Peter Greene reminds us of an important anniversary that we should have commemorated: the arrival of 6-year-old Ruby Bridges at the William Frantz Elementary School in New Orleans, where she was the first Black child. She had to walk through crowds of screaming whites, mostly women, who didn’t want her to integrate the school. She integrated the school, but the white children were gone. She was the only child in her class, and she developed a close relationship with her kind teacher.
He writes:
Things got busy here at the Institute this week, so I missed posting about this anniversary on Thursday. But I don’t want to overlook it for another year.
On November 14, Ruby Bridges was six years old, three months younger than the Supreme Court’s Brown v. Board of Education. Six years old.
She had attended a segregated kindergarten in New Orleans. The district gave Black children a test to see if they would be allowed to attend the all-white William Frantz Elementary School. Six passed. Two decided not to go through with it. The three other girls were sent to a different all-white school; Ruby Bridges would be the only Black student desegregating William Frantz.
Her father was not sure he wanted to put her through that. Her mother argued it had to be done for her daughter and “for all African-American children.”
This was three years after the Little Rock Nine were escorted into school by the National Guard. Conditions in the South had not improved. A crowd came out to hurl insults and threaten a six year old child.

“What really protected me is the innocence of a child,” Bridges said at an event last Thursday.“Because even though you all saw that and I saw what you saw, my 6-year-old mind didn’t tell me that I needed to be afraid. Like why would I be afraid of a crowd? I see that all the time.”
But it is still shocking to see pictures of the protests. They made a picture of a coffin, with a Black baby in it, and paraded it around the school. Along with a cross. Bridges was the only child in her class– white parents pulled their children out, and many teachers refused to teach. The boycott was eventually broken by a Methodist minister, but Bridges still was shunned, her father fired, her family barred from some local businesses.
It’s Ruby Bridges portrayed in the Norman Rockwell painting “The Problem We All Live With.” one of his first works after he left The Saturday Evening Post. It earned him sackfulls of angry mail, calling him, among other things, a “race traitor.”
This week, many schools celebrated a Ruby Bridges Walk To School Day in schools all around the country.
There is a common narrative, that in the sixties we pretty much settled all the racial issues in this country and that demands for equity ever since have just been a political ploy to grab undeserved goodies. “We fixed that stuff,” the argument goes, “so we shouldn’t need to be talking about it now. You sure you don’t have some other reason for bringing it up?” It’s the narrative that brings us to a President-elect who claims that since we fixed racism in the sixties, it’s white folks who have been the victims, and who need reparations.

But here’s what I want to underline– Ruby Bridges is alive. Not even old lady alive, but just 70. Presumably most of the children gathered around that coffin and cross are also alive, probably a few of those adults as well (Bridges’s mother died in 2020).
This is not some episode from the distant past. It’s not about some form of schooling that belongs to some dead-and-gone generation. The anniversary is a reminder to do better, to be better, a reminder that it really wasn’t very long ago that a whole lot of people thought it was okay to threaten a six year old child with abuse and violence. White folks don’t need to hang their heads in shame and embarrassment, but neither should they say, “That was people from another time, long ago and far away,” as a way to feel better about the whole business. It can happen here. It just happened here. Pay attention and do the work to make sure it isn’t happening tomorrow.

Ruby Bridges books…
https://www.scholastic.com/site/ruby-bridges/books.html
LikeLike
If we had resolved racism in the ’60s, it still wouldn’t be an issue that continues to plague this country. The federal government gave up on trying to enforce integration, and so many schools remain aligned by race and class today. The federal government also made a tremendous misjudgment in funding the privatization of education under the guise of “choice.” Choice results in enhanced segregation, and charter schools ushered in vouchers which spawned universal vouchers which can lead to the dismantling of foundational public schools that support democracy and integration. Our current policy in education highlights the failure of the federal government to take its commitment to integration, civics education and equity seriously. The federal and state governments should not be funding schools that allow discrimination because so-called choice is veiled license to discriminate.
LikeLike
Exactly right. The choice movement is promoted by people who want to restore segregation.
LikeLike
Public money should fund legitimate public schools. People’s individual educational choices should be funded by personal dollars or funds from magnanimous billionaires. The public should not be compelled to fund schools that discriminate. We need to stop diminishing public school budgets to benefit private contractors and affluent families.
LikeLike
If Ruby with Family, Friends & Supporters could do it. All by her little lonesome. Then so can we. Because this is a Ruby Bridges Moment for each of us. Forget about it happening tomorrow. It is happening right this very minute to one and all.
LikeLike
Ruby Bridges and I are the same age, a fact that used to leave my students’ mouths agape when I shared it. I remember not understanding what was going on when I saw her trying to attend school on the news.
I don’t understand what I see on the news now, either.
LikeLike
Thankful that, this, young six-year-old, as she walked into an, all-white school, she didn’t know to, fear. This is, one tiny step for a, little girl, but a, huge leap for, civil rights!
LikeLike
RACIAL RESEGREGATION of America’s school systems by the private charter school industry is so blatant and illegal that both the NAACP and ACLU have called for a stop to the formation of any more charter schools. The Civil Rights Project at UCLA summed it up, stating that charter schools are “a civil rights failure.”
“SCHOOL CHOICE”: The catch-phrase “school choice” was concocted by racists following the U.S. Supreme Court’s 1954 Brown v. Board of Education ruling that required racial integration in public schools. After that, racist organizations used racist politicians to conduct a decades-long attack that underfunded public schools and crippled their ability to provide the full measure of education and to “prove” that public schools were “failing”. That public school “failure” is an issue manufactured by racists organizations and politicians is well-documented in the book “The Manufactured Crisis”.
THERE’S NO SUCH THING as a “public charter school”. Charter school operators spend a lot of taxpayer money telling taxpayers that charter schools are “public” schools — but they are not. As the Supreme Courts of Washington State and New York State have ruled, charter schools are actually private schools because THEY FAIL TO PASS THE MINIMUM TEST for being genuine public schools; that is — They aren’t run by school boards who are elected by, and therefore under the control of and accountable to voting taxpayers, that is, THE PUBLIC. All — ALL — charter schools are corporations run by private parties or are religious organizations. Taxpayers have no say in how their tax dollars are spent in charter schools.
CHARTER STUDENTS LOSE GROUND: The Stanford University Center for Research on Education Outcomes (CREDO) — which is funded by pro-charter organizations — has reported that in the case of popular online charter schools, students actually lose ground in both reading and math — but online charter schools are the fastest-growing type of charter school because they make it easiest to skim away public tax dollars. CREDO has been conducting years-long research into the educational quality of charter schools and yet even this charter-school-funded research center’s findings are that in general charter schools don’t do any better academically than genuine public schools.
FINANCIAL FRAUD BY CHARTER SCHOOLS IS STEALING TAXPAYER MONEY FROM GENUINE PUBLIC SCHOOLS: The impartial, non-political watchdog Office of Inspector General of the U.S. Department of Education issued a report warning that so much taxpayer money is being skimmed away from America’s genuine public schools and pocketed by private corporate “school choice” charter school operators that the IG investigation declared: “Charter schools and their management organizations pose a potential risk to federal funds even as they threaten to fall short of meeting goals.”
In the 1990’s, Wall Street hedge fund billionaires discovered that they could profit from the “school choice” movement and so they took over by founding corporate chains of charter schools that have reaped billions of dollars since then through various mechanisms, such as REITs that collect exorbitant lease and rental profits from charter schools…as the expense of public schools.
THE MOST EFFECTIVE STRATEGY FOR DISMANTLING THE CHARTER SCHOOL MOVEMENT is to simply require that charter schools file THE SAME, EXACT PUBLIC DOMAIN QUARTERLY AND ANNUAL BUDGET REPORTS THAT PUBLIC SCHOOLS ARE REQUIRED TO FILE.
Every state in our nation should have that same common sense accountability requirement for charter schools — and that hook of financial accountability with taxpayer money should be a successful strategy to win votes.
LikeLike
A few days ago, I had a look at the history of the Insurrection Act that I’ve read Traitor Trump plans to use to implement his mass deportation plans.
“The Insurrection Act has been invoked numerous times throughout American history for a variety of purposes. Presidents George Washington and John Adams used it in response to early rebellions against federal authority. President Abraham Lincoln invoked it at the start of the Civil War, and President Ulysses Grant used it to crush the first incarnation of the Ku Klux Klan in the 1870s. Several other presidents, including Andrew Jackson, Rutherford Hayes, and Grover Cleveland, have deployed troops under the Insurrection Act to intervene in labor disputes, invariably on the side of employers. Most famously, Presidents Eisenhower, Kennedy, and Lyndon B. Johnson all invoked the Insurrection Act during the civil rights movement to enforce federal court orders desegregating schools and other institutions in the South.”
“What Is The Insurrection Act That Trump Is Threatening To Invoke?”
— NPR
Thomas Jefferson Signed the Insurrection Act in 1807 to Foil a Plot by Aaron Burr | HISTORY
LikeLike
“THERE’S NO SUCH THING as a “public charter school”.”
Sadly, there is. . . at least here in the Show Me State as the law authorizing charter schools (in St. Louis and Kansas City only) states that charter schools are to be called “public charter schools.”
LikeLike