Thom Hartmann is a keen observer of American politics. A prolific writer, he sees issues in historical perspective. He knows that your grandfather’s Republican Party was conservative and imbued with a sense of devotion to community and tradition. Conservatives conserve, not destroy. That party today is devoted to disruption, to destroying communities and their public schools, to protecting the billionaires, and to mocking the weak. It is not your grandfather’s Republican Party.
Thom Hartmann writes:
During the 1950s, Republicans were the party that promoted labor unions, Social Security, and a top 91% income tax bracket and 70% estate tax on the morbidly rich. Dwight Eisenhower successfully campaigned on what we’d call a progressive agenda for re-election in 1956.
During the Reagan years, Republicans embraced Milton Friedman’s neoliberalism with its free trade, opposition to unions, ending free college, and tax cuts for the fat cats. They called themselves “the party of new ideas.” They may have done more harm than good, but for most Republicans it was a good-faith effort.
Today, they’ve pretty much given up on all of that. All they have left is cruelty.
When Governor Tim Walz gave his heartwarming acceptance speech Wednesday night here at the DNC in Chicago, his son Gus was caught on camera proudly proclaiming, through tear-streaked eyes, “That’s my dad!”
The response from Trumpy Republicans was immediate: Ann Coulter wrote, “Talk about weird.” Rightwing hate jock Jay Weber posted, “Meet my son, Gus. He’s a blubbering bitch boy. His mother and I are very proud.” Trumpy podcaster Mike Crispi ridiculed Walz’s “stupid crying son,” adding, “You raised your kid to be a puffy beta male. Congrats.” Another well-known podcaster on the right, Alec Lace, said, “Get that kid a tampon already.”
Compassion for a learning-disabled child is dead on the right: all they have left is cruelty.
Ronald Reagan helped shepherd through Congress the most consequential border bill in American history, and when it needed updating Oklahoma’s Republican Senator James Lankford worked with Democrats to update it in a meaningful way. Trump demanded Republicans kill the legislation, invoking the memory of his tearing over 5,500 babies away from their mothers and trafficking them into fly-by-night “adoption” schemes (around 1000 are still missing) and his demand that the border patrol shoot immigrants in the legs.
Trump’s acolytes in Congress don’t even pretend any more to have a border policy: all they have left is cruelty.
President George HW Bush worked with Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev to unwind the USSR in the hope of creating a democratic Russia. Neither expected Vladimir Putin to turn that nation into a virtual concentration camp where gays are routinely murdered, child pornography is legal (and they’ve kidnapped over 700,000 Ukrainian children), and dissenters are tortured, poisoned, and sent to brutal Siberian gulags. Donald Trump celebrates Putin, calling his invasion of Ukraine “genius” and “savvy,” handing Putin’s ambassador a western spy and top-secret information in his first month in office, and trying to abandon America’s traditional role as a moral leader in the world.
Trump’s GOP has abandoned our founding principles: all they have left is cruelty.
During the 2020 election, Trump followers tried to run a Biden/Harris campaign bus off the road in Texas, threatening to kill the occupants (which they believed included Kamala Harris). A crazed Trump supporter broke into Nancy Pelosi’s home and attacked her 82-year-old husband with a hammer. Trump tweeted a picture of the bus being attacked, writing below it, “I LOVE TEXAS!” and repeatedly makes jokes about the attack on Pelosi, as if to encourage future attacks on the families of other Democratic politicians.
Not a single elected Republican (as best as I can find with a pretty thorough web search) has condemned either: all they have left is cruelty.
Florida Republican Governor Ron DeSantis turned down federal money that would have fed 2.1 million low-income children in his state; he was one of 13 Republican governors to do the same, in a nation where one in seven children — over 11 million every year — go to bed hungry.
We are literally the only developed country in the world with a massive child hunger problem because all Republicans have left is cruelty.
When President Obama succeeded in passing and signing the Affordable Care Act, it offered every state funds to expand Medicaid to give healthcare coverage to all their low-income citizens with the federal government covering 90% of the cost. To this day, ten states under Republican control have refused to accept the money, leading to millions of preventable illnesses and early deaths.
Republican states could have joined all the Blue states and every other developed country in the world by providing universal healthcare, but refuse to because all they have left is cruelty.
When a 10-year-old girl was raped and impregnated, Republicans like Congressman Jim Jordan, Governor Kristi Noem, Fox’s Tucker Carlson and Jesse Waters, and Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost ridiculed the claim. When the rape and pregnancy were proven and the girl fled Ohio to a state where abortion was legal to terminate the pregnancy, Indiana’s Republican Attorney General Todd Rokita promised to launch an “investigation.”
Rokita didn’t investigate the rape, however: he instead went after the physician who performed the abortion. Because cruelty is all Republicans have left.
When Donald Trump lost the 2020 election by seven million votes, he sent a violent mob against the US Capitol. As they tried to murder the vice president and speaker of the house, covered the walls of the building with feces and defaced priceless paintings, Trump gleefully watched on live television for over three hours while refusing to call in the national guard or take any other meaningful action.
Five civilians and three police officers died as the result of his sending that murderous mob because all he and his GOP have left is cruelty.
This week Americans saw Democrats display compassion, care, respect, and reverence for our democracy. We saw the best of this country, hope for the future, and actual plans to improve the lives of Americans.
Last month, in sharp contrast, we watched the Republican convention and saw, instead, a cavalcade of anger, bile, grievance, hate, and, of course, cruelty.
Because cruelty is all Republicans have left.
Note to Thom:
Some things you didn’t mention.
The red states that have repealed or loosened their child labor laws so that teens can work in hazardous jobs at younger ages.
The red states that overturned local laws requiring regular water breaks for laborers working outdoors in hot weather.
The red states that are defunding their public schools.
The red states that have abolished all gun laws and allow open carry of guns without a permit.
The red states oppose free lunches for children.

Cruelty is indeed ALL the REPUG-NI-CONS have left. The GOP is indeed the Party of HATE!
That Dump and his sycophants are gonna go down in history … as THE WORST…ever!
LikeLike
The GOP is dedicated to making the wealthy wealthier. They do not care about working families. All their schemes including privatization are designed to transfer money from working families to the ultra-wealthy. Democrats should attack the GOP’s economic policies. They need to flip the erroneous narrative that the GOP is better for the economy than the Democrats. When the GOP is in power, the stock market is often stronger, but the stock market is not the entire economy. The GOP intends to cut services to the poor, seniors, veterans and children so they can line the pockets of the super-rich. Cruelty is a natural result of the GOP’s moral decay.
LikeLike
“When the GOP is in power, the stock market is often stronger. . . .”
Really?
Please provide a source or backup for that statement.
LikeLike
I should have said the perception is that the stock market is better. The point is that Democrats need to do a better job promoting their economic success and answering the GOP’s falsehoods. Polls tend favor the GOP on the economy. According to this poll Trump leads Harris by 9 points on the economy. https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/harris-trump-poll-election-issues/story?id=112865487
LikeLiked by 1 person
The stock market is at its highest point ever.
Four years ago, Trump predicted a crash in the market if Biden were elected. When the market dropped about 10 days ago, Trump called it “the Kamala Crash.” It went up again.
LikeLike
Thanks for the clarification.
LikeLike
Retired: That’s what happens when the viruses of capitalism and transactionalism take over one’s brain . . .
Trump is just the poster boy for having a stunted transactional brain. My guess is he sits on his toilet wondering how he can capitalize on his own excrement. What a waste. And the incident at Arlington National Cemetery is just another example of a whole family’s lobotomized spirit . . . or of what Lawrence O’Donnell called “the humanity gap.” It’s the same capitalist-transactional virus (CTV). The whole family has no idea how to think beyond using every means, including other people, to serve their own truncated selves.
. . . which answers Duane’s “Really”? comment below. The stock market is a good thing, as long as no one checks to see how the “morbidly rich” make their money and keep their power. I read recently that many big corporate fat cats are investing more and more in munitions companies. And then there’s “cancer alley” and political bribery.
Get with it, Duane: There’s good money in war, polluting the planet, hoarding, and make slaves out of children. CBK
LikeLike
Yes, Catherine, there has always been good “money to be made by supplying the army with its tools of trade*.” No doubt! See Smedley Butler’s 1935 writing “War is a Racket”.
“My guess is he [the CONVICTED FELON] sits on his toilet wondering how he can capitalize on his own excrement. What a waste.”
Now that’s a good one!
Country Joe McDonald:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1J9ACOKIPH4
LikeLike
While I read Tom Hartman regularly, and think his basic thesis about modern Republicans is sound, I would like to take exception to his characterization of the older GOP in terms of Eisenhower and George HW Bush.
First Eisenhower: he may have started the interstate and supported Social Security, but his party was opposed to labor, passing the Taft-Hartley Right to Work (for less) legislation and fought hard against Medicare.
Then there’s HW Bush: while Hartman gives him credit for helping Russia transition to freedom after the collapse of the Soviet Union. My memory is that he mostly stood aside while oligarchs took control of most of the old state businesses. This laid a good solid foundation for Putin.
I would lay the cruelty of the modern Republicans to their stirring up of the American right wing through media.
LikeLike
Oh, good grief! So very presidential!
https://x.com/i/status/1828451144508600491
LikeLike
Astonishing! What grifter.
He’s running to make money, cheat the rubes, con the fools.
LikeLike
What an utter lowlife POS.
LikeLike
It’s embarrassing that this lowlife was ever our president. He is to politics what Cheez Whiz is to fine dining. He makes the hillbillies in the move Deliverance look civilized and educated by comparison.
LikeLike
It’s the depiction of himself on the NFT’s that is an astonishing look into his mental image of himself.
LikeLike
Yes: Donald Trump, the Super Hero who dodged the draft with phony bone spurs in his feet.
LikeLike
I saw this video earlier. The huge muscles are so phony looking, yet presented as if no one knows that the real guy looks nothing like those images.
I think something is VERY wrong with adults who have an intense need for a leader. Grown-ups should be able to function independently, not cling to a superhero type. When that occurs in adulthood, it’s indicative of severely arrested development, especially when people want to emulate the leader, warts and all. Like little kids, they are so enamored that they can’t see his flaws or recognize that he conned them into believing that he is better than other people and convinced them that being cruel to lesser people is a good thing.
Although I’ve known some kind folks who’ve supported tRump, I’ve also known some very mean, vindictive people who love him. I think a lot of his followers are just as sick and depraved as the leader they adore (much like with Hitler).
LikeLike
I am not sure that this is much of a change. Although Dixiecrats morphed into Republicans. Before WW2 Republicans covered for Nazis and viciously attacked the New Deal especially Unions . After the War Robert Taft Mr Republicans name is on the anti Union Taft Hartley act passed over a Truman veto . To claim Republicans supported Unions is a little over the top to say the least. Eisenhower may have paid lip service to Unions in 1952. At 30%+ of the workforce that may not be saying much. To do otherwise might have been political suicide. . By Goldwater the party had changed the Moderates like Rockefeller and George Romney booed off the stage. Rockefeller’s father was not just responsible for the Ludlow massacre . He also had led moderate corporate leaders in dropping opposition to the NLRA. At least till it passed. By the 60s Taft Hartley had done its Job Northern Manufacturing moving to the anti Union Right to Work South in Droves . The Rust belt had already become a bucket of nuts and bolts. Nixon courted Blue Collar and Construction Unions with his phony Patriotic appeals. While he sent Maurice Stans his Commerce Secretary out to organize the Business Round Table (To control Construction spending ) out of three anti Union law firms. Those Construction Unions got slaughtered in the 70s because of the BRT. . By the time Reagan got to office the movement had shrunk to the low 20s and unlike in the late 40s that number included many Public Sector Unions. The Taft Hartley act and Nixon had accomplished their mission.
LikeLike
By Nixon, southern textiles that had made so many small towns in the post Civil War South were already leaving for cheaper labor abroad and more mechanical production at home. By the mid1980s, wage increases driven by the arrival of auto plants and their suppliers had driven away lighter industries and replaced them with service jobs during the aftermath of the Regan outsourcing era.
LikeLike
Let’s not forget that many Dems also embraced Milton Friedman’s neoliberalism and that’s what has gotten us into this big mess! Too many politicians from both sides of the aisle let their big donors get richer and richer until we are stuck with a VERY unhealthy societal situation.
LikeLiked by 1 person
There’s a video clip of a debate between Phil Donahue and that toad, Milton Friedman. Uncle Miltie was contending that greed is good and natural and has lead to our great successes in this country. Totally vile and not actually true in all cases. He was on the wrong side of a fascist dictatorship in Chile.
LikeLike
I ran into him once on a sidewalk in Chicago. Should have run him over, the evil little bastard.
LikeLike
Being a court singer for the oligarchy is extremely lucrative.
LikeLike
Are you talking about Jimmy Carter? He was the first Dem to start embracing the neoliberal agenda and if Jimmy Carter had not blocked it, the US would have had universal healthcare in the late 1970s. How Democrats went from LBJ to Jimmy Carter so fast is beyond my understanding. Carter did some very good things, but his embrace of neoliberal ideas started the trend.
Jimmy Carter started the Democrats move to neoliberalism. I don’t think Carter did that because he was helping his big donors, but I am not sure of his reasons for embracing so much neoliberalism.
After 12 long years of the Republicans moving the country more and more to the right, I remember being so thrilled with Bill Clinton’s election. One of the first things he did was raise taxes on the rich (not enough but at least the Dems were moving in the right direction).
But when Clinton tried to push through universal healthcare, the Republicans ran their “Harry and Louise” ads and with help from what was becoming a right wing media, the VOTERS elected Newt Gingrich’s agenda to block all that. I wish they hadn’t, but it did seem like they were just proving to Democrats that they would not win because the VOTERS wanted the big donors’ neoliberal agenda, too.
To me, the very sad answer is that those fighting the neoliberal agenda have to move the needle a little at a time, because all they get from moving it too far is the empowerment of the right wing Republicans leads to that needle moving back even further than it was.
I wish it weren’t so.
LikeLike
I am NOT talking about Jimmy Carter. I love Jimmy Carter and thought he was a decent humane being. He inherited some bad situations and maybe in his attempt to be kind, human and humane made some bad decisions regarding those situations. Maybe that is when the camel stuck its nose in the tent? Ronnie ushered in the big era of big easy money and it all went downhill from there. Slick Willie was the epitome of neoliberal politics and got rich to boot.
LikeLike
Once again, Marcy Wheeler at Empty Wheel NAILS the NYT’s pro-Trump bias on her blog. To wit, Maggie Haberman and Jonathan Swan actually presented an OPINION – a right wing talking point – as a FACT in a news story because right wing talking points that denigrate Democrats are “facts”, but truth that might make Trump or Republicans look bad are reported as opinions, with “the other side” (the side that makes Republicans look reasonable and caring) prominently reported as equally valid.
“But her involvement in Mr. Trump’s debate preparation, which has not previously been reported, was partly because of her own performance in a 2019 Democratic presidential primary debate, when Ms. Gabbard eviscerated Ms. Harris in a memorable onstage encounter.”
Certainly Haberman/Swan’s source for that belief – Donald Trump – believes it is a fact that Gabbard “EVISCERATED” Kamala onstage, but it isn’t a “fact”. That is an opinion. Wheeler shows the clip and whether one believes Kamala called out Gabbard or Gabbard called out Kamala probably depends on how much you like either candidate. Given that the NYT news reporters who write “news” articles about the candidates present it an indisputable fact that Gabbard EVISCERATING Kamala, we know exactly where their biases stand — it’s not even close since the NYT doesn’t inform the public that Gabbard scored a point off of Kamala, but that she EVISCERATED her. The evisceration of Kamala by Gabbard is a fact.
This is what the NYT specializes in. Writing news stories that leave NO DOUBT that the Republican talking point attacking and undermining Dems is a TRUE FACT, while writing news stories that “inform” the public that there is plenty of reasonable doubt that whatever those partisan Dems are saying about Trump is true.
That double standard has left our democracy in danger. And it will get worse over the next 2 months. Only reporters who present Republican talking points as very credible are assigned to cover the Trump campaign. Only reporters who “know” the Democrat has major trust issues that need to be amplified are assigned to cover the Democrat.
When Kamala does her first interview tomorrow, the coverage of her will be about her “issues”, how she “didn’t answer questions”, etc. etc. In other words, all the things that should have been reported when Trump gave a faux press conference in which he both lied repeatedly AND didn’t answer any of the questions. When Trump gave that non-press conference, the NYT reporters found whatever bits of phrases seemed to present some rational viewpoint and informed the public of those, ignoring the rest. The next day, because other online folks were getting other media to give Trump’s lies more attention, DIFFERENT reporters wrote about one of Trump’s lies about being on a plane with Willie Brown. Which did not put one dent in the strong credibility the NYT reporters covering Trump give to his every utterance. After all it is an absolute fact that Tulsi Gabbard EVISCERATED Kamala Harris in a debate. There are not two sides to that at all, says the “fair and balanced” NYT. It’s 100% true.
Thank you, Marcy Wheeler, for all your excellent work trying to hold the so-called liberal media to one standard only – presenting the truth.
LikeLike
^^https://www.nytimes.com/2024/08/16/us/politics/trump-debate-tulsi-gabbard.html
LikeLike
I remember that debate. It resembled an evisceration to me. Either way, I cannot imagine having a state of mind that would cause me to read that sentence and have a conniption fit about the evil New York Times.
LikeLike
Of course, the attack wouldn’t have hit very hard if Harris hadn’t already tried to eviscerate Joe Biden for opposing court- or federally-mandated busing (which of course she herself does not support, either).
LikeLike
LikeLike
I don’t recall Tulsi Gabbard eviscerating anyone in the debate.
LikeLike
Well, metaphorically.
LikeLike
Given your biases, your OPINION makes sense. Your lack of consistency in whether something should be reported as factually true (a Democrat being “eviscerated” by a Trumpie) and whether it should never be presented as a fact (almost every negative characterization about anything Trump has done or said) is duly noted.
You can’t imagine why Marcy Wheeler would have what you condescendingly call a “conniption fit” (but what others less nasty than you would call “reasonable criticism of the NYT’s double standard”). And that reflects your own biases. What did Marcy Wheeler ever do to you?
If you watch the clip of the debate, you will see Gabbard making the kind of ad hominem attacks on Kamala Harris that you frequently object to when directed at others that you like. I don’t really wonder why you were so impressed with Gabbard and unimpressed with Kamala, since I recall you frequently objecting to Kamala being the nominee just because she was the sitting VP and saying there were better candidates.
Your low opinion of Marcy Wheeler and Kamala Harris is noted. As is how impressed you were with Gabbard’s convincing arguments and “evisceration” (a truth that cannot be disputed according to you).
LikeLike
I don’t know much about Marcy Wheeler. I’ve been to her blog and have not found it very impressive.
My opinion of Kamala Harris is a work in progress, but I have always disliked her for that bullsh!t attack on Biden over busing. But she’s better than Trump so that’s all that matters how.
The rest of the comment I can’t understand.
LikeLike
flerp!, your words reveal your own bias.
Tulsi Gabbard eviscerated Harris.
But Harris “tried to” eviscerate Biden – I assume you think she failed.
It’s interesting that you found Gabbard’s accusation that Kamala Harris wanted to continue the “Bush Clinton Trump foreign policy of regime change wars” so convincing, so “eviscerating”?
Since you are so impressed with Gabbard’s “evisceration”, can you please explain exactly what the “Bush Clinton Trump foreign policy of regime change wars” is, exactly, and what the heck Gabbard’s accusation that Kamala Harris wanted to continue it actually means? Or it is just some rhetorical nonsense where Clinton Bush and Trump all have the same vague “pro-regime change” foreign policy?
flerp! says: “I have always disliked her for that bullsh!t attack on Biden over busing”
Did you actually listen to the clip you posted? First of all, Kamala BEGAN by saying she does not believe Biden is racist. Her criticisms were that Biden had spoken approvingly of politicians who were known segregationists and she pointed out he had worked with them to oppose busing.
BECAUSE Kamala was not doing what Tulsi Gabbard did and making meaningless ad hominen attacks, Biden was able to clarify his beliefs and make a decent defense. Kamala made a good point that every community is not Berkeley, CA and in the south, it’s not unheard that local communities will NOT do it on their own, and that’s when there is a role for federal government.
But more importantly, Biden himself did not hold a grudge as long as you do, flerp! Not only did Biden want Kamala for VP, but Biden specifically wanted Kamala to be the nominee to replace him, even when other people like you thought that there should be an open convention to choose one of the “better” candidates.
It’s weird that you dislike Kamala more than Biden dislikes Kamala because of something supposedly unforgiveable she did to Biden during a debate. Perhaps that is another reflection of your own biases. Thus when the NYT says Gabbard “eviscerated” Kamala, you are certain it is a fact, not an opinion and you go out of your way to insult Marcy Wheeler for “having a conniption fit”.
Would you say it would be reasonable and accurate for me to characterize your feelings about Kamala during that debate as a “conniption fit”? Or do you think it would be as gratuitiously insulting as I do?
LikeLike
Your words reveal your compulsive need to finely parse even the most blatantly negative article about Trump for signs that it is actually pro-Trump.
It’s probably true that the editors of that Times article should have changed “eviscerated” to “attacked,” a less conclusory verb. That’s fair. But it’s not a basis to freak out about how the article or the Times itself is “pro-Trump.” It’s a very weird conclusion. Weirder still is the need to return to draw the same conclusion over and over and over. I’m a simple man, but I recommend you stop reading the paper that you regard as a major threat to democracy. You could read Marcy Wheeler’s blog instead. Although I gather she writes a lot about how the Times is a threat to democracy, too, so maybe that’s not a great idea, either.
If Harris’s attack on Biden for being opposed to busing in 1970 eviscerated him, he recovered pretty quickly. That debate was her high-water mark in that campaign. Within a few months she was in single digits and she dropped out before the first primary.
I don’t know Biden’s personal feelings about Harris. Maybe you do. I don’t. I do suspect that he may make decisions for strategic and political reasons, though. But maybe I’m wrong about that!
As I said, I’m not a big Harris fan, but I am rooting for her.
LikeLike
flerp!,
Your words reveal your compulsive need to finely parse even my most mildly negative observations about the NYT’s bias in their news reporting and jump in to defend the NYT as a fine arbiter of truth that may not be criticized as having any bias except an anti-Trump bias.
My observations in a comment are not a basis for you to freak out as if my citing of Marcy Wheeler’s evidence-based observations is a major threat to the admirable work the NYT does in protecting our democracy and reporting accurately and fairly about Trump (very negatively in your view) and accurately and fairly about Democrats (very fair, especially their Biden is a cognitive vegetable coverage.) It’s a very weird reaction.
I recommend you stop reading my comments that you regard as a major threat to the NYT. They seem to give you a “conniption fit”.
LikeLike
Oh yeah well your words reveal stuff!
LikeLike
Remember, the deal to have neither of us interact with the other remains on the table. Don’t complain about the interaction if you don’t want to take the deal.
LikeLike
lol! I wasn’t complaining! Obviously, you were complaining, since I just copy and pasted your words (replacing some) to point out your double standard. In fact, I wouldn’t normally use such insulting words, but I had to since I was (apologies) intentionally plagiarizing you.
On the contrary, I am always complimented when you read my comments and reply to them! Seriously! Please keep interacting with me as much as you want!
Here is more of Marcy Wheeler’s astute observation about Maggie Haberman and Jonathan Swan, the two people the NYT has assigned to inform the public about Trump:
“You don’t have to decide which woman eviscerated the other. Indeed, avoiding such comment would invite a better explanation for Tulsi’s role in Trump’s orbit, one that these two Trump-whispers don’t claim to know.
Do they — two Trump whisperers who have covered Trump for years — not know that Trump is just a carnival barker, setting up conflict to distract people performing a role called journalism? Have they unwittingly come to merge their own consciousness with his? Or are they just wittingly part of the kayfabe now themselves?
Whichever it is, as actual journalists continue to treat Trump’s obvious con without comment, it flips the complaints about influencers back on its head.
The coverage Trump has enjoyed has long worked to pressure straight journalists into covering things with a right wing spin. And these days, it’s not clear whether the straight journalists need any help.”
LikeLike
^^also fascinating to read the article on neokayfabe in pro wrestling and politics that Marcy Wheeler links to. I have no interest in pro-wrestling, so never even knew what the term kayfabe meant. I can see how NYT reporters have become like the fans of pro wrestling, easily distracted and unsure of what is fake and what is real. And getting to the point where it’s too hard to tell, and for lazy reporters, it’s much easier to write both sides articles than to actually figure out what is true.
LikeLike
Far be it from me to weigh in on who’s right between NYCPSP and Flerp!, but I will say I found this article about Dana White, CEO of UFC, to be illuminating. The Venn diagram of mixed martial arts and Trump World is very nearly a circle, and even Ari Emanuel, brother of Obama’s Chief of Staff, has a role.
No paywall:
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/04/14/business/dana-white-ufc-trump.html?unlocked_article_code=1.Gk4.NAVb.YACjg2uuwQr_&smid=url-share
LikeLike
Christine, thanks for the link. Fake wrestling is Trump’s world. Violent, profitable, and fake.
LikeLike
It’s also a gateway to conspiracy theories and snake oil salesmen like Joe Rogan, who is in turn linked to Steve Bannon, Alex Jones, Andrew Tate, and Roger Stone. The target audience is also young white guys who are sold a toxic hyper “masculinity”.
And all of it is fake.
LikeLike
Thank you for that link! That was an interesting article. Depressing, but interesting. Cage-match politics indeed!
On the Republican side, politics seems to be entirely entertainment, with the right wing, neo-fascist powers behind the scenes reaping the benefits of power.
It’s hard for the Dems to compete, when the very idea of politics seems to be turned on its head. And then the media turns on the Dems for not being “serious” enough and revealing long and detailed policy memorandum which somehow isn’t required of the Republicans.
LikeLike
ALL True!!! All they have is cruelty!
LikeLike
Why the need to lie? “(and they’ve kidnapped over 700,000 Ukrainian children)“
From the original article in 2023: “Since the beginning of the full-scale invasion of Ukraine, Russia has “accepted” about 4.8 million residents of Ukraine, of whom more than 700 thousand are children, according to a report by the Russian Commissioner for Children’s Rights Maria Lvova-Belova. According to the ombudsman, the overwhelming majority of Ukrainian children came to Russia with their parents or other relatives.”
LikeLike
You may very well be correct that the number of kidnapped Ukraine children is greatly exaggerated. But citing the Russian Commissioner for Children’s Rights? Do you think Maria Lvova-Belova knows what happens in Russia to people who offer up any facts that Putin might not like? Not to mention she is a Russian politician and the International Criminal Court has issued arrest warrants for her and Putin.
The ICC might have its own biases, but it ALSO issued arrest warrants for Netanyahu and Yoav Gallant so it’s not as if the ICC takes their marching orders from the US. I would trust them over a Russian pol. Why not treat them like you would a report from an Israeli Commission — I assume you’d be skeptical of a report from Israel and not cite it to show that people were “lying” about the number of dead in Gaza.
LikeLike
Thanks for that info on the ICC arrest warrants. I did not know about that.
LikeLike
Duane,
Actually, I got that info about Maria Lvova-Belova from one of the links in your comment, but now that link is taking me to an article in Russian! (Shades of the Twilight Zone). But the ICC website confirms the warrant.
Also, you are correct that Hartmann should have used a smaller number (from what I could find, the number of child kidnappings reported by Ukraine is 19,000+). I don’t think this is a lie as much as it is a misinterpretation of Russia’s own citing of 700,000 that you quoted in your comment, but that isn’t specifically “kidnappings”.
I would not call this a “lie” unless Hartmann doubled down on the number the way Trump and Republicans do when they lie and ignore all the evidence that what they are saying isn’t true.
But you are correct that 700,000 is INcorrect!
LikeLike
I thought that number of 700,000 was wildly inaccurate, but he wrote it.
LikeLike
“As they tried to murder the vice president and speaker of the house, covered the walls of the building with feces and defaced priceless paintings. . . .”
Really. . . “covered the walls” Quit lying Hartmann.
LikeLike
Two coats plus primer
LikeLike
Don’t get me wrong. The current Rethugs are abhorrent, no doubt. But misstating facts and/or otherwise putting out false information is exactly what the current Rethugs do and those fighting the Rethugs need to have a higher standard than the limbo low bar that the Rethugs have.
LikeLike
Ok, as long as you hold people criticizing the Dems on the left to the same standard.
LikeLike
I critique any and all sides when they spout falsehoods.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ms. Ravitch, I have been a Montessori advocate for decades (currently involved in teacher training). IS THERE ANY CHANCE that Montessori model will get a voice in the educational reform movement (given that Dr. M anticipated so much of what we now know to be true about neuroscience, development, and the way children learn)? Koren Clark also talks about Montessori as “liberation pedagogy.” Angeline Lillard shows that Montessori closes the achievement gap. Do you have any advice for how to build bridges between educational philosophies? Thank you in advance.
LikeLike
“Angeline Lillard shows that Montessori closes the achievement gap”
What do you mean by “achievement gap”? Please explain, thanks.
LikeLike
I’d also be interested in what you mean by “liberation pedagogy.” Again, thanks!
LikeLike
We also shouldn’t forget that the red state of Georgia passed legislation in 2021 making it illegal to give food or water to people who are waiting in line to vote: https://checkyourfact.com/2024/04/12/fact-check-criminal-food-drink-voters-line-polls/
LikeLike
There are so many instances of cruelty that I can’t remember all of them, even when I wrote about them here. Like when Iowa changed its food guidelines so that poor people get less to eat.
LikeLike
It might be nice to start and end every Fox News segment with the soundtrack from the Twilight Zone. CBK
LikeLike
Heh heh!
It would be better than nice to never watch FuxNews.
Although I understand the concept of holding friends tight while keeping enemies closer.
LikeLike
Diane
Plenty of those 60’s hippies were “dodging” the draft along with Bernie Sanders, Chuck Schumer, Bill Clinton, Joe Biden, and others. But of course, it’s only wrong when Trump does it.
There were many people who would enroll in college to get deferments. If they didn’t have the money, their only other option was to run off to Canada.
LikeLike
Harry,
No one but Trump had a rich daddy to buy his way out of the draft.
LikeLike
Diane
It doesn’t matter if you had a rich daddy or not, thousands of people got their deferments by going to school. Trump basically did the same thing that Clinton did along with many others.
LikeLike
Trump was born with a golden spoon in his mouth. He has cheated other people all his life. Have you bought Trump steaks, Trump wine, Trump sneakers, Trump Bible? He’s currently selling NFT trading cards with him as a hero. Anything for a buck, esp picking the pockets of rubes.
LikeLike
George Bush, Jr., had even better for this purpose–a powerful political Daddy.
LikeLike
Don’t assume people went to college just to dodge the draft. In those days, many of us had parents that were in the service during WWII who benefited from the educational opportunities provided by the GI Bill. Often, they were the first in their families to graduate from college and they wanted their own kids to become college educated as well, so many of us had long planned on going to college. Students didn’t typically get tied down to student loans for years then either, as happens now, because a lot of colleges were actually affordable then.
I knew people who were drafted after they graduated, including one who became a physician. They went into the service then, too, instead of having their fathers pay a doctor to lie so they could avoid going by claiming a fake disability, as tRump did.
LikeLike
Diane
You don’t really know if Trump’s daddy bought his way out of the draft. You’re only assuming it because you hate the guy, so he HAS to be guilty. Tons of rich parents bought their kids way into elite colleges in the 1960’s & 70’s, many of which stayed in the academia field to lay the ground work to indoctrinate and brainwash future students, which is why our campuses are so filthy toxic and violent now.
leftist just can’t let go of the TDS they’re suffering from.
LikeLike
Harry,
I do know that Trump’s rich daddy bought his deferments.
His daughters said so.
https://search.app/Z59ido63sFNJiraF6
The foot doctor rented space in a mall owned by Fred Trump, Donald’s father. They told The NY Times that their daddy wrote the diagnosis as a “favor,” but it’s likely that Fred lowered his rent.
LikeLike
In those days, many hippies across the country frequently protested against the Vietnam war –which they did on principle, because they didn’t believe our nation’s involvement in that war was good for America. I know because I participated in the protests myself, and I knew a lot of other protesters as well.
tRump dodged the draft purely for his own sake. He has demonstrated time and again that he has no principles whatsoever. I’ve been tracking him for decades and learned this early on. He has always had only personal ambitions. They include his aspirations for fame & fortune, and a very strong yearning for prestige, especially amongst the ruling class (& the rich and famous). But topping the list are his insatiable desires for more money and unlimited power.
LikeLike
I have enjoyed Diane Ravitch’s blog for a long time and hope to continue. However, I’m dropping my earthlink email and only using my gmail address michaelserra112358@gmail.com. Please continue sending me Diane’s blog via the gmail address.
Thank you.
Michael Serra
LikeLike
Michael, please make the change of email. I can’t do it.
LikeLike
Growing up, I can remember watching all of those Westerns on TV and thinking I was glad people weren’t shooting each other like that anymore. I have since learned that those Westerns weren’t accurate and that today in some states are worse than the violent conditions portrayed in Bonanza.
LikeLike