The New York Times was recently the target of a protest by a group protesting its “sanewashing” of Trump, that is, publishing stories that made his incoherent speeches sound normal when they were not. Critics have complained that the Times published many stories about Biden’s age and his gaffes and misstatements, but overlooked Trump’s gaffes and persistent lying.
With this story by Peter Baker and Dylan Freedman, with the assistance of two journalists who excerpted relevant videos, the Times may have mollified the critics. The story contains excellent video clips that show Trump making incoherent statements. Unfortunately, I was unable to copy them. Each of them shows Trump saying what is quoted in the article.
The story begins:
Former President Donald J. Trump vividly recounted how the audience at his climactic debate with Vice President Kamala Harris was on his side. Except that there was no audience. The debate was held in an empty hall. No one “went crazy,” as Mr. Trump put it, because no one was there.
Anyone can misremember, of course. But the debate had been just a week earlier and a fairly memorable moment. And it was hardly the only time Mr. Trump has seemed confused, forgetful, incoherent or disconnected from reality lately. In fact, it happens so often these days that it no longer even generates much attention.
He rambles, he repeats himself, he roams from thought to thought — some of them hard to understand, some of them unfinished, some of them factually fantastical. He voices outlandish claims that seem to be made up out of whole cloth. He digresses into bizarre tangents about golf, about sharks, about his own “beautiful” body. He relishes “a great day in Louisiana” after spending the day in Georgia. He expresses fear that North Korea is “trying to kill me” when he presumably means Iran. As late as last month, Mr. Trump was still speaking as if he were running against President Biden, five weeks after his withdrawal from the race.
With Mr. Biden out, Mr. Trump, at 78, is now the oldest major party nominee for president in history and would be the oldest president ever if he wins and finishes another term at 82. A review of Mr. Trump’s rallies, interviews, statements and social media posts finds signs of change since he first took the political stage in 2015. He has always been discursive and has often been untethered to truth, but with the passage of time his speeches have grown darker, harsher, longer, angrier, less focused, more profane and increasingly fixated on the past.
According to a computer analysis by The New York Times, Mr. Trump’s rally speeches now last an average of 82 minutes, compared with 45 minutes in 2016. Proportionately, he uses 13 percent more all-or-nothing terms like “always” and “never” than he did eight years ago, which some experts consider a sign of advancing age.
Similarly, he uses 32 percent more negative words than positive words now, compared with 21 percent in 2016, which can be another indicator of cognitive change. And he uses swearwords 69 percent more often than he did when he first ran, a trend that could reflect what experts call disinhibition. (A study by Stat, a health care news outlet, produced similar findings.)
Mr. Trump frequently reaches to the past for his frame of reference, often to the 1980s and 1990s, when he was in his tabloid-fueled heyday. He cites fictional characters from that era like Hannibal Lecter from “Silence of the Lip” (he meant “Silence of the Lambs”), asks “where’s Johnny Carson, bring back Johnny” (who died in 2005) and ruminates on how attractive Cary Grant was (“the most handsome man”). He asks supporters whether they remember the landing in New York of Charles Lindbergh, who actually landed in Paris and long before Mr. Trump was born.
He seems confused about modern technology, suggesting that “most people don’t have any idea what the hell a phone app is” in a country where 96 percent of people own a smartphone. If sometimes he seems stuck in the 1990s, there are moments when he pines for the 1890s, holding out that decade as the halcyon period of American history and William McKinley as his model president because of his support for tariffs.
And he heads off into rhetorical cul-de-sacs. “So we built a thing called the Panama Canal,” he told the conservative host Tucker Carlson last year. “We lost 35,000 people to the mosquito, you know, malaria. We lost 35,000 people building — we lost 35,000 people because of the mosquito. Vicious. They had to build under nets. It was one of the true great wonders of the world. As he said, ‘One of the nine wonders of the world.’ No, no, it was one of the seven. It just happened a little while ago. You know, he says, ‘Nine wonders of the world.’ You could make nine wonders. He would’ve been better off if he stuck with the nine and just said, ‘Yeah, I think it’s nine….’”
Mr. Trump dismisses any concerns and insists that he has passed cognitive tests. “I go for two hours without teleprompters, and if I say one word slightly out, they say, ‘He’s cognitively impaired,’” he complained at a recent rally. He calls his meandering style “the weave” and asserts that it is an intentional and “brilliant” communication strategy….
How much his rambling discourse — what some experts call tangentiality — can be attributed to age is the subject of some debate. Mr. Trump has always had a distinctive speaking style that entertained and captivated supporters even as critics called him detached from reality. Indeed, questions have been raised about Mr. Trump’s mental fitness for years.
John F. Kelly, his second White House chief of staff, was so convinced that Mr. Trump was psychologically unbalanced that he bought a book called “The Dangerous Case of Donald Trump,” written by 27 mental health professionals, to try to understand his boss better. As it was, Mr. Kelly came to refer to Mr. Trump’s White House as “Crazytown….”
He does not stick to a single train of thought for long. During one 10-minute stretch in Mosinee, Wis., last month, for instance, he ping-ponged from topic to topic: Ms. Harris’s record; the virtues of the merit system; Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s endorsement; supposed corruption at the F.D.A., the C.D.C. and the W.H.O.; the Covid-19 pandemic; immigration; back to the W.H.O.; China; Mr. Biden’s age; Ms. Harris again; Mr. Biden again; chronic health problems and childhood diseases; back to Mr. Kennedy; the “Biden crime family”; the president’s State of the Union address; Franklin D. Roosevelt; the 25th Amendment; the “parasitic political class”; Election Day; back to immigration; Senator Tammy Baldwin; back to immigration; energy production; back to immigration; and Ms. Baldwin again.
Some of what he says is inexplicable except to those who listen to him regularly and understand the shorthand. And he throws out assertions without any apparent regard for whether they are true or not. Lately, he has claimed that crowds Ms. Harris has drawn were not real but the creation of artificial intelligence, never mind the reporters and cameras on hand to record them.
He mispronounces names and places with some regularity — “Charlottestown” instead of “Charlottesville,” “Minnianapolis” instead of “Minneapolis,” the website “Snoops”instead of “Snopes,” “Leon” Musk instead of “Elon.”
In Rome, Ga., he went on an extended riff about Mr. Biden in swim trunks on a beach. “Look, at 81 — do you remember Cary Grant? How good was Cary Grant, right? I don’t think Cary Grant, he was good. I don’t know what happened to movie stars today. We used to have Cary Grant and Clark Gable and all these people. Today we have — I won’t say names because I don’t need enemies. I don’t need enemies. I got enough enemies. But Cary Grant was like, Michael Jackson once told me, ‘The most handsome man, Trump, in the world.’ Who? ‘Cary Grant.’ Well, we don’t have that anymore. But Cary Grant at 81 or 82 — going on 100, this guy, he’s 81 going on 100 — Cary Grant wouldn’t look too good in a bathing suit either, and he was pretty good-looking, right?…”
He considers himself the master of nearly every subject. He said Venezuelan gangs were armed “with MK-47s,” evidently meaning AK-47s, and then added, “I know that gun very well” because “I’ve become an expert on guns.” He claims to have been named “man of the year” in Michigan, although no such prize exists.
He is easily distracted. He halted in the middle of another extended monologue when he noticed a buzzing insect. “Oh, there’s a fly,” he said. “Oh. I wonder where the fly came from. See? Two years ago, I wouldn’t have had a fly up here. You’re changing rapidly. But we can’t take it any longer.”
But like some people approaching the end of their eighth decade, he is not open to correction. “Trump is never wrong,” he said recently in Wisconsin. “I am never, ever wrong.”

Oh I’m sure there will be a list of reasons why this article is not sufficient and in fact is further evidence of the Times being in the tank for Trump.
LikeLike
And complete with ALL the political buzzwords du jour.
LikeLike
Good article, and the comment thread is interesting too.
I often think back on something an older cousin once told me. I was in my early 30’s, venting about certain behavior of my mother’s that had gotten worse, not better. He pointed out that one’s foibles don’t usually ‘get better’ as one ages, they get more pronounced.
LikeLike
Oh, well. . . . just Trump being Trump . . . . How about that hair that was out of place on Kamala’s head. What about THAT, huh? CBK
LikeLike
That dumpster was NEVER SANE or intelligent! He’s ball of LIES and a totally SHAMEFUL person. He has no intelligence and would make America the “mockery” of the free world and …Putin would be happy, because he would “own that dumpster.”
LikeLike
Put this on your resume: “I’m never wrong about anything.”
You’ll have to get a bigger mailbox for the job offers generated from such a line . . . from MAGA employers, right after some sane person drives you to the nearest insane asylum.
“Move over, Hitler . . . wait until you see what I did.” CBK.
LikeLike
With Trump’s racism and his convictions, he would never be hired for a job in the federal government. Even at the lowest level.
LikeLike
I found it rather laughable to read this news analysis about Trump when on the SAME DAY, the NYT ran a big news story about Trump’s appearance in Butler, PA, that completely sane-washed Trump. Looking at today’s “Trump is a normal candidate” news coverage, my guess is this is another one-off article that even the writers of the article will say is no longer newsworthy – they’ve written one article about it, and now they have to write 10 or 50 negative articles about Kamala to make up for this single “negative” Trump article. Because that’s what being “fair and balanced” means.
Peter Baker co-wrote this story. But four weeks ago, on September 9, NYT writer Peter Baker wrote a similar one-off story:
“As Debate Looms, Trump Is Now the One Facing Questions About Age and Capacity”
Despite Trump’s disastrous debate performance right after this article came out (“they’re eating the dogs..they’re eating the cats!”), Peter Baker followed up that September 9 article with his sane-washing analysis article a couple days later:
“Harris and Trump Bet on Their Own Sharply Contrasting Views of America: Former President Donald J. Trump is gambling that Americans are as angry as he is, while Vice President Kamala Harris hopes voters are exhausted by the Trump era and ready to move on.”
“These two visions of America on display during the first and possibly only presidential debate between Ms. Harris and Mr. Trump on Tuesday night encapsulated the gambles that each candidate is taking in this hotly contested campaign. Mr. Trump is betting on anger and Ms. Harris on exhaustion. Mr. Trump is trying to repackage and resell his “American carnage” theme eight years later, while Ms. Harris is appealing to those ready to leave that in the past….
…Elections are, of course, about contrasts and the contrast between the candidates now on offer this campaign season is as stark as any in modern history — not just along ideological, cultural, temperamental, demographic or generational lines but in fundamental outlook.
Mr. Trump has always been about extremes, articulating an all-or-nothing Manichaean worldview in which the country is a virtual paradise on earth when he is in charge and going to hell when he is not. “We had no problems when Trump was president,” he said, attributing the claim to a European autocrat. Now that he is out of office, Mr. Trump added, “the whole world” is “blowing up,” and “we’re a failing nation.”
The 200+ NYT articles that followed the Biden-Trump debate were ALL focused on Biden’s cognitive decline (even a NYT article about a NATO press conference BEGAN with “During a nearly hourlong news conference on Thursday, President Biden delivered a series of sometimes shaky answers but also demonstrated a command of foreign policy and avoided a repeat of the worst moments of his debate performance that prompted calls for him to abandon his re-election campaign.”)
But one month ago, after writing a single article questioning Trump’s mental status, Peter Baker followed up Trump’s disastrous debate performance with an article NORMALIZING Trump!
Instead of writing one or hundreds of post-debate article that presented the doubts and questions about Trump’s mental status in the first line and as the main subject, as was done with virtually every post-debate Biden story, Baker presented Kamala and Trump as equals, offering “contrasting visions”.
Buried in Peter Baker’s post-debate “analysis” of the “contrasting visions” offered by Trump and Kamala – in the 11th or 12th paragraph – is a mention of Trump’s questionable debate performance. Along with a mention of how Kamala Harris “stretched the truth” and “ducked questions” and was guilty of doing to Trump what she accused him of doing.
My very low expectation is that the NYT start covering Trump the same way they covered Biden. But what I know will happen is what has already happened – one article followed by 30 days of sane-washing reporting. Where all the crazy stuff Trump says is sane-washed or buried deep in a story about how Trump got huge cheers from the crowd as he attacked Kamala or said xxx. No mention of the serious concerns and doubts voters have about Trump’s cognitive fitness. Trump’s cognitive fitness is no longer “newsworthy”, just like all the revelations in Jack Smith’s immunity filing are no longer newsworthy. One article, then pretend it never happened.
Kamala “ducking” interviews is so important that it must be alluded to in 100s of news stories. Trump’s cognitive fitness and his corruption get reported once and forgotten. If you don’t believe me, check out the sane-washing NYT coverage for the 30 days following the previous Peter Baker article that was supposed to signal a change in coverage but ended up just being Peter Baker himself joining in on the sane-washing with his post-debate article about Trump!
The NYT believes that publishing this single article now allows them to continue to sane-wash Trump for the next 30 days right up to the election. They have already demonstrated this with their coverage yesterday and today.
LikeLike
I refuse to subscribe to the NYT.
LikeLike
Yes!
LikeLike