Our Supreme Court used to be an institution that all Americans could rely on to be impeccably honest, nonpartisan, and fair-minded. Tge Court occasionally issued unanimous decisions.
No more.
Several justices have been criticized for accepting money from people or groups with issues before the Court.
None is more profligate in accepting gifts of great value than Justice Clarence Thomas.
ProPublica, a nonpartisan investigative website, has reported on Justice Thomas’s acceptance of many expensive gifts from billionaire Harlan Crow. Vacations, private jets, tuition for his nephew, the purchase of his mother’s home, etc.
Now ProPublica reports that Justice Thomas attended Koch events as a draw to bring in additional donors to Koch’s campaigns to privatize schools, cut taxes on billionaires, and undercut all government programs. Charles Koch and his late brother David had interest in many cases before the Court, but Thomas never revealed his ties to the billionaires nor did he recuse himself.
ProPublica wrote:
On Jan. 25, 2018, dozens of private jets descended on Palm Springs International Airport. Some of the richest people in the country were arriving for the annual winter donor summit of the Koch network, the political organization founded by libertarian billionaires Charles and David Koch. A long weekend of strategizing, relaxation in the California sun and high-dollar fundraising lay ahead.
Just after 6 p.m., a Gulfstream G200 jet touched down on the tarmac. One of the Koch network’s most powerful allies was on board: Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas.
During the summit, the justice went to a private dinner for the network’s donors. Thomas has attended Koch donor events at least twice over the years, according to interviews with three former network employees and one major donor. The justice was brought in to speak, staffers said, in the hopes that such access would encourage donors to continue giving.
That puts Thomas in the extraordinary position of having served as a fundraising draw for a network that has brought cases before the Supreme Court, including one of the most closely watched of the upcoming term.
Thomas never reported the 2018 flight to Palm Springs on his annual financial disclosure form, an apparent violation of federal law requiring justices to report most gifts. A Koch network spokesperson said the network did not pay for the private jet. Since Thomas didn’t disclose it, it’s not clear who did pay.
Thomas’ involvement in the events is part of a yearslong, personal relationship with the Koch brothers that has remained almost entirely out of public view. It developed over years of trips to the Bohemian Grove, a secretive all-men’s retreat in Northern California. Thomas has been a regular at the Grove for two decades, where he stayed in a small camp with real estate billionaire Harlan Crow and the Kochs, according to records and people who’ve spent time with him there.
Please open the link and keep reading.
The Koch’s invested well. In a 2021 decision, called Americans for Prosperity v. Rob Bonta, Justice Thomas concurred that it violated the first amendment rights of Koch donors (dark money) to require them to disclose their names. Rob Bonta W’s the Attorney General of California, who was trying to force disclosure of the names of donors to the Koch group called Americans for Prosperity.

If one didn’t know beforehand, reading Michael Waldman’s new book, Supermajority, one becomes quite clear that the Supreme Court has very often not been honest, nonpartisan, or fair-minded, although we certainly are at a very low point on these counts.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The book, Playing God, by Mary Jo McConahey, provides insight into the alliance of right wing Catholics and evangelicals which led the nation to this political point. Ryan Girdusky, founder of the 1776 PAC, has an interview posted at Pat Buchanan’s site that explains how jurist Antonin Scalia was the beginning of a long game.
Jefferson warned, in every age, in every country, the priest aligns with the despot. The Pope has warned about the right wing Catholic Church and its funders politicking in the US.
In Ohio and other states, vouchers and school choice legislation were initiated and passage achieved by those who, IMO, want the continuation of authoritarian, White, patriarchy. The means is conservative religious training in schools paid for by tax dollars. Paul Weyrich, co-founder of ALEC, Koch’s Heritage Foundation (former employer of Ginni Thomas), the secretive religious Council for National Policy and the religious right called for parallel schools. The training manual of Weyrich (a right wing Catholic) is posted at Theocracy Watch.
The legal scholar credited as most influential in advancing religious charter schools is Notre Dame’s Nicole Stelle Garnet, who is good friends with Amy Comey Barrett.
LikeLike
My conservative friend, Joe (remember he was a plumber in years past), would say that this is not news. All those rich folks do it, he says. Democrats do it but are lying when they make the appearance that they are interested in the regular old hard-working guy. But Trump is a guy who tells you like it is, see? When he sees a spade, he calls it a spade. That’s why Joe goes with Trump. He’s rich and he wants the common man to be rich too.
The problem with arguing with this line of logic is that it is exactly the they-all-do-it-ism that benefits those that want to tear apart the government. They want to tear apart the government because they know there are legitimate functions of the government, one of which is to root out corruption and the sort of legalized crime that many so quickly ascribe to the functions of government. The crooks in government want it destroyed so they can be free to sell whatever snake oil puts money in their pocket.
Honest Republicans are now in such short supply that most elected officials are afraid that speaking up about republican corruption will land you out of a job. You will be primaryed into going home, and you will be replaced by someone who impresses Joe. By contrast, honest Democrats are calling for the resignation of Bob Menendez, fearing not the loss of their position.
LikeLike
All true except the fact that NJ has a Dem Governor who would appoint Menendez’s successor takes most of the courage out of calling for Mendendez’s resignation.
LikeLike
Whether there is courage in it is not the point. The point is that calls for the resignation of Trump are a sure-fire way of getting a primary challenger who will support Trump. In Tennessee, Senator Bob Corker called out Trump early and left office to Marsha Blackburn, a Trump bootlicker. He saw the writing on the wall and did not want to be a part of scrubbing off the graffiti. Was this courage? I do not know, I only know that he is not a loud voice in Tennessee any more.
LikeLike
Also, I think Joe the Plumber died recently.
LikeLike
Yes, he did. But his spirit lives on. Tongue in cheek…but true
LikeLike
This is a crucial test for the Democratic Party to get out from under “whataboutism”. Every Democratic Senator should call for his resignation.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Roy-
You’ve made very good points. A 2nd legitimate and substantially important function of government is education.
The Catholic church’s overt and highly successful plan to get tax dollars for its schools hasn’t been called out and it is critical for it to be known by the public.
Biden went to Mich. to join the picket line, a first for a President. Trump is headed to a non-union plant, Drake Enterprises, in Mich. If the owners of Drake Enterprises belonged to an organization that overtly discriminated against women, would there be media coverage, if they were members of an organization that spent its money on anti-LGBTQ legislation? But, when that organization is the Catholic Church, media ignores it.
The difference between Biden, who is a minority in the Church and, the majority of others who are demographical similar, White members of the Catholic Church (attending church regularly) is that Biden doesn’t vote nor, politic for a discriminatory right wing agenda.
People seem to feel there’s a rationale for identifying and criticizing evangelicals for their spending and politicking for the right wing agenda e.g. Cisco brothers. Why are right wing Catholics immune?
LikeLike
“Why are right wing Catholics immune?”
I will give you my opinion. It is probably worthless. There is no damage done when someone goes after the evangelical right wing because their tradition is Pat Robertson and Jim and Tammy Faye. Evangelicals are primarily rural, and making fun of rural people has been a national pastime ever since Mencken at least. The Hillbilly, the Hayseed, the Cracker, and the rube are general stereotypes that have lived without much criticism for a long time in our culture. We used to allow a special opprobrium for Catholics back in the day. I was a five-year-old boy when I first heard my friends suggest that a vote for Kennedy was a vote for the Pope. I believe that the mainstream media is afraid of being tagged with the “anti-catholic” label, just as they are afraid of being tagged with the “anti-military” label or the “liberal” label.
Why this prevents some from going after Kochtholicism (surely this is not my original) is a bit beyond me, but that is my guess. Or maybe all that Catholic School regimentation produced a generation of journalists who are afraid to step out.
LikeLike
It’s totally bizarre that the love affair with Kennedy among Democrats has continued to this day. The man was utterly corrupt and a foreign policy disaster of truly major proportions. A rapist of interns. One of the worst presidents ever. A truly dangerous person.
LikeLike
John Kennedy didn’t have to rape women. They threw themselves at him. His appetites were legendary among the press corps but no one wrote about it.
LikeLike
The intern whom he took upstairs was 17 years old.
That’s rape.
LikeLike
I will never understand why people continue to lionize the guy made powerful by money that his family made by criminal means who won the Pulitzer Prize for a book he did not write, probably fixed his election, brought us to the brink of nuclear war, pulled the air cover off the bay of pigs invasion at the last moment and so caused our people to die pointlessly, made the disastrous appointment of the war criminal Robert McNamara to the office of Secretary of Defense, practiced nepotism in the appointment of his brother, dramatically deepened our involvement in Vietnam, leading us into the Vietnamese War, carried on affairs with a foreign agent and the mistress of a leader of organized crime, was addicted to drugs, routinely partied in Vegas with the Rat Pack and mobsters, and treated his mistresses like Marilyn Monroe abominably.
LikeLike
But hey, he was handsome and took great pictures walking on the beach.
Yes, there were a few highlights: his appointment, for example, of Thurgood Marshall to the U.S. Court of Appeals.
LikeLike
Thanks Roy, I think you’re correct. I like the Kochtholicism and you are the first I’ve read to use it. If it’s ok, can I use it?
I posted in another thread a tweet I’d like to see at NYT pitchbot, “Tax dollars diverted to Catholic schools, surge in handmaidens.”
I asked a friend what religion she thought the owners of the business in Michigan that is hosting Trump were. She named evangelical. She, then, named a non-Christian religion. She couldn’t think of a third possibility despite the fact that the Catholic Church overtly discriminates against women, spends its money to thwart rights for LGBT, the conservative majority on SCOTUS were raised Catholic and, she and I have had lengthy discussions about the substantial role right wing Catholics played in school choice advocacy.
The anecdote echoes the refusal to acknowledge that the Knights of Columbus shrine in D.C. was a photo op for Trump after a protestant church gave aid to protestors against him.
The false perception about the political leaning of the majority of White Catholics and their church is deeply entrenched in the public and it’s one of the reasons that the left has had so many political losses.
Trump’s choice of protestant DeVos was good strategy to protect Catholic machinations from scrutiny.
LikeLike
Linda: You may use anything I say and call it your own. I do feel that the urban nature of the conservative Catholics gives them a space not allowed for the evangelicals. Perhaps I am wrong.
LikeLike
Roy
Thanks. I already found an opportunity to use Kochtholicism. If the characterization spreads, which I hope it will, people will begin to ask about the word’s derivation and, with luck, you’ll be credited.
Interesting- the urban space- original and it may be part of a parcel of perceptions like the image of Catholic universities as better than those of evangelicals. The Catholic power center at Hillsdale has managed to stay out of the public eye.
Until a reckoning, democracy will take major hits.
LikeLike
Roy,
I’ve read that evangelicals rely on writers employing “Catholic intellectualism” in order to have their views find respect. Depressing that.
“Catholic intellectualism” – 2000 years after Christ, women’s cultural, spiritual, intellectual, etc. position still must be subordinated to men because men interpreted the Bible to say Jesus didn’t choose women disciples.
LikeLike
“ I will never understand why people continue to lionize the guy made powerful by money that his family made by criminal mean…”
…etc…
I hear you, Bob. Well said. He shines like a newly washed and waxed vintage Corvette.
And I think your follow up post shows that you DO understand.
Good looking. Strolling on the beach. The best PR that money could buy. And, man, we’re talking a LOT of money.
Add to that the fact that there aren’t many assassinated presidents in our country’s history. And this one was within the baby boomers’ lifetimes.
Money can’t buy me love…?
LikeLike
“He’s rich and he wants the common man to be rich too.”
Where did he get the idea that Trump cares about the common man? Certainly not from his track record!
LikeLike
H.e said so. He is their source
LikeLike
Yeah, I know. The only person who could ever say “Because I said so,” and have me believe them was my mother.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I just sent this letter to selected Democratic Senators including mine in Georgia..
Dear Senator Ossoff,
The Democratic Party and the US Senate has just been handed a great opportunity. Part of the argument promoted by the Republican Party is that their corruption isn’t a big deal because “everybody does it.” Democrats in the Senate can put this to rest if they unanimously call for the resignation of Senator Menendez. If you don’t then you give the Republicans what they want. You cannot afford to appear as if you are protecting a party colleague.
Once you have called for this resignation the second thing you should do is propose a Constitutional Amendment for term limits with a maximum combined service of 18 years in the House and Senate, 18 years as a federal judge, and 18 years as an appointed policy maker. I realize this is difficult for those who are so comfortable in Washington, but if there is any hope for regaining the confidence of the American People this must happen. It would provide the opportunity to crush MAGA at the ballot box and reset the Republican party to a conservative entity that believes in our Democracy. This is a political gold mine. Not getting this done basically confirms the American attitude that you are all in politics for power and wealth.
Regards,
Paul Bonner
I encourage everyone to contact your representatives. This is truly an opportunity for the Democratic Party!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I am with you until the term limits idea. Floated in the past, this practice tends to strengthen behind-the-scenes people, those who lobby, those who know how to construct legislation and move it through. People who have power but are background.
Some age qualification might be appropriate due to modern ability of medicine to keep us alive longer, even as our productivity declines, but it should be paired with strong guardrails against kingmakers in the background.
LikeLike
There would have to be statutes that limit lobbying opportunities. IT is complicated and I think your perspective certainly brings up unintended consequences. However, a collective service limitation of 18 years for all appointed policy makers would reduce the bureaucratic influence significantly. Appointed officials would not only include department secretaries, but advisors at all political levels. Therefore, a Chief of Staff who follows a House member to the Senate and perhaps a move to the White House would be limited to a Total of 18 years service. I have been thinking about this in the context of how the Athenian democracy fell through the malfeasance of plutocrats. To prevent the same fate for this country requires checks to money, not just government. This would also require an end to Citizens United. I recall that the US History misinformation machine tried to convince our citizenry that many of the Constitutional rules were put in place to limit the “tyranny of the majority.” I think what we are seeing today is that a wealthy minority is far more dangerous.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Jefferson warned, in every age, in every country,
“When my forewarning doesn’t prepare or arm,
against undue influence, repeating the warning
works as good as a wink to a blind horse.”
LikeLike
But it did prepare or arm, NoBrick. We have a long history of separation of church and state in this country because of Mr. Jefferson’s views. The man was a cad, but on this he was right AND VASTLY INFLUENTIAL.
LikeLike
From what I have read, the only way to get rid of Thomas is for Congress to impeach him and as long as Republicans in Congress have enough votes in the House and or Senate to stop it, Thomas is going to keep his seat until he’s dead.
Republicans (most of the GOP’s voters, too) only care about the alleged crimes and scandals of Democrats.
MAGA and conservatives get a free pass to cheat, lie, steal, et al.
LikeLike
A lifetime appointment. Roberts and Alito have been doing pretty well for themselves, as well.
Serious political clout. With no oversight from an outside agency. Answering to nobody.
There’s an authoritarian ring to this song.
LikeLike