Peter Greene warns that the people who want to ban books will never be satisfied.
He writes:
At the heart of the raging controversy about reading restrictions, there are books about which reasonable adults can disagree, even books that the most ardent free speecher might not want their younger children to read. This is why one tactic of the reading restriction crowd is to shove the most extreme excerpts and pictures in front of audiences. If you aspire to being a reasonable person in these debates, you probably accept the premise that there are some books that do not belong in the middle school library.
But no matter how reasonable you want to be, you have to remember one thing.
The book banners, reading restrictors, censors, ultra-conservative crowd, whatever you want to call them–the people out in front of this drive– are never going to be satisfied.
Greene reviews the list of books that the censors want to purge in Collier County, Florida. It’s an astonishing list, because it contains books that have been taught for decades without incident. One must wonder how many students are actually reading the books that are considered offensive.
So what books did Collier County find as dangerous as guns and drugs? The list is long, but PEN America is sharing it; here are some highlights.
Some of the usuals are here– Steven King, Ellen Hopkins, Toni Morrison. But Ernest Hemmingway? Three are on the list, including The Sun Also Rises which I taught for years and while, yes, sex is obliquely (really obliquely) an idea in the book, digging out sexual content would be a hopeless quest.
Dune Chronicles? Steve Martin’s novel Shopgirl? One Flew Over The Cuckoo’s Nest? 2001: A Space Odyssey– I mean, seriously, Clarke is one of the most asexual authors in all of SF.
Many Waters??!! The Madeline L’Engle second sequel to Wrinkle in Time is, like the rest of the series, soaked hard in religious ideas, but Many Waters has for sexual content some heavy flirting. Flowers for Algernon, also regularly taught and unsexy. The Once and Future King, T. H. Whites four-book Arthurian doorstop that is the basis for both Disney’s Sword in the Stone and the musical Camelot and, again, not very sexy.
Man in the Iron Mask, the final of Dumas’s three Three Musketeers novels published in the mid-nineteenth century, when no literary characters ever had sex at all. This is one of several items on the list that lead me to suspect that, in the time honored tradition of non-readers, the compilers of the list skipped the book and watched a movie version instead.
And, believe it or not, both Atlas Shrugged and The Fountainhead, the two Ayn Rand cornerstones. Granted, I agree that nobody ever needs to read Atlas Shrugged ever, but if you feel so compelled, go ahead. Both books, other than presenting Rand’s bizarro notions about romance and some very ungraphic depictions of what appears to be angry sex, these are not ban-worthy books. I mean, I deeply dislike them for their blundering prose and teenaged sociopathic egoism promotion, but I wouldn’t ban them.
Do they want students to read anything?
As Greene notes, PEN America made the list of banned books available. It also pointed out that Collier County “responded to growing restrictions from the state by requiring parents to grant permission for their students to access school libraries. District administration also requires parental permission slips to use nicknames for students.”

This is an attempted awakening of what will lead to the 2nd Inquisition that lasted for more than 350 years the 1st time around, rooting out and punishing people for “heresy”. Torturing people to admit they were guilty and then burning them at the stake. Something similar happened in China during Mao’s Cultural Revolution (I don’t think anyone was burned at the stake though).
https://www.history.com/topics/religion/inquisition
We are one election away from this awakening of hell.
LikeLike
How can we teach the, younger generations to, become more tolerant of, those who aren’t the same as we ot they are, if, we take away these, materials that are considered, “controversial”, based off of the, interpretations of the, law? We will end up with societies that only, has, one-voice, with NO other, opinions, allowed…
LikeLike
How odd. Considering Rand’s themes of libertarianism and how coercive govt is I would have thought Atlas Shrugged to be compulsory reading for anyone of The Right. (they could always produce a Children’s Edition)
LikeLike
Red state governors that promote censorship have unleashed a reign of terror on free thought and speech. When a single objection to a particular title can make a book disappear the shelf, we are living in a fascist society. I am watching this debacle play out in Florida where more people are objecting to more and more books. Whatever happened to the party of personal responsibility? If someone finds a particular book offensive, that person should stop reading it and make another selection. Instead, these immoderate people want to control access and impose their will on everyone else.
LikeLike
This hyper-partisan left-wing blog wants people to believe that banning books is only favored by right-wing types. Well-informed people know that is not true, that many on the Left favor removing various books from school libraries. A common one is To Kill A Mockingbird, as the link below explains. Another is Huckleberry Finn.
https://jewishworldreview.com/jeff/jacoby110823.php
LikeLike
Mark,
I wrote a book called THE LANGUAGE POLICE, in which I documented book-banning from both right and left. At the present time, the threat across the nation comes from the rightwing.
LikeLike
Those who wish to ban books want everyone to fit into the “cookie cutter” mold. By reading books, the reader (no matter the age) opens his/her mind to other ideas, other cultures, other situations than those the reader faces every day. This leads the reader to do something the book banners do not want…think. Book banners want everyone to think just as they do; this makes them selfish in the extreme – my way is the only way. By reading and thinking we realize that while we are all different, we are all human and it’s our differences that make us strong.
LikeLike