Erin Reed is a transgender activist who tracks the attacks on people like her on her blog “Erin in the Morning.” Erin has a lot of ground to cover, as Trump launches a firestorm of hate towards transgender people, joined by extremist state legislatures, occasionally slowed down by court rulings. Do trans people have any rights? As American citizens, shouldn’t they be able to live the life they choose? Why does Trump try to erase their existence? Why are Republicans so fearful of this tiny minority of people?
Trans people are a perfect scapegoat.
As long as Republicans can keep their base focused on the nonexistent danger of trans people, they won’t notice that Trump is undermining healthcare and chopping up social programs that benefit his base, while cutting the taxes of billionaires and corporations.

Erin Reed writes:
Nearly a century ago, Nazis raided the Institut für Sexualwissenschaft—the Institute of Sexology—a pioneering research institution and clinic founded by Magnus Hirschfeld, a forefather of transgender research. The institute housed tens of thousands of books, research notes, and data documenting the first decades of scientific study on transgender and queer people. Long before the labor camps and mass killings, the Nazis identified Hirschfeld as a primary enemy, targeting his work in the early rise of fascism. That night, in Berlin’s Bebelplatz Square, they burned his institute’s collection in a now-infamous spectacle, immortalized in history books yet often stripped of the context of who, exactly, was targeted. Now, President Trump is doing the same—digitally burning records of transgender people and pressuring nonprofits to follow suit.
And those digital fires have spread. Within days of Trump’s anti-trans executive orders, the word “transgender” was erased from nearly every government website where it once appeared. CDC data on transgender health was stripped from its pages. The Stonewall National Monument—dedicated to the LGBTQ+ people who fought back against oppression, led by transgender activists—was purged of any mention of transgender people online. Even institutions and nonprofits serving LGBTQ+ communities, particularly those receiving federal funding, have been pressured into scrubbing “transgender” and “gender identity” from their materials. The Nazis would envy the speed and efficiency with which it was done.
As a transgender journalist dedicated to documenting these events and helping people grasp the broader context of attacks on queer and trans communities, I feel the weight of this moment. The sacking of the institute was not met with uproar; there was little popular resistance. At the time, no journalists spoke with sympathy about those who sought care there—much less transgender journalists who might have needed that care themselves. If only alarm had spread then, or even earlier, when the very people receiving treatment at the institute were first being demonized.
And like today’s digital fires, those flames were not lit without years of prior hate. Four years before the book burnings, one of the earliest editions of Der Stürmer—the Nazi propaganda publication that fueled fascism’s rise—accused Hirschfeld of “grooming” youth, echoing today’s attacks on LGBTQ+ people. Hitler notoriously called Hirschfeld “the world’s most dangerous Jew.” Trans and queer people were the canaries in the coalmine of atrocity. Similarly, just a few years ago, the “groomer” slur ignited online, feeding a growing trans panic that has only escalated since.

Early edition of Der Stürmer accusing Hirschfeld of grooming youth.
I don’t know where we are heading as a country, or what future you see when you stare into today’s fires. But I do know that the transgender and queer readers I write for every day see the signs—and fear the worst. Trans people, in mass numbers, have rushed to secure passports—some too late, as the administration has tightened restrictions on gender marker changes, in some cases even confiscating documents. Anyone active in this space knows people who have already left. And yet, despite this fear, so many cisgender people I speak to—including journalists covering stories that implicate our rights—seem unaware of the full scope of what is happening. I even had one reporter recently express surprise and dismay at hearing trans people were removed from Stonewall, something widely reported on in recent weeks.
People should pay attention. Court battles are already raging, with rulings blocking the administration from stripping funding from hospitals that provide transgender care. In another case, a judge appears poised to halt Trump’s attempt to expel trans service members from the military. As Trump and his allies openly float the idea of ignoring court rulings, the risk of a brazen defiance of judicial authority looms, and transgender rights could be an early test case. The way this administration treats transgender people may foreshadow how it treats all those it seeks to silence—a potential step toward consolidating totalitarian power.
Trump’s digital erasure of transgender people is more than policy—it is a declaration that the very existence of certain human beings is unwelcome in the official record. This is not a hallmark of a democratic leader respecting courts and laws; it is the move of someone intent on atrocity. When you eliminate all traces of a people’s identity, it surpasses mere ideology and becomes an act of “salting the earth,” ensuring their name and their history cannot be seen. Such an action must be recognized and resisted by every voice capable of protest. We are witnessing the dark echo of “first they came for…” in our own time, and we must understand that after they come for us transgender people, they will not simply stop with us.

If anyone needs to know where this is headed, here are some things you need to read and/or watch: Fahrenheit 451, Brazil, 1984, The Rose, Anything Kurt Vonnegut, George Orwell, or Margaret Atwood wrote; any documentary on WWII, the Nazis, Hitler, or any of the wealth of books and stories about that time period in our history; Schindler’s List; Spielberg’s or Ken Burns’ series on WAR, or the Holocaust; Mrs. Miniver; The Boy in the Gray Pajamas,” and many many more. Anyone here–add to this list. CBK
LikeLiked by 1 person
I forgot to add the movies: “The Exception,” and the series “Band of Brothers.” CBK
LikeLiked by 1 person
I recommend anything by the late University of Wisconsin-Madison scholar and professor George Mosse, particularly The Crisis of German Ideology: Intellectual Origins of the Third Reich, Nazi Culture: Intellectual, Cultural, and Social Life in the Third Reich, and Toward the Final Solution: A History of European Racism.
LikeLike
I agree with the sentiments here, but I’m always hesitant about the facts when presented by Erin Reed, who is one of the biggest purveyors of falsehoods and misinformation about trans medical issues. Here’s a rundown of the lies she spread to try to discredit the Cass Review. It’s written by Ben Ryan, who in my view is one of the best reporters on this beat, along with Helen Lewis and Jesse Singal.
https://archive.is/BlBIP
LikeLiked by 1 person
Link doesn’t work.
LikeLike
https://open.substack.com/pub/erininthemorn/p/nazis-burned-trans-books-to-usher?r=rls8&utm_medium=ios
LikeLike
Thanks, Diane, but I was referring to FLERP!’s link.
LikeLike
Flerp: not being able to access the link you provided, can I assume its author takes issue with medical information? The history here seems pretty solid.
LikeLike
Strange, it works for me.
Yeah, it’s about medical info.
LikeLike
Thanks, the link worked that time go cyberfigure
LikeLike
Just a note about Erin Reed-hater Ben Ryan, who someone linked to here as if he is a trustworthy source. Ben Ryan – who proudly explains how he uses the term “Gender-distressed child” instead of “trans child” because “gender distressed” is – according to Ryan – a “purposefully neutral terms that don’t come pre-baked with any declarations about the wisdom of cross-sex hormone treatment or the essential nature of gender identity.”
Ben Ryan is the Emily Oster of journalism. You might recall all of Emily Oster’s “data-based” conclusions – which she always presented with a wildly inaccurate certainty – about it being absolutely safe to reopen schools in large urban areas (where underfunded, poorly ventilated schools had 30+ students in the classroom and many children lived in very small multi-generational apartments) in the fall of 2020 before there was any vaccine.) Emily Oster has never admitted being wrong — even when her overhyped dissertation turned out to be completely false. (As a privileged and connected white woman, after years of completely ignoring other scholars’ warnings about the shoddiness of her research, she simply did a “new” study that found exactly the opposite of her attention-grabbing – but 100% wrong- earlier dissertation, and got praise for that!) Ben Ryan also arrogantly proclaims he is “proud that I have never had to run a major correction.”
Oh the perfection of Ryan and Oster! I am always skeptical of folks who proudly proclaim their perfection! It makes me trust them LESS. I trust the open-minded people with integrity like Diane Ravitch, who is always willing to look at further evidence and retract a conclusion if the evidence doesn’t support it.
“I know for a fact that sex is binary.” says Ben Ryan, who proudly links to his definition of very distinguished and trustworthy “expert” source – an “evolutionary biologist” named Colin Wright whose main scholarship after receiving an (undistinguished?) PhD in Biology in 2018 seems to be writing anti-trans screeds in right wing publications and whining that he was “cancelled” in 2020 even though he not only got a fellowship at Penn State, but that fellowship was renewed! Rather than blame his own research mediocrity for why he wasn’t handed a tenure track academic position 1 year after getting his PhD, Ben Ryan’s “reliable” source who claimed he was canceled blew off his fellowship and took a job at the always admirable right wing Manhattan Institute!!! Sort of like those “very qualified” Doge bros.
If Ben Ryan is actually the fair minded “never wrong” journalist he presents himself as, he would stop attacking Erin Reed and actually do some research about the flaws in the Cass Report that he knee jerk defends. But I guess it’s harder for Ben Ryan to attack the work of a group of doctors, scientists and researchers who actually ARE distinguished as opposed to relying on the assertions of a random PhD recipient whining about being cancelled (but wasn’t) who left an academic fellowship job to promote his supposed “expertise” at the right wing Manhattan Institute.
THIS is much more reliable than Ben Ryan’s “expert source”, the Manhattan Institute’s Colin Wright. It’s not a screed, it recognizes what the Cass Study did well, but quite rightly critiques what the Cass Study did wrong.
https://law.yale.edu/sites/default/files/documents/integrity-project_cass-response.pdf
“Indeed, statements of the Review favorably describe the individualized,
age-appropriate, and careful approach recommended by the World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH) and the Endocrine Society.3
Unfortunately, the Review repeatedly misuses data and violates its own evidentiary standards by resting many conclusions
on speculation. Many of its statements and the conduct of the York SRs reveal profound misunderstandings of the evidence base and the clinical issues at hand. The Review also subverts widely accepted processes for development of clinical recommendations and repeats spurious,
debunked claims about transgender identity and gender dysphoria.
These errors conflict with well-established norms of clinical research and evidence-based healthcare. Further, these errors raise serious concern about the scientific integrity of critical elements of the report’s process
and recommendations.
In the short time since its release, the Review has been used to justify restrictions on healthcare for transgender youth.”
The fact that Ben Ryan trusts some Manhattan Institute guy’s opinion over the distinguished researchers pointing out what is wrong with the anti-trans pseudo-science, then why even have science?
LikeLike
The Manhattan Institute, where I was a Senior Fellow about 20 years ago, is a political, highly ideological organization.
A genuine think tank, like the Brookings Institution, hosts a variety of views, scholars with diverse ideologies or none at all. Discussions are vibrant because people disagree, politely and vigorously.
By contrast, at the Manhattan Institute, everyone is on the same page. They range from very conservative to rightwing extremists, like Chris Rufo.
I would never quote anyone from the Manhattan Institute, except as an example of ideologically driven policies.
LikeLike
Just wanted to alert people that Reed is a well documented liar. Ben Ryan is a good reporter who has done many years of reporting on the now-dead PEPFAR program. I respect him even if he quoted someone from the Manhattan Institute. Anyway, I’ve flagged what I’ve flagged, so people can make up their own mind.
LikeLiked by 1 person
FLERP, I posted one article by Erin Reed. Can you point out any lies in that article?
LikeLike
No
LikeLike
I have no opinion on Ben Ryan’s reporting on other topics.
But I do know that Ben Ryan’s reporting on trans issues and especially his uncritical embrace of the Cass Review is embarrassingly bad. Maybe if he spent less time admiring the scientific knowledge and expertise of some Manhattan Institute “biology expert” who already has a retracted published paper listed in his limited scientific research, and read the Yale Law document I linked to, he would not be so determined to amplify the hyped, extremely flawed findings of the Cass Review and so quick to discredit Erin Reed.
The misleading hyping of cherrypicked findings in the Cass Review have caused huge harm to trans children – with lots more to come – and it is beyond sick that the people intentionally harming them are claiming that they are doing it to save them.
Reporting on trans care did not have to be so lousy. The Yale paper – and the nine scientists and doctors whose names are on it – would have made far better sources for Ben Ryan than a Manhattan Institute PhD whose mediocre qualifications were the reason academia didn’t coming begging him to become a professor. A PhD whose mediocre qualifications were less important than his right wing ideology when the Manhattan Institute came calling.
I don’t care that Ben Ryan is so proud he is never wrong, and so proud of using people’s preferred pronouns in the name of “kindness”. I care about whether his reporting is good or lazy, and his complete embrace of the flawed Cass Review shows a very, very lazy journalist. Maybe he isn’t as lazy when he reports on other subjects. If he has the integrity of Diane Ravitch, he would read the criticisms with an open mind and address those criticisms. Emily Oster would a far better scholar AND human being if she actually considered the criticisms of her work instead of arrogantly dismissing them all. Same with Ben Ryan. He needs to get some new sources with credibility, instead of giving unearned credibility to sources whose opinions agrees with his own.
The Yale paper is an example of what the fact-based discussion could have been without the politicization and polemics that reporters like Ryan gave credibility to.
LikeLike
Flerp! I just clicked your link & it worked.
LikeLike
It is chilling yet somehow entirely predictable that “trans-hate” was a thing during early Nazi years. Trump’s “digital erasure” echoes early-Nazi burning of Hirschfeld’s research. Just shows how far back US has turned the clock.
LikeLike