A blog reader who identifies as “Democracy” argues that today’s Republican Party, which prizes individualism over the common good has abandoned the vision of the Founding Fathers.
It appears that Ron DeSantis and the entirety of the Republican Party is in direct opposition to American history and the United States Constitution.
The Founders envisioned a democratic society “in which the common good was the chief end of government.” They agreed with John Locke’s view that the main purpose of government –– the main reason people create government –– is to protect their persons through –– as historian R. Freeman Butts put it –– a social contract that placed “the public good above private desires.” The goal was “a commonwealth, a democratic corporate society in which the common good was the chief end of government.”
The Preamble – the stated purposes – of the Constitution, reads
“We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”
In Article I, Section 8 of that document, the legislative branch is given broad, specific powers (among them taxing, borrowing money, regulating commerce, coining money and regulating its value, etc.). Indeed, Article I, Clause 1 gives Congress the power to tax for “the common defence and general Welfare of the United States.” Clause 18 of Section 8 stipulates that Congress had the power “To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers.”
Two Supreme Court decisions early in the republic’s history –– both unanimous –– supported and cemented a broad – liberal – interpretation of the implied powers of Congress.
Republicans call them “socialism.”
In 1819 (McCullough v. Maryland) the Supreme Court reaffirmed that the U.S. government was “a Government of the people. In form and in substance, it emanates from them. Its powers are granted by them, and are to be exercised directly on them, and for their benefit.”
The Court explicitly reaffirmed that one of the critical purposes of government under the U.S. Constitution is to promote the general welfare “of the people.”
In that case, Chief Justice Marshall wrote this about the necessary and proper clause:
“the clause is placed among the powers of Congress, not among the limitations on those powers.” And he added this: “Its terms purport to enlarge, not to diminish, the powers vested in the Government. It purports to be an additional power, not a restriction.”
In Gibbons v. Ogden (1824) Chief Justice Marshall wrote this about the Congressional commerce power:
“This power, like all others vested in Congress, is complete in itself, may be exercised to its utmost extent, and acknowledges no limitations other than are prescribed in the Constitution.”
The history of the United States, and the Constitution, over time, reflect progressive changes. The American Revolution was a progressive movement inspired by the ideas of Enlightenment thinkers; conservatives opposed it. The early expansion of voting rights to those who didn’t own land was progressive, and conservatives of the day fought
against it. The purchase of the Louisiana Territory, a purchase that doubled the size of the fledgling United States, rested on a liberal interpretation of constitutional authority. U.S. government funding of roads and canals relied on a liberal perspective of Congressional commerce power. Those roads and canals were instrumental to economic growth and prosperity, not unlike federal funding of interstate highways, the Internet, medical research, and health care.
And yet, the Republican Party is filled with people who basically reject all of this in favor of sedition.
As David Blight, Yale professor of American history put it,
“Changing demographics and 15 million new voters drawn into the electorate by Obama in 2008 have scared Republicans—now largely the white people’s party—into fearing for their existence. With voter ID laws, reduced polling places and days, voter roll purges, restrictions on mail-in voting, an evisceration of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, and a constant rant about ‘voter fraud’ without evidence, Republicans have soiled our electoral system with undemocratic skullduggery…The Republican Party has become a new kind of Confederacy.
Obviously, public education has a central – critical – role to play here. Here’s how Will and Ariel Durant explained it in ‘The Lessons of History’ (1968):
“Civilization is not inherited; it has to be learned and earned by each generation anew; if the transmission should be interrupted for one century, civilization would die, and we should be savages again.”

For two hundred years, the chief “corporate” power in this country was the US government. Since the so called Reagan revolution, three destructive tax cuts created private wealth whose holders now see their resources as more important than the people’s government. Yes, many in the Republican Party see any government action as “socialist” but it is the few holding most of the fiduciary cards who finance the propaganda that promotes this grift. A few billionaire sociopaths have little regard for a government of the people, by the people, and for the people. This contemporary war on public schools has an obvious and nefarious purpose.
LikeLike
Diane, the Republican party has been completely taken over by the radical Libertarian movement as framed by Calhon, Buckingham, Friedman, Koch, and the rest of them. The cornerstone of their belief is that the majority should not be allowed to rule. We are seeing that play out. I felt that in Democracy in Chains, Nancy MacLean did an excellent job of exposing just what this movement intends to do. Truly terrifying.
LikeLike
The goal of democracy should be to address the needs of the people, but our government has become a gigantic “pay to play” scheme. Our capitalism is out of control, and it needs to be regulated. Unless we can figure out a way to rein in private equity, big corporations and billionaires, there is not enough interest from politicians to protect the interests of people. What is beneficial to working families becomes an afterthought or a campaign promise that is easily abandoned. While the GOP has lost its collective minds and souls, Democrats also have a good deal of work to do in this regard.
LikeLike
The money being followed certainly has a bipartisan flavor…
LikeLike
My wife and I were just discussing this. Amen to your post! For crying out loud is it always going to be, “The one with the most money crushes everyone else?”
LikeLike
Dear John Inman,
You are right.
Nancy MacLean’s “Democracy in Chains” is an excellent book.
LikeLike
Bravo, Democracy!
LikeLike
Posted thoughts on this mistakenly in previous post.
LikeLike
LikeLike
Josh has serious issues.
LikeLike
LikeLike
LikeLike
sound much smarter than you greg lol, the Biden supporter, such a shame.
LikeLike
Seriously we have to stop re-inventing history. The consent of the Governed in the Declaration never made it to the Constitution . The framers neither allowed for the direct election of a President nor for that matter Senators. The Constitution never specified who can vote. Leaving that task up to the States. A conundrum we are stuck with to this day. Or the Orange Menace would be in a Federal Lock Up already. While at the same time almost every state tied voting rights to property ownership for many decades. Today with extreme gerrymandering and voter disenfranchisement we can hardly call what we have as consent in many states or even in congress.
Direct Election of the House of Lords did not become Constitutional Law till 1913. But even if the US Senate were elected by the people would the people in NY or California today had they been around in the 1780s, signed on to the Connecticut Compromise. Would they have signed on to a system that gave Southern States more power in selecting a President and more power in the House than their White Voting Population warranted. Doing so by counting disenfranchised slaves as 3/5ths of a person. Would the 3 Western States of the Dakota Territory , Wyoming, North and South Dakota not be one. If not for appeasing Jim Crow Southern Senators.
We live with the legacy of slavery today. Got a problem with SCOTUS rulings. Democrats have won the Popular vote in 7 of the last 8 elections. The Court has a 6 to 3 Republican Majority. It has had a Republican appointed Majority in every term since 1970. How has that worked out for progressives. We measure those ruling as it could have been much worse. Abood v. Detroit Board of Education in 1977 labor saw as a victory in that it wasn’t Janus; till Janus eliminated fair share fees altogether.
Republicans or those groups who are today’s Republican party, have Run on culture wars since Goldwater in 64. The John Birch Society booing Nelson Rockefeller off the stage.
Nixon, Reagan and Trump colluding with foriegn powers to sway National elections. Some may call that treason!
LikeLike
Joel I thought “consent of the governed” was covered pretty well with “We the People” and other like passages, both commissions and omissions, in the U.S. Constitution, not to mention the Declaration of Independence and the Bill of Rights and the definition of “democracy” itself as power in the people. CBK
LikeLike
Catherine Blanche King
Slavery aside, Woman’s Suffrage aside. The Majority of White males over the age of 18 could not vote till at least the 1840s.
So here is Madison himself :
“The right of suffrage is a fundamental Article in Republican Constitutions. The regulation of it is, at the same time, a task of peculiar delicacy. Allow the right [to vote] exclusively to property [owners], and the rights of persons may be oppressed… . Extend it equally to all, and the rights of property [owners] …may be overruled by a majority without property…. ”
Simple solution for the Framers ,toss those decision to the States. How is that working even today.
LikeLike
Joel It’s an experiment and, as we all know, sometimes experiments fail . . . that’s why. And micro-management of a Constitution for a rule-of-law government, that concerns the freedom and responsibility of so many people, is the textbook definition of a fool’s errand. CBK
LikeLike
“The Republican Party has become a new kind of Confederacy.”
How is the new kind different from the old kind?
Black robes instead of white?
LikeLike
The original A Confederacy of Dunces was much better.
LikeLike