Scott Maxwell, columnist for The Orlando Sentinel, wrote about the state’s callous indifference to the neediest of the state’s children. These are the children who are not included in Ron DeSantis’s commitment to “right to life.” He cared about them when they were fetuses but neglects them now. Their lives don’t matter.
Maxwell writes:
Last week, the Orlando Sentinel shared a gut-wrenching story about the parents of some of this state’s sickest children either losing Medicaid coverage or bracing for losses.
Keep in mind: We’re not talking about kids with sniffles and headaches, but toddlers with traumatic brain injuries who need feeding tubes, wheelchairs and round-the-clock care. And kids who are nonverbal with challenges so severe that their parents take days off work just to care for them.
They are Florida’s most vulnerable residents.
The story was depressing, yet merely the latest in a long string of stories about various vulnerable populations. Consider other recent headlines:
That last headline was actually from last year. Now, we’re one of only 10 states rejecting billions of federal dollars meant to help struggling families.
Each of those stories has its own complexities involving different segments of families in need. But I submit the common theme boils down to a single, soul-defining litmus test:
When you see a paralyzed or terminally ill child or an impoverished family, you either believe we have a collective, societal obligation to help them … or you don’t.
I submit this state has too many of the latter in charge. And too many people who just breeze past the dire headlines, because they have the luxury of doing so. Because they aren’t personally affected.
Like many of you, I was dealt a relatively good hand in life. My wife and I are healthy. So are our kids. But I still believe we have an obligation to care for those who aren’t, particularly those who can’t care for themselves.
I think most people agree. On tough issues — like abortion, taxes or the death penalty — reasonable people can reach different conclusions. But throughout time, most civilizations have agreed on this point.
In Florida, however, the state leaves children born with severe disabilities — without the ability to feed themselves or ever live on their own — languishing on waiting lists for services. The average wait is seven to 10 years. Some kids die before they’re served.
Again, either you think that’s OK or you don’t. The leaders of this state haven’t fully funded that Medicaid waiver program since Jeb Bush was in office.
Now, if you’re healthy and wealthy, the term “Medicaid waiver” may be unfamiliar. The health care landscape is littered with a dizzying array of jargon. There are Medicaid waivers, iBudgets, the Medikids program, Healthy Kids, the Children’s Medical Services Health Plan.
It all makes most people’s eyes glaze over. But each program serves a different population and has two common themes: Most are incredibly difficult to navigate. And most leave many people struggling to get the services they need … often by design.
Nowhere is that more evident than in this state’s steadfast refusal to accept federal dollars to expand Medicaid.
The expansion was created under the Affordable Care Act to provide coverage to millions more low-income Americans and hundreds of thousands more Floridians. A slew of organizations and think tanks have said Florida should do so for both moral and economic reasons.
Health care experts say it would save lives. Hospitals say it will create jobs. The Florida Chamber of Commerce says it will boost our economy by tens of billions of dollars.
GOP lawmakers, however, have steadfastly refused — as part of a decade-long tantrum against “Obamacare.” To hell with those who need coverage and for whom the money is there. These politicians say they’re unconvinced the program will work or that the state’s costs won’t rise.
But remember: Florida Republicans are an outlier. The vast majority of states — including dark red ones led by hard-core conservative leaders — have already accepted the money.
“It’s pro-life, it’s saving lives, it is creating jobs, it is saving hospitals,” Arizona’s former governor, Jan Brewer, said when she took the money back in 2013. “I don’t know how you can get any more conservative than that.”
Arkansas Gov. Asa Hutchinson said: “We’re a compassionate state, and we’re not going to leave 220,000 people without some recourse.”
Florida Republicans, however, are fine with abandoning those low-income people. And sick kids. And those with profound disabilities. Re-read the headlines.
After reading all this, if you believe this state should do better by its most vulnerable residents, do me a favor, will you? Don’t send me an email telling me you agree. While I enjoy hearing from readers, I’m not the one who needs to hear this.
Send your thoughts to your state legislators. Or to the House speaker or Senate president. (Their contact info can be found at www.leg.state.fl.us) Or use the governor’s website at www.flgov.com/email-the-governor to share your thoughts there.
You can also ask them some basic questions.
Ask them if they believe it’s acceptable for 22,000 families with profound disabilities to face a 7- to 10-year wait for getting Medicaid waivers.
Ask if they believe the state did the right thing by removing 1.3 million people, including families with terminally sick children, from the state’s Medicaid roll.
Or just copy all those headlines above and ask: “Do you really believe all of this is OK?”
I’d like to believe most decent people don’t. But the headlines keep coming.
Diane Ravitch's blog 
The poor are easy to ignore. Politicians know this, and unscrupulous politicians like DeSantis will exploit their vulnerability. The GOP in Florida seem to be more interested in making the state a playground for wealthy extremists than helping children get access to healthcare. They would like the poor to disappear. The governor would rather spend tax dollars on migrant flights to sanctuary cities than saving the lives of disabled children. After all, DeSantis’ own children are well taken care of, and those are the children that matter to him.
DeSantis has offered no solutions to the exploding homeowner insurance rates. Some senior citizens cannot get any homeowners insurance on older homes, and others have been quoted annual rates of over $12,000 per year. Some seniors are moving out of state, and others are “going bare,” aka, no insurance. The governor knows these properties will get snatched up by affluent developers so he could care less about sick children, the elderly, immigrants or LGBT or any other marginalized groups. While a couple of new insurance companies are now available, it remains to be seen if it will make a difference.
The governor and state legislature work for the affluent conservatives in the state, not the poor and vulnerable. The state motto should be “survival of the fittest.”
Here’s another example of “right to life” Ron’s hypocrisy. Executions have increased tremendously under DeSantis. He also made it easier for juries to convict so judges can impose the death penalty on felons. https://www.tallahassee.com/story/news/politics/2023/12/01/desantis-six-executions-florida-drive-increase-us-new-death-penalty-report-shows/71746073007/
From the article:
“Some kids die before they’re served.“
Florida Republicans (and Tennessee as well) channeling Scrouge before the night visitation:
“Well, they had better die, then, and decrease the surplus population”
Nothing indicts the far right more than the contrast between their statements about the poor defenseless unborn and their ignoring of the born immediately after that occurs.
Am I reading this right or has my UK brain got a bit fuddled.
These folk who make such a fuss about the unborn child’s rights, are willing to let them suffer when they are out of the womb?
You have it right.
Thanks for confirming that.
The current USA Right scatter shot approach does defy rationality, doesn’t it? (amongst other things)
If one isn’t wealthy/evangelical/conservative, DeSantis isn’t interesting them.