Heather Cox Richardson reports on the preparations for Trump’s return to the White House. At the top of the priority list is removing all those officials who are not loyal to Trump. Forget the fact that those who took an oath of office pledged their loyalty to the Constitution. The higher loyalty in 2025 is to Trump personally.
She writes:
The incoming Trump administration is working to put its agenda into place.
Ranking member of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Representative Gerry Connolly (D-VA) warned that the loyalty purge “threatens our national security and our ability to respond quickly and effectively to the ongoing and very real global threats in a dangerous world.”
Although experts on the National Security Council usually carry over from one administration to the next, Aamer Madhani and Zeke Miller of the Associated Press today reported that incoming officials for the Trump administration are interviewing career senior officials on the National Security Council about their political contributions, how they voted in 2024, and whether they are loyal to Trump. Most of them are on loan from the State Department, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and the Central Intelligence Agency and, understanding that they are about to be fired, have packed up their desks to head back to their home agencies.
The National Security Council is the main forum for the president to hash out decisions in national security and foreign policy, and the people on it are picked for their expertise. But Trump’s expected pick to become his national security advisor—his primary advisor on all national security issues—Representative Mike Waltz (R-FL) told right-wing Breitbart News that he wants to staff the NSC with people who are “100 percent aligned with the president’s agenda.”
But during Trump’s first term, it was Alexander Vindman, who was detailed to the NSC, and his twin Eugene Vindman, who was serving the NSC as an ethics lawyer, who reported concerns about Trump’s July 2019 call to Ukraine president Volodymyr Zelensky to their superiors. This launched the investigation that became Trump’s first impeachment, and Trump appears anxious to make sure future NSC members will be fiercely loyal to him.
With extraordinarily slim majorities in the House and Senate, Republicans are talking about pushing through their entire agenda through Congress as a single bill in the process known as budget reconciliation. Budget reconciliation, which deals with matters related to spending, revenue, and the debt limit, is one of the few things that cannot be filibustered, meaning that Republicans could get a reconciliation bill through the Senate with just 50 votes. If they can hold their conference together, they could get the package through despite Democratic opposition.
House speaker Mike Johnson and Republican leaders have said that the House intends to pass a reconciliation bill that covers border security, defense spending, the extension of Trump’s 2017 tax cuts, spending cuts to social welfare programs, energy deregulation, and an increase in the national debt limit.
But Li Zhou of Vox points out that it’s not quite as simple as it sounds to get everything at once, because budget reconciliation measures are not supposed to include anything that doesn’t relate to the budget, and the Senate parliamentarian will advise stripping those things out. In addition, the budget cuts Republicans are circulating include cuts to popular programs like Medicaid, the Affordable Care Act (more commonly known as Obamacare), the Inflation Reduction Act’s investment in combating climate change, and the supplemental nutrition programs formerly known as food stamps.
Still, a lot can be done under budget reconciliation. Democrats under Biden passed the 2021 American Rescue Plan and the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act under reconciliation, and Republicans under Trump passed the 2017 Trump tax cuts the same way.
A wrinkle in those plans is the Republicans’ hope to raise the national debt limit. As soon as they take control of Congress and the White House, Republicans will have to deal immediately with the treasury running up against the debt limit, a holdover from World War I that sets a limit on how much the country can borrow. Although he has complained bitterly about spending under Biden, Trump has demanded that Congress either raise or abandon the debt ceiling because the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimates that the tax cuts he wants to extend will add $4.6 trillion to the deficit over the next ten years, and cost estimates for his deportation plans range from $88 billion to $315 billion a year.
Republicans are backing away from adding a debt increase to the budget reconciliation package out of concern that members of the far-right Freedom Caucus will kill the entire bill if they do. Those members want no part of raising the national debt and have demanded $2 trillion in budget cuts before they will consider it. Tonight, Senate majority leader John Thune (R-SD) told Jordain Carney of Politico that Senate Republicans expect the debt limit to be stripped out of the budget reconciliation measure.
So Republicans are currently exploring the idea of leveraging aid to California for the deadly fires in order to get Democrats to sign on to raising the debt ceiling. Meredith Lee Hill of Politico reported that Trump met with a group of influential House Republicans over dinner Sunday night at Mar-a-Lago to discuss tying aid for the wildfires to raising the debt ceiling. Today, House speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) confirmed to reporter Hill that this plan is under discussion.
Indeed, Republicans have been in the media suggesting that disaster aid to Democratic states should be tied to their adopting Republican policies. The Los Angeles fires have now claimed at least 24 lives. More than 15,000 firefighters are working to extinguish the wildfires, which have been driven by Santa Ana winds of up to 98 miles (158 km) an hour over ground scorched by high temperatures and low rainfall since last May, conditions caused by climate change.
On the Fox News Channel today, Representative Zach Nunn (R-IA) said: “We will certainly help those thousands of homes and families who have been devastated, but we also expect you to change bad behavior. We should look at the same for these blue states who have run away with a broken tax policy…. Those governors need to change their tune now.” Senator Ron Johnson (R-WI) blamed Democrats for the fires and said of federal disaster relief: “I certainly wouldn’t vote for anything unless we see a dramatic change in how they’re gonna be handling these things in the future.”
Aside from the morality of demanding concessions for disaster aid after President Joe Biden responded with full and unconditional support for regions hit by Hurricane Helene (although Tennessee governor Bill Lee is still lying that Biden delayed aid to his state, when in fact he delayed in asking for it, as required by law), there is a financial problem with this argument. As economist Paul Krugman noted today in his Krugman Wonks Out, California “is literally subsidizing the rest of the United States, red states in particular, through the federal budget.”
In 2022, the most recent year for which information is available, California paid $83 billion more to the federal government than it got back. Washington state also subsidized the rest of the country, as did most of the Northeast. That money flowed to Republican-dominated states, which contributed far less to the federal government than they received in return.
Krugman noted that “if West Virginia were a country, it would in effect be receiving foreign aid equal to more than 20 percent of its G[ross] D[omestic] P[roduct].” Krugman refers to the federal government as “an insurance company with an army,” and he notes that there is “nothing either the city or the state could have done to prevent” the wildfires. “If the United States of America doesn’t take care of its own citizens, wherever they live and whatever their politics, we should drop “United” from our name,” he writes. “As it happens, however, California—a major driver of U.S. prosperity and power—definitely has earned the right to receive help during a crisis.”
Today, Biden announced student loan forgiveness for another 150,000 borrowers, bringing the total number of people relieved of student debt to more than 5 million borrowers, who have received $183.6 billion in relief. This has been achieved through making sure existing debt relief programs were followed, as they had not been in the past.
Establishment Republicans continue to fight MAGA Republicans, and MAGA fights among itself: former Trump ally Steve Bannon yesterday called Trump’s sidekick Elon Musk “truly evil” and vowed to “take this guy down.” But even as their enablers in the legacy media are normalizing Republican behavior, a reality-based media is stepping up to counter the disinformation.

Who is the “reality-based media”?
I think ProPublica is still on the reality-based list?
Amazon may not be considered part of the news media, but Amazon is the biggest bookstore in the world. And Jeff Bezos jumped onto FELON47’s loyalty wagon along with Mark Zuckerberg’s Facebook, probably the biggest social media news/gossip and now fascist propaganda site in the world.
“Facebook quietly removes fact checking, hate speech policy“
Facebook quietly removes fact checking, hate speech policy | Nation & World News | komu.com
We, who do not live in the world of alternative facts (two words used to sane-wash lies, hoaxes and conspiracy theories), could use an updated list now that some media that was once reality-based jumped ship, climbed on FELON47’s loyalty wagon, and is now sane-washing MAGA and the felon.
LikeLike
California could conduct effective guerilla warfare because it has a key role in the overall U.S. economy in the huge amount of products flowing into and out of the United States do so through California seaports.
It is the constitutional duty of any state to assure the safety of its citizens, so California could institute strict, time-consuming, costly safety inspections of container trucks that are entering California from other states and that are preparing to leave the seaports to deliver goods throughout the country.
Slow, thorough safety inspections of port facilities, such as container cranes used to offload ships and load trucks, would also be required.
The resulting delays in offloading and shipping out goods would tank the national economy and put great pressure on the Trumpsters in Congress to keep their grubby hands off of California and any other blue state.
It is time to play hard ball in order to save our democracy.
I wonder if Democrats have the guts to play hard ball even to save our democracy.
LikeLike
The president is supposed to help all Americans when there is a natural disaster. Biden never made aid from the federal government a bargaining chip. I hope Democrats pay hardball. Playing softball has lost them the respect of too many voters.
LikeLike
Trump will send disaster relief to red states.
Will he help blue states?
LikeLike
What would the Dems “playing hardball” look like?
LikeLike
Wait, you’re proposing that California destroy the economy as a form of political “hardball”? No offense but that is easily the dumbest thing I have seen on the internet in a whole.
LikeLike
Haven’t the Rethugs been doing just that- threatening the country with intimidating, menacing economic disasters with their budget shenanigans for the last 30-40 years?
The Dims have no cojones to do so, so you don’t have to worry about it FLERP!
LikeLike
Call me crazy, Duane, but I don’t think tanking the national economy is a good strategy or a good negotiating tactic! There are many reasons why I’m not a Republican and having a party that is not suicidal and/or homicidal is just one of them.
LikeLike
I don’t think it is either, but the facts are that both parties, the Rethugs more so than the Dims haven’t been afraid to tank it.
LikeLike
Duane,
I had the very same thought. The Dems doing what the Republicans have done for decades in order to successfully control all branches of government, and the media, would be “dumb”?
Dems are afraid of just this kind of attack if they stand up to Republicans. Republicans can play hardball and destroy the economy and they are praised for “looking strong” and never, ever accused of destroying the economy. There is a reason that Americans think Republicans are the party that is good on the economy, despite it not being true. And if it’s not because Republicans play hardball that makes Americans trust Republicans to be good on the economy, and we aren’t allowed to blame the co-opted liberal media for legitimizing right wing propaganda that treats trickle down economic ideas as totally valid even after they failed over and over, then perhaps we should all just give up.
But since the options are to give up and let the right wing authoritarian government steamroll us, or play “political hardball” and be insulted by folks who call that the dumbest thing, I agree with playing political hardball. It’s not as if NOT playing political hardball is going to prevent the authoritarian takeover of the country, and the destruction of our economy. What is there to lose? The dumbest thing to me is giving into authoritarianism without any fight.
LikeLike
A recent post by Thom Hartman suggested that Democrats should try to seize the grievance market from Republicans, who have cornered it around false factual information.
I personally oppose grievance politics, finding in history a lot of unintended consequences of such behavior. I do see the frustration of those tired of Republicans employing various tactics to get people to vote against their own self interests.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Roy,
“Democrats should try to seize the grievance market from Republicans, who have cornered it around false factual information.”
No, exactly no. The Dims have been trying to coop the Rethugs on many issues and when they attempt to do so they fail spectaculary. . . . Why?
Because they have no cojones to come up with their own brand, and since Clinton and the horrid “third way” have tried to out do the Rethugs at their own game.
“Seizing the grievance market” is a guaranteed loser as most of the voting populace has seen that in DEI and identity politics and rejected them. Not to mention starting off so far behind the Rethugs that they can’t ever “catch up”.
LikeLike
“I wonder if Democrats have the guts to play hard ball even to save our democracy.”
No, they don’t and haven’t since Saint Unca Ronnie occupied the White House.
LikeLike
Dems didn’t play political hardball when Jimmy Carter was president, either. That’s why we don’t have universal healthcare like virtually every other western nation.
You might have to go back to since LBJ occupied the White House. I heard he was very good at playing hardball when it came to economic policies.
FDR played “political hardball” (and saved the economy) when he threatened to pack the Supreme Court.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Feckless Garland let the Putin puppet take the ball home to his his toilet.
LikeLike
It’s going to be up to a handful of Republican senators and representatives to preserve our democracy. To stand strong and fulfill their sworn duty. Think McCain.
They risk losing in the midterms, but maybe not. Trump could very well start losing his appeal as his campaign promises start to exit stage left. And blaming it on the Dems rings hollow when you’ve got a majority in both Senate and House.
LikeLike