John Manley was a deputy prime minister and minister of finance in Jean Chrétien’s government in Canada.
He loves Trump’s idea of uniting Canada and the United States. Democrats should love it too. Republicans would never again win the presidency!
“I am so excited about this, Mr. Trump – I can already see the 60 little maple leaves on the flag with 13 stripes!”
His article appeared in The Globe & Mail, a major newspaper in Canada.
Dear Donald Trump,
My mentor and former boss, prime minister Jean Chrétien, has dismissed your suggestion that Canada and the U.S. merge.
Don’t despair. My point of view differs somewhat from his (sorry, Boss). I think we may be able to make this work if Canadians fully understand your proposal.
Imagine what the “United States of Canada” could be. We would marry American ingenuity and entrepreneurship to Canada’s natural resources, underdog toughness and culture of self-effacing politeness to create a powerful, world-dominating country.
We would be the largest land mass in the world. We would be self-reliant in every respect (food, energy, minerals, water). We would attract the world’s most talented people. We would truly be “the best country in the world,” to use Mr. Chrétien’s words, and would dominate international hockey competitions. Your idea is truly brilliant.
As you know from your corporate experience, for any successful merger, the devil is in the details, but I have some suggestions.
First, Canada could never simply be the 51st state. Canada consists of 10 states (we call them “provinces”) and three territories. Each of our provinces exists for historical reasons and citizens feel a deep loyalty to their province.
So we would need to be the 51st to 60th states. With two senators for each state, of course. Our 20 senators will no doubt bring fresh ideas to the institution that will help make the United States of Canada truly great!
Some issues that cause division and frustration in your country are considered settled by political parties of all stripes in Canada, so I suggest adopting Canadian consensus in the interest of making this deal work.
For example, there is no argument in Canada over women’s reproductive rights. There! That hot-button issue is resolved for you! (You can thank me later.)
All Canadian politicians support our single-payer health care system because no one is refused treatment for their inability to pay and no one goes broke because they suffer a catastrophic illness. In effect, all of our citizens have lifetime critical illness insurance provided by the government. And while it’s expensive, our system costs considerably less than yours, with 100 per cent of the population covered! Your citizens will love it, I promise.
I would also observe that Canadians have long preferred to live with many fewer firearms than are tolerated in the United States. The result is a drastically lower rate of deaths and injuries caused by gun violence in Canada. Our gun laws would make the country safer than it is, and safer is definitely greater!
We have some other innovations that you may wish to consider. Our Canada Pension Plan, equivalent to your Social Security, is fully funded and actuarially sound. This requires higher contributions, but it pays off with solvency. I believe your Social Security runs out of money in the near future. (That’s not great, is it?)
Lower personal income taxes paid in the U.S. are a great attraction. But our programs to support both seniors and young families to reduce the worst cases of poverty among them help make society more cohesive and fair. That’s one of the reasons our taxes have been higher.
Oh, and we must consider how we fund government expenses. We’re struggling to bring our deficit back down, but it wasn’t that long ago (2015) that our budget was effectively balanced. In fact, for more than a decade prior to the global financial crisis, Canada ran surplus budgets. In addition to spending discipline, our national value-added tax, the GST, was key. You definitely want to adopt that! In fact, you will love it! (Canadians don’t love it, but their governments do. And it beats borrowing money from the Chinese.)
There are many smaller details that I am sure we can work out. You will enjoy the simplicity of the metric system for weights and measures, for example. Oh, but we’re not crazy, you can keep yards for football! And you will love that sport even more when you play it on a bigger field with only three downs.
I am so excited about this, Mr. Trump. You are truly a visionary leader to have come up with this idea. I can already see the 60 little maple leaves on the flag with 13 stripes! I am ready to throw myself into this great project of making the United States of Canada great again! (Oh, that’s too long. Let’s just call our new country “Canada.”)
Respectfully, as I dislodge my tongue from my cheek,
John Manley

20 more senators and more House members than California. Sounds great.
When we add Greenland (two Inuit senators and one House member), Puerto Rico (two Hispanic senators and maybe our House members), USVI (two Black senators and one House member), and Guam (two API senators and one House member), why not also add DC (two Black senators and one House member) for an even 65 states?
With all that diversity, we might survive the closure of DEI programs.
LikeLiked by 1 person
20 new senators yes, but not the House. The House is apportioned according to population. Close though.
California’s population in 2025 is projected to be between 41 million and 46.7 million people. A year or two ago, the number of people moving into the state became larger than those leaving. Before the pandemic the number coming in were almost always larger than those leaving.
Canada 40.1 million
The population of each congressional district is an average of 761,169.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Could someone who is artistic please post a sample flag with 60 maple leaves and 13 stripes? Let us know if such an artist starts selling t shirts with the image. It could be a fundraiser for California wildfire survivors who may be denied Federal aid.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Great idea!
LikeLike
Once we have the flag, maybe someone will manufacture it and some of us could buy it and run it up flag poles in our yards.
LikeLike
Canada also does not have anything like the First Amendment with its strong guarantees of free expression. The far Left (e.g. this blog) favors suppressing speech that they don’t agree with.
LikeLike
Says the party of book banning and Elon’s X which carefully monitors criticism of Elon.
If free speech means that mis/disinformation can b spread, that is a problem. And that’s all the internet is right now.
You can say whatever you want, you are just as sensitive to disagreement as anyone else.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Any chance you can produce (and I know this is a silly formality) evidence to support the extremely broad claims you make here? Because what you have here is a statement of opinion that is essentially meaningless. Also, may I recommend a political science course so that you actually know what you’re talking about–because your comment here accomplishes exactly the opposite–when you use a term like “far Left.”
LikeLiked by 1 person
Well-informed people outside the left-wing bubble know that Canada has suppressed political speech for many years. There are many similar articles on the Internet that explain this fact.
https://nationalpost.com/news/canada/despite-what-you-may-think-canadians-dont-actually-have-freedom-of-speech
LikeLike
If you are getting your news from The National Post, which, incidentally is swirling the drain, then I have some bad news for you: You are not “well-informed.” And again, you should really try to understand what the term “left-wing bubble” means. May I again, in order to aid you in understanding the continuum of politics from left to right, suggest a political science course to you? As far as “many similar articles on the internet” goes, really? That’s your evidence? Pretty shabby.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Kirk Hauser, GET INFORMED!!!!!!!
From wikipedia: section 2(b) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms establishes the right to freedom of expression, and the Supreme Court of Canada has interpreted this right in a very broad fashion. The Court has said that any act that is intended to convey a message is protected under section 2(a) but that this does not include acts that have a violent form. [1] However, section 1 of the Charter establishes that “reasonable” limits can be placed on the right if those limits are prescribed by law and can be “demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society”.
LikeLiked by 2 people
It seems to me that there are reasonable limits on free speech. Yelling “fire” in a crowded theatre is one. Urging people to ingest warfarin to cure or prevent COVID is another. I expect there are others.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thanks, Joe. I was headed in this direction, so you saved me some work.
LikeLike
I’m LMAO, Kirk Hauser, at your assertion that Canada consores freedom of speech while no one does in the U.S.
Book bans have been reported in many states, including Florida, Iowa, Missouri, South Carolina, Texas, and Utah.
States with book bans
Factors that contribute to book bans State laws, State guidance, Local challenges to books by individuals and groups, and Legislation that creates processes for removing books with sexual content.
“Here’s the Long List of Topics Republicans Want Banned From the Classroom”
https://www.edweek.org/policy-politics/heres-the-long-list-of-topics-republicans-want-banned-from-the-classroom/2022/02
LikeLike
Kirk Hauser, if I keep laughing this hard, I’m going to lose a lot of weight.
https://pen.org/press-release/analysis-project-2025-wants-to-censor-government-language-with-a-hit-list-of-forbidden-words/
Pull quote from the link’s source, an analysis of what Project 2025 wants to Censor … with a hit list of Forbidden Words.
“(NEW YORK)— Despite its explicit claim to champion free speech, the conservative policy blueprint Project 2025 instead would do the opposite with proposals that are “unabashedly hostile” to free expression and the free flow of information, PEN America warned today in a new analysis.
“The free expression group said the Heritage Foundation blueprint for the next conservative White House seeks to impose a range of new controls over how government agencies, government-funded media outlets, and even the general population, communicate, share and receive information.
“Project 2025 goes so far as to propose banning words and phrases like “diversity,” “gender,” “reproductive health,” and “sexual orientation” from government documents; would turn long-standing government-funded global media—Voice of America among them— into propaganda outlets or shut them down; would defund the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which provides support to National Public Radio and the Public Broadcasting System, among other things; and advocates for a national ban of TikTok, a platform now used by one-third of all Americans. … “
Lloyd thinks the willing ignorance of FELON47’s loyalist MAGA cult is incredible.
LikeLike
This is exactly what we need more of to defend our democracy. Where is Norman Lear when we need him:)?! One of the strategies should be to use humor to show exactly how ridiculous and dangerous the administration is — textbook totalitarian theory — come in and overwhelm. And, the messages need to go to the general population. While focusing on the purchase of Greenland what about those eggs? Are we going to Greenland for their chickens? Obfuscation and confusion…that way they do not have to do anything about the economy. They promised to end the war in Ukraine in the first 24 hours of his presidency. I was wondering was that EST or PST?
LikeLike
The best political humor these days is Andy Borowitz.
LikeLiked by 3 people
We have to be very careful using intelligent humor to point out the stupidity and frailties of the Trump administration. Trump will just use his magic marker to sign another Executive Order banning all humor when it is directed at him, his family, his minions, and the Republican Party. A person like Trump cannot stand being laughed at or about.
LikeLike
Agreed. All in the Family made statements more bold than anything today. But it wasn’t making fun of the Archie Bunkers, it was hearing how those words sound when someone speaks them seriously.
SNL’s first couple of cold openings are funny, but pretty soon it just normalizes the ridiculous and reinforces the real “Oh, that’s just trump being trump.”
Trump sitting at a desk bellowing expletives and his actual, serious statements about his targets would get attention.
LikeLike
Exactly right. Trump has such a fragile ego that he hates ridicule. It unnerves him. Have you ever seen him laugh? His natural expression is a scowl. He’s afraid that someone somewhere is laughing at him.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I find it odd to live in an America where we elect a sneering, sarcastic man president. Government by grievance only works where the press is dominated by the right wing.
LikeLike
Perhaps my comment was unclear. All In The Family produced by Norman Lear did not make fun of people. He brilliantly designed the show and dialogue to demonstrate the inherent contradictions within each character played in a way that elicited humor without diminishing the character.
The Borowitz Report is great — but, its audience is small and of true believers.
What was spot on about the column on Canada was its inherent humor…demonstrating that Canadians are their own people and in fact have values distinctively different than those of the new administration. And, may have a b it of a problem being “taken over” by the U.S.
As part of an overall strategy to address the fear that this administration is engendering through their rapid hits on our democratic institutions — classic totalitarian theory — go in and overwhelm — hope that our democratic leaders (that can include those of the Republican party that believe in democracy) will develop a strategy that appeals to the broader population in a way that illuminates the actions of the administration and characterizes values that as a nation we share. Humor is a great tool for disseminating that information that allows people to hear it before “blocking it.”
Getting that message out now is the hard part as the distribution of news and information has become so targeted and segmented. And, having the corporate leaders who unfortunately run it living in fear of losing their power and fortunes to the administration and putting our democracy further at risk.
Harvey Milk was a great leader of the LGBTQIA+ communities and Harvey always spoke of hope — that is something we need to lean into — and, find ways to build upon that message. That our actions – even small ones- can make a difference.
Many thanks,
Laurie
LikeLike
Thank you John Manley (and Diane for posting it) for this entertaining and very informative bit of satire. We need all the laughs we can get with 4 years of Trumpism to be endured. Just a minor nit pick, Social Security is not going to go bankrupt in a few years, it is the Social Security trust fund that will go bankrupt IF nothing is done to fix the problem. It is an easily fixable issue by raising the SS wage tax cap, problem solved. For 2025, the Social Security wage cap will be $176,100.
What stands in the way of a solution, the GOP which hates SS or any other social programs that help the great mass of Americans.
LikeLike
In a related story …
Europe is renaming the Atlantic Ocean
the “Moat to Keep the Morons at Bay”
LikeLiked by 1 person
That’s a good one!
LikeLike
Streaming on Amazon Prime: Canadian Bacon/1995/John Candy
Watch the civilized world teeter on the brink of anarchy in this hilarious comedy about the New World Order. Beset by falling approval ratings and a sagging economy. A desperate U.S. president and his closest advisors launch a campaign to turn America against its most unlikely enemy – 🍁 🇨🇦 CANADA!
LikeLike
life imitates art
LikeLike
Fun essay. The telling flaw is the underlying premise that the president and fearful (or wealthy) loyalists actually care about people and have a dose of empathy. I guess Canada is too Woke?
The response about the first amendment? Ha! No fact checkers and the fox vacuum pretty much makes the first baseless. And, you can’t cherry pick parts of the Constitution you like and ignore the rest.
But, OH NO! We can’t teach the Constitution! IT’S ALL DEI & WOKE
LikeLike
And, gotta keep suggesting it. Canada, 51st state. Puerto Rico, 52 state. Expand like its 1820.
LikeLike
Kirk, sweetie, if you think this is a far left blog, you are a very sheltered person.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I’ve suggested he avail himself of a political science course in order better to understand the political spectrum.
Sheesh!
LikeLike
Diane–I had to laugh at your response. Earth to Kirk! Earth to Kirk! CBK
LikeLike
I’m not sure if my last comment went through. Just in case, this is for Kirk, sweete, to WOKE up with.
(“NEW YORK)— Despite its explicit claim to champion free speech, the conservative policy blueprint Project 2025 instead would do the opposite with proposals that are “unabashedly hostile” to free expression and the free flow of information, PEN America warned today in a new analysis.
“The free expression group said the Heritage Foundation blueprint for the next conservative White House seeks to impose a range of new controls over how government agencies, government-funded media outlets, and even the general population, communicate, share and receive information.
“Project 2025 goes so far as to propose banning words and phrases like “diversity,” “gender,” “reproductive health,” and “sexual orientation” from government documents; would turn long-standing government-funded global media—Voice of America among them— into propaganda outlets or shut them down; would defund the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which provides support to National Public Radio and the Public Broadcasting System, among other things; and advocates for a national ban of TikTok, a platform now used by one-third of all Americans. …”
Title: “Analysis: Project 2025 Wants to Censor Government Language with a Hit List of Forbidden Words” from pen.org
LikeLike
Mr. Manley,
I agree with you generally. However there is one significant issue requiring resolution prior to Canada accepting the USA as an equal.
You touched on it but did not explore it fully. It is the weak US economy. Canada’s, debt/capita at the end of 2023 was $53,600 and falling while the USA’s was $87,000 and rising. It would seem to me to take on a partner with such a shaky economic footing would be highly irresponsible.
The USA would need to bring this amount down and bring the trend under control before exchanging rings.
DD
LikeLike
Dear Mr. Dawkins,
Your point is well taken. Canada is in better financial shape than the U.S.
Did you know that Trump raised our national debt more than any other President in history? That was to give lower taxes to the wealthiest individuals and corporations.
He intends to do it again.
DR
LikeLike
Dear Ms, Ravitch,
I am aware. It is my belief he has treated the first four years as a practise run and it is his full intention to take the USA for every pfennig this time around. Either personally or for his cadré.
He is treating the first four years as a practise run. He is not subtle enough to hide his agenda. He has told everyone about his greed and need for control. He went farther telling everyone exactly how he will rape the nation. He is throwing up distraction noodles like snow in a blizzard, having had 4 years to plan.
Unless his masters tell him to do so he will never hire anyone smarter than he is this go around. A pretty low bar.
Without an American Spring I hold no hope for the USA being the land of milk and honey four years down the road. He will return the country to something much more like the Dirty Thirties.
D
LikeLike
Trump will produce either the Age of Robber Barons, or the roaring 20s preceding the Crash
LikeLike