This is the most bizarre story I have read in many a day. The Boston Globe reported on a study showing a “serious literacy crisis” among the state’s youngest children. This is strange because Massachusetts regularly performs at the top of NAEP reading assessments.
The study was conducted by WestEd, a research group based in California. Apparently the researchers assessed the literacy skills of children in kindergarten, first and second grades. It is not surprising that most children in K and 1 and even 2 can’t read. They are only beginning to read.
The story starts:
A new state-commissioned study of young elementary students found that more than half showed early signs of reading difficulties — more evidence that the state has a serious literacy crisis, despite its reputation for educational excellence.
The report, released Friday, provides a first-of-its kind look at the reading skills of the state’s youngest children, whose reading prowess is not assessed by the state until the first MCAS exam in third grade.
The results are troubling: Nearly 30 percent of students in grades K-3 were at high risk of reading failure, and as many as 20 percent showed signs of having dyslexia, a language processing disorder that must be addressed with specialized reading instruction. Low-income students, those learning English or receiving special education services, Latino students, and Black students were most likely to experience reading struggles, according to researchers with WestEd, a San Francisco-based nonprofit that conducted the analysis.
The report suggests schools are not helping most struggling readers catch up: 60 percent of students who began the school year at risk of reading difficulties ended the school year in the same concerning position. But it found that younger students are much more likely to improve with extra help than older students are, a powerful argument for early intervention…
The extent of the state’s early literacy struggles have been laid bare annually in MCAS results, which, as the Globe’s Great Divide team previously reported, regularly show tens of thousands of students advancing from grade to grade without the reading skills they need to be successful.
The Globe investigation found nearly half of the state’s school districts last school year were using a reading curriculum the state considered “low quality.” A national nonprofit ranked Massachusetts this year in the bottom half of the nation in preparing educators to teach reading.
Massachusetts has not, as other states have, required evidence-based methods of reading instruction.
The “national nonprofit” that gave low scores to teacher education programs in the state is the National Council on Teacher Quality, a conservative group created by the Thomas B. Fordham Foundation and the George W. Bush administration. Its goal is to promote phonics. When NCTQ ranks Ed schools, it doesn’t visit them; it reads their catalogues.
If Massachusetts has a “serious literacy crisis,” the rest of the nation is a dumpster fire.
On NAEP, fourth grade students in Massachusetts typically score at or near the top in the nation. The percentage of students in Massachusetts who performed at or above NAEP Proficient in 2022 was 43%.
NAEP Proficient is equivalent to an A.
The only jurisdiction with higher scores in fourth grade was the Department of Defense schools. Five states had scores that were not significantly different from Massachusetts. Those six states outperformed 45 states and jurisdictions in fourth grade.
The point of the WestEd study seems to be that the state must push through a greater emphasis on phonics in teacher education programs, and that MCAS testing in grade 3 should start sooner.
The children who need extra help are low-income, limited-English, or in need of special services, etc. This is not news.
The “serious literacy crisis” looks and smells like a manufactured crisis. This report looks like a hit job on the state’s teachers and colleges of education. If the rest of the nation’s children matched the performance of those in Massachusetts, that would be cause for a national celebration.

It’s all in the marketing….. and fear sells to parents.
LikeLike
“The Boston Globe reported on a study showing a “literacy crisis” among the state’s youngest children.”
There is the problem. Modern yellow journalism. If the kids can read, that’s not news. But if there is a problem, that is the news. Solve a problem and things go smoothly. Not news. Problem? now there is some news people will read.
This reminds me of some of the stuff Michael Foucault wrote about the French judicial system.
LikeLike
Good GAWD!
Diane, your last paragraph says it all and I agree with:
“The “serious literacy crisis” looks and smells like a manufactured crisis. This report looks like a hit job on the state’s teachers and colleges of education. If the rest of the nation’s children matched the performance of those in Massachusetts, that would be cause for a national celebration.”
LikeLike
Here comes another contrived crisis designed to usher in the so-called science of reading. As someone that worked with poor, young ELLs for over twenty years, I am opposed to the labeling of young children, unless there is a major neurological or physical reason to do so. Children mature and develop at different rates, and readiness to read varies from child to child. My district provided interventions for young struggling readers in grades 1 and 2 without classifying them. Classification is a serious, legal process and label that should be considered after other repeated interventions have failed, and it should not generally be considered for reading issues before 3rd grade, IMO.
WestEd is not a company led by reading experts. It is a educational data collection company. Based on the performance on the NAEP, Massachusetts has no reading crisis. What it has is profiteers that are eager to cash in on “The Science of Reading” craze.
LikeLike
I would be curious to know what folks here think of Kumon. My impression is that the homework it provides is exceedingly helpful in advancing the early math and reading skills of several immigrant families I know whose K-3 kids use it here in Massachusetts. And I would think that the State would benefit by offering a similar set of materials at no cost to all students whose families might find it helpful.
LikeLike
Sounds like another (name your country) does X better than American public schools. Seen many of them over the years.
Let the kids be kids. No schooling until at least six years of age. Day care? Provide play opportunities not structured pseudo-educational “lessons”.
LET THE KIDS BE KIDS!
LikeLike
Duane: “No schooling until at least six years of age.”
Depends on what the realistic alternative is for any four to five year old, correct?
For a single child of a single working parent, if the alternative is hanging out watching TV for hours supervised by gramps who doesn’t speak English, or another babysitter, but no other kids present, then some schooling… a Junior Kindergarten with some ABCs (including phonics), and 1,2,3’s, and story hour, and art, music and playground, mingling with about 15 other kids sounds very good to me.
In regard to TV, I can’t believe there isn’t far better assistance easily available for families that allow their young kids to watch a lot of TV, but would prefer that the content be carefully curated to support healthy cognitive/emotional/behavioral development. Perhaps much more of such potential support exists than I’m aware of. Any leads would be appreciated.
LikeLike
BU WHEELOCK literacy experts are pushing back on the reading wars binary choices, arguing for a more nuanced approach that pulls in the best of each philosophy as well as other evidence based teaching techniques.” page 19: “Dean David Chard found that NCTQ reviewed only two outdated syllabi not the totality of our students’ experiences when coming up with its grade of how well we train aspiring educators to teach literacy. Dean David Chard listed some of the steps that the college is taking to improve, some of which have been in progress for more than 2 years; these include reviewed course offerings, and hiring an outside agency to assess the school’s literacy program.” We are addressing the gaps.——————————————————————————— see Boston University Magazine pages 19 and 20https://www.bu.edu/wheelock/magazine/
LikeLike
I work in Ohio and when the survey results came out my literacy trainers were concerned. I looked into it and found that there were many issues with the National Council on Teacher Quality survey. Additionally several of the universities in Ohio chose NOT to participate because of these issues.
LikeLike
Agree, This is a solution in search of a problem. Funny how the NCTQ involvement with the Globe story is masked. Follow the bread crumbs here. Heather Peske was an Associate Commissioner at the state Dept of Education in MA…and she was all about the state getting involved in curriculum rating. She didn’t get a ton of traction… at least not fast enough. Fast forward, she moves to a top spot at NCTQ…folks that MA educators have not given attention to over the years. NCTQ has used questionable practices on collecting and interpreting data to ‘rate’. They have been doing this for more than a decade . They had not been getting marked attention or responses to their findings. But, they have money and they keep coming back. MA educators have been wondering what would be next when Peske moved to NCTQ…
Can MA do better? Yes. Always. Is MA paying attention? Yes. And we do better when national data collectors are not setting dumpster fires. Especially dumpster fires that sell products.
LikeLike
I have written repeatedly about NCTQ. It is an organization created by the conservative Thomas B. Fordham Foundation in 2000 to criticize and discredit teacher education. No researchers consider it a reliable source.
LikeLike
I see that WestEd is listed on the Bill & Melinda Gates foundation as one of their committed grants. They’ve given WestEd $176,000. WestEd is partners with the National Charter School Resource Center.
LikeLike
Anything I could say about this story would be rudely dismissive, especially considering smart folks here have provided good context. [OK, can’t resist: I find the Globe article hilarious]
LikeLike
WestEd may be non-profit, but they do sell a program for kindergarten that rates student readiness, which involves a lot of teacher time to implement. This sounds like a marketing ploy to expand sales into a new state.
LikeLike
Andrea, good point.
LikeLike
Most children in the United States are not reading by kindergarten.
Still, a few are. My grandson turned 5 this year and he’s already reading simpler easier to read material that will put him ahead when he starts kindergarten soon. He’s also learning to speak and read Mandarin in a private preschool and at home since his grandmother, his mother and his father all speak Mandarin, although the father is not as fluent as his wife and her mother who grew up in Mao’s China before immigrating to the United States in the 1980s.
Studies show that most if not all children that grow up in homes with college educated parents learn to read at an earlier age. This is especially true in Finland where almost all children start school at 7, not 5, and are already reading so they do not have to learn from scratch. Most parents in Finland start teaching their children to read years before turning 7.
My daughter and her husband are both Stanford grads. She earned a BS there , and he has a BS from Yale and earned his PhD at Stanford.
LikeLike
Why the rush to read so early? My kids came from a solid home and I have a masters in education but they were all late readers.
This need to rush kids into reading destroys so many other important skills. Don’t equate early readers with intelligence. Kids don’t need to be reading at 5. Let them play.
LikeLike
Exactly, Stef!
LikeLike
Agreed, Stef, Duane!
LikeLike
Oh no! Not everyone is perfect! Help me, Mark Zuckerberg! Save me, Bill Gates! You’re so awesome. Totally awesome.
LikeLike
Guess that one went into moderation. Hell, the least WP could do would be to tell me so.
LikeLike
Nothing in moderation
LikeLike
Thanks for the update.
LikeLike
This is very concerning. And very much planned and manufactured and very much calculated by some big money! Who is doing this? Tech companies? Conservative parties? All of the above.
Those in this camp have viciously attacked some of the leading reading experts in order to quiet them and they have succeeded. Now they are attacking states that choose not to cave into their demands? Not only to they say how you MUST teach but also tell you what you CAN’T teach.
There is a great article by George G. Hruby titled “The Science of Readingpolitick: A Commentary.”
“The massive media push for phonics mandates across the nation in the past 4 years is thesort of coordinated shock-and-awe, full-court press that only well-funded lobbyists, political action committees, and advocacy “nonprofits” could muster.”
I am very concerned about those behind this push. Most states have forced horrific mandates on children in the name of SOR. And if they don’t pass it you can these harassment tactics.
I worry about the ed tech being used as the replacement for teachers in the way of reading programs like I- Ready and IXL.
Also from this article.
“Newer forms of educational technology built around evolving entwinement of information systems and the newer forms of AI are going to radically transform public school classrooms. Disregard for the wellbeing of end users while chasing profits with the assist of dubious or fabricated research findings is how Big Pharma gave us the opioid crisis, how Big Tobacco
gave us the lung cancer crisis, how Big Oil gave us the leaded pollution and global climate change crises.”
LikeLike
LET KIDS BE KIDS!
Yes, I’m screaming it out loud!
LikeLike
Agreed. But then there is my grandson Aidan:
LikeLike
No worries, folks. Billy Gates assures us all that ChatGPT is going to fix the reading problem. Just as Clippy the Paperclip became your indispensable, go-to daily assistant!
And you can do your part by insisting that your school stop using bad old teachers and start depending on online criterion-referenced Behaviorist “learning tools” instead, personalized by removing the persons (those bad old teachers) from the equation!
LikeLike
If all Homo Supposedly Sapiens were to be turned into machines it would help fulfill Mr. “FU’s” dreams of conquering Mars.
LikeLike