Timothy Snyder is outraged that Republicans in Congress refuse to send more aid to Ukraine unless there is a border deal, and have decided to help Trump by refusing to agree to a border deal. Trump insists: no border deal because it will make Biden look good. This is sickening.
He writes:
It’s a frustrating time for Americans who support Ukraine. Congressional Republicans said that they support Ukraine, but want to connect it to the border. Then, when given the chance to address the border, they decline.
During these gaslit shenanigans, good people who are fighting a defensive war of tremendous historic significance are being killed when they might have lived.
It is sad to recite all the ways that Ukrainian resistance serves US interests. Sad because not enough people in Congress care about US interests. And sad because one shouldn’t even have to refer to them.
It is rare to have a chance to halt a war of aggression and prevent a genocidal occupation at zero risk and with the loss of zero soldiers. That level of moral clarity, available once in any political lifetime, ought to be reason enough to act.
Even if they do not care for others, Americans ought to at least care for themselves.
They should care that they do well from an international order in which it is not normal for countries to invade one another. Ukrainians defend that. Americans should care that the risk of nuclear war has been reduced. Ukrainians achieve that by resisting Putin’s nuclear blackmail. Americans should care that the chance of war in Europe has been drastically reduced. Ukraine is fulfilling by itself the entire NATO mission, absorbing and blunting a Russian attack. Americans should care that China is being deterred. So long as Ukraine resists, it is much less likely that Taiwan will be threatened and America will be drawn into a war in the Pacific.
The money in question has not been significant. It is a nickel on the defense department dollar. Much of that nickel remains in the United States. The weapons we send have been used extraordinarily efficiently. The Ukrainians, with symbolic numbers of American weapons, have used them withe extraordinary skill and to great effect.
We can hope that these arguments will matter at some point! And perhaps they will.
In the meantime, we can at least act as civil society. Please help me finish my Safe Skies project. It funds a passive drone detection system, one that is already protecting four Ukrainian regions and is now being extended to another four. It allows Ukrainians to find Iranian-made or -modelled drones and shoot them down before they cause harm. It also works on cruise missiles. I have seen the system’s components when I was in Ukraine, and I know how it works. Like so much that the Ukrainians do, the system is very cost effective. $1.8 million was the total amount to be raised, and we are about 90% there.
Amidst all the ill will, it would be good to have something to celebrate. Thanks to all of you who have contributed. Most drone attacks are now halted, and in this way critical infrastructure is protected and people are kept alive.
America as a country can do much more, and should. But as Americans this is one thing we can achieve now. We are almost there.
PS: In saying all this, I don’t at all want to leave out all of you from beyond the United States, and it is a very significant number, who have contributed to this campaign! Thank you. This is just a particular moment when Americans might want to take the matter in hand.

“It is rare to have a chance to halt a war of aggression and prevent a genocidal occupation at zero risk and with the loss of zero soldiers.”
Zero American soldiers (which, incidentally, isn’t entirely true – there have been plenty of American soldier mercenaries who have been killed in Ukraine, plenty of whom I suspect are getting paid by Uncle Sam). Hundreds of thousands of Ukrainian soldiers have already died for those U.S. interests. I kinda thought this was about the Ukrainians? Now it’s about U.S. interests? Well, thanks for the honesty at least.
LikeLike
To be sure, it is certainly in America’s interest to enable Ukraine to stop Putin’s unprovoked war of aggression. We sent billions to defend Ukraine because it’s in our interest to uphold a nation trying to establish democracy. And it’s in our interest to defend the sovereignty of Ukraine. We should continue to help the brave people of Ukraine. They do not want to be subjected to Putin’s dictatorial tyranny.
If we could have stopped Hitler in 1938 or 1939, the world would have been spared a World War.
Putin has grand ambitions to reassemble the USSR. He said that the dissolution of the Soviet empire was “the greatest geopolitical disaster of the 20th century.” The people of the former Soviet satellites do not agree. They do not want to be subjugated by Putin.
I am sending $500 to Professor Snyder for his project. I support Ukrainian independence.
LikeLike
I think it’s cute that you think the U.S. gives a fig for any country’s “sovereignty” given the dozens of countries we’ve invaded, bombed, couped and otherwise regime changed.
And if Putin has a grand ambition to reunify the USSR, why did he take 20 years to start?
LikeLike
I can’t explain Putin’s behavior. Russia was doing incredibly well before he decided to invade Ukraine. It was integrated into the global economy. Young people in Russia had hope for the future. The streets in Moscow and St. Petersburg resembled streets in Western European cities—bustling with commerce and cafes.
Now Russia is cut off from the world except for its fellow tyrannies—North Korea, Iran, and a few others like Hamas. Its educated youth have fled the country and moved to Lithuania, Latvia, Georgia, Albania. They don’t want to die in Ukraine. Russia’s independent media have been closed down. It’s back to the days of Stalinism. The creative types—the intellectuals, writers, artists—have run away.
So sad that this demented tyrant would throw away peace and prosperity to satisfy his goal of reassembling the USSR.
LikeLike
Putin is a Cold War relic. He is breathtakingly backward.
LikeLike
His supreme court, stroking the Glorious Leader, just made just being LGBTQ participation in an international terrorist organization and imposed prison sentences on all LGBTQ people. Simply being gay or lesbian in Russia is now a crime punishable by a prison sentence. And Putin thinks this just grand.
He’s a relic. And a kleptocrat. And a dictator. And a mass murderer. And an indicted international war criminal. It’s breathtaking that there are any Americans or Europeans who support the guy. So so so so regressive and oppressive.
LikeLike
Ah, there is the whataboutism we’ve come to know and slap our foreheads about, that causes us to laugh and groan.
LikeLike
The word you’re looking for is hypocrisy. Or serial lying maybe. Sure, they lied to us about every other conflict we’ve ever been in but they’re totally telling the truth this time! And I’m the one propagandized. LOL and SMDH.
LikeLike
Putin and his cronies and George Jr. and his manipulators and handlers should all be in prison for war crimes. In each case, there were multiple egregious violations of international law.
LikeLike
Thank you, Diane!
LikeLike
If your neighbor’s house is burning and you turn your water hose on the fire, this is in your neighbor’s interest. It is also in yours.
Duh.
LikeLike
If your “neighbor” lives 5,000 miles away, you generally aren’t threatened by their house being on fire.
LikeLike
I expect you would have said the same in 1938.
LikeLike
Well said, Diane!
LikeLike
The analogy works PRECISELY because we are also threatened (and because helping the neighbor is the right thing to do). This is a challenge of the fundamental law on which the fragile international order is based. If we do away with the principle that one UN country cannot just decide to invade another UN country, then THAT’S THE END OF INTERNATIONAL LAW AND OF THE UN. Neither means anything anymore. And for this reason alone, the attack on Ukraine is an attack on us and on the rest of the world. But that’s not the only one. We (and much of the rest of the world) depend upon Ukraine for exports of staples like flour and cooking oil. We don’t need Russia controlling those–Russia, which has proven itself not to have the interests of the world in general at heart. Another MAJOR reason why this invasion threatens US is that it gives Russia control over shipping in the Black Sea. Yet another MAJOR reason is that Putin has been quite clear that he is intent upon building a “Greater Russia” by engulfing his neighbors, and this must be stopped, for it is a DIRECT THREAT TO THE NATO ALLIANCE, of which we are a member. Many of the other members of this alliance are our major trading partners, so an attack on them is also an attack on us. I could go on, but you don’t get the picture because you don’t get anything about this war. You swallow propaganda whole and it addles your brain.
LikeLike
It’s so funny how a guys whose views line up precisely with the liberal media thinks other people are propagandized. Seriously, turn off the MSDNC and put down the NYT and WaPo. Start looking for non-western sources because it’s becoming a non-western world, especially after the west’s support of genocide.
LikeLike
Read Pravda and learn the truth.
LikeLike
Russians know their media lies to them. You think American media reports the truth. Despite numerous examples to the contrary. Who’s more propagandized?
LikeLike
C’mon. There is no free or independent media in Russia. They have all been closed down. Obviously you have many sources of information that don’t agree with the New York Times or the Washington Post. In Russia, it is a crime to discuss Putin’s war on Ukraine. We are discussing it now, and you will not be arrested for criticizing the government.
LikeLike
Here’s the difference, Dienne: I can say that George Bush, Jr.; Condoleezza Rice; Dick Cheney; and Paul Wolfowitz are war criminals without having goons come throw me out of a 10th-story window. Pretty big difference, that. And I can read media here that explain just why they are war criminals. And I can go out in the street and hold up a sign denouncing a U.S. war.
LikeLike
“When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle.” Edmund Burke (probably what morphed into the wrongly attributed quote “The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing”)
There are people here who don’t view Putin as bad and they post obsessively any time there is criticism to justify Putin’s actions as reasonable and right. Putin is NEVER wrong. Not ever. Putin is a selfless leader who tries only to do what’s best for his country and is occasionally forced to protect his country.
At some point, you choose sides, and they have chosen Putin. It’s not at all surprising that these very same people have chosen to normalize Trump’s evil as well.
Neither Trump nor Putin does anything bad that wasn’t directly caused by the evil “West/Dems/other”. Just rational actors with totally normal intentions to do what’s best for their country who are sometimes forced by the “bad” people to act in ways that should never be criticized because it was done to help their country.
LikeLike
From a US and world perspective, this war is about upholding international law, about ensuring that the legal order is secured and prevails and persists. Here, a sampling of the many ways in which indicted international war criminal Tsar Vladimir Putin the Defenestrator has VIOLATED INTERNATIONAL LAW in Ukraine:
by illegally invading another sovereign UN member state, in direct violation of THE FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLE on which the UN and the world legal order is based
by directly targeting civilians, raping and murdering them (regardless of age, btw: its untrained and undisciplined marauders have raped and murdered small children and grandmothers)
by pillaging civilians’ resources
by kidnapping and deporting large numbers of children
by directly targeting civilian infrastructure necessary for survival, including electricity for heating during the winter
by using banned weapons, including thermobaric bombs, cluster munitions, and CHEMCIAL grenades
by directly targeting cultural institutions and monuments
And before Dienne pipes in with some whataboutism, yes, the US did many of the same things in Iraq in the Second Gulf War. And for exactly the same reasons, those responsible for that war should also be tried as war criminals.
LikeLike
And this war is about stopping Putin’s imperialist territorial ambitions. He made it quite clear in his essay based on mythological history, “One the Historical Unity of Russians and Ukrainians,” that he planned to create a “Greater Russia,” a new empire, by attacking and engulfing his neighbors.
LikeLike
America First?
On April 23, 1941, American aviation hero and spokesman for the America First movement delivered a major speech in New York in which he declared that perhaps Hitler was justified in starting the war in Europe and told the listening throng that “we cannot win this war for England, no matter how much assistance we send.” The cheers from the huge America First crowd showed how popular this view was — and the America First crowds had been responsible for delaying and strangling U.S. aid to England ever since HItler started war in Europe in 1938. This failure to aid England was seen by Hitler as American cowardice.
The Japanese were also watching the America First movement, and, like HItler, the Japanese military concluded that Americans were too cowardly to take any military action if Japan bombed Pearl Harbor and told America that the Pacific belonged to Japan.
So, on December 7, 1941, just five months after Lindberg’s much-cheered speech to the America First movement, Japan bombed Pearl Harbor; then Hitler declared war on America, and World War II was underway.
Americasuffered more than 1,000,000 casualties in WWII. Could all those Americans have been spared had America early-on sent England and France the weapons they needed to fight Hitler and stop him before he conquered all of Europe? Would the Japanese have taken a look at America’s resolve to stop Hitler’s aggression and have decided not to attack Pearl Harbor?
We will never know…yet it seems possible.
Today, Trump has been calling touting “America First” for years and implying that Putin has justification for seizing the Crimean region of Ukraine and invading other areas of that nation. Trump and his “Make America Great Again” supporters in Congress have fought against sending aid to Ukraine. And Putin sees that as a sign of American weakness; already he is using the same words he used to justify his invasion of Ukraine to attack other former Soviet Union nations, claiming that they are “a threat to Russia’s security”. If Putin isn’t decisively stopped now, he is likely to invade those nations — and those nations are members of NATO. Is that why Trump wants America out of NATO? So that his pal Putin can invade those small NATO nations, knowing the western Europe alone cannot stop him?
And then what comes next?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Well said!
LikeLike
I made a donation and posted it on social media. We must not abandon Ukraine.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Another brilliant post from you, Quickwrit! Thank you for this.
LikeLike
Prior to its invasion, Russia asked for an assurance that Ukraine would remain a neutral nation and not join NATO. Egged on by the west, Ukraine was to be a cat’s paw in an effort to weaken Russia. Alas, Ukraine became another sacrificial lamb in one of several failed proxy wars the U.S. and NATO have waged around the world. Meanwhile, weapons manufacturers rake in record profits and a stubborn minority of Americans continue to support pushing conscripted Ukrainian soldiers (poorly trained, average age 43+ years old) to their deaths. Sooner or later, a negotiated ceasefire, truce, or treaty will be achieved. How many more Ukrainians must die while westerners figure out how to best save face?
LikeLike
Indicted international war criminal Tsar Vladimir Putin was the one who violated international law here by illegally invading another sovereign UN member state.
LikeLike
I won’t waste time debating how/when/why the “war” started. Instead, the focus ought to be how to end the suffering and bloodshed.
LikeLike
I’m with you, James. How to end Putin’s war on Ukraine is paramount.
LikeLike
Putin could end it right now. A single word from him, and it would be over. Withdraw.
LikeLike
James,
Bob asks the perfect question.
Why aren’t you demanding Putin stop? That would put an end to the bloodshed immediately as Ukraine has no desire to control Russia.
Do you really want to stop the bloodshed, or do you just want Putin to get anything he wants with us acting as Neville Chamberlain to Putin and giving him the go ahead?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Excellent commment, NYCPSP. Russia invaded Ukraine. There are only two ways to end the war: Ukraine surrenders.
Or Putin stops attacking Ukraine.
Russia currently occupies 20% of Ukraine.
LikeLike
LOL. The propagandist’s technique of accusing the opposition of what one is doing. RUSSIA is sending untrained soldiers who are LITERALLY criminals to fight and die in Ukraine. It is LITERALLY emptying prisons to supply the cannon fodder.
LikeLike
Projection much? (Old men and teenagers are being kidnapped off the streets of Ukrainian cities to be compelled to fight and die in the failed U.S./NATO proxy war against Russia.)
LikeLike
Putin has been sending prison convicts to fight for Russia.
LikeLike
More bullshit false propaganda. Putin was charged in the International Criminal Court with the mass kidnappings of Ukrainian children removed to Russia to be indoctrinated.
LikeLike
And Russia is losing. If it weren’t for the draconian authoritarian silence in Russia imposed by hefty prison terms for anyone who EVEN FREAKING MENTIONS THE WAR and calls it a war, there would be overwhelming demonstrations in the street. Russians are tired of losing their young lads in a pointless and criminal war that they have no chance of winning.
LikeLike
Putin’s approval ratings in Russia are higher than Biden’s approval ratings in the U.S. Sanctions imposed on Russia have failed to significantly harm that country’s economy. Large numbers of anti-war advocates in Ukraine have been imprisoned, tortured, and murdered. In Ukraine, opposition parties have been banned and freedom of the press is practically non-existent. Your selective outrage is duly noted.
LikeLike
I’m sure Putin’s approval ratings in Russia are very near 100%. So were Stalin’s.
LikeLike
Haaa!!! Perfect, Diane. Oh yes. Everyone loved Stalin or was tortured and killed.
https://fujomedia.eu/edward-tufte-lessons-in-information-visualisation/#prettyPhoto/6/
LikeLike
Putin’s approval rating is currently about 70%.
LikeLike
How quickly that will change when he’s gone.
LikeLike
Stalin appears to Putin in a dream. Putin asks if Stalin has any advice for him. Stalin says, “Yes. Kill your opponents and paint the Kremlin blue.” Putin says, “Why blue?”
LikeLike
James Eales says Putin has done NOTHING wrong. Putin’s annihilation of so many Ukraine families – including children – and their homes, is not his fault. The similarity between James Eales and the Hitler-loving American Firsters that quickwit mentions is stunning.
They loved Hitler beyond reason and excused his worst actions. Just like this post excuses Putin’s worst actions.
LikeLike
NYC public school parent writes, “James Eales says Putin has done NOTHING wrong.” I’ve never said that, as I don’t believe that. (Libel isn’t good faith commenting.)
LikeLike
This is what NYC does, James. Not just to you, to everyone she disagrees with. She imputes to them statements they never made and thoughts they never had, and then posts extended diatribes attacking those positions that people never took. LOL. “Then you must think that, . . .” This tendency goes beyond bad writing to extremely sloppiness of thought that several here have referred to as “word salad” and “tortured logic.” Anyone who holds an opinion that varies in the slightest from hers is automatically at some horrific extreme because everything is black and white, good or evil. I am as yet unawakened and a horrible racist because I think we should teach To Kill a Mockingbird and that it’s untrue that all white people are racists, for example.
LikeLike
Adding to its many crimes under international law in Ukraine, Russia has started using chemical weapon grenades there. Chemical weapons!
Criminals. We must renew our military support for Ukraine, and may the day come when Putin and his cronies are standing in the dock at the Hague, charged with war crimes and crimes against humanity.
And this war must be fought, for the sake of the international legal order, until the aggressor is driven out of every square millimeter of Ukraine, including Crimea and the Donbas.
LikeLike
Does Ukraine’s use of depleted uranium weapons (supplied by the U.S.) count as a war crime?
LikeLike
So glad you asked. You are referring to the recent decision to send depleted uranium-coated howitzer shells to Ukraine to help it defend itself against the Russian invader’s tanks.
Well, several studies have shown no adverse long-term health effects from the use of armor-penetrating depleted uranium weapons, while a couple have. So, it’s not an entirely settled issue. The preponderance of the evidence is that they do not have long-term effects due to radiation. The UN issued a report on them after their use in Kosovo and said that it found NO EVIDENCE of radiation poisoning from their use. As a result of the scientific studies done on this topic, use of depleted uranium weapons is NOT currently illegal internationally under the Law of Armed Conflict (LOAC), which bans indiscriminate weapons like thermobaric bombs, cluster munitions, and chemical weapons. So no, their use is not a war crime.
LikeLike
I see that we have received comments from BOTH of our regular Putinist propagandists. Predictable as mangled English at a Trump rally.
LikeLike
As Thom Hartmann pointed out today, if Putin succeeds in Ukraine he will move on to Poland and/or the Baltic countries, Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania. Putin is a shameless, power hungry prevaricating aggressor.
LikeLike
Exactly. And this is just what Putin himself promised in the essay that I cited above.
LikeLike
The handwriting is on the wall, but the MAGA maniacs bury their heads in the sand. Quickwrit made the parallels quite clear between our late support for WWII and what is happening in Ukraine.
LikeLike
“We all agree on the need to better secure the border … we simply cannot allow people to pour into the United States undetected, undocumented, unchecked, and circumventing the line of people … who are waiting lawfully,” – Barack Obama, 2005.
How many Democrats would say this in 2024? How many commenters on this blog?
LikeLike
Barack Obama was a Democrat in name only. His policies were extremely right-wing. He filled his cabinet with fat cats from the US financial industry, and he carried on war criminal Bushie Jr’s war in precisely the same vein as Bushie did.
LikeLike
And yes, to his eternal shame, he was ruthless in his deportation of undocumented immigrants and people seeking asylum while at the same time professing Christian belief. Just like the Repugnicans he was indistinguishable from except by his race. And ironically, that alone was enough for the Repugnicans to hate him, including a criminal moron real estate guy from New York with orange tan-in-a-can skin.
LikeLike
Cathy Patterson,
Statue of Liberty:
“Give me your tired, your poor, Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free, The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.”
How many Republicans whose grandfathers and wives got here illegally would say this in 2024?
It is the Republicans who are blocking the bill to secure our borders. Because they don’t want to secure our borders. They want to stop immigration period, except of their chosen ones.
It’s like how Republicans support their own version of the right to vote, where the chosen ones should be able to vote often (in their two homes, on their dead relative’s ballot, when they aren’t yet 18!) and easily, but the ones who aren’t chosen should have as many barriers as possible put in their way and have to travel long distances and stand in line for hours to vote.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Did Melania Trump get in because models are in such short supply in the US that we have to make exceptions for them? ROFL.
LikeLike
Using the term “models” loosely.
LikeLike
Thanks for the clarification. I was thinking “escorts.”
LikeLike
What a first for the profession, becoming First Lady of the United States!!! Pioneering!!!
LikeLike
So much about Trump’s term was unpresidented.
LikeLiked by 1 person
LOL. Don’t you love Trump’s accidental coinage there? IT’S SO PERFECT. Unpresidential in an illicit liaison with unprecedented. The word so perfectly describes Trump’s maladministration. Who would have expected this delicious outcome from Trump’s War on English? It’s even more wonderful than is misunderestimated.
LikeLike
“We all agree on the need to better secure the border … we simply cannot allow people to pour into the United States undetected, undocumented, unchecked, and circumventing the line of people … who are waiting lawfully,” – Barack Obama, 2005.
“How many Democrats would say this in 2024? How many commenters on this blog?”
Cathy Patterson,
I would say it. I believe everyone who enters the US should enter legally.
Why do you think that Democrats want “open borders”? I don’t . Biden doesn’t.
Trump is trying to kill the bipartisan deal that gives Republicans whatever they have asked for.
So, it’s safe to say that Trump wants open borders along with agribusiness and fat cats who want low-wage workers.
LikeLike
Well said. The system is broken, and we need both parties to fix it. The right wing extremists are to blame for refusing to tackle it and for trying to use it as a bargaining chip.
LikeLike
Where are the supporters of Bush’s illegal war in Iraq? They said he had WMDs. They said he was dangerous to the world. Saddam was a world danger. Now they say America first. Horse manure! These people like Putin because their fascist leader likes him.
LikeLike
According to former CIA Director George Tenet’s autobiography, there actually were SOME WMDs found in Iraq. These were barrels of chemical weapons in a warehouse, weapons that the US had sent to Hussein when he was our guy (we are the ones who put this former hired killer in power to begin with). Tenet says that the US bombed the warehouse to destroy the evidence because the barrels had labels on them clearly indicating that they came from us.
LikeLike
One of the supporters of Bush’s illegal war in Iraq lives in the White House. His name is Joe Biden.
LikeLike
Do you realize Biden voted AGAINST authorizing force against Iraq?
In 1991, Senator Joe Biden voted AGAINST authorizing authorizing Operation Desert Storm. So did many other Democrats. Funny how you aren’t excoriating Biden for being too anti-war by invoking his 1991 vote. Cherry pick much?
In 2002 Biden voted to authorize the president to go to war, as did noted peacenik and anti-war pro-peace crusader John Kerry.
I also agreed with John Kerry’s vote AT THE TIME.
Because AT THE TIME, it was a reasonable choice, even if it turned out to be the wrong choice.
And let’s look at the facts:
“Yes, Biden voted to authorize the invasion, along with most senators; the resolution passed the Senate 77-23. But as chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Biden held a series of hearings in the summer of 2002 that remain the best public discussion of the likely challenges any such military campaign would face. They underscored how complex any invasion and stabilization effort in Iraq would surely be. That the Bush administration chose to ignore the Senate’s advice, and prepare for war on the premise that overthrowing Saddam would be a “cakewalk,” as defense policy analyst Kenneth Adelman infamously predicted, is not Biden’s fault.”
Neither Biden nor Kerry continue to support the war once they had further information, but both of them were smeared by the far right (and deluded, pro-putin folks on the left) for their original vote to authorize the war.
In fact, Obama was one of the most prominent anti-war candidates and Biden accepted Obama’s VP offer and helped Obama defeat John McCain by defending Obama’s anti-war stance throughout the 2008 campaign.
James Eales, when you have to invoke what someone did 22 years ago but ignore what they did 33 years ago, and ignore what they did 19 years ago, 15 years ago, 10 years ago, 5 years ago, 4 years ago, 3 years ago, 1 year ago, you are simply revealing your own bias. Bernie Sanders was pro-gun. Once. Diane Ravitch was pro-education reform. Once.
GOOD people change their minds. Bad people try to demonize good people who follow the evidence and change their minds by selectively ignoring this and attacking them for positions they haven’t held in decades.
Bad people keep supporting Putin and Hitler long after it is clear that they are very bad. Bad people push the narrative that Putin can do no wrong. Certainly if you lived in Russia, you and your family would live short lives if you disagreed.
LikeLike
^^quote from USA Today, 9/14/20 “Iraq makes most politicians look bad. Joe Biden’s record is actually a bit above average.”
LikeLike
My longer post is held up so maybe this will post.
Joe Biden voted AGAINST Bush’s war in Iraq. In 1991, Biden voted against authorizing Operation Desert Storm.
In 2003, Bush and John Kerry and others voted to authorize another Bush War. And then they BOTH realized they were wrong.
You were one of the supporters of Putin’s illegal war on Ukraine. But unlike Biden, you don’t seem to have changed your mind as new evidence arose about why Putin’s war is wrong.
Do you think the rest of your life you should be judged untrustworthy and immoral because you supported Putin’s illegal war on Ukraine? You made a mistake. So did Biden. Perhaps one day your integrity will result in you acknowledging you were wrong, as Biden’s integrity did.
LikeLike