ProPublica published a new exposé of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas’ many luxury vacations, yacht trips, and private jet transportation. All provided free to him by very dear friends who happen to be Republican billionaires. How did this man who grew up in poverty in a tiny town in Georgia find so many generous billionaire friends? Why did he fail to disclose their generosity? Were any of them his friends before he joined the Supreme Court?
During his three decades on the Supreme Court, Clarence Thomas has enjoyed steady access to a lifestyle most Americans can only imagine. A cadre of industry titans and ultrawealthy executives have treated him to far-flung vacations aboard their yachts, ushered him into the premium suites at sporting events and sent their private jets to fetch him — including, on more than one occasion, an entire 737. It’s a stream of luxury that is both more extensive and from a wider circle than has been previously understood.
Like clockwork, Thomas’ leisure activities have been underwritten by benefactors who share the ideology that drives his jurisprudence. Their gifts include:
At least 38 destination vacations, including a previously unreported voyage on a yacht around the Bahamas; 26 private jet flights, plus an additional eight by helicopter; a dozen VIP passes to professional and college sporting events, typically perched in the skybox; two stays at luxury resorts in Florida and Jamaica; and one standing invitation to an uber-exclusive golf club overlooking the Atlantic coast.
This accounting of Thomas’ travel, revealed for the first time here from an array of previously unavailable information, is the fullest to date of the generosity that has regularly afforded Thomas a lifestyle far beyond what his income could provide. And it is almost certainly an undercount.
While some of the hospitality, such as stays in personal homes, may not have required disclosure, Thomas appears to have violated the law by failing to disclose flights, yacht cruises and expensive sports tickets, according to ethics experts.
Perhaps even more significant, the pattern exposes consistent violations of judicial norms, experts, including seven current and former federal judges appointed by both parties, told ProPublica. “In my career I don’t remember ever seeing this degree of largesse given to anybody,” said Jeremy Fogel, a former federal judge who served for years on the judicial committee that reviews judges’ financial disclosures. “I think it’s unprecedented….”
The total value of the undisclosed trips they’ve given Thomas since 1991, the year he was appointed to the Supreme Court, is difficult to measure. But it’s likely in the millions.
Huizenga sent his personal 737 to pick Thomas up and bring him to South Florida at least twice, according to John Wener, a former flight attendant and chef on board the plane. If he were picked up in D.C., the five-hour round trip would have cost at least $130,000 each time had Thomas chartered the jet himself, according to estimates from jet charter companies. In February 2016, Thomas flew on Crow’s private jet from Washington to New Haven, Connecticut, before heading back on the jet just three hours later. ProPublica previously reported the flight, but newly obtained U.S. Marshals Service records reveal its purpose: Thomas met with several Yale Law School deans for a tour of the room where they planned to display a portrait of the justice. (Crow’s foundation also gave the school $105,000, earmarked for the “Justice Thomas Portrait Fund,” tax filings show.)
Don Fox, the former general counsel of the U.S. Office of Government Ethics and the senior ethics official in the executive branch, said, “It’s just the height of hypocrisy to wear the robes and live the lifestyle of a billionaire.” Taxpayers, he added, have the right to expect that Supreme Court justices are not living on the dime of others.
Fox, who worked under both Democrat and Republican administrations, said he advised every new political appointee the same thing: Your wealthy friends are the ones you had before you were appointed. “You don’t get to acquire any new ones,” he told them….
To track Thomas’ relationships and travel, ProPublica examined flight data, emails from airport and university officials, security detail records, tax court filings, meeting minutes and a trove of photographs from personal albums, including cards that Thomas’ wife, Ginni, sent to friends. In addition, reporters interviewed more than 100 eyewitnesses and other sources: jet and helicopter pilots, flight attendants, airport workers, yacht crew members, security guards, photographers, waitresses, caterers, chefs, drivers, river rafting guides and C-suite executives.

While I think the evidence is overwhelming that Clarence Thoams is corrupt and seriously biased for extreme right causes, I hope I’m wrong, but I’ve read enough to know that there’s probably little that can be done to remove him from the U.S. Supreme Court.
From what I’ve read, the only way to do it is to impeach him and with a corrupt, mostly fascist controlled Republican Party holding enough seats in the Senate, the odds of that happening are almost impossible, and with a Republican majority in the House, there will never be that first step in the impeachment process—-except for Democrats.
U.S. Senate: About Impeachment
“The Constitution requires a two-thirds vote of the Senate to convict, and the penalty for an impeached official upon conviction is removal from office. In some cases, the Senate has also disqualified such officials from holding public offices in the future. There is no appeal.”
LikeLike
Trump is only the most brazen example of wealthy conservative ideology that rules are for low-class suckers. “Take what I can get,”is their only principle. So, Thomas is just a member of the club.
LikeLike
Was he required to pay taxes on those gifts? If so, did he?
LikeLike
Do you mean the way the IRS has scrutinized Trump and his organization over the years??
LikeLike
Good point! Maybe there should be a further investigation into Thomas and his many “gifts.”
LikeLike
In most cases, the giver of the gift is required to pay the gift tax to IRS.
So Thomas’s benefactors could be in trouble, especially if they did not declare the gift.
LikeLike
I’ve been watching for evidence of which GOP candidate the Koch/Roman Catholic traditionalists will support. IMO, that will tell us who the nominee will be. Based on the reporting about an article written by a Constitutional “originalist” at the University of St. Thomas (Minn.), I speculate that Trump has been abandoned.
The article itself isn’t scheduled for publication until next year. The content in the article is being disseminated widely, now, which acts to inform GOP influencers and the public.
The article’s title is, “Trump can’t hold office…” (insurrection reasons).
The article author has opinions that are posted at the Witherspoon Institute (Robert P George is a Senior Fellow) and, at the Federalist Society (Leonard Leo’s group), as well as Ivy League publications.
The author is well connected in the conservative religion network, e.g. Institute on Religion and Public Life located in D.C.
LikeLike
At least as far back as 2001, the plan to prevent focus on conservative Catholic politicking was publicly discussed, as example, “True God of Next Justice,” posted in a publication at the University of Minnesota.
The talking points we heard at the time of Amy Barrett ‘s confirmation hearing were 20 years in the making as was the plan for SCOTUS and the elected governments of states.
LikeLike
Congress should enact a law that (1) raises SCOTUS Justices’ income to, say, $1 million per annum, pegged to inflation, and (2) bars Justices from any outside income apart from gains in a passive index fund. No gifts from non-relatives worth more than some small dollar amount. No paid speeches. No book deals. Etc.
LikeLike
The GOP would never agree
LikeLike
So, we have to pay $1 million per year to people like Thomas so they won’t prostitute themselves?
Is it really too much to expect that members of the Supreme Court will have a modicum of respect for the Court, for the Constitution, for the American people and for themselves?
LikeLike
How about we get Congress to just pass number 2 and not number 1.
Then anyone who is in it for the money will just quit.
Wouldn’t that be a good thing?
LikeLike