Gary Shteyngart is a successful novelist and author whose family emigrated from the Soviet Union when he was a child. He reviewed Walter Isaacson’s new biography of Elon Musk in The Guardian. On the site formerly known as Twitter, he described his piece as “my review of a dull book about a silly but dangerous man.” Please open the link and read the full review.
He began:
Who or what is to blame for Elon Musk? Famed biographer of intellectually muscular men Walter Isaacson’s dull, insight-free doorstop of a book casts a wide but porous net in search of an answer. Throughout the tome, Musk’s confidantes, co-workers, ex-wives and girlfriends present a DSM-5’s worth of psychiatric and other theories for the “demon moods” that darken the lives of his subordinates, and increasingly the rest of us, among them bipolar disorder, OCD, and the form of autism formerly known as Asperger’s. But the idea that any of these conditions are what makes Musk an “asshole” (another frequently used descriptor of him in the book), while also making him successful in his many pursuits, is an insult to all those affected by them who manage to change the world without leaving a trail of wounded people, failing social networks and general despair behind them. The answer, then, must lie elsewhere.
There’s a lot to work with here, but it doesn’t make reading this book any easier. Isaacson comes from the “his eyes lit up” school of cliched writing, the rest of his prose workmanlike bordering on AI. I drove my espresso machine hard into the night to survive both craft and subject matter. It feels as though, for instance, there are hundreds of pages from start to finish relaying the same scene: Musk trying to reduce the cost of various mundane objects so that he can make more money and fulfil his dream of moving himself (and possibly the lot of us) to Mars, where one or two examples would have been enough. To his credit, Isaacson is a master at chapter breaks, pausing the narrative when one of Musk’s rockets explodes or he gets someone pregnant, and then rewarding the reader with a series of photographs that assuages the boredom until the next descent into his protagonist’s wild but oddly predictable life. Again, it’s not all the author’s fault. To go from Einstein to Musk in only five volumes is surely an indication that humanity isn’t sending Isaacson its best….
Highest on the list of things Musk won’t shut up about is Mars. “We need to get to Mars before I die.” “We got to give this a shot, or we’re stuck on earth forever.” The messianic part of the Muskiverse is his attempt to put 140m miles between himself and his father as he tries to turn humanity into a “multiplanetary civilization” even though we are having a hard enough time making it as a uniplanetary one. But Musk also knows what’s keeping us from reaching the lifeless faraway planet, and he’s not afraid of telling us: “Unless the woke-mind virus … is stopped, civilisation will never become interplanetary.” There is a far more interesting book shadowing this one about the way our society has ceded its prerogatives to the Musks of the world. There’s a lot to be said for Musk’s tenacity, for example his ability to break through Nasa’s cost-plus bureaucracy. But is it worth it when your saviour turns out to be the world’s loudest crank?

Good morning Diane and everyone,
When/If we get to Mars (and we probably will in the future unless we destroy ourselves and/or our planet before we can) will will be taking ourselves with us and if we haven’t learned about that (ourselves), we will have the same problems over there that we have over here. We are the common denominator of everywhere we go and whatever we do. So to think we are escaping our problems and making a better world for ourselves is pure delusion. 🙂
LikeLike
Mamie, you just expressed the point of Dr. Seuss’ “I Had Trouble in Getting to Solla Sollew.”
The main character yearns to go to Solla Sollew, “where they never have troubles, at least very few.”
When he does get there, he finds it’s no better than where he came from.
I find it weird to be obsessed with the goal of going to Mars. Why? It probably has a climate that does not support human life.
LikeLike
Even brilliant minds are not immune to mental illness. Ted Kaczynski, aka the unabomber, with a degree from MIT comes to mind. It also highlights that any innovation related to national security should be commissioned by the Pentagon for public use. Privatization of such products puts the country at risk when we must depend on the whims of unstable billionaires in order to deploy technology needed by us or our allies.
LikeLike
Absolutely. Especially when the funding for Space X is from Government Contracts. Contracts that could go to other Defense Contractors (Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman ) just as easily. The Neo Liberal assault on Government services in the form of PPPs seldom leads to savings for the Tax Payer.
LikeLike
Privatization generally costs more for a worse public service. In this case security is also at risk.
LikeLike
Musk can determine the fate of the war in Ukraine by denying access to Starlink, his private satellite system.
LikeLike
I’d rather read Dickens than Shakespeare.
The most powerful government in the history of the world is privatizing and deregulating itself and in so doing ceding its power to individuals who now wield global control over entire nations and states. That these individuals act as did the monarchical tyrants of old whom we fought a revolutionary war to escape is — should have been predictable and avoidable. Now, Supreme Court justices receive Koch bribes. Communications are Starlink and X-ed out.
I’d rather read Dickens than Shakespeare. It doesn’t matter what makes the prince of Denmark or the king of Scotland tick more than it does what makes the lives of us downtrodden subjects a struggle. The wealthy elite are not geniuses. They are just lucky and cruel welfare queens. Elon Musk is simply an ass, and that’s enough said.
LikeLike
Exactly my impression when I saw Isaacson on Morning Smoe.
LikeLike
Just a quick note here to x “x” about x because deranged.
LikeLike
Should we terraform Mars? I would say that the challenges are equivalent to those involved with humane-ifying Musk.
LikeLike
Just yesterday I happened to read Jill Lepore’s New Yorker review of the Musk biography. Then, after visiting here and reading this blog entry, checked out a related piece she did two years ago for The New York Times.
What a CREEP this guy is
If a writer back in, say, 1980 had made up such a character and invented that name … I might’ve thought it’s too over the top. The future couldn’t be that bad, really? But truth sure is stranger than fiction.
How in God’s name did we get HERE…. man-baby whiners like Donald Trump and Elon Musk having such power over the course of the 21st century?
(I nominate technology, esp. the internet, but, well, that’s another story….)
BTW I looked up the word “musk” -as in the smell. And, oddly enough, a website called fragrancex popped up (not owned by Elon, I believe.)
From that site:
“Natural musk comes from the gland of any of seven species of musk deer, a small ruminant with a historical range that stretches throughout China to the Himalayas and far north into Russia. A small, shy herbivore, the deer are rarely seen by those not actively hunting them, as most of their range extends into mountainous regions….Today, almost all perfumes that contain musk use a synthetic variant created in a lab”
Indeed!
Despite their alleged macho personalities and undeniable weirdness, isn’t their something synthetic….something sort of lab created about these so called tough guys, Musk, Tump etc…. etc….
A subspecies: the modern male American jerk.
LikeLike
Yup!
LikeLike
“Unless the woke-mind virus … is stopped, civilisation will never become interplanetary.”
If dangerously deranged Musk man thinks woke is dangerous, he has it all wrong. It’s the manufactured war on WOKE (being educated, a life long learner, awake and aware) that is a threat to modern civilization and even the survival of our species.
Still, maybe Musk is referring to the anti-woke crowd (that doesn’t know what WOKE is supposed to mean) as that virus.
MAGA is a virus. What does Make America Great Again really mean. Traitor Trump never defined what it means to him, and I’m sure that whatever that is, his supporters have a variety of definitions explaining what MAGA means to them that doesn’t match what the traitor thinks it means.
That’s what makes WOKE a virus in the minds of MAGA, because WOKE could be anything a MAGA person imagines it might mean, something they hate.
LikeLike
MAGA is mainly about white grievances. They hate the idea of equality.
LikeLike
MAGA means “Moscow’s Asset Governing America”
also
Make America Grate Again
LikeLike
Agreed!
Yet, check out this recent poll, to be taken with a grain of salt. (Well, a shovel of salt.) But still….
“Trump, for his part, has improved in retrospect. When he reluctantly left office in January 2021, 38% approved of his work as president, essentially the same as Biden’s rating now. But currently, looking back, 48% say they approve of Trump’s performance when he was in office — matching his peak as president. Essentially as many — 49% — now disapprove, down from 60% when he left the White House.”
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/troubles-biden-age-reelection-campaign-poll/story?id=103436611
Say what???
If 48% of the people sitting on a Sunday night in a given Pizza Hut in Iowa said they approved of Trump’s time in office -THAT would make me feel queasy about the health of our democracy. In fact, any time I meet a fellow citizen who still supports this guy I get a sinking feeling in my heart.
Okay, talk me down here. It’s only 1,006 adults in the poll and the article linked above has all kinds of qualifiers baked in…. C’mon though…
January 6 alone should tank Trump’s approval -forever!
Can I get a, well, not an “Amen!” Maybe WTF works better?
LikeLiked by 1 person
John,
It’s strange that anyone would still support the Chaos-maker. I wonder if you can become President if you are imprisoned. Do you sign executive orders from your cell?
The fact is that Trump has a kind of evil charisma and has created a cult built around him.
LikeLike
This is the thing that I cannot get over, John, that so many of my fellow Americans are cruel bigots and utterly deranged.
LikeLike
Bob is a deranged mess, russia was a hoax, you understand Clinton bought and paid for. It was proven too Bob I know it is hard to get over. Biden got 3 million from moscow mayor. Just like Hunter got millions fro m ukraine, biden given our whole economy to, most corrupt polace where you idiots think you are helping. Maga hates the idea of sex books for kids, trans readings to kids, not allowing men to ruin womens sports.
Trump gone for 3 years all you weak minded morons talk about. Not 4 gas, not millions families struggling survive, not open bordee and your stupid sanctuary cities.
LikeLike
Jerome
Have you seen a psychiatrist lately. In the last 50 years they have limited the incarceration of the mentally ill, replacing that with drug therapy.
LikeLike
Joel, there is one guy who posts with different names each time. He lives on Long Island. He gets his jollies by imitating his lord and master, the King of Insults.
LikeLike
“There is a far more interesting book shadowing this one about the way our society has ceded its prerogatives to the Musks of the world.”
This is perhaps the most troubling condition of our time. Governments around the globe are relinquishing power to predatory capitalists in the tech sector. In the US, huge tax breaks and subsidies are used to attract the Musks and Bezos of the world with almost no oversight. The breadth of Starlink on the global stage gives an unstable petulant individual power to decide the outcome of a war between governments. I am not surprised by Isaacson’s take. He, like so many in the mainstream biosphere, is never one to challenge the mainstream take on his subjects. Our politicians are afraid to hold unelected wealth to account while writers focus on the bottom line.
LikeLike