The National Education Policy Center is hosting a webinar on the implications of federal funding of religious schools. Actually, two webinars, on September 26. Sign up here.
NEPC writes:
Should religious schools be publicly funded? And what are the implications when they are?
These questions have become increasingly relevant in the United States in the wake of Espinoza v. Montana (2020) and Carson v. Makin (2022), two U.S. Supreme Court cases that forced states, under certain circumstances, to provide public funding to private religious schools. But questions raised by such public funding are not unique to our nation. In fact, many of the issues currently confronting the United States have already been wrestled with in other countries around the world.
On September 26th, two back-to-back webinars will explore these trends and issues, with an eye to helping parents, teachers, administrators, scholars, advocates, journalists, and other education stakeholders better understand the history and impact of state-funded religious education in the U.S. and abroad.
The webinars, which are free to register for and attend, feature the authors of articles in a new special issue of the Peabody Journal of Education, a peer-refereed publication. This special issue on publicly funded religious schools considers research findings around equity, segregation, and discrimination as they relate to state-funded religious education. Studies presented in the special issue were conducted in Canada, Spain, and the U.S., and they examine how state-funded religious education has shifted over time as a result of factors such as legal rulings, politics, demographic changes, global migration, and education privatization.
The webinars are sponsored by NEPC, which invites the public to attend either or both.
Law and Public Discourse is the title of the first webinar in the series, which runs from noon to 1 pm Eastern Time.
Kathleen Sellers of Duke University will moderate. Panelists are Sue Winton of York University in Canada and NEPC Fellows Bruce Baker of the University of Miami, Suzanne Eckes of the University of Wisconsin, Preston Green of the University of Connecticut, and Kevin Welner of the University of Colorado.
The second webinar, Catholic Culture and Market Concerns, will be held right after the first one, from 1 to 2 pm Eastern on September 26th.
Joel Malin of Miami University will moderate. Panelists will be James Coviello, Stephen Kotok, and Catherine DiMartino, all of St. John’s University, Clara Fontdevila of the University of Glasgow in Scotland, Adrián Zancajo and Antoni Verger of the Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain, and Ee-Seul Yoon of the University of Manitoba, Canada.
Click here now to register for one or both of these two webinars.
For those interested in reading the underlying articles in the Peabody journal, they’re available (although some are behind a paywall) as follows:
Fontdevila, C., Zancajo, A., & Verger, A. (2024). Catholic Schools in the Marketplace: Changing and Enduring Religious Identities
Green, P., Baker, B., & Eckes, S. (2024). The Potential for Race Discrimination in Voucher Programs in a Post-Carson World
Kotok, S., DiMartino, C.C., & Coviello, J. (2024). New York City Catholic Schools Operating in the Public Space in a Post-Makin World
Welner, K. (2024). Charting the Path to the Outsourcing of Discrimination Through School Choice
Winton, S. (2024). Same Arguments, Different Outcomes: Struggles Over Private School Funding in Alberta and Ontario, Canada
Yoon, E.S. (2024). Unequal City and Inequitable Choice: The Neoliberal State’s Development of School Choice and Marketization in the Publicly Funded Catholic School Board in Toronto, Canada
Yoon, E.S., Malin, J.R., Sellers, K.M., & Welner, K.G. (2024). Should Religious Schools Be Publicly Funded? Issues of Religion, Discrimination, and Equity

Will we be able to view the archived Webinars?
I tutor at the Public Library via BoulderREADS on those dates and times.
Thank you, Diane!
LikeLike
Unfortunately, the webinars won’t be recorded.
LikeLike
Maybe the RELIGIOUS SCHOOLS could remain down on their knees 🙏🏽 praying for the school kids in Springfield Ohio. Today 9/17 these brave public school families were met by The Ohio State Highway Patrol. This is the ONLY way the Governor can guarantee that classrooms have even a chance at a safe & complete instructional day.
Ohio State Highway Patrol officers were inside and outside Snowhill Elementary and other Springfield City Schools buildings early Tuesday morning 9/17 on the first day of a new state-led program to ensure safety in the school district.
The Snowhill school day doesn’t begin until 8:30 a.m., but since some kids come for breakfast that starts earlier, OHSP officers were standing ready by 7:30 a.m.
Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine said Monday 9/16 that 36 members of OHSP’s field force would sweep all school district buildings for safety each morning before classes. That would include the use of specially trained K-9s among other steps.
The district has been hit REPEATEDLY by a series of bomb threats that has forced them to evacuate a total of 6 schools Thursday, Friday and Monday. Real safety worries from those threats were mixed with the frustration that all of the 33 threats in Springfield the past several days had been hoaxes and that these ruses continued to disrupt kids’ learning.
Barring unexpected circumstances, Springfield City Schools will now stay open the rest of this week with increased safety measures, rather than closing school buildings as they’ve done in recent days when they received non-credible bomb threats.
The OHSP officers will stay around during the school day and past dismissal,
https://www.springfieldnewssun.com/news/highway-patrol-greets-springfield-school-families-in-new-safety-effort/7PYQWUW47BCFNIWKHPXQIWB7NY/
LikeLike
Thanks for the link.
LikeLike
I have an idea: Give religious institutions a choice. I they insist on public dollars then they will have to pay taxes like every other business in America because they are then political entities.
LikeLike
That might be a choice that did not get a lot of support. Choice is a relative thing.
LikeLike
The religious schools that get public funding should take the same tests as other students. They should also adhere to non-discrimination law. No exclusion of students because of their race, religion, special ed status, or LGBT+. Live by the same requirements as public schools.
LikeLike
I agree. They should also be taxed. Religious institution have been given a pass for too long and have participated in political activity, which is supposed to be the line in the sand that ends their special status.
LikeLike
There are intensely political orgs like ALEC that enjoy tax-exempt status.
LikeLike
I just read this piece in the Times about Leonard Leo,https://www.nytimes.com/2024/09/18/opinion/leonard-leo-fundraising-supreme-court-irs.html, that articulates the abuse of both religious and not for profit tax breaks. Meaningful tax reform is critical in regard to this misuse of philanthropic giving. The question is whether the Democratic Party has the stomach to take it on. Perhaps Republican never Trumpets could see this as a way to overcome the practices that led to MAGA.
LikeLike
According to a recent NEA article, “Forcing American taxpayers to fund private religious education—even when those private schools fail to meet education standards, intentionally discriminate against students, or use public funds to promote religious training, worship, and instruction—erodes the foundation of our democracy and harms students,” NEA President Becky Pringle said.
It certainly harms public schools when the transferred funds come from public schools budgets, and private religious schools are not held to the same level of accountability as public schools. In addition, no public dollars should be used for schools that discriminate.https://www.nea.org/nea-today/all-news-articles/supreme-court-decision-paves-way-public-funds-flow-religious-schools
LikeLike
It took almost two decades before Federal Courts got to busing as a remedy for segregated schools after Brown v. Board because half or more of Americans were determined to resist integration (This wasn’t limited to the South). The local and state resistance, along with court complicity, eventually rendered the spirit of Brown v. Board toothless. The current battle over funding of religious schools would be a final nail in the coffin of Brown should the advocates for parochial and Christian Schools have their way. The entire enterprise has been a reestablishment of schools that are segregated by race and income. This is very clear through the organizations that are funding such efforts, from Catholics to right winged evangelical interests.
LikeLike
Related: https://www.propublica.org/article/ohio-taxpayer-money-funding-private-religious-schools
LikeLike
thought you might be interested in this.
Who Should Teach about Anti-Semitism in our Schools.
Word for the day: Chutzpah
https://carolkocivar.substack.com/p/who-should-teach-about-anti-semitism
LikeLike