Many federal government websites went dark after Trump took office. Medical and scientific professionals were concerned when websites containing research were shut down. One reason for the lights out was the Trump administration’s determination to remove any research that contained language that referred to diversity, equity or inclusion and any research that related to sexuality, especially references to transgender or bisexual or any LGBT issues. The Trump administration has stated that there are only two genders–male and female–and that’s it.
The news was reported by The Washington Post:
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention removed or edited references to transgender people, gender identity and equity from its website Friday, racing to meet a late-afternoon deadline imposed by the federal Office of Personnel Management.
Whole pages about HIV testing for transgender people, guidelines for use of HIV medication and information on supporting LGBTQ+ youth health were no longer available late Friday. The page that lists vaccines recommended by the CDC’s vaccine advisory committee was also no longer available. The vaccine to protect against mpox virus is recommended for groups including transgender, nonbinary or gender-diverse people.
By Saturday, the page of vaccine-specific recommendations was back online, with no mention of the mpox vaccine.
The blog Inside Medicine reported on the pall of censorship by the feds across the scientific community. Its report included the words that triggered the DEI censors.
In the order, CDC researchers were instructed to remove references to or mentions of a list of forbidden terms: “Gender, transgender, pregnant person, pregnant people, LGBT, transsexual, non-binary, nonbinary, assigned male at birth, assigned female at birth, biologically male, biologically female,” according to an email sent to CDC employees (see below).”

An expansion of an emerging censorship regime at the CDC.
The policy goes beyond the previously reported pause of the CDC’s own publications, including Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR), which has seen two issues go unreleased since January 16, marking the first publication gap of any kind in approximately 60 years. Emerging infectious Diseases and Preventing Chronic Disease, the CDC’s other major publications, also remain under lock and key, but have not yet been affected because they are monthly releases and both were released as scheduled in January, prior to President Trump’s inauguration. The policy also goes beyond the general communications gag order that already prevents any CDC scientist from submitting any new scientific findings to the public.
The National Science Foundation was directed to screen papers submitted for funding; it uses a list of words to flag papers that might offend the new administration.Being flagged means that the research needs a closer review to be sure that the topic is inoffensive.

Judd Legum and Rebecca Crosby of the blog “Popular Information” reported on censorship at the National Secutity Agency.
They wrote:
A memo distributed by NSA leadership to its staff says that on February 10, all NSA websites and internal network pages that contain banned words will be deleted. This is the list of 27 banned words distributed to NSA staff:
Anti-Racism
Racism
Allyship
Bias
DEI
Diversity
Diverse
Confirmation Bias
Equity
Equitableness
Feminism
Gender
Gender Identity
Inclusion
Inclusive
All-Inclusive
Inclusivity
Injustice
Intersectionality
Prejudice
Privilege
Racial Identity
Sexuality
Stereotypes
Pronouns
Transgender
Equality
The memo acknowledges that the list includes many terms that are used by the NSA in contexts that have nothing to do with DEI. For example, the term “privilege” is used by the NSA in the context of “privilege escalation.” In the intelligence world, privilege escalation refers to “techniques that adversaries use to gain higher-level permissions on a system or network.”

Truly Orwellian. I’m critical of a lot of this stuff but to just memory hole it all is so messed up.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The idea that any grant that uses the word “women” should be suspect –while women make up 51% of the population!
Trump/Elon cabal is out to wreck any program that is not specifically created to benefit white males – their wives and daughters be damned.
Leonie Haimson
LikeLike
Sure looks that way. Of course, women are the prime beneficiaries of DEI policies, so any study that mentions them is immediately suspect. We will return to the “good old days,” when women were routinely overlooked by researchers.
LikeLike
If this statement refers to the oft-repeated statement that white women have benefited from affirmative action more than any other group, it’s a myth.
LikeLike
FLERP, white eomen have been the biggest beneficiaries of big business’s efforts to diversify their corporate boards and their management.
LikeLike
Non-publication of official reports such as the MMWR is unconscionable. At the state department of education, we have been advised by our Technical Advisory Committee to get any documents we may need from the US ED website now, because they may soon be gone or altered so significantly as to be unhelpful to public schools and districts. It may already be too late for readers of this blog.
LikeLike
This is truly a life imitating art situation. We all read 1984 in school & shook our heads at how crazy it was, but could never really happen here in the US. Then we read Animal Farm & learned the evils of Stalinist Communism & were sorry that Russia had suffered through such a horrible time but relieved that we live in a free, democratic country where that could never happen. Oh well, MAGA America, here we are. Enjoy the ride with your Dear Leader.
LikeLike
And all those who did not vote because they could do not see the difference between Harris or Trump
And all those who did not vote Democrat on a matter of ‘principal’ over Palestine.
And those who ‘could not be bothered’
Now your decision will come home to haunt you.
This administration will not stop at your door, it will come into your life and require you to do as it says.
LikeLike
Likewise, I can recall seeing a Latinos for Trump sign at one of Trump’s rallies. I wonder how they feel seeing relatives getting deported. Another sign read, “Muslims for Trump.” They must be feeling “buyer’s remorse” after seeing what Trump would like to do in Garza.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I daresay for the present they will find some justification. Though I don’t know if the heady and triumphalist brand of White Supremacists will be asking any of them ‘Who did you vote for?’ before being abusive.
It’s a classic case of ‘Careful What You Wish For’
LikeLike
Don’t blame the voters for the inadequacies and derelictions of the Dimocraps.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Indeed they could have done better, that much is true. There ample opportunities to have mobilised ‘United Under One Flag’ from 2016 onwards.
Being European, born in the aftermath of WWII, then living through the Cold War gave me a number of stark outlooks though.
On Democracy:
1. If you want to keep it Democracy sometimes it’s down to choosing the least worst alternative and hoping for the best.
2. Don’t take Democracy for granted. It will be taken away from you.
3. If you didn’t vote you’re on shaky ground when complaining.
Thus, I give those who do not vote because they couldn’t be bothered or think it’s a principled choice very little if any leeway .
Living in a Europe where the lessons of 1914-1945 and The Cold War seem to being brushed aside by far too many tends to have that effect.
LikeLike
“3. If you didn’t vote you’re on shaky ground when complaining.”
No, not at all. The act of not voting is a way of saying “I reject what is before me. There are no good options, at least as far as I can see, I do not need to give my stamp of approval. And apparently that is how at least a third of the voting age population perceives it.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The problem being, someone is going to win the Election, and will they be your least worst choice? (which would be of some comfort). Or the worst choice
I know I being very bleak about this, but there is a grim inevitability written large through History when circumstances indicate it is better a side is taken.
My memory takes me back to a year 2000 cartoon of Jeff Danziger’s where Democrat donkey is leaning over Uncle Sam’s shoulder and excitedly pointing out that in a manifesto ‘There. There is the difference between us and the Republicans’ Uncle Sam just says ‘Hmmm’.
Now in those days I could see why folk did not vote.
All pre 9/11 of course.
LikeLike
It wouldn’t post “W o r d P r e s s is getting harder to use.”
LikeLike
Sorry for the problems created by Eordpress.
LikeLike
I know you can’t control what WP does. It’s not on you.
LikeLike
For someone that favors deregulation, Trump has no problem playing word police with federal employees. Words are graphic representations of thought. Censorship is the opposite of free thought and expression. It is an attempt to control and limit the dissemination of information to the public on certain topics.
LikeLike
Retired,
Funny that the Trumpers complain about “cancel culture” when they are imposing a regime of censorship.
LikeLike
Oddly, where are terms like: Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, Queer – I could think of a lot of ‘woke’ orbit terms that are missing, why are these spared?
LikeLike