Robert Reich has been a champion of democracy throughout the Trump era. An economist, he knows that we are crippled as a nation by escalating income inequality. He describes here how Viktor Orban provided a model for Trumpism and what we should do to resist our headlong plunge into oligarchy, authoritarians, and ultimately full-blown fascism. h/t to Retired Teacher, who called my attention to this article.
Reich writes:
Friends,
A few days ago I had breakfast with my old friend John Shattuck, who, as president of Central European University in Budapest, saw firsthand how Viktor Orbán took over Hungary’s democracy and turned it into an authoritarian state.
When Trump was elected in 2016, Trump endorsed Orbán, and Orbán started attacking universities — forcing the Central European University out of Hungary.
John believes Trump is emulating Orbán’s playbook. (Steve Bannon once declared that “Orbán was Trump before there was Trump.”)
Orbân’s playbook has 10 parts, according to John:
One: Take over your party and enforce internal party discipline by using political threats and intimidation to stamp out all party dissent.
Two: Build your base by appealing to fear and hate, branding immigrants and cultural minorities as dangers to society, and demonizing your opponents as enemies of the people.
Three: Use disinformation and lies to justify what you’re doing.
Four: Use your election victory to claim a sweeping mandate — especially if you don’t win a majority.
Five: Centralize your power by destroying the civil service.
Six: Redefine the rule of law as rule by executive decree. Weaponize the state against all democratic opponents. Demonize anyone who doesn’t support the leader as an “enemy of the people.”
Seven: Eliminate checks and balances and separation of powers by taking over the legislature, the courts, the media, and civil society. Target opponents with regulatory penalties like tax audits, educational penalties such as denials of accreditation, political penalties like harassment investigations, physical penalties like withdrawing police protection, and criminal penalties like prosecution.
Eight: Rely on your oligarchs — hugely wealthy business and financial leaders — to supervise the economy and reward them with special access to state resources, tax cuts, and subsidies.
Nine: Ally yourself with other authoritarians like Vladimir Putin and support his effort to undermine European democracies and attack sovereign countries like Ukraine.
Ten: Get the public to believe that all this is necessary, and that resistance is futile.
John noted that Orbán’s influence now reaches across Europe.
In Austria, a political party founded by former Nazis will be part of a new coalition government this year headed by a leader who has close ties to Russia and opposes European support for Ukraine. A similar nationalist far-right government has taken over next door in Slovakia.
Europe’s three biggest countries, Italy, France and Germany, have all swung toward the far-right, but so far they remain democracies.
Italy has a nationalist government headed by Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, who’s followed parts of the Orbán playbook but has been pushed toward the center and has softened her position on immigration and Ukraine.
In France, the far-right party of Marine Le Pen won last year’s parliamentary elections, but a coalition of opposition parties, prodded by Emmanuel Macron, united to deny her party a parliamentary majority. Their resistance will be tested by new elections in June.
In Germany, the center-left government headed by Olaf Scholz fell at the end of last year. In late February, parliamentary elections took place that determined whether the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) party would become part of a new government. Viktor Orbán, Elon Musk, and JD Vance all endorsed the AfD before the elections, but it came in second with just under 20 percent of the vote, and polls show that 71 percent of Germans believe that the AfD is a threat to democracy because of its overt connections to the Nazi past.
Poland, the biggest new democracy in Eastern Europe, at first adopted but is now resisting the Orbán model. A far-right government elected in 2015 almost destroyed the independence of the Polish judiciary, but opposition parties united to defend the courts and defeated the government in 2023, replacing it with a centrist regime headed by Donald Tusk, with a strong commitment to restore Polish democracy.
What lessons can be drawn from all this?
John believes that the best way to respond to Orbán’s right-wing populism is by building coalitions for economic populism based on health care, education, taxes, and public spending.
He points to historical examples of this, like the American Farmer-Labor coalition that brought together urban workers, white farmers, and Black sharecroppers and led to the Progressive Movement and the New Deal in the 20th century. Today there’s an urgent need for a new populist movement to attack economic inequality.
John says that defending democracy should itself be a populist cause. In the Orbán playbook, the national flag was hijacked by the authoritarian leader. John believes that the flag of American democracy must be reclaimed as a symbol of the rule of law, a society built on human rights and freedoms, and international alliances and humanitarian values.
When these soft-power democratic assets are destroyed, a huge void opens up — to be filled by authoritarians like Xi Jinping and Vladimir Putin, who are the ultimate political models for Viktor Orbán and Donald Trump.
John urges that we pro-democracy anti-Trumpers move quickly with protests, lawsuits, and loud resistance. He says that those who believe Democrats should just play dead and wait for the 2026 midterm elections are profoundly wrong. Speed is essential.
I was struck by John’s optimism. He believes that the U.S. is better situated than Hungary to resist authoritarianism. We are 30 times bigger and infinitely more diverse, and our diversity is the source of our economic and cultural strength. The U.S. has an enormous and active civil society, a judiciary that remains mostly independent, a free and open if partially captured and manipulated media, and a constitution that guarantees the rights of the people to challenge and change their government.
Trump won less than 50 percent of the vote in last fall’s election, and his approval rating is well below that in recent polls.
National polls show that 70 percent of Americans today see democracy as a core American value.Resistance to the assault on democracy is not only possible, John says, but it’s essential — and it can work, as shown by the growing number of successful lawsuits that have been brought against Trump’s flood of executive decrees and the rising tide of grassroots mobilization by civil society groups across the country who are organizing demonstrations and lobbying legislators to stand up for democracy.
For two and a half centuries, Americans have fought to expand the right to vote, to achieve equal protection, to oppose intolerance and political violence, to gain freedom of speech and religion, to guarantee due process of law.
These goals may now seem to be blocked by Trump, but the U.S. is not Germany in the 1930s nor Hungary in 2025. Americans across the country are beginning to resist. John believes American democracy will emerge stronger for our efforts.

Hungary has a population of 9,584,627 comparable to NJ’s population of 9,622,060. It’s surprising that Hungary is kissing up to Putin and Russia considering its history of being crushed and suppressed by the USSR. But I guess being king of Hungary is more important to Orban who wants to follow the Putin example. Watch out Orban, Putin is a shark who might want to set up another puppet regime in Hungary obeisant to his every whim. Oh wait, never mind, Orban fits the bill of a puppet leader.
Trump has certainly been kissing up to Putin for years.
LikeLiked by 1 person
What does the Trump/Putin kiss really mean?
LikeLike
Step 6, “rule by executive decree” in Orbän’s Playbook is the key to his “success” because he acts by decree, bypassing the lawmakers. That’s exactly what Trump is doing by issuing a blizzard of so-called “Executive Orders”, even though EXECUTIVE ORDERS ARE NOT AUTHORIZED IN THE CONSTITUTION.
THE CONSTITUTION doesn’t give the President of the United States any authority to write “Executive Orders”.
THE CONSTITUTION specifically says in Article 1, Section 1, that ONLY CONGRESS can make laws: “ALL LEGISLATIVE POWERS herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States.”
THE CONSTITUTION does not authorize Congress to delegate — to give — any authority to the President or to anyone the power to make law. This is known as “The Constitution’s Nondelegation Doctrine”.
THE CONSTITUTION says in Article 2, Section 1, that “The Executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America.”
The word “executive” comes from the Latin word “exsequi,” which translates as “to carry out”. So, an “executive” is someone who carries out orders or follows through on a plan made by others, as in “the soldier executed his orders.”
AT THE CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION of 1797 in which the Constitution was written by delegates from the original states, Connecticut delegate Roger Sherman explained that the Constitution created the Presidency as “nothing more than an institution for carrying the will of the Legislature [Congress] into effect.”
THAT MEANS that the President as Chief EXECUTIVE Officer of the United States can only CARRY OUT the laws made by Congress, NOT MAKE OR CHANGE LAWS by so-called “executive order”.
THE CONSTITUTION says in Article 2, Section 3, that the President “shall take care that the laws be faithfully executed [carried out].”
BECAUSE SO-CALLED “EXECUTIVE ORDERS” ARE NOT AUTHORIZED BY THE CONSTITUTION, and because the Constitution limits law-making only to Congress, any so-called “Executive Order” that makes a new law or that changes existing law is unconstitutional.
And any so-called “Executive Order” that reverses or in any way limits a law passed by Congress is a violation of the Constitution’s requirement that the President “shall take care that the Laws be faithfully executed [carried out]” and is therefore AN IMPEACHABLE OFFENSE.
WHAT DEMOCRATS MUST DO is to file suit that so-called “Executive Orders” that change established law, ranging from changes to EPA to changes to voting laws, are unconstitutional and are a violation of the presidential Oath of Office. And they need to act quickly.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you, Quickwrit, for that lesson in law. It will serve as a quaint reminder of how things used to be.
LikeLike
There are quite a few differences between Orbán’s methods and Trump’s which I think is encouraging for the US. I think the most important difference is the speed with which Trump is trying to establish his empire. Orbán has been PM of Hungary for 15 years, and he was elected with super majority in 2010. He used his supermajority to transform the laws and judicial system lawfully, starting with expanding the supreme court and appointing loyalists to the new places. Many Hungarians didn’t even notice the rather slow transition to an authoritative system. To this day, Hungary has free health care and higher education.
On the other hand, everybody noticed that Trump has been trying to turn this country into a dictatorship, and it’s also clear to most that he’s been breaking the law every single day.
I think this recklessness is Trump’s Achilles heel.
My understanding is that demonstrations that involve 3.5% of the population can stop a dictator. That means 10 million people in the US, and we are half way there, since about 5 million people demonstrated during Hands Off day.
LikeLike
Robert Reich: “But what does a national civic uprising look like?
It may look like a general strike — a strike in which tens of millions of Americans refuse to work, refuse to buy, refuse to engage in anything other than a mass demonstration against the regime.
And not just one general strike, but a repeating general strike — a strike whose numbers continue to grow and whose outrage, resistance, and solidarity continue to spread across the land.
I urge all of you to start preparing now for such a series of general strikes. I will inform you of what I learn about who is doing what.
My friends, what the Trump regime has unleashed on America is intolerable. It is time — beyond time — for a national civic uprising. We must take action.”
https://www.alternet.org/the-only-way-trump-is-going-to-be-stopped/
4/19/25
LikeLiked by 1 person
Outrage of the Day, 4/26/25:
In goosestep behind Orange Leader, Republicans in Congress are pushing forward a sweeping tax and spending plan to be paid for in part by deep cuts to Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. Because attacking the most vulnerable to engorge the rich further is such good, Red sport, I guess.
LikeLike
“further to engorge the rich” would have been a more felicitous phrasing
LikeLike
I’ve found”engorge” is a verb best left on the shelf.
Unless, of course, you’re writing porn.
LikeLike
Engorge is precisely the right word for what the Trump maladministration has been doing. Le mot juste. Why? Because it means to consume so much as to swell unnaturally. That’s PRECISELY what the rich are doing in the United States today.
LikeLike
It means to consume extremely excessively. Exactly what I meant.
LikeLike
and it suggests something disgusting, so it has exactly the right emotional associations
LikeLike
And the fact that the verb has connotations of being overfilled with bile or blood makes it all the more perfect as I have used it.
LikeLike
Your words are fine by me, Bob. Always nice to see you on here.
Here = one of my few constants on the computer/internet; this blog.
LikeLiked by 1 person
From above: “National polls show that 70 percent of Americans today see democracy as a core American value”
What? 30% of Americans do NOT see democracy as one of our shared core values?
My God. No wonder why the MAGA monster’s “approval” rating keeps hovering above 40% no matter how much he craps on human decency.
Note to those liberals who keep beating each other up or who are just sitting on their hands, doing not much of anything: Be worried…be very worried.
LikeLike
When I was a 16-year-old hippie kid dreaming that we would all be living on small, communal farms and practicing peace, love, brotherhood and sisterhood, that we were getting beyond racism and sexism and xenophobia and the exploitation of the working classes, that there was an awakening going on, I never dreamed that we would be here.
LikeLike
There’s a huge story within your comment, Bob. Because I’m finding that many of those “hippie kids” are still fighting on, shouldering a lot of this burden during an incredibly difficult time.
2025 is like a nightmare. But nightmares do end, I keep telling myself.
Meanwhile, “resistance” zoom meeting coming up in, like, t-minus 16 minutes. And, most the people soon to be peering through this computer screen have gray hair.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Strangely 49% of voters voted for a known Fascist . Yet 70% of Americans see Democracy as a core value . Not central enough how ever to affect their vote or get them up off their ass to defend it at the polls. I think feeding the Christians to the lions was always an attractive distraction. Until the Guillotines come out for the lion handlers. Perhaps the Democrats need to learn from Republican Demagoguery. Because promising policy that Republicans have blocked for 4 decades has not worked. And even when they deliver as Biden did , the same working class dismisses it. Biden/ Democrats saved the Pensions of almost every Teamster and Union Construction Worker in the Country, and dozens of other Unions with Multi Employer Pensions. ( “The Shock Doctrine” explains why). Not to mention being the most Union friendly President since FDR . Both in his policies and his appointments to courts and agencies. Did it do him / Democrats any good with this constituency ? Not that I see . It would seem that inflicting hate and pain are great human motivators. A big part of Sanders attraction was his promise to deliver economic pain to the “1%” Time for “Common Sense ” Democrats and incrementalists to move aside.
LikeLike
I keep going back to Bernie. He speaks a lot of truth that’s for sure.
I also have a hard time getting past my own longstanding interest in the philosophy of technology.
As in….we have a new authoritarian in the the United States, and it ain’t just #47. It’s a machine. Or, to use the 1960s term (since protesters way back then were onto this idea) ….the “system”.
It’s no coincidence, I think, that Elon and his tech ‘bros are part of the dismantling of our republic.
The 1960s kicked off with the anti-nuclear movement and went from there. God knows that specific threat is not gone, plus so much else from that era.
Anyhoo…
Gotta go look through a lens at good people scattered all over rural Delaware County, NY.
Enjoy this afternoon!
LikeLike
No accident that the Muskrat was having a lot of private talks with Vladimir, I suspect.
LikeLike
Thanks, Joel. And John, I would love a discussion with you about the philosophy of technology, also an interest of mine. For many years, I was a member of a loosely affiliated group of business consultants called The Sociotechnical Systems Group. Our particular interest was the unintended and unforeseen consequences of new tech introduced into businesses. Let me give one example: in the old days, salespeople typically carried around a book in which they recorded everything about their clients–names of their wives or husbands and children and their birthdays, football teams they rooted for, concerns they had, job titles, authority to make sales, sales made, and so on. These books were their great treasures. Over a lifetime, they gathered enormous stores of information that made these salespeople extremely valuable to their employers. And when they moved to a new employer, THE BOOK went with them. Then, businesses started implementing Customer Resource Mangement Systems (CRMs), into which the salespeople were supposed to enter essential information about sales prospects and ongoing customers. And using them took hours and hours, and all their secret knowledge of their customer base was supposed, via these, to become proprietary to the company, making the salesperson a replaceable widget. Well, you can imagine how these went over in actual practice. Salespeople would make up shit and put in them. Or this: When I was managing editorial teams for very large projects with hundreds of components, I fell for the prospect of using GANTT and PERT charts to keep track of resources and schedules and bottlenecks and so on. But I found that I was spending so much time doing the damned charts that I was becoming out of touch with my staff. I threw out the software and went back to Management by Walking Around. Smartest thing I ever did.
LikeLike
Another fascinating topic that nestles under the heading “Philosophy of Technology” is what the invention of technologies that extend our sensory access to the world tells us about the nature of the mind and of the universe. Profound metaphysical implications:
See this:
Christian Existentialism, Episode 12, Why Materialism Is False and Panentheism Is True, Part 3, Perc
LikeLike
Thanks for the link to your video, Bob. It’s a nice way to start off this last and cold Monday in April.
Funny coincidence: the video starts with a picture and discussion of a TICK. Just prior to sitting down here at the computer, I was digging through a big ziploc bag I have full off stuff about ….ticks.
(I’ve been enrolled in a scientific study for a Lyme disease vaccine. Big pharma and me, ha ha. I have a follow-up appointment for a lab test on my blood later this week. Subject number whatever….double blind, etc… I have to double check the appointment.)
So, yeah….what are the chances of that?
Then as soon as your voice started up on the computer here our sheepdog came ambling over with, I wouldn’t be surprised, a tick or two on him. We’ve been finding them crawling around the house and us this week. Spring!
Anyway, wonderful video with lots to think about.
An aside: as an official social security collecting oldster, I sometimes find myself considering how my perception has changed over time. For example, when I was much younger I could think about being older someday but until I got, well, here, I couldn’t feel that reality. The physical reality….plus….
And, now that I’m “here”, it’s difficult for me to really understand how young people today experience the world. I didn’t grow up with a touchscreen in my hands, for example.
How are young adults and children perceiving this crazy era that we’re living in? (Or is it even “crazy” for them?)
Perhaps the solution to this global disaster called ‘Donald Trump’, these horrible MAGA times, will come out of their realm of existence? It’ll be something I can’t even imagine.
Humans are lucky we have people (of all ages) who wonder and are curious and who share what they find with others.
That gives me hope.
LikeLike
My understanding is that the authors of Project 2025 got direct advice from Orbán.
LikeLike