Nancy Bailey criticizes the ongoing campaign to raise academic expectations and academic pressure on children in kindergarten. She traces the origins of this misguided effort on the Reagan-era publication “A Nation at Risk” in 1983.
Although the gloomy claims of that influential document have been repeatedly challenged, even debunked*, it continues to control educational discourse with its assertion that American schools are failing. “A Nation at Risk” led to increased testing, to the passage of George W. Bush’s No Child Left Behind in 2002, to the creation of Barack Obama’s Race to the Top in 2009, to the release of the Common Core standards in 2010.
Despite nearly a quarter century of focus on standards and testing, policymakers refuse to admit that these policies have failed.
And nowhere have they been more destructive than in the early grades, where testing has replaced play. Kindergarten became the new first grade.
But says Bailey, the current Secretary of Education wants to ratchet up the pressure on little kids.
She writes:
In What Happened to Recess and Why are our Children Struggling in Kindergarten, Susan Ohanian writes about a kindergartner in a New York Times article who tells the reporter they would like to sit on the grass and look for ladybugs. Ohanian writes, the child’s school was built very deliberately without a playground. Lollygagging over ladybugs is not permitted for children being trained for the global economy (2002, p.2).
America recently marked forty years since the Reagan administration’s A Nation at Risk: The Imperative for Educational Reform which blamed schools as being eroded by a rising tide of mediocrity that threatens our very future as a Nation and a people.

Berliner and Biddle dispute this in The Manufactured Crisis: Myths, Fraud, and the Attack on America’s Public Schools. They state that most of these claims were said to reflect “evidence,” although the “evidence” in question either was not presented or appeared in the form of simplistic, misleading generalizations (1995, p. 3).
Still, the report’s premise, that public schools failed, leading us down the workforce path of doom, continues to be perpetuated. When students fail tests, teachers and public schools are blamed, yet few care to examine the obscene expectations placed on the backs of children since A Nation at Risk.
Education Secretary Cardona recently went on a bus tour with the message to Raise the Bar in schools. Raising the bar is defined as setting a high standard, to raise expectations, to set higher goals.
He announced a new U.S. Department of Education program, Kindergarten Sturdy Bridge Learning Community.
This is through New America, whose funders include the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the Waltons, and others who want to privatize public education. Here’s the video, Kindergarten as a “Sturdy Bridge”: Place-Based Investments, describing the plan focusing on PreK to 3rd grade. This involves Reading by 3rd and the Campaign for Grade Level Reading.
Cardona says in the announcement:
Getting kindergarten right has to be top of mind for all of us, because what happens there sets the stage for how a child learns and develops well into their elementary years and beyond.
Ensuring that kindergarten is a sturdy bridge between the early years and early grades is central to our efforts both to Raise the Bar for academic excellence and to provide all students with a more equitable foundation for educational success. The kindergarten year presents an opportunity to meet the strengths and needs of young learners so they can continue to flourish in the years to come.
Raise the bar? Kindergarten is already the new first grade. What will it be now? Second? Third? Fourth? What’s the rush? How is this developmentally sound? One thing is for sure: there will still be no idle time for children to search for ladybugs.
Few bear the brunt of A Nation at Risk,as do early learners whose schools have been invaded by corporate schemes to force reading and advanced learning earlier than ever expected in the past.
If kindergartners aren’t doing well after all these years of toughness, higher expectations, and an excruciating number of assessments, wouldn’t it seem time to back off, instead of raising the bar higher?
Editor’s note:
*James Harvey and I will discuss the distortions contained in the “Nation at Risk” report at the Network for Public Education conference on Oct. 28-29 in Washington, D.C. James Harvey was a high-level member of the staff that wrote the report. He has written about how the Reagan-era Commissuon in Excellence in Education “cooked the books” to paint a bleak—but false—picture of American public schools. Please register and join us!

“But says Bailey, the current Secretary of Education wants to ratchet up the pressure on little kids.”
So maybe that’s why the current Secretary of Education just this week hired the superintendent that Atlanta Board of Education just last month got rid of. Every child’s little behind plopped down in front of a computer and NWEA MAP-tested for “growth” was pretty much how it went with the superintendent.
https://www.ed.gov/news/press-releases/dr-lisa-herring-join-us-department-education-strategic-advisor-secretary
LikeLike
Thank you, Nancy. You’re awesome!
LikeLike
Here’s the tragedy: Those of us who have taught kindergarten to students who come to school with very few literacy experiences in the home know that you can teach reading THROUGH play–not instead of it. It’s not ‘drill and kill’–it’s the ‘thrill of skill’. In my kindergarten class, I used letter necklaces, paddles, cubes, bean bags and magnetic tiles as well as Play-doh, mini-slinkies, and beach balls to promote orthographic mapping. Kids were happy and engaged. And they learned to read.
Getting Reading Right: On Truths, Truce, and Trust
https://pamelasnow.blogspot.com/2023/01/guest-post-getting-reading-right-on.html
LikeLike
Young children learn through their senses and exploration. Unfortunately, education policy in this country has become so politicized, we have been following the will of edumeddlers and those that want to standardized education. Young children are not standardized. Their development varies from child to child, and it is not a sign of intelligence. As a young child that was delayed in language development, Albert Einstein was believed to be “mentally deficient.” He was simply figuring out the world on his own terms and spoke when he was ready. Children develop at their own pace, and allowing them to explore with hands-on materials helps to nurture this development. Pushing young children too early is unhealthy, and plonking them down in front screens is developmentally inappropriate and harmful to their developing brains and eyes.
Secretary Cardona should know better. He needs to think more like an informed educator and less like a politician. We should not be trying to force caterpillars to try to fly as it is not their nature. They will fly when they are ready to soar as butterflies.
LikeLike
Tragically, we are now testing 4-year-olds as part of the data-mining machine that constantly requires new widgets to keep churning. The inappropriateness of the curriculum/pedagogy doesn’t stop at kindergarten, and now my 4th graders who still haven’t learned math facts are expected to do algebra concepts that used to be taught in middle school. It’s push, push, push, without any regard as to whether their math foundation/number literacy is strong, and it isn’t. Thanks to Bill Gates and CC, all the reformers care about is pacing, and not whether the kids are actually understanding the material. It’s inappropriate, damaging, and abusive.
LikeLike
Non-educators sometimes believe that covering material is the same as learning it. I noticed this when my husband was trying to help our daughter with math. I told him to slow down and give her time to practice the new material before moving on.
LikeLike
Let the kids be kids!
LikeLike
There’s a saying that I love (and I have it in a t-shirt)…”those who can, teach; those who can’t, pass laws about teaching.”
LikeLiked by 1 person
Who gets the blame for starting this war against our public schools – Nixon or Reagan?
LikeLike
Milton Friedman.
LikeLike
Charles Koch.
LikeLike
Adolf Hitler.
LikeLike
East India Company.
LikeLike
I posted this on Nancy’s site as well, but worth sharing here as well. It is sad to see education become standardized like nuts and bolts. Just for grins, well, because I tell a lot of stories “from the trenches” but…
When I first started out teaching third grade, we had a science and music specialist. We had a schedule so they could make it to all the grades, but each class got a music specialist come and expose the children to music. In fact, we had a Christmas assembly, and I wrote a parody to “The Twelve Days of Christmas” based on “educational stuff.” The kids sang it at our local Elks Club. This was in the ’90s and we did a lot of hands-on learning. But, the little ones participated in a Discover/Descubrimiento science activities. They all wore lab coats (just like real scientists) and progressed through a series of experiments (these were all printed on cards in English and Spanish). Each grade level had the same cards, but allowed for the natural cognitive growth of the child. The experiments were nearly the same, but the way the students solved the experiments differed. I equated it to my “Charvet’s Red Ball.” When I was young, I played with the ball as it was bouncy. As I matured the ball became something different and the usage varied. When I attended college I thought, “If the ball could think, what was it pondering.” I think you get the gist of Descubrimiento. The kids had fun and none of it was forced, but based on natural inquiry. Thanks for allowing me to share.
LikeLike
Also see this web site. Great fun all around for parents and kids. https://letgrow.org
LikeLike
It almost sounds like Cardona et al never read a bit of ed theory since Piaget, nor studied Montessori theory (or observed a single Montessori classroom), nor examined any of the decades of studies on how young children learn…
I am reminded of a conversation I had long ago with another kindergarten mom whose son had moved up (a year “late”) from a SpEd public school PreK program. She told me she’d heard that children tend not to learn to read until they have their two front [adult] teeth. I started looking around at that point, and found it to be generally true—i.e., about age 6 -7+…
LikeLike