Thom Hartmann reports on the growing numbers of nations that have rejected democracy and accepted authoritarian rule. The Republican Party, he notes, has pledged its loyalty to an authoritarian leader, accepted his lies about the 2020 elections, and is abandoning Ukraine to please him. Shockingly, very few elected Republicans have stood up to Trump; the few that did are no longer in office.
He writes:
Democracy is in trouble, and the Russian/Ukrainian conflict highlights how imperiled it is becoming in the 21st century. The real issue in Ukraine isn’t just land, any more than the real issue in the US is abortion: that’s all the activity on the surface.
What’s grinding away below the surface, however, is the erosion or outright destruction of democracy itself, whether by invasion from without or corruption from within.
Ukraine and Taiwan represent possible tipping points for democracy internationally, while Republicans passing laws that allow politicians to ignore the results of elections — and Republicans in the US House have refused to stand up for a fellow democracy for 16 months now — could be a tipping point here.
Around the world, and in America today, there are nations and politicians who do believe that democracy — governance via the will of the majority, carried out by elected representatives — is the best form of government for a republic.
At the same time, however, there are many who give lip service to democracy to accomplish their political ends but, in reality, believe that authoritarianism and oligarchy are better ways to rule a nation and keep peace around the world.
And that movement toward authoritarianism and away from democracy is growing.
Freedom House reported in 2021 that:
“[T]he share of countries designated Not Free has reached its highest level since the deterioration of democracy began in 2006, and countries with declines in political rights and civil liberties outnumbered those with gains by the largest margin recorded during the 15-year period. The report downgraded the freedom scores of 73 countries, representing 75 percent of the global population.”
One of those countries they identified as a place where democracy itself is under assault is the USA, where virtually the entire Republican Party has rejected supporting democracy at home and supporting democratic governments abroad.
While this may seem like it’s just a conflict between Russia and the US/Europe, what’s really at stake here is a much, much larger issue.
The real question at the core of the Ukraine conflict, as well as the geopolitical and domestic political positions taken by Fox “News” and many in the GOP, is simple and straightforward:
“What’s the best way for humans to govern themselves?”
The real issue in the Russia-Ukraine and the China-Taiwan (among others) conflicts is that core question of what form of government is best.
Both Ukraine and Taiwan are asserting that democracy is the best way for humans to govern themselves; Russia and China (and about half the other countries of the world) believe they know better — and that history is on their side.
Who’s right?
Is democracy viable and natural, the “best” form of human governance, or is it a weak attempt to accomplish do-gooder goals that simply aren’t realistic or, even worse, are violations of natural law and/or human nature?
Strongman authoritarian regimes, theocracies, and dynastic empires run by ruling families or landowning cliques have been the “norm” for most of the last 7000 years of “modern” human history.
Is that proof, as many on the hard right argue, that the “experiment” of democracy is unnatural and therefore doomed to failure? Should we let Trump overthrow democracy and establish authoritarian rule here in the US? Has the “American experiment” run its course?…
Virtually the entire Republican Party is now committed to authoritarianism instead of democracy. Not even one single Republican senator was willing to vote to guarantee free and fair elections when the We, the People legislation was before Congress, and the party is using Trump’s “stolen election” lie to undermine and ultimately end democracy at the state level.
Right now they are embracing Vladimir Putin instead of Volodymyr Zelenskyy, the president of our Democratic ally. The Putin Caucus in the House is willing to overturn Mike Johnson‘s speakership in service of Putin.
The few former Republican holdouts, like Kinzinger and Cheney, are the exceptions that prove this rule: the GOP is no longer a political party that holds what most of the world has always thought to be “American values.”
They’ve joined the side of Russia and China in this debate, openly asserting that political power should flow from the top down; in our country’s case, they’ve embraced a ruling class of morbidly rich American oligarchs.
A “hot” war across greater Europe may be on the way if Ukraine falls, perhaps followed by China seizing Taiwan once the precedent of “reclaiming former territories” has been set.
This debate about how humans should govern themselves is the real battle of our time, both metaphorically and literally, both internationally and right here at home.
It’s being fought across social media, battled in the billions spent on elections, and even in state and local governments across the US as authoritarian politicians work to keep minorities, young people, women, and LGBTQ+ people “in their place” and away from the voting booth.
No matter how the crisis in Ukraine works out, the underlying dispute will remain: should humans govern themselves democratically from the ground up, or with oligarchy from the top down?
The future of democracy is hanging in the balance, not just in Ukraine and Taiwan but here in the US, as well.
Please open the link to read this article in full.

Democracy will survive.
LikeLike
Indeed, the sky is falling, eh!
LikeLike
When people tell you what they are going to do believe them. These 24 are not exactly snowflakes. https://www.cnn.com/2023/10/03/politics/donald-trump-former-allies-what-matters/index.html
LikeLiked by 1 person
If we knew each other in real life, I would bet you $10,000 that America will still be a democracy at the end of the next President’s term.
LikeLike
That is a debatable proposition already!
LikeLike
Our democracy is already “in chains.” In order to restore this country to a better functioning democracy, we need rules that will limit money in politics. It is hard to see how “one voice, one vote” can compete with the outsized influence of billionaires and corporations.
LikeLiked by 1 person
A few years ago, John Ozalek described a functioning democracy as “majority rule with minority consent” in a comment on this site. I have thought about that idea a lot since he put it so succinctly. This is the principle upon which we maintain the voting rights Hartman mentions. Your vote should have the power to protect the interests of the majority without crushing the right of the minority. A minority can be a lot of things. We might be a religious, ethnic, or simply in political disagreement with a majority.
Right now, what threatens our role as the leader of world democracy is the present system of creating a reliable voting block that can rule with a minority of the votes. Gerrymandered districts where representatives like Margorie Taylor Greene can feel safe in their extremism has granted them veto power in a divided House. We effectively have government by a minority with majority consent. We need to take away this consent in the fall with a massive outpouring of support for the opposition to those who are guiding us toward Hungarian-style authoritarianism. Vote, dammit!
LikeLiked by 2 people
Smart guy, that Ozelek. And one helluva good writer.
LikeLike
In other news, Donald Trump just sent a letter to Republican office holders around the country telling them that if they use his likeness in any of their materials, they have to send him 5% of their contributions.
That’s how it works in the Mob. The organization is arranged into crews. They crews pull off crimes like union no-show jobs, protection rackets, prostitution, drug sales, hijacking of cargo, waste management under inflated contracts arranged by cronies, and so on, then then they pay the Boss his Vig.
This is what it has come to in the United States. We have the head of a crime family running one of our political parties.
LikeLike
Put another way, where’s the vig?
LikeLike
Whoops–missed this question in your comment, Bob.
LikeLike
Don Snoreleone! And they want to call Joe sleepy.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Haaaaaa!!!!!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Stealing that.
LikeLike
Please forgive me if this is overly simplistic, but it seems clear from historical precedent that Democracy survives when people know what it is (and isn’t), people remember how long and hard any common (not royalty or rich) people had to fight to obtain this form of government, and people have enough “free time” (not constantly having to work for basic survival nor constantly being bombarded by commodification and commercialization of every aspect of life) to be “free thinkers” about what they truly want (and truly do not want) in their world and the future worlds of their children. Granted, these conditions are thwarted by contemporary American culture’s consummate obsession with “wealth for wealth’d sake” even at the expense of its own citizens’ mental health or socio-emotional growth despite corporate-sponsored culture wars.
LikeLike
Therefore, perhaps it’s cold comfort for those who know their world history to admit that the “will of the people” at present is, tragically, to sell their Democracy to the highest bidder (or, in colonialist-speak, the ones with the most financial/political/religious “might” in the hopes that they are “right”) because capitalism in its current corrupted form is doomed to reincarnate the Divine Right of “Kings” (winners in the “gang warfare” of overthrowing the rule of law for personal gain). But again, using history as a predictor of arguably inevitable (aka inalienable or self-evident) future events, a return of feudalism will result in a return of common people yearning to use their “common sense” and fight ruthlessly once again for a return of Renaissance, Great Awakening, and Liberty and Justice for All.
LikeLike
Well said! Hope to see more of your comments on this blog!
LikeLiked by 1 person
mountainmaidenmade
Was it ever the common people. Were they commoners who forced King John to sign the Magna Carta. Were the great artists and thinkers of the renaissance commoners ? Were Hobbes or Voltaire Commoners. Were the signers of the Declaration ” Commoners” or were they disgruntled English Aristocrats who thought that all English land owners should be treated equally, regardless of whether they lived in England or the Colonies.
I suspect the commoners have followed not led throughout history. Usually just happy to subsist. The mob following Robespierre as they follow Trump. Till they turn on Robespierre. We should be so lucky.
LikeLiked by 1 person
“…enough “free time” (not constantly having to work for basic survival…”
I consider it ironic that the New England citizen farmer and small merchant had plenty of time in 1770 to recreate by considering political philosophy, yet we seem to distracted to do the same in a day when we have far more time than they did.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Exactly! One might conclude that our so-called “Age of Information “ is when human beings lost sight of or were over-powered by our own lack of conscious control of what “information” is rather than developed “mastery” over information. But then (hold on to your sense of humor, Homer Simpson as Everyman “Doh!” style) one might be tempted to reassess the Industrial Age as when we were overcome by our own inability to manage industry appropriately. Even the Age of Reason falls suspect as that happened to be an age in which human beings’ enslavement of other human beings was most widely considered “reasonable” around the globe. As a final insult to hubris-cursed species (“wise, wise man” really???), presently our planetary ecosystem is collapsing, our implementation of “civility” in our “civilizations” has become questionable, multiple crises from biological epidemics to soaring suicide rates afflict first-world countries whose governments are too preoccupied with trying to discern avarice from virtue and unalterable facts from whole-cloth fictions to do anything sufficiently productive or proactive about the people’s crises, and we use our supposed supplemental intelligence (aka Artificial Intelligence) not to gather and analyze innumerable data points which could tell us exactly how big our real problems are and suggest real possible solutions but to reflect our own self-destructive, narcissistic, out-of-control consumerism and capitalistic Ouroboros nature!
LikeLike
I would venture to guess that 80 percent of insects have disappeared worldwide has not been mentioned in the halls of our Congress this term, or the term before that. But, you know, Hunter’s Laptop.
LikeLike
MM: interesting observations. Things look bleak in some ways. Still, I expect people during the 30 years war thought they were never coming out of the carnage. My mother often talked of how bleak things looked in 1940 with Hitler “marching across Europe,”
LikeLike
In a very related topic, it appears Austin Smith, Arizona State Representative has ended his campaign when he was caught forging signatures. Seems there is voter fraud, and it is being used by the far right.
Turning Point Action official resigns after accusation of election-related fraud – The Washington Post
LikeLike
It’s never been easy. Adlai Stevenson pointed out that “the natural condition of man is servitude.” He added that by great and continued vigilance we could have something better. But it would never be easy.
I ask, if we play the part of Hitler, who plays Roosevelt? When we invaded Iraq in ’03, for no good reason–when we overthrew Iran in ’54, etc., when we helped overthrow Ukraine in ’14, when we continue to support a violent ouster in Syria, we set terrible examples. The Roosevelt-Truman U.N., the Carter-sponsored peace between Israel and Egypt, the Clinton-aided truce between Catholics and Protestants in Ireland, those were America at its best–America the peacemaker. Sadly, we’ve too often been something other than peacemaker.
Democracy at gunpoint is not democracy. We need the respect other systems, other peoples, and follow the good examples of Roosevelt, Carter, etc.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ukraine was not overthrown in 2014. There was a revolution to oust the pro-Russian government. The Ukrainian people wanted to be part of the west.
2014 was also the year that Putin invaded Ukraine and seized Crimea. The west let him get away with it so he thought he might as well take the whole country in 2022.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Exactly, Diane. I wish that people would learn the history here.
Highly recommended:
Timothy Snyder: The Making of Modern Ukraine. Class 1: Ukrainian Questions Posed by Russian Invasion (youtube.com)
LikeLike
What’s the difference between a “revolution” and an “overthrow”? In 2014 there were a lot of guns, some shots, some killed. An elected leader fled for his life. Sen. John McCain was involved–there are pictures of him speaking to crowds there. Undersecretary Victory Nuland was there–there are recordings of her conversations on the phone, deeply involved in what seems like choosing Ukraine’s leaders.
There is some dispute as to who fired the shots into the crowd–were they anti-Russian, pro-western agents or anti-western, pro-Russian? It’s not totally clear to me and others.
Ukraine has a long and close relationship with Russia–they were intertwined nations and cultures for hundreds of years. (Like Texas was part of Mexico, for e.g.). Many, many people of Ukraine–especially in the east speak Russian and identify with Russia–don’t want to be part of the “West”). Others, especially in western Ukraine apparently do.
Into this set of facts, one should consider the US’ sad history of overthrowing governments. It’s a very long list–starting with Texas/Mexico, on through Hawaii, many governments in Latin America, etc. In ’54 we overthrew Iran; Iraq in ’03; etc. (See “Overthrow,” by Kinzer and “Desert Mirage” by Yant). We tried to overthrow Venezuela. We had troops in Norway, a few miles from the Russian border, in 2014.
I’m a veteran, a retired history teacher, etc. I don’t like the above facts, but they are facts. I’m old enough to remember FDR and his Four Freedoms–for “everybody in the world.” But through the UN, etc., not by force. I point to Pres. Carter’s return of Panama territory, his efforts to bring Egypt and Israel together–and even to Reagan’s reproachment with Gorbachev–as better directions for our nation. As we discuss this, we have troops on Syrian soil attempting to carry out the “Assad must go” slogan of our out-of-control foreign, interventionist policies. Btw, Assad, Hussein, Madero, and Gadhafi–whom we helped overthrow–were all allies of Putin. Any sane person in his shoes would have a right to worry a lot about Western motives in Ukraine.
And–on top of all this–whether you agree with any of it or not, Russia has 6000 nuclear bombs and might well use them in an attempt to save their best warm water part, Odessa. What would we do if Russia were helping Mexico retake Texas? It’s not worth the risk of a nuclear war for us to get control of Ukraine, the Black Sea, or whatever we imagine we’re doing.
And please, let’s not imagine we’re doing this for love of the people of Ukraine. As stated, millions want to be part of Russia. Sadly, many of us don’t like foreigners from any land. I don’t think we’re risking WWIII for love of the people of Ukraine. Though, of course, some Americans do care–as I think the owners of this web do, about the people of Ukraine. But let’s not try to change their land or region by force.
Peace,
Sp3 Jack Burgess, 894 Tank Btn.
History teacher, retired
LikeLiked by 1 person
Jack. Lisen to Snyder’s lectures. Learn the actual history.
LikeLike
I’m simply not going to take the effort to explain to you why you are wrong about all this. Take Snyder’s class. Learn what really happened.
LikeLike
Perhaps it’s fair and accurate to say that we all can only be as wise as we are in any present moment. The scientific method itself, for all of its methodological benefits, would reduce life itself and any individual human being’s experiences to “matters of faith” or worse – logical fallacies – insofar as they are dependent upon irreproducible “experiments” not necessarily open to “peer review.” In short, kindness and patience with ourselves and our fellow human beings may prove yet to be the highest expression of wisdom (aka sometimes intelligence).
LikeLiked by 1 person
Read “Overthrow.” You can do that. I can’t take anybody’s classes. I’m 86. I did study Russian Foreign Policy at Ohio State with folks who’d been there.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Another of Hartmann’s posts well worth reading is his summary of the numerous times GOP’s fixer Bill Barr has intervened to save the day for the nefarious doings of the upper echelon. Barr disavowed Trump just before January 6, but now says he will support the Republican nominee. Barr is consistent.
https://hartmannreport.com/p/bill-barr-the-gops-master-fixer-for
LikeLike
Barr is one of those guys like Lee Atwater who do the dirty work for the bosses. Despicable.
LikeLike
And now for a quick joke: WWJB? It’s Thanksgiving, 2024, just after our next US Presidential Election has concluded. Jesus is having Thanksgiving dinner with three far-right Conservatives, three Republicans, three Democrats, and three Progressives. What would Jesus be? A Preservative.
“Just a spoonful of sugar helps the medicine go down.”
LikeLiked by 1 person