Department.
But I was wrong. Obviously. It didn’t occur to me that Trump would fire half the staff of the Department and dismantle it without seeking Congressional approval.
Yesterday, the Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that the President could continue to lay off the employees of the Department of Education while leaving aside the legal question of his power to destroy a Department created by Congress 45 years ago. Its ruling allowed him to achieve his goal without consulting Congress or abiding by the Constitution.
Because he wanted to. And because Congress–if asked– would stop him. And because six members of the Court wanted to help him achieve his goal.
Lower courts told him to reinstate those who were fired without cause. Federal Appeals courts agreed with the lower courts. The Supreme Court reversed them and gave Trump what he wanted.
The Republicans in Congress watched supinely, conceding another of their Constitutuinal powers. They had already abandoned their power of the purse. Trump might as well abolish Congress. He doesn’t need their approval. They have disemboweled themselves, with the approval of the Supreme Court.
The Supreme Court majority are extremists. They occasionally hold up a fig leaf and claim to be “originalists” or “textualists,” interpreting the Constitution as it was written. We now see that they are originalists when it suits them, but not originalists when Trump asks them to expand his imperial powers.
The Founders thought they had created a system of checks and balances, where no single branch could control the other two. Trump is the conniving scoundrel that they warned about in the Federalist Papers.
Republicans were not always hostile to the Department of Education. Reagan wanted to abolish it right away, but instead reaped the rewards of a 1983 report called “A Nation at Risk,” which excoriated the nation’s public schools and undermined the public’s faith in them.
Reagan’s successor, his Vice-President George H.W. Bush, did not try to abolish the Department of Education. Instead, he decided to use it to burnish his credentials. After first appointing a little-known president from Texas as Secretary of Education, Lauro Cavazos, President Bush decided that he wanted to be known as “the Education President.” He appointed Tennessee Governor Lamar Alexander as Secretary and convened a gathering of the nation’s governors to set national goals. (Secretary Alexander selected me to become Assistant Secretary in charge of the Department’s research arm).
There was no talk of abolishing the U.S. Department of Education during the term of Bush 1.
When George W. Bush became President in 2000, he never sought to close down the Department. His first piece of legislation was called No Child Left Behind, and he expected the Department to help him build his claim to be “a compassionate conservative.”
Again, no talk of abolishing the Department during the eight years of Bush 2.
When Trump was elected in 2016, abolishing the Department was not on his agenda. He appointed billionaire Betsy DeVos as Secretary, and her goal was to use the Department to fund charters and vouchers. She shoveled nearly $2 billion into the creation and expansion of charters but got nowhere with a federal voucher plan.
And then came Trump’s second term, where he allied himself with the most extreme elements of the Far Right. They were there during Trump 1, but in his second term, the extremists are in charge. By extremists, I mean not only the anti-government billionaires like Peter Thiel, but the entrenched rightwing zealots of what used to be called the John Birch Society. When Trump denounces Democrats as “Communists,” “radical leftwing lunatics,” and other bile, I feel as if I’m time-traveling back to the McCarthy era, when unhinged rightwingers flung such insults at their political opponents.
With the Supreme Court’s approval, Linda MacMahon will resume firing employees of the Departnent of Education and sending its core programs to other departments.
If the Supreme Court ever gets around to deciding whether Trump has the legal authority to abolish the Department of Education, it will already be gone.

His as-s needed to be thrown out of the office on day one, and why it hasn’t been done yet, is baffling.
LikeLiked by 1 person
What a horror. He’s dragged human consciousness down to level all honest curiosity about this marvelous world may become criminal. Even love may be legislated a crime.
LikeLike
“Even love may be legislated a crime.”
Yes, coupled with Israel, terrifyingly it has come to that, greed and inhumanity are the lingua franca of the age.
LikeLike
In times when our daily existence is largely consumed by news either centering upon the latest barbarity inflicted by the Israelis on the Gazans, or absurdity emanating from the White House, I have given up the pretense of maintaining civility and humanity in the face of those who show utter contempt for those notions. It’s come down to fire with fire. And so I say let’s take a look at the architect of that current – and set for the long term – 6-3 structure of the Supreme Court. I wish Mitch McConnell a long, slow, painful death, and may they inscribe on his tombstone, “Here lies Mitch McConnell, longtime Senate leader, who did far more than his fair share of damage to the country.”
LikeLiked by 2 people
I agree. When McConnell held open the first seat during the Obama years, then rushed through the second seat in Trump’s last year, he did more to damage the Supreme Court’s role than Trump has ever imagined.
LikeLike
Shouldn’t go unpunished.
LikeLike
We can thank Mitch McConnell for packing the Supreme Court with reactionaries.
LikeLike
In my naivete – I started to get hints under Reagan – I never realized the reactionaries were such a prominent, vicious, ruthless part of American society. It’s like “Invasion of the Body Snatchers.”
LikeLike
Re “The Republicans in Congress watched supinely, conceding another of their Constitutional powers.”
Or … or … the Congressional Republicans get what they want without their fingerprints on it, nor do they need concede anything else to achieve that goal. I think of them being more spineless than unwilling to defend Congressional power. All they have to do is think “good riddance” and then they can say to their constituents “There was nothing I could do.”
LikeLike
Hi Diane,It’s all so enraging. I’m calling them. It’s the only number I have but they must be held accountable.Contact Us – Supreme Court of the United Statessupremecourt.govThank you!Jennifer Jennifer Hall Lee Altadena, Calif.818-219-9339Our public schools – the schools of the Pasadena Unified School District, serving Altadena, Pasadena and Sierra Madre – are great. Here is a map showing where the 2023 PUSD graduates are now. https://pasedfoundation.org/2023/08/10/2023-pusd-graduate-destinations/
LikeLike
The irony of this is that title 1 and similar programs from the department of education provided help to poor red states more than it did blue states, where trump is seen as a great leader. Republicans like Tennessee’s Marsha Blackburn are not just complicit in this, they are engineering it constantly with their attention to false religion, fear of immigrants, and crime.
The only way to get a voter to vote against his own interests is fear.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Trump said this about his victory in the Supreme Court:
“On Truth Social, Trump exulted that the Court had “handed a Major Victory to Parents and Students across the Country” by freeing him to “proceed on returning the functions of the Department of Education BACK TO THE STATES.” Soon, he pledged, “America’s Students will be the best, brightest, and most Highly Educated anywhere in the World.””
–quoted from The Bulwark today.
Seems all that federal aid to help poor kids was depressing their test scores.
LikeLike
“. . . they are engineering it constantly with their attention to false religion. . . .”
Roy, I’m sure you know what my question is going to be:
What is a “false religion?” And correspondingly-What is a true religion?
LikeLike
It is unfortunate that the extremists fail to value the importance of free, all access public education that has played a big role in building this nation. It is built on the principles of opportunity and access to all. No other system is as efficient, effective and professional as local public schools led by elected representatives. Good public schools help build stronger communities which build strong states which, by extension, creates a stronger more united nation.
But dangerous extremists want the opposite. They want a public ignorant in history and science. Instead of a government working for the people, they want the people to serve the needs of billionaires that will control the power. The extremists are afraid of critical thinkers. They prefer sheepish, ignorant followers that they can push around like widgets.
LikeLike
Hell hath no fury like the wrath of a parent whose child has been discriminated against, denied access to higher expectations, and dismissed as invisible by administrators.
Apparently, the Supreme Court members have never met with a SCHOOL DISTRICT COUNCIL OF PARENTS OF CHILDREN WITH DISABILITIES. They’ve never sat next to a parent in an IEP meeting – a federally protected process to develop a child’s Individual Education Plan.
This was a no brainer for the Court. 14th Amendment. Civil Rights Act of 1964. Disabilities Rehabilitation Act of 1973. OCR office 1979. Right? Apparently not obvious to the Supreme Court and the MIA silent republican congress.
This is a ‘gimme’ for the Supreme Court to do right instead of upholding its loyalty to the president. They could blame the Constitution for their votes (ha!)
There’s a sick irony, as well. Isn’t it a civil rights federal violation when government closes the Office of Civil Rights?
They claim they can “function with a pared down staff to fulfill its federal statutory function.” They’ve shuttered the doors to 7 of 12 offices. Fired thousands of case workers. Cases sitting for months or dismissed. Parents and kids left with no recourse. And somehow the Court can sleep at night.
LikeLike
These right wing “sickos” want to shuttered everything public because they think the private sector does everything better. Without government involvement it will give corporations more “avenues of opportunity” to explode their profits and bleed working families dry. We can forget about diversity, equity and inclusion and some notion of fairness or human rights. The only thing that excites the private sector is big profits.
LikeLike