Michael Elden-Rooney wrote in Chalkbeat about the arrest and detention of a public high school student in New York City, which has spurred protests on the student’s behalf. He was attending a school for students learning English. His earnings after school were devoted to helping his mother and two younger siblings move out of a shelter and into an apartment. He entered the country legally. Mayor Eric Adams, who is indebted to Trump for pardoning him, has remained silent.
The campaign pushing for the release of a Bronx high school student arrested by immigration authorities last week continued to escalate with a new legal petition challenging the validity of his detention.
Attorneys for Dylan, 20, a native of Venezuela, made several moves Thursday they hope will slow, and ultimately stymie, the government’s efforts to fast-track his deportation following his arrest last week by Immigration and Customs Enforcement, or ICE, agents after a routine court date.
Dylan is the first known current New York City public school student to be detained by immigration authorities in President Donald Trump’s second term. In the days following Chalkbeat’s Monday report on Dylan’s arrest, his case has become national news and galvanized local efforts to oppose Trump’s immigration policies, including a rally Thursday on the steps of the city’s Education Department headquarters in lower Manhattan.
Dylan’s attorneys from the New York Legal Assistance Group, or NYLAG, filed a “habeas corpus” petition late Thursday night in federal court in Western Pennsylvania, where Dylan is being held, arguing that immigration officials violated his due process rights by preventing him from making full use of the court system. They assert that Dylan is ineligible for “expedited” deportation because he had legal permission to enter the country under a Biden-era humanitarian program.
Dylan’s arrest was part of a nationwide enforcement blitz where government lawyers move to dismiss migrants’ immigration cases, allowing authorities to arrest them on the spot and thrust them into a fast-tracked deportation process with fewer legal protections.
Officials from the Department of Homeland security did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the new legal petition. They previously criticized former President Joseph Biden’s policy allowing migrants like Dylan to enter the country and said “ICE is now following the law and placing these illegal aliens in expedited removal, as they always should have been.”
For the first week of his detention, Dylan’s lawyers could not reach him because he was shuttled so rapidly between four different states, according to a NYLAG spokesperson and his mother, Raiza, whose last name is being withheld at her request to avoid retaliation.
His lawyers finally managed to make contact Wednesday morning — just in time to prepare him for an interview with an asylum officer about whether he has a “credible fear” of returning to Venezuela — a hurdle Dylan must clear to avoid immediate deportation.
The interview took place early Thursday morning, with no advance notice to Dylan’s lawyers. They were only able to get a lawyer patched into the interview after Raiza alerted them shortly before, according to one of the attorneys….
“Dylan’s arrest and ongoing detention cause him enormous and continued harm,” the filing alleges. “He has been ripped away from his high school studies, his work, and his mother and young siblings who rely on him.” The full-time student at ELLIS Prep, which caters to older newly arrived immigrants, has also been working part-time as a delivery worker, helping his mom and two younger siblings move out of a shelter and into their own apartment.
His attorneys argue that Dylan’s arrest and detention have curtailed his ability to access the court system — a violation of the due process rights guaranteed to anyone in the U.S., regardless of immigration status. In addition to his asylum claim, Dylan is applying for Special Immigration Juvenile Status, a type of legal protection for youth under 21 who can’t be reunited with both parents (his father passed away years ago), according to the petition.
Dylan was scheduled to have a hearing in family court for that case Friday morning but was unlikely to be able to attend from detention — endangering his case, according to his attorneys.
The lawyers argue that Dylan was never eligible for “expedited removal” in the first place, since the procedure is not meant for people who were “admitted or paroled” into the country like Dylan was, according to federal immigration law.
Adding to the urgency of the situation is the fact that Dylan is facing severe gastrointestinal issues that doctors were still trying to diagnose when he was detained. “These specialists are currently in the process of assessing whether Dylan’s symptoms are the result of cancer or [Crohn’s] disease,” and recommended an “immediate in-person follow up appointment,” the filing states...
Meanwhile, Dylan’s case has continued to pick up public attention. An online fundraiser that launched Wednesday to help Dylan’s mom with expenses related to his legal case and caring for her two younger children had collected more than $27,000 by Friday morning.
And hundreds of supporters — including elected officials and city schools Chancellor Melissa Aviles-Ramos — rallied outside of the Education Department’s downtown Manhattan headquarters calling for his release.
Chants of “Free Dylan” echoed through the crowd of teachers union members, immigration advocates, students, and anti-Trump protesters.
“Dylan is a student, a worker, and part of our community. He did everything right, and still, ICE tore him away from his life and family in New York,” U.S. Rep. Nydia Velasquez said in a statement, the second federal elected official to publicly challenge Dylan’s detention.

#TodaysAcronym ☞ #GOP
🧌🧌🧌
#GestapoOnPatroll
LikeLike
Jon, Surely you can create an acronym reflecting the fact that the primary beneficiary of Trump’s reign of chaos is Putin.
LikeLike
Yup, Jon. Did you see the Trump Executive Order the other day creating new military garrisons around the country, reportable to him, to serve “policing functions”?
Now, why, exactly, does he need those, in violation of the Posse Comitatus Act?
LikeLike
Bob: I missed that one. Those people at Heritage and the rest are really organized super fascists. No way Trump does this all by himself. Interesting also is what’s happening between Trump and Leonard Leo et al. I actually felt relieved when I read about it–even from the Federalist Society–push back is welcome from my view. CBK
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes. They are.
LikeLike
Bob: There is a long article in the NYT this morning about the rift between the Federalist Society, Leo, John Yoo, and Trump. I posted a few of the comments from that article here, but it went to moderation. Not sure if it was a good idea to post a direct quote from that section but the comments were pretty telling. Trump cannot seem to be able to see beyond his personal whims and neuroses, and now he is mistaking them for his own sense of divinity. Apparently, it’s still a going concern. Move over, God. CBK
LikeLike
Yes. Probably the most blasphemous man who ever lived. He understands nothing, including nothing of the values and policies that he supposedly supports, and so he is a very unreliable useful idiot. LOL. And, ofc, he embodies ALL of the seven deadly sins. The rift with Leo, which I also read about, is hilarious, but it’s great to see Donnie Dumbo making such powerful enemies.
LikeLike
Bob: Trump is after the Nobel Peace Prize–doesn’t matter how–but unfortunately, Putin isn’t on board.
LikeLike
I don’t think Trump will ever win Nobel Peace Prize.
LikeLike
Hi Diane: I think Trump thinks he can get the Nobel Peace Prize like he thought he might become the new Pope. CBK
LikeLike
We could start a contest of Trump’s wackiest ideas. Winning the Nobel Peace Prize. Becoming Pope. Turning Gaza into the Riviera of the Middle East. Ending Russia’s war on Ukraine in one day. Ending Israel’s war on Gazans in one day.
LikeLike
Diane: . . . add to that list: emptying the United States of all immigrants, black people, and “foreigners.” Making Canada a U.S. State. Taking over Greenland. Mistaking or double-speaking grift, bribery, fraud, and vindictiveness for “the art of the deal.” In fact, and by that point, he dirties everything he touches. Think about it–he wants everyone to love him and to constantly show it (by his own twisted view of what that means); but if he got the Nobel Peace Prize, would you think of the Prize the same way you think of it now?
My view is that he went down a very bad developmental road a long time ago, remained stuck in the painful arena he landed in, and has never found his way back since then. And he seems not to realize that it’s not him as such, it’s what he chooses to do and who he chooses to be that is killing the centerpiece of his own now-bottomless needs and desires.
I believe in the constant potential for intellectual, moral, and spiritual conversion; but I’m not naive or stupid enough to think it is guaranteed to occur in everyone. CBK
LikeLike
Dylan is lucky to be in New York, which will still try to stand up for the law and human rights. Other legal Venezuelans have not been so fortunate as they have been scooped up by ICE and denied due process. If the “big beautiful theft on the working class” bill is passed, we will see troops turned on our citizens for simply dissenting, which is our right. Let’s not forget that Trump and his goons are “looking into” deporting American citizens. Grim times ahead!
LikeLike
If you’ve never read “The Diary of Anne Frank”, here’s what she wrote in her diary on January 13, 1943, in Germany: “People are being dragged out of their homes. Families are being torn apart. Children come home from school and find that their parents have disappeared.” And then came the pounding on her door, and Anne Frank and her family disappeared into a Nazi death camp.
“First they came for the socialists, but I did not speak out because I was not a socialist. Then they came for the union members, and I did not speak out because I was not a union member. Then they came for the Jews, but I did not speak out because I was not a Jew.
“Then they came for me…and there was no one left to speak out for me.”
— Martin Neimöller
Speak out now…act now…before it’s too late — before they come for you.
LikeLike
For a while, there were a bunch of trolls coming onto Diane’s blog, pretending to be anti-Trump and suggesting extremist acts. My first thought was that these people were Trumpanistas seeding the blog with excuses for arresting people who contribute here–trying to provoke a “Hey, that’s a great idea!” in response to their extremist suggestions.
Intellectuals are high on the list of those for whom the Fascists come.
I’m worried. We are looking a LOT like Germany in 1933.
LikeLike
This Trump-supporting town spoke up.
This article is long (from local NPR story). In a small Missouri town, a waitress was detained by ICE and may be deported after living in Kennett, MO for 20 years. There was an outpouring of support for her.
This quote says so much. Why can’t one Republican Rep or Senator say the same thing out loud.
“Ninety-five percent of the people in here support Trump – I do, too – but this is wrong.”
– a daily customer of John’s Waffle & Pancake House
https://www.stlpr.org/law-order/2025-05-24/missouri-kennett-woman-ice-deportation-visa
LikeLike
Missouri,
I believe the story from Kenneth, MO, was reported by The NY Times.
What will the townsfolk do to serve and protect a neighbor?
I assume she was not a rapist, a murderer or member of a violent gang.
Are the folks in Kennett doing anything? Co reacting their member of Congress? Speaking up?
Will they feel safer after she has been deported?
LikeLike
Diane, Bpb and all: A NYT article on the rift between Leonard Leo, the Federalist Society, John Yoo, and Trump, Inc. this morning. Below is a selection from the comments section of that article, fyi:
Sort by: Newest
Susan Anderson commented 5 hours ago
Susan Anderson
Boston5h ago
The Federalist Society created the current SCOTUS, who gave Trump near absolute power. They’ve been suborning the justice system for decades. Their pet project has turned on them. People shouldn’t adopt predators and then help them grow into monsters. One cannot be happy with this karma, since we too are the victims of a system which puts power and wealth ahead of a compassionate society which works for all of us.
141 RecommendShare
Flag
Steve sheldon commented 5 hours ago
S
Steve sheldon
Roseburg,Oregon5h ago
Trump needs to ask his lawyers if he has to follow the constitution, so allowing him to pick judges who pass a loyalty test means they will not follow the Constitution .. an oath they take. I would hope there are enough republican senators who would not sign off on such appointees. if there aren’t then democrats need to block in any way possible until after the midterms. Out republic depends on it.
45 RecommendShare
Flag
Concerned commented 5 hours ago
C
Concerned
Los Angeles5h ago
This is interesting. We are about to find out whose puppet is whose. I think it’s Trump who’s has been the puppet all along. The question is, now that they don’t need him anymore, can they contain him? Because he definitely seems to be going rogue.
48 RecommendShare
Flag
TB1899 commented 5 hours ago
T
TB1899
Houston, TX5h ago
When I was in law school and clerking on the fifth curcut in the 1960s, the federalist society was an absolute fringe group. Over time, it became the power for getting ultra-conservative, and often,a too young judges appointed at both the trial and appellate levels by GOP presidents. Now, Trump questions their loyality of federalist society- recommended judges because they choose the constitution over his whims. Small solace to those who support the rule of law an d due process. trump’s ignorance and disregard of the law ensures he will appoint no acceptable judges, regardless of whom is advising him.
38 RecommendShare
Flag
NY Times Critic commented 5 hours ago
NY Times Critic
In the US5h ago
The Federalist Society needs to call it’s pals at the Heritage Foundation and add a chapter to Project 2025. How to get rid of the leader they created!
57 RecommendShare
Flag
Eric commented 5 hours ago
E
Eric
Minneapolis5h ago
I am beginning to understand MAGA just a little bit. When Trump is on your side, it is an absolute pleasure. Unfortunately it is so rare. But when he criticized Putin it was an absolute joy to watch. And if he wants to burn down the Federalist society, pass me the popcorn. I want front row seats.
16 RecommendShare
Flag
Tom commented 5 hours ago
T
Tom
Bluffton SC5h ago
If Trump would stop breaking the law, then maybe judges would stop ruling against what he does
71 RecommendShare
Flag
David J commented 5 hours ago
D
David J
San Francisco5h ago
Trump wants a DOJ and especially a federal judiciary that’s about as far from co-equal as anyone can imagine. Actually, he wants our entire federal government to operate like his business—its various departments and agencies doing his bidding and under his thumb. Think of the various ventures of The Trump Organization—real estate development projects, hotels, licensing deals. All of them are totally under his thumb and always have been. Think also of large criminal organizations engaged in multiple enterprises—drug dealing, extortion. tax evasion. smuggling, and prostitution—all under the thumb of a kingpin or don. AG Bondi and Secretaries Rubio and Hegseth know this very well. Apparently, Chief Justice Roberts thinks he can keep Trump out of his hair enough to be able to look semi-independent.
26 RecommendShare
Flag
M Saleem Chaudhry commented 5 hours ago
M
M Saleem Chaudhry
San Jose,ca 951485h ago
Professor Yoo said the purpose of the conservative legal movement was to get presidents to stop treating judicial appointments as patronage and instead advance ideological goals. If Mr. Trump deviated from that path, he cautioned, the president risked the revolt President George W. Bush faced when he tried to appoint his friend and the White House counsel Harriet Miers to the Supreme Court two decades ago. Mr. Bush ultimately backed down. No matter the shared goals of the conservative legal movement, Professor Yoo added, its members had a limit. He said they would not support “him calling for the impeachment of judges or wanting to appoint judges who are not the best and the brightest, but instead are people getting personal rewards from the president — which is how it was before the Federalist Society.”
4 RecommendShare
Flag1 Reply
Steve sheldon commented 5 hours ago
S
Steve sheldon
Roseburg,Oregon5h ago
@M Saleem Chaudhry They supported SCOTUS nominees based soley on there stance against Roe, certainly nothing to do with ‘best and brightest’. Kavanaugh.
16 RecommendShare
Flag
Semi-retired commented 5 hours ago
S
Semi-retired
Midwest5h ago
Wish we could transport Trump onto the set of The West Wing TV show. He could sign executive orders to his heart’s content. He could be given a staff of actors to act as “yes men” to his every whim. He could be told that this was the greatest show ever and would be watched by trillions of people. Then the doors would be locked and the key thrown away and all broadcast and internet signals cut off for the next 25 years.
23 RecommendShare
Flag
CH commented 5 hours ago
C
CH
Indianapolis, Indiana5h ago
The Federalist Society is all about instituting massive corruption, always putting Big Business and the wealthy first. Federalist Society justices gave us the corrupting Citizens United decision, and seek to judicially repeal our critical environmental laws. I don’t see declining their choices to be a problem. But I guess Trump will now pick his judges from Fox. The Senate has the option, and the duty, to refuse to confirm any nominee who is not qualified.
23 RecommendShare
Flag
cdc commented 5 hours ago
cdc
San Diego5h ago
And so those who unleashed the beast are left behind. Et tu Brutus?
14 RecommendShare
Flag
Ben commented 5 hours ago
B
Ben
Florida5h ago
Please contact all your Senators, and any other Senators, and urge them to REJECT the budget bill before them, including this part: “No court of the United States may use appropriated funds to enforce a contempt citation for failure to comply with an injunction or temporary restraining order if no security was given when the injunction or order was issued” What that means is to deny a court the power to pursue enforcing a contempt of court order. More importantly, that means that the courts would effectively be denied their coequal status alongside the Congress and the Administration, and by definition, usher in the Constitutional crisis we have been warned about.
24 RecommendShare
Flag
Ellie commented 5 hours ago
Ellie
Arizona5h ago
Remember his speech at West Point about avoiding “yes men.” He lied to an entire graduating class of young Americans to their faces on the most important day of their lives thus far.
19 RecommendShare
Flag
Mayvin commented 5 hours ago
M
Mayvin
Boston5h ago
we’re seeing a central defect in judicial nominations: patronage, doing favors for the president, his party, and of course the senators of the state where nominees originated. We’re unlikely the get the best candidates sometimes. Trump is unlikely to pick any good candidates at all; they will be all his lapdogs, especially in the lower courts from which they hope to be promoted. The only advantage; unlikely to have best gray matter; they aren’t in law for noble reasons. Is anyone?
6 RecommendShare
Flag
Craig Hoffman commented 5 hours ago
C
Craig Hoffman
DC5h ago
John Yoo on the “find out” end of his aggressive role in expanding executive power. Would be hilarious irony reading his quotes, if I didn’t have shared stakes in this mess of an executive branch.
3 RecommendShare
Flag1 Reply
Karen commented 5 hours ago
K
Karen
Bay Area5h ago
@Craig Hoffman, as a Californian, and a proud UC alum, I have always found the UC Berkeley decision to employ John Yoo simply appalling. A gratuitous decision to make the law school look like a Fox News version of “fair and balanced,” just makes our public, taxpayer funded university appear careless.
9 RecommendShare
Flag
Cassandra commented 5 hours ago
C
Cassandra
Arizona5h ago
Isn’t it obvious that sooner or later Trump will turn on anyone who does not kowtow to him completely? Everyone who supports Trump will sooner or later realize this. What will they do then?
LikeLike