John Thompson, historian and retired teacher in Oklahoma, reacts to an article in the Washington Post.
He writes:
I agree with Perry Bacon’s excellent and optimistic Washington Post analysis and its new path for improving America’s schools – with the possible exception of his first sentence and the first sentence of his last paragraph. After decades of working for the education policies and principles he supports, I’ve become too pessimistic to not doubt his title, “‘Education reform’ is dying. Now we can actually reform education.” I sure hope I’m wrong and he’s right.
Bacon writes, “Joe Biden is the first president in decades not aggressively pushing an education agenda that casts American schools and students as struggling and in desperate need of fixing.” Biden offers a 21st century path away from the 40-year “education gospel” launched by the 1983 Reagan administration’s “A Nation at Risk,” which was joined by presidents of both parties. Bacon then described the bipartisan “fixation” which:
Included the expansion of charter and magnet schools as an alternative to traditional public schools; an obsession with improving student test scores; accountability systems that punished schools and teachers if their kids didn’t score well.
But this reform ideology was worse than that. Bacon explains, “This agenda was racial, economic and education policy all wrapped into one.” He also cited Jon Shelton’s “The Education Myth: How Human Capital Trumped Social Democracy,” which:
Blamed growing economic insecurity in the United States — caused in actuality by corporate disinvestment in American industry and efforts to fight unions tooth and nail beginning in the 1970s — on the supposed failures of the education system.
“By 2001 and the passage of No Child Left Behind,” Shelton further explains, “Democrats and Republicans competed with each other to remake our education system under the pretext that our schools needed to be held accountable to the long-term economic fortunes of American workers.” Since they could only agree on making education a priority, Bacon added, the Republicans adopted the Democrats’ “view that education was the main way for Black people to make up for the effects of racism.”
Based on decades of experience teaching in the inner city, and studying what it would have actually taken to achieve equity, I’ve seen the way that the students who were supposed to be the main beneficiaries of accountability-driven, competition-driven mandates, were damaged the most. And on-the-cheap, quick fixes hurt these kids in the way educators and education research predicted. Even worse, I would add, the Billionaires Boys Club turned education into a reward-and-punish, data-driven privatization campaign based on the neoliberal venture capitalist model.
Having seen how worksheet-driven “accountability” and segregation by choice reforms drove our school into the lowest-performing mid-high in Oklahoma, and hearing my students protest that they had been completely robbed of an education, I thoroughly support Bacon’s vision of education. He writes:
Our education system should be about learning, not job credentialing. Schools and universities should teach Americans to be critical thinkers, not automatically believing whatever they heard from a friend or favorite news source. They should make sure Americans have enough understanding of economics, history and science to be good citizens, able to discern which candidate in an election has a better plan to, say, deal with a deadly pandemic. They should foster interest and appreciation of music, arts and literature.
They should be places where people meet and learn from others who might not share their race, class, religion or ideology. … They should provide a path to becoming a doctor, lawyer, professor or any profession that requires specialized training without going into debt.
But, I’ve also seen the rightwing attacks on public schools. And these assaults come after decades of destructive, neoliberal corporate reforms. The difference was that they sought to “blow up” the education system so that entrepreneurs could rebuild it. Today, we have to resist extremist and conservative privatizers who are going for the kill while education is on the ropes.
And that gets me back to Bacon’s optimistic introduction and conclusion. Yes, he is correct in beginning, “America’s decades-long, bipartisan ‘education reform’ movement, defined by an obsession with test scores and by viewing education largely as a tool for getting people higher-paying jobs, is finally in decline.” The vast majority of the people I know agree that these reforms failed, and “what should replace it is an education system that values learning, creativity, integration and citizenship.” I hope I’m being too pessimistic because of my state’s rightwing minority’s assaults on democracy, but I don’t see evidence that the majority of parents and educators, as well as researchers, will be listened to.
Similarly, his last sentence is true, “Now we can reform our schools and colleges in a way that actually improves teaching and learning.” Yes, we can, but what will we be able to do as we again go up against market-driven elites and, worse, MAGA zealots?
I must emphasize that I have always been an optimist so, ordinarily, I would celebrate his sentence, “Blessedly, education reform is dying.” But after four decades of undermining the principles of public education, I worry that its decline has come too late, and I see no sign of progress in my state. Even so, regardless of the odds we face, we must draw upon the wisdom of Jon Shelton and Perry Bacon, and that requires us to keep our hopes up.

I am not optimistic. There is a herd mentality that now has to be overcome. We have been doing the bs testing based on bs skills-based “standards” for so long that that’s all that a lot of people know now. So, even with Gatesian “reform” dead, it will have a long, long, long zombielike afterlife. It will take true innovators to throw this crap off entirely and return to coherent, knowledge-based curricula and pedagogy.
LikeLike
So, what is most likely to happen is that idiots will barely tweak and retain their moronic skills-based “standards” lists that serve as default curriculum outlines and give slightly tweaked version of the invalid tests on those, and nothing much will change at all. And that will be part of the decline of the empire.
LikeLike
The long, slow, ugly decline of the empire.
LikeLike
And the voucher debate will continue because of it! The Charter school debate will rage on. I’m NOT optimistic about it at all, either. I believe in the idea of public schools, but what we have now is not education and it’s not good for kids (or teachers). We have a mental health crisis with kids and all anyone (the powers that be!) wants is more “data” before doing anything constructive about the problem.
LikeLike
The problem actually predates the standards and testing mishigas. Long, long before this, back in the early 1970s, when American K-12 education was just starting to awaken from its long dogmatic Behaviorist and Taylorist slumber, there arose a movement to replace knowledge-based education with skills-based education. The idea was that what is useful for people to know continually changes but that abstract skills, such as critical thinking ability, will always be useful. It was an utterly misconceived and cockamamie theory that had its origins in stuff like people rejecting history textbooks as meaningless lists of battles and dates and wanting them, instead, to teach kids how to think about concepts related to history and how to do history. Noble goals.
But as a result of this, what happened is that curricula that once produced knowledgeable adults was replaced by curricula based upon breathtakingly vague and abstract skills goals like “ability to make inferences.” And lessons could then contain ANY content, as long as they required “making inferences.”
So, here’s the idiotic part: Actual ability to make inferences (or to apply any other so-called “skills” required an enormous amount of specific knowledge, including PROCEDURAL KNOWLEDGE, of what to do, when, why, and in what order. Lessons that formerly would have imparted knowledge were replaced by incredibly vague “skills practice” or “strategies practice” that taught no news that kids could use, and state “standards,” in ELA at least, became lists of these incredibly vague, incredibly broad “skills.” Kids walked away from their lessons knowing NOTHING that they didn’t already know when they started doing them. This was a mind-blowingly STUPID approach to education, but it became what prospective teachers typically learned in their training programs that they were supposed to do: they were supposed to be guides on the side cheering kids on as they acquired “skills” via these vague, incoherent, inchoate means—practice of “inferencing” and other such bullshit. And this despite the fact that the whole history of education had, prior to that, been based upon imparting knowledge, including knowledge of the world and knowledge of procedures.
We now are at the tail end of this utter debacle. We’ve had decades, now, of “standards” and “assessments” (scare quotes intended) based upon this ludicrous theory of education, and we’ve seen, as a result, ZERO improvement by the Ed Reformers’ own measures. But the horror runs deeper, even, than Ed Reform—deeper than Coleman and Gates and Duncan and their ilk. It goes back to this profound anti-intellectualism in American culture that spawned the reaction against knowledge-based instruction.
LikeLike
Ideas matter. Bad ideas end up mattering a lot. This idea–that teachers were there to grow skills–was, well, utterly vapid–there was no there there. But its vapidness, its essential stupidity, was recognized by almost no one. This cancer has eaten away at our school system for many, many decades now. It’s going to take a massive reconceptualization of what we are doing to fix the damage done.
LikeLike
For longer than there have been humans, as we define that term, our ancestors conceived of education as the transmission of knowledge, including procedural knowledge, from older people who had that knowledge to younger people who didn’t yet. Well, little Uruk needs to spend some time with the flint knife maker. But only in our time did the geniuses in our education establishment in the United States decide that it didn’t matter what teachers know, that lessons shouldn’t be about transmission of knowledge from one to knows to those who don’t but that the idea way to run a lesson was to choose a task and have kids sit in a circle and bullshit about it and figure it out on their own.
I’m not exaggerating. Walk into any school in America. It’s full of teachers who think of themselves that way–not as people with knowledge to share (many of them have almost none) but as skills development facilitators or some other bs formulation of the same idiotic notion.
LikeLike
In general, for most learnings, if you can break a task down into specific, concrete, step-by-step skills, each of which can be taught, then you know it well enough to teach it. And not until then.
LikeLike
My experience in the last couple of decades is that not only did a lot of teachers I’ve met know almost nothing about their subjects, but they didn’t think this important. One could be a great English teacher without, for example, having read a lot of novels, poems, plays, myths, fables, and so on. All that mattered was being a “great facilitator” who could give students lots of opportunities to practice their finding the main idea skills or their using context clues skills. AIE YIE YIE.
Utter idiocy. The blind leading the blind.
LikeLike
The ignorant leading the ignorant.
LikeLike
We have somehow lost sight of the teacher as profoundly cultured, profoundly well-educated person who has a LOT of knowledge to share.
LikeLike
But thank you, Lisa. You say what people are afraid to hear. We do have so truly severe problems in our schools–in public schools and charter schools–that are not being addressed. Our curricula are a joke now.
LikeLike
“:We have somehow lost sight of the teacher as profoundly cultured, profoundly well-educated person who has a LOT of knowledge to share.”
I am not a brilliant person nor one widely read, but my reputation within my school was that I knew everything. There were a lot of younger teachers who could transmit some technique, but just a few who could introduce you to a new author or scientific idea. Exceptions existed, of course. One new teacher (who had also been our student) introduced me to Cormac McCarthy.
Part of the school anti-intellectual climate exists because the necessity of offering sports. I call this a necessity because the public is so sports crazy that the support for the school often depends on the highly public nature of the football team and the marching band. Other parents choose schools that offer a swim team or a golf program. We were very lucky to get a guy who could coach golf and has a good historical base of knowledge. Still, it is hard to coach and teach. I did it for nine years. I was younger then, and I coached because I knew we needed it. I was not very good at coaching, precisely because I had limited knowledge of the sports I helped out.
LikeLike
John Thomson is right in his assessment, as far as this retired Ohio teacher can tell. The real education world is like the real political world, which is like the real world and universe–analogue, not digital. There is no switch one can throw or button one can push to reverse directions in education to a better, more holistic world. At the risk of being written off as just another old codger longing for the “good ole days” in education, I’ll just point out that most important and positive socio-political changes came about after years of struggle and hard work–and some losses–along a winding path. Whether you look at the status of working men, the rights of women, the rights of minorities, or the real improvement of education from 1900 to 1980, it took struggle–organizing, marching, pressuring, voting, suing, sitting in and walking out to get the big things done.
As an activist then Executive Director of the Columbus E.A., 1967-1981, I and many others pushed, pulled, agitated, struck illegally, sued, badgered, etc. to help bring Columbus and Ohio into a more humane educational world. Ultimately, I was cut loose when I tried to help unite EA and AFL forces in an effort to reverse the state’s policies which were giving away the tax base to business and industry.
To reverse the juggernaut of our industrial complex will take monumental effort by lots of people, including well-placed, well-paid leaders of unions, political groups, etc.–who will risk their positions and their all–as did union leaders, civil rights workers, feminists of the past.
They might start with passive resistance to pathological changes such as endless standardized testing. They might occupy Fox in a push to force that entity to use its license “in the public interest,” as technically required by law–or, more peacefully, boycott Fox advertisers. Or, they might combine to form their own cable and on-line news channel.
Short of these kinds of dramatic actions, I don’t think we intellectual writers will be enough to do anything but point out the problems.
Peace,
Jack B.
LikeLike
One of the problems that will have to be overcome is the very notion that schools need top-down micromanagement to achieve quality. Ironically, the morons who have thrust this upon our schools claim to be basing their approach on what works in business, but the great lesson from business in the 20th and early 21st centuries is the value of BOTTOM-UP CONTINUOUS QUALITY IMPROVEMENT involving EMPOWERING WORKERS ON THE LINE. Put really well-trained professionals in the classroom. Pay them well. Then, get TF out of their way and stop telling them what to do. Return to site-based, school-based management.
LikeLike
Well said. It would also help if politicians, particular in red states, would stop their endless lies about and attacks on teachers.
LikeLike
Now, that would be a miracle, Retired Teacher.
LikeLike
Yes, the term “reform,” is dead. The takeovers and dismantling will continue without dressed up euphemisms. The era of data accountability is over, and it is going to be replaced with accountability to Christian authoritarian ideology. Out with Gates, in with Hillsdale. Ohio just woke up to its school boards and admins welcoming Lifewise Academy to provide Christian nationalist instruction during school hours to public school students.
LikeLike
Yes, and “our” side continues to aid and abet the “enemy” by using their language such as “Today, we have to resist extremist and conservative privatizers who are going for the kill while education is on the ropes.”
They aren’t conservative! They are now, as you point out regressive xtian theocrats.
It has been those theocrats in conjunction with the neoliberal bean counters who have been destroying public education.
LikeLike
Out with Gates, in with Hillsdale.
Yeah, afraid so. At least in the red states, for a time.
LikeLike
I’d say the era of bipartisan corporatization is dead.
LikeLike
For all the good it did, good riddance to “education reform.” The problem with these things is that they are driven “top down.” Progress has invariably been made in the field from the bottom up. Having a system designed to help people innovate locally and then sharing the results would be most helpful. (The information and help are available but it is piecemeal.)
LikeLike
All the mechanisms of “reform” are still in place–the skills-based state “standards,” the test based on those standards, the school grading and teacher evaluation based on test scores, the test-preppy curricula and pedagogy.
Perhaps the writer sees some tiredness setting in among the “reformers.” After all, NOTHING THEY HAVE PROPOSED HAS WORKED.
But it is still all in place, and it is unlikely to change because our education leaders are sheep.
LikeLike
In order for education to move forward, we have to allow professional educators to have a voice in the process. We need to abandon the failed neoliberal beliefs that have plagued education for the past forty plus years. We need to release public schools from the corporate influence that has been imposed on public schools. Public schools need the freedom to focus on education, not on products that public schools can consume to produce revenue for big business. This includes the tendency to impose mindless, harmful cyber instruction on many schools and endless testing schemes under the guise of accountability.
Schools must focus on the needs of students first and reclaim their mission to serve all students to the best of their ability by funding them more equitably. We need to restore the teaching of civics as educated citizens must be able to distinguish fact from fiction in a democratic society. In other words, we need to return to the beliefs of the past when professional educators led education and were valued for the work they do.
LikeLike
The Houston parent advocate defended legitimate instruction made a good case for professional teachers. “These teachers are professionals. They actually went to school to learn how to teach.” Who wants the services of an untrained doctor, plumber, pilot or teacher? Adequate training creates competent teachers.
LikeLike
to allow professional educators to have a voice in the process.
We have to allow building-level teachers to run the freaking process. We have to undo the whole bureaucracy above them EXCEPT the parts of it that a) enforce the law, b) dole out the federal and state funding, c) take care of facilities and maintenance. Everything else–hiring, firing, curriculum decisions, pedagogical decisions, etc., needs to be placed into the hands of building-level teachers.
Continuous improvement occurs by empowering people from the bottom up. Get out of the way and watch what happens when you give people a mission and the autonomy to do what they choose to do to achieve it.
Here’s the thing: This sounds bizarre now, but building-level autonomy and authority used to be the rule back when our schools turned out the folks who made this the richest and most powerful nation on earth. Back before the top-down micromanagement by districts, by the state, and by the feds.
There are reasons why this previous system worked and the current one doesn’t. Challenge: think about what those were.
LikeLike
So true! Teachers have always been supervised in various ways, but never harmfully micromanaged and insulted the way they are today. Let teachers teach, and students will learn. We need to stop making them the national whipping boy, and get the politicians off their backs. No wonder there are so many vacancies.
LikeLike
Who would want to teach under these conditions of constant micromanagement and other interference and thus extremely low autonomy?
LikeLike
“Education reform’ is dying. . . .”
That may be but education deform is alive and well.
LikeLike
And that deform has been implemented and continues to be implemented by the GAGA Good German type adminimals and teachers who have refused and continue to refuse to stand up for the just and ethical treatment of students and the teaching and learning process.
LikeLike
Duane, you really need to take a trip to Germany today. You would no longer use that nasty stereotype.
But you are right, nothing has changed with regard to the implementation of the major malpractices.
LikeLike
I agree with Bob.
Duane, visit Germany.
More than any other country, the Germans have faced their history.
They teach about its horrors.
They have museums to preserve the past.
Their are all sorts of public reminders of the past.
Unlike red states, that ban teaching things that might make white students uncomfortable.
LikeLike
Duane, when you say, “GAGA good Germans,” that is an aspersion on all German people, It is not a reference to Nazis. Really, it’s not OK. It’s as though you were saying something negative about all members of any national or ethnic group–Slavs or Chinese or whatever. That might not be what you intend, but it is what your words say, so you should rethink that. Really, it’s extremely offensive.
LikeLike
Hey, I’d love to take a trip to Germany! It’s the country of origin of my ancestors.
It’s not a stereotype. It is a specific reference to those in Nazi Germany who “did what they were told” and who turned a blind eye to the harms/deaths around them, to which they contributed. Almost all (99.999% I’d say) of the adminimals and teachers today turn a blind eye to the injustices and harms to the students in the implementation of the standards and testing malpractice regime. What a great example to be showing to the students, eh. The hidden curriculum: Obey or else!
I will continue to condemn those who choose their own selfish interests as do today’s supposed educators. Yes, they need to hear it. . . and everyone else does to. Yes, there is a holocaust of minds occurring on a daily basis in that malpractice regime.
LikeLike
GAGA Good Nazis might work instead.
LikeLike
How about GAGA Good Candy Assed Educators?
LikeLike
Or GAGA Good Candy Assed Apparatchiks?
That way I’ll be demeaning Soviets/Ruskies.
LikeLike
One doesn’t have to be Russian to be an apparatchik. The term has entered English in general use. Merriam Webster gives as its second definition, after “member of a Communist apparat,” “a blindly devoted official, follower, or member of an organization (as a corporation or political party).” So, it has these general denotations not tied to any particular nationality, despite the etymology.
LikeLike
Yes, I know that. I’m just giving you and Diane a little, hopefully humorous, grief about your GAGA Good German complaints.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Dying, yes; not dead.
Howard Blume of the Los Angeles Times recently wrote,
*”An AI chatbot named “Ed” will be Los Angeles Unified’s newest student advisor, programmed to tell parents about their child’s grades, tests results and attendance, Supt. Alberto Carvalho announced Friday in a back-to-school speech at Walt Disney Concert Hall that rivaled a Hollywood extravaganza.
Carvalho took the stage as high-volume music pounded and fast-paced video flashed across a giant screen. The audience of district employees — mostly administrators — applauded as if on cue as lighting, singers, videos, dancers enmeshed in an annual address unprecedented for its production values in the nation’s second-largest school district…”*
When Congress reauthorizes the ESSA without an annual testing mandate; when the federal charter startup slush fund for big charter chains is reduced to zero dollars; when embedded testing, competency-based education platforms cease to sell; when the superintendent of the nation’s second largest school district stops buying chatbots named Ed that collect and overemphasize data and data-driven drivel and announcing them with corporate style blowout events a la Elon Musk wherein he stands in front of a giant screen with loud music and puts on a circus ringleader act; and when my principal stops forcing me to give a standardized test once or twice a month every single month; corporate “education reform” will be dead.
LikeLike
An AI chatbot named “Ed” will be Los Angeles Unified’s newest student advisor, programmed to tell parents about their child’s grades, tests results and attendance
OMG. We are doomed. This is the end. The empire is over.
LikeLike
It may be my personal failing but I refuse to write about or even think about AI.
LikeLike
I rue the fascination I had with it as a young man.
LikeLike
Elon. AIE YIE YIE. Here it comes, the X-ing of U.S. education.
Let’s see if American ED-ucation can lose 69.9 percent of its value in 11 months, as the company formerly known as Twitter has.
LikeLike
“Carvalho took the stage as high-volume music pounded and fast-paced video flashed across a giant screen. The audience of district employees — mostly administrators — applauded as if on cue as lighting, singers, videos, dancers enmeshed in an annual address unprecedented for its production values in the nation’s second-largest school district…”
Why did pictures of past totalitarian regimes come into my mind when I read this? It’s just spiced up a little for modern American times.
LikeLike
Nailed it, Duane.
LikeLike
Yay, we love Biden because he wants gender pushed over education. He wants sexual books, could care less like Obama how dumb your kids are. oh no, republicans and moms are mean. Joe Biden is also the first president to openly state he does not want his kids growing up in a racial jungle. Just another way of saying I do not want black or bowrn kids around my children, otherwise “I will put yall back in chains” another Biden classic. You all support this loser puppet in Obamas third disaster term, very sad.
LikeLike
You really have gone off the edge into Bizarroland, Josh. This characterization has nothing whatsoever to do with the actual Joe Biden. It’s totally off the wall. It’s JUST WEIRD. I mean lock him up in a padded cell and give him some meds weird. It’s totally disconnected with reality.
I’m curious: what news media do you consume on a regular basis?
LikeLike
Tucker and Jesse Watters. X22, and we know podcasts, joe rogan are a few.
Whatever you listen to, broke your brain and brainwashed you, I never fell for the lies.
LikeLike
Josh, didn’t you see the Tucker tapes, where he acknowledged that Trump lost?
LikeLike
When I became a teacher in the fall of 1982 I honestly believed that the vast majority of Americans and political leaders thought public education was a civic good. Those few who seemed determined to deny education to the underprivileged were simply a minority that would never get the power to disrupt and neuter education as a tool for social mobility. My entire career spanned this age of reform that awakened me to the reality that there are illiberal forces who simply want to sustain ignorance and dependence among the masses for the sake of social economic caste. The most obvious evidence of this was the ongoing refusal to fund public education in Southern states where I have resided my entire life. Every measure of education shows us that simply denying resources keeps the underprivileged in their place while a minority sustain their political and economic advantage. As Southern politicians began to take power in national politics, this practice was imported to midwestern and rust belt states and then the federal government. Beginning with the misguided Standards Movement, Secretary of Education Richard Riley teamed with President Clinton, both former Democratic governors from the South, to follow a “basics” philosophy that put a limited scope for reading and math at the forefront of curricular policy while demeaning the importance of inquiry and critical thinking. When George Bush passed “No Child Left Behind”, with Ted Kennedy along side, the dye was cast. We no longer needed to produce citizens who could think, but those who could simply read and do math as they filled the low paying service jobs necessary to provide resources for the privileged. The final nail was The Obama administration’s “Race to the Top” that promoted school closures and teacher evaluations focused on test scores. If we really developed education policy according to the revelation of data we would have determined that the high stakes standards movement had been an abject failure and it would have been abandoned decades ago. However, our country has developed an education industrial complex that thrives on current policy and doesn’t care about the well being of our citizenry, just the equity provided for those who keep the goose alive to produce their golden egg. Yes, Biden has reduced this focus on high tech/High stakes curricula, yet it still exists. Meanwhile, on the Republican side, politicians like Chris Christie still advocate more of the same while overstating the failure revealed in NAEP scores (That, if they were honest, actually reveals the failure of this bipartisan policy). Poll after poll reveals that almost eighty percent of parents have confidence in our public schools while clueless representatives seek to tear them down. While policy makers continue with inequitable funding, conservative pundits claim that our overall funding is too high when most of that money goes to wealthy districts while our test scores continue to fall because poor districts simply lack the resources. The greatest threat to our public schools is the dishonesty that promotes a false narrative about school failures. The last forty years have not been an age of reform in public education but a protocol of intentional ineptitude. The public knows this. We simply need a political movement that will overwhelm the disrupters who only care about their bottom line.
LikeLike
Excellent comment, Paul.
LikeLike