When I worked in George H.W. Bush’s administration from 1991-92 as Assistant Secretary of Education, I quickly learned about the importance of the Department’s Inspector General. He or she is nonpolitical, a guardian of the Department’s integrity, a watchdog. The IG is a crucial safeguard against corruption. Trump fired a bunch of them Friday night.
He acts as though he is a king or a dictator and the laws do not apply to him.
Heather Cox Richardson explained that his firing of them was illegal:
We have all earned a break for this week, but as some of you have heard me say, I write these letters with an eye to what a graduate student will need to know in 150 years. Two things from last night belong in the record of this time, not least because they illustrate President Donald Trump’s deliberate demonstration of dominance over Republican lawmakers.
Last night the Senate confirmed former Fox News Channel weekend host Pete Hegseth as the defense secretary of the United States of America. As Tom Bowman of NPR notes, since Congress created the position in 1947, in the wake of World War II, every person who has held it has come from a senior position in elected office, industry, or the military. Hegseth has been accused of financial mismanagement at the small nonprofits he directed, has demonstrated alcohol abuse, and paid $50,000 to a woman who accused him of sexual assault as part of a nondisclosure agreement. He has experience primarily on the Fox News Channel, where his attacks on “woke” caught Trump’s eye.
The secretary of defense oversees an organization of almost 3 million people and a budget of more than $800 billion, as well as advising the president and working with both allies and rivals around the globe to prevent war. It should go without saying that a candidate like Hegseth could never have been nominated, let alone confirmed, under any other president. But Republicans caved, even on this most vital position for the American people’s safety.
The chair of the Senate Armed Services Committee, Roger Wicker (R-MS), tried to spin Hegseth’s lack of relevant experience as a plus: “We must not underestimate the importance of having a top-shelf communicator as secretary of defense. Other than the president, no official plays a larger role in telling the men and women in uniform, the Congress and the public about the threats we face and the need for a peace-through-strength defense policy.”
Vice President J.D. Vance had to break a 50–50 tie to confirm Hegseth, as Republican senators Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, Susan Collins of Maine, and Mitch McConnell of Kentucky joined all the Democrats and Independents in voting no. Hegseth was sworn in early this morning.
That timing mattered. As MSNBC host Rachel Maddow noted, as soon as Senator Joni Ernst (R-IA), whose “yes” was secured only through an intense pressure campaign, had voted in favor, President Trump informed at least 15 independent inspectors general of U.S. government departments that they were fired, including, as David Nakamura, Lisa Rein, and Matt Viser of the Washington Post noted, those from “the departments of Defense, State, Transportation, Labor, Health and Human Services, Veterans Affairs, Housing and Urban Development, Interior, Energy, Commerce, and Agriculture, as well as the Environmental Protection Agency, Small Business Administration and the Social Security Administration.” Most were Trump’s own appointees from his first term, put in when he purged the inspectors general more gradually after his first impeachment.
Project 2025 called for the removal of the inspectors general. Just a week ago Ernst and her fellow Iowa Republican senator Chuck Grassley co-founded a bipartisan caucus—the Inspector General Caucus—to support those inspectors general. Grassley told Politico in November that he intends to defend the inspectors general.
Congress passed a law in 1978 to create inspectors general in 12 government departments. According to Jen Kirby, who explained inspectors general for Vox in 2020, a movement to combat waste in government had been building for a while, and the fraud and misuse of offices in the administration of President Richard M. Nixon made it clear that such protections were necessary. Essentially, inspectors general are watchdogs, keeping Congress informed of what’s going on within departments.
Kirby notes that when he took office in 1981, President Ronald Reagan promptly fired all the inspectors general, claiming he wanted to appoint his own people. Congress members of both parties pushed back, and Reagan rehired at least five of those he had fired. George H.W. Bush also tried to fire the inspectors general but backed down when Congress backed up their protests that they must be independent.
In 2008, Congress expanded the law by creating the Council of Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency. By 2010 that council covered 68 offices.
During his first term, in the wake of his first impeachment, Trump fired at least five inspectors general he considered disloyal to him, and in 2022, Congress amended the law to require any president who sought to get rid of an inspector general to “communicate in writing the reasons for any such removal or transfer to both Houses of Congress, not later than 30 days before the removal or transfer.” Congress called the law the “Securing Inspector General Independence Act of 2022.”
The chair of the Council of Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency, Hannibal “Mike” Ware, responded immediately to the information that Trump wanted to fire inspectors general. Ware recommended that Director of Presidential Personnel Sergio Gor, who had sent the email firing the inspectors general, “reach out to White House Counsel to discuss your intended course of action. At this point, we do not believe the actions taken are legally sufficient to dismiss” the inspectors general, because of the requirements of the 2022 law.
This evening, Nakamura, Rein, and Viser reported in the Washington Post that Democrats are outraged at the illegal firings and even some Republicans are expressing concern and have asked the White House for an explanation. For his part, Trump said, incorrectly, that firing inspectors general is “a very standard thing to do.” Several of the inspectors general Trump tried to fire are standing firm on the illegality of the order and plan to show up to work on Monday.
The framers of the Constitution designed impeachment to enable Congress to remove a chief executive who deliberately breaks the law, believing that the determination of senators to hold onto their own power would keep them from allowing a president to seize more than the Constitution had assigned him.
In Federalist No. 69, Alexander Hamilton tried to reassure those nervous about the centralization of power in the new Constitution that no man could ever become a dictator because unlike a king, “The President of the United States would be liable to be impeached, tried, and, upon conviction of treason, bribery, or other high crimes or misdemeanors, removed from office; and would afterwards be liable to prosecution and punishment in the ordinary course of law.”
But the framers did not anticipate the rise of political parties. Partisanship would push politicians to put party over country and eventually would induce even senators to bow to a rogue president. MAGA Senator John Barrasso of Wyoming told the Fox News Channel today that he is unconcerned about Trump’s breaking the law written just two years ago. “Well, sometimes inspector generals don’t do the job that they are supposed to do. Some of them deserve to be fired, and the president is gonna make wise decisions on those.”

“Saturday Night Massacre” October 20 1973.
Nixon ordered Attorney General Elliot Richardson to fire Watergate Special Prosecuter Archibald Cox.
Richardson refused and resigned effective immediately.
Nixon then ordered Deputy Attorney General William Ruckelshaus to fire Cox.
Ruckelshaus refused and also resigned.
Nixon then ordered the third-most-senior official at the Justice Department, Solicitor General Robert Bork, to fire Cox.
Bork carried out the dismissal.
”The Presidency: Richard Nixon Stumbles To The BRINK”
https://time.com/archive/6844693/the-presidency-richard-nixon-stumbles-to-the-brink/
LikeLike
He keeps confirming the lie that he told when he claimed that he wanted to be a dictator only on his first day in office. History has demonstrated repeatedly that for tyrants, who are so clearly oppressors, the first day is ALWAYS just the very beginning of authoritarian rule… G-d help us!
LikeLike
“I’m going to make him an offer he can’t refuse.” They voted in a mob boss.
“As soon as Senator Joni Ernst (R-IA), whose ‘yes’ was secured only through an intense pressure campaign, . . .”
Apparently, it’s not only about being “primaried;” they’ve been threatening people’s children ever since the impeachment trials and probably before.
Also, the other presidents named who fired Inspectors General were not out to destroy democracy itself, install a “past sell date” coo-coo fascist dictator, and replace the U.S. Constitution with a variably named document, in this case, Project 2025 . . . . So, stop with the comparisons. They don’t apply. CBK
LikeLike
Both Democrats and Republicans seem to still be gobsmacked and refuse to acknowledge the FACT that Trump and his buddies are out to drain the Congress of every bit of power it ever had, and are working hard on the courts.
Woke-up you guys. Trump has crapped on your dining room table, and you are still so power groggy that you still cannot smell it. CBK
LikeLiked by 1 person
A case in point: “MAGA Senator John Barrasso of Wyoming told the Fox News Channel today that he is unconcerned about Trump’s breaking the law written just two years ago.” (BLAH BLAH BLAH):
“‘Well, sometimes inspector generals don’t do the job that they are supposed to do. Some of them deserve to be fired, and the president is gonna make wise decisions on those’.” REALLY? And so, the law you people just passed doesn’t matter anymore? Wake up, Wyoming. It’s cold under the bus.
“But the framers did not anticipate the rise of political parties. Partisanship would push politicians to put party over country and eventually would induce even senators to bow to a rogue president.”
That’s a nice way to put it, but “partisanship” is still a cover for bare-knuckled politics and mob tactics. What we are seeing, among so many other extremely dark events, is how far Trump will go to keep the lie going, and how many people are willing to trash the entire democratic world that so many have worked and died for.
LikeLike
““partisanship” is still a cover for bare-knuckled politics and mob tactics.”
Beyond partisan politics the framers could not have conceived of a government that is so corrupted by the influence of big money and lobbying that serves the interests of the wealthy over ‘we the people.’ Deregulation, corporate subsidies and a tax code with lots of loopholes for the wealthy benefit billionaires and corporations, not regular people. It is also the reason we are the only western nation without a public option for healthcare, and our federal minimum wage remains a paltry $7.25 per hour. We can forget about any government program to help with expensive childcare costs, and the few social safety nets we have are all on the chopping block in Trumplandia. Our society has no economic balance anymore. Our income inequality gap continues to widen. Our economy is heavily tilted to benefit the wealthy, and it’s about to get a lot worse.
LikeLike
Retired: Maybe the founders couldn’t imagine it, but WE and our Congresspeople CAN.
There is also a place for terms like authenticity and genuineness where human relationships are concerned.
Oligarchs, the Trump family and followers, and many Congresspeople have apparently lost their connection to those qualities, if they ever were connected in the first place. But they can be recovered and brought to one’s performance.
Nothing but their own IN-authenticity and DIS-ingenuousness is keeping that from happening.
Oddly, it’s the end run of a failed democracy as a way of life–the convoluted and undeveloped attitude that IF I CAN do it, then I WILL do it–so says those we are watching tear down whatever good is left in everyone’s life. CBK
LikeLike
Special Prosecutor Archibald Cox held a televised news conference to object to this Nixon “compromise” on the tapes and to declare that he would ask the courts either to cite Nixon for contempt or to clarify why the President’s out-of-court offer was unacceptable.
Nixon ordered Attorney General Elliot Richardson, who under heavy Senate pressure had appointed Cox and given him a free hand to investigate all Watergate-related crimes, to fire Cox. Richardson refused and resigned on principle.
Nixon ordered Deputy Attorney General William Ruckelshaus to dismiss Cox. Ruckelshaus also in conscience declined. So Nixon fired him.
Nixon then appointed Solicitor General Robert Bork acting Attorney General and directed him to fire Cox and abolish Cox’s entire operation, including his staff of more than 60 attorneys, who have been investigating the pervasive scandal for five months. Bork obeyed, and within hours the nation witnessed the spectacle of FBI agents sealing off the offices and papers of the two top Justice Department men as well as those of Cox and his aides.
Saturday Night Massacre 1973
https://time.com/archive/6844693/the-presidency-richard-nixon-stumbles-to-the-brink/
LikeLike
He acts like he’s a King bc SCOTUS gave him the tools to do so. He has the support from the spineless republicans and the billionaires are controlling the information.
LikeLike
Trump’s got a point when he says this is normal, (for republicans that is), and it was good old Ronald Reagan who did it first. His justification was that “he wanted to hire his own people” which is laughable. George H. W. tried by asking everybody for their resignations, but took it back when congress objected. Obama fired one person, but he had very strong justification. That went through the legal process and was held up by the court. The bottom line is it’s up to the congress to stop the president from breaking the law and since republicans have a majority they’ll probably let Trump slide on this.
LikeLike
David Pearce: It’s so sweet: “He is using his power, and we are looking forward . . . ”
To that Lady GOP Congressperson: You are “looking forward” from a seat that is already under the bus. Trump has you checkmated–as soon as you are no longer an “asset” by his standards, you are toast; and if you try to stop him now by standing up to him, you are also toast-though by your own standards, whatever those are: Not being primaried , though there’s no guarantee of that, or perhaps not having to defend your family from Trump’s brownshirts. CBK
LikeLike
The more important questions in my mind are “Do the Dimocraps care?” and “What will they do about it?”
At least from what I’ve seen the IGs know that this is an illegal move and are resisting.
LikeLike