The U.S. Navy and the other branches of the military were told by order of Trump and Hegseth to remove all books on the subjects of diversity, equity, and inclusion. In practice, this meant elimination of books about race, racism, and sexual orientation.
These were the search terms used to identify offending titles:
The 20 official search terms included in the May 9 memo included: affirmative action; allyship; anti-racism; critical race theory; discrimination; diversity in the workplace; diversity, equity, and inclusion; gender affirming care; gender dysphoria; gender expression; gender identity; gender nonconformity; gender transition; transgender military personnel; transgender people; transsexualism; transsexuals; and white privilege.
Using these identifiers, the Navy took 381 books out of circulation and off its shelves.
However, a second review restored all but about 20 of the titles.
In a major reversal, almost all the 381 books that the U.S. Naval Academy removed from the school’s libraries have been returned to the bookshelves after a new review using the Pentagon’s standardized search terms for diversity, equity and inclusion titles found about 20 books that need to be removed pending a future review by a Department of Defense panel, according to a defense official.
The reversal comes after a May 9 Pentagon memo set Wednesday as the date by which the military services were to submit and remove book titles from the libraries of their military educational institutions that touch on diversity, race, and gender issues using the Pentagon’s specific search terms.
Prior to the Pentagon memo standardizing search terms, the Navy used its own terms that identified 381 titles, including titles like “I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings” by Maya Angelou, “How to Be an Antiracist” by Ibram X. Kendi, “Bodies in Doubt” by Elizabeth Reis, and “White Rage” by Carol Anderson.
Frankly, I have no idea why the list of banned books was pared down from 381 to only 20. The news story doesn’t explain.
Here is the original list of banned books. Most are about race and racism. The others are about gender and sexuality.
If the military is strong enough to fight, aren’t they strong enough to read about challenging topics?

Has the role of the aircraft the Enola Gay, which was used to drop the Hiroshima bomb been reinstated in Federal government websites?
LikeLiked by 1 person
First Amendment. No administration has any Constitutional authority to ban books, read peoples’ social media posts, book words and phrases. These zealot authoritarians are in a civil war against the rest of us. Their programs will not achieve their vision.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m not surprised that the US Navy did this. Will the Air Force follow.
Past Polls on Military Opinions Towards Trump:
There doesn’t seem to be any up to date active military polls about Cadet Bone Spur current approval rating among active duty troops yet. The Military Times is the publication taht runs these polls.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The numbers have long gone the other way (against Trump) among officers in all the branches of our services.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I havent seen the polls but can believe officers are far more liable to support someone other than tRump, than enlisted men and women.
It makes sense to me, more training and responsibility leads to higher levels of discernment.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I did see such a poll a while back. I’ll try to find it. Officers were far more likely to disapprove of Trump. Of course, they are more educated than are enlisted folks on average.
LikeLike
The polls from the traitor’s first term repeatedly revealed 70% or more of the officers in very branch not supporting him.
Still, I have no doubt that the family crime lord is aware of this and wants to or is already planning and in the process of replace everyone with the rank of colonel (in the navy that’s full captain} and above with a MAGA loyalist.
The result will be the end of the US military as an efficient fighting unit.
MAGA loyalists are, to keep it simple, willingly dumber than dumb. Most of them would probably end up being shot in the back by the troops, which is called friendly fire.
LikeLike
Military Times Poll: What you really think about Trump
LikeLike
It is HIGHLY likely that this support has declined in recent months. It was already more than 53 percent unfavorable among officers.
LikeLike
The poll is dated 2017
LikeLike
Yes. I suspect that the numbers have fallen considerably since then. NB: Officers have longer tenures. So most of these people are still around.
LikeLike