Jan Resseger provides a thoughtful analysis of what seems to be a new phenomenon called “white Christian nationalism.” Others say it’s nothing new, that it is just another manifestation of racism, as in the KKK, the White Citizens Councils, and other hate groups. She reviews a new book, The Flag and the Cross: White Christian Nationalism and the Threat to American Democracy that provides a historical perspective.
She writes:
Our politics and our national ethos seem to have gone awry, and a lot of people blame it on something called Christian nationalism or white Christian nationalism. And yet, the book bans, the efforts to prohibit honest teaching about slavery, and the attempts to quash equity and inclusion seem to have nothing to do with the teachings of Jesus, embodied, for example, in the Great Commandment: “You shall love your neighbor as yourself.” (Matthew 22: 39) If, like me, you have been confused by the seeming contradictions, I recommend a book that begins: “This book is a primer on white Christian nationalism, what it is, when it emerged, how it works, and where it’s headed. White Christian nationalism is one of the oldest and most powerful currents in American politics.” (The Flag and The Cross, p. 1)
The book is The Flag and The Cross: White Christian Nationalism and the Threat to American Democracy, by two professors of the sociology of religion, Philip S. Gorski at Yale University and Samuel L. Perry at the University of Oklahoma. The book is short, readable, and extremely relevant to the political maelstrom in today’s United States.
The authors trace the existence of white Christian nationalism back to the introduction of slavery to Virginia; the subjugation of American Indians beginning in Massachusetts and then westward through the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries; the Civil War and subsequent collapse of Reconstruction followed by Jim Crow; the Mexican American War; and the Spanish American War with the establishment of an American empire including the Philippines, Guam and Puerto Rico.
So… what is white Christian nationalism? “White Christian nationalism is a ‘deep story’ about America’s past and a vision of its future. It includes cherished assumptions about what America was and is, but also what it it should be… America was founded as a Christian nation by (white) men who were ‘traditional’ Christians, who based the nation’s founding documents on ‘Christian principles.’ The United States is blessed by God, which is why it has been so successful; and the nation has a special role to play in God’s plan for humanity. But these blessings are threatened by cultural degradation from ‘un-American’ influences both inside and outside our borders.” (The Flag and The Cross, pp. 3-4)
Gorski and Perry continue: “Like any story, this one has its heroes: white conservative Christians, usually native-born men. It also has its villains: racial, religious, and cultural outsiders. The plot revolves around conflicts between the noble and worthy ‘us,’ the rightful heirs of wealth and power, and the undeserving ‘them’ who conspire to take what is ours. Sometimes the conflicts culminate in violence—violence that restores white Christians to what they believe is their rightful place atop America’s racial and religious hierarchy… But this story is a myth… At this point, the skeptical reader might wonder what’s ‘Christian’ about this deep story. It is ‘Christian’ because the vast majority of those who believe this story identify as such.” (The Flag and The Cross, pp. 4-5)
Why has white Christian nationalism exploded in recent years? “The source of the growing pressure is a set of slow-moving changes in American society. The United States has slowly become less white, less Christian, and less powerful; more diverse, secular, and cosmopolitan. And this collided with a certain conception of America as a white Christian nation favored by God and ruled by white Christian men ready to defend freedom and order with violence.” (The Flag and The Cross, p. 103) Gorski and Perry describe the January 6th insurrection as a symbol of the conflict.
After defining “white Christian nationalism,” Gorski and Perry explain what it is not: “(W)hite Christian nationalism is not ‘Christian patriotism’; white Christian nationalism…. is rooted in white supremacist assumptions and empowered by anger and fear. This is nationalism, not patriotism… Second, white Christian nationalism is not synonymous with white evangelicalism per se, even if there is considerable overlap… Third and finally, white Christian nationalism is not just a problem among white American Christians. There are secular versions of white Christian nationalism that claim to defend ‘Western Culture’ or ‘Judeo-Christian civilization.’ And there are secular white Americans who know how to leverage white Christian nationalist language. For such Americans, the ‘Christian’ label simply signals shared tribal identity or veils political values that would otherwise be socially unacceptable. That is certainly how Trump himself used the label—as a rallying cry and a fig leaf—and one reason why so many white Christians have been attracted to him: not because he himself is an exemplar of Christian piety, but because he waved the Christian flag and announced his willingness to ‘fight’ for it.” (The Flag and The Cross, pp. 8-10)
The book is not principally about the institution of public education, but it says a lot about today’s assault on inclusive public schools. The authors name some of what’s been happening in recent years and in addition create a theoretical scaffolding to help us understand attacks on public education as part of a scheme to use public schools to protect the dominant culture. Here are four threats to public education that reflect white Christian nationalism:
- opposition to teaching about racism in American history, and the passage of state laws to ban multicultural education, and ‘diversity, equity and inclusion;’ (The Flag and The Cross, p. 14);
- efforts to permit religious education at public expense—promotimg the beliefs of specific faith traditions and undermining the protection of religious liberty (The Flag and The Cross, p. 16);
- efforts to block school integration after Brown v. Board of Education (The Flag and The Cross, p. 69); and
- the recent proposal by the Heritage Foundation of a strategy to overturn Plyler v. Doe to exclude from public schools undocumented students who cannot afford to pay tuition.
All of these attacks exemplify pushback against inclusion and welcome for ‘the other’: “The first and most fundamental way in which white Christian nationalism threatens American liberal democracy is that it defines ‘the people’ in a way that excludes many Americans. White Christian nationalism is a form of what is often called ‘ethno-nationalism.’ Liberal democracy rests on what is usually called ‘civic nationalism’ It defines the nation in terms of values, laws, and institutions.’” (The Flag and The Cross, p. 114)

White Christian nationalism is an expression of 16th Century Calvinism expressing itself in modern day politics. The theory of of predestination espouses the belief that some members of society, usually the wealthy class, are morally superior. God rewards them with prosperity for their superior status. It is easy to see how this type of thinking can be used to exclude those that are different. It was exactly this type of thinking that allowed the Calvinists to seize my ancestor’s property and drove my mother’s Anabaptist family members out of Switzerland and brought them to Pennsylvania where they continued to worship freely for generations. Christian nationalists use their religion to justify discrimination and exclusion. This white Christian nationalist religious belief is often associated with capitalism, libertarianism, a classical education as well as sense of entitlement and a great fear of individual differences.
LikeLike
I find it hilarious that some of these White Christian Nationalists fancy themselves classicists. They have an entirely mythological view of ancient Greece and Rome akin to the view of George Washington that is all about admitting that he chopped down the cherry tree–total bs mythology.
LikeLike
Imagine all that they have to leave out. But I guess they just love the original Fascists.
LikeLike
I used to tell my students that there are two great rivers that run down through American history to the present day–one from the Puritans, the other from the Transcendentalists.
LikeLike
Very well said, RT. Here, a little background for those who are sketchy about this history:
History of Ideas: Background to Puritan and Pilgrim Protestantism in North America | Bob Shepherd | Praxis (wordpress.com)
LikeLike
While I see what you suggest, I would counter that the Second Great Awakening was mostly Armenian influence through Wesley. This was the soil from which Nineteenth Century American Protestantism arose. It rejected the concept of the elect in favor of an emotoinal attachment to beliefs, and sprung far more from the Western Frontier (revivals initiated the Second Great Awakening in Kentucky, spreading to other frontier areas) than it did from John Calvin. The moribund Puritans gave way to the vibrancy of Methodist and “New Light” Presbyterians, guided more by the hymns of Wesley and Watts than the formulaic Calvinists, who continued to claim doctrine while no one listened. Meanwhile, Episcopal Churches usually housed the community leaders, rooted in the Anglican past of that denomination.
Modern Christian Nationalists rise not from a line drawn through history, but from cafeteria selection of philosophical ideas drawn strategically from various sources. They bear more resemblance to Jerry Falwell than they do to John Calvin. Perhaps they share the political bent Calvin demonstrated in Geneva when he tacitly approved the execution of Michel Servatus (anti-trinitarian philosopher who began unitarianism). they do not, however, reflect so much Calvinism as they do a reactionary view of the mainstream protestantism of the mid-Twentieth century.
LikeLike
Betsy DeVos shares the Calvinist view. She believes she deserves her billions, and that the poor deserve their poverty
LikeLike
Donald Trump accomplished so much as president—all those tax cuts for really rich people, all that increase in the deficit, alienation of allies, and support for dictators around the globe–but there is still much that he proposed that remains to be done. That’s why you need to vote for him this November, so he can fully fund injecting people with disinfectant, sweep all our forests to prevent forest fires, nuke hurricanes, build more invisible airplanes wall for climbing at our southern border, make nuclear secrets storage in Mar-a-Lago bathrooms permanent, buy Greenland AND Denmark, expand the President’s cabinet to include Vladimir Putin, add his own portrait to Mount Rushmore, protect our monuments to slaveholders, appoint more anti-abortion religious zealot Supreme Court Just Us-es, and much, much more. So, be sure to vote for him this November to ensure that this vision is implemented!
LikeLike
White Christian Nationalist. n. phrase. The American Taliban
LikeLike
The leader of the White Christian Nationalists today is, of course, Donald Trump, who is the living, breathing embodiment of all of the seven deadly sins and is even less Christian than I am (and someone once asked me whether the holy water started bubbling when I enter a church).
LikeLike
You are correct about that horrible person, the dumpster. He is indeed the living, breathing embodiment of the 7 deadly sins.
LikeLike
Most undocumented immigrants that enter the United States across its Southern border are Catholics and the 2nd largest religious group are evangelicals.
To these extremist Christian Nationalists, the religion of those immigrants isn’t the issue. It’s the skin color of undocumented immigrants.
LikeLike
Donald Trump loves the uneducated, so he should love AI. People are now using to write and illustrate books credited to them as authors. This will lead inevitably to dumbing down of the culture, resulting in mediocrity followed by kakistocracy.
Case in point:
Large-language model AI writes excruciatingly bad poetry. Why? Well, it is based upon prediction of what’s to come next given what came before, and it makes these predictions based on a ginormous corpus of text that it has consumed. So, it’s going to weight most highly the most common, most vulgar, most over-used, most trite, most cliche stuff out there. It is utterly lacking in discernment. That’s why almost all AI-generated “poetry” sounds like it was written by a particularly sappy, barely educated 13 year old.
Here’s another issue. Almost everyone has committed poetry at some point–generally when still a child and heartbroken about something. Some very large percentage of poetry out there is by amateurs who never read poetry, and in their work, this shows. It’s dreadful. Really childish and predictable and cliched and full of what they imagine, in their ignorance, to be “poetic” diction–glorious sunsets, verdant hillsides, the first kiss of spring, blah, blah, blah barf. So, AI learns from all that sickening, horrible poetry that that’s what poetry is.
And if you try to EXPLAIN THIS KIND OF THING to large-language-model AI, it’s like trying to explain, say, climate change or law to Donald Trump. Whoosh. The model will thank you and then generate a new, improved poem with exactly the problems that you just enumerated. That’s because it cannot think. All it can do is predict the most common next words from the words preceding those.
LikeLike
I thought all good poetry started out: there once was a man from St. Paul…
LikeLike
There was a gay lad from Khartoum,
took a lesbian girl to his room.
They spent all the night
in a terrible fight
over who should do what and to whom.
LikeLike
AI is high tech imitation, not creation.
LikeLike
Not all AI, but a great deal of it, and all of these large-language-model AIs. And it is imitation of whatever is most common–i.e., of the mediocre.
LikeLike