Carol Burris, executive director of the Network for Public Education, writes here about the latest disturbing development in the charter school industry—the growth of charter schools that promote a Christian Nationalist perspective. Her article was published on Valerie Strauss’s blog The Answer Sheet at the Washington Post.
Valerie Strauss introduces Carol’s article:
The religious right scored a win this week when Oklahoma’s virtual charter school boardapproved the opening of the nation’s first religious charter school, which, if it is actually allowed to open as planned in 2024 for grades K-12, will weave Catholic doctrine into every single subject that students take. Given that charter schools are publicly funded, and public schools aren’t supposed to provide religious education (although they can teach about religion), you may wonder how this school could be given permission to exist.
The decision is no surprise to people watching the way some charter schools run by right-wing organizations have been operating in recent years, pushing the boundaries of the separation of church and state embedded in the U.S. Constitution even as Supreme Court decisions have chipped away at it. Details can be found in a new report entitled “A Sharp Turn Right: A New Breed of Charter Schools Delivers the Conservative Agenda.” (See full report below.) It was written by the nonprofit Network for Public Education, a group that advocates for traditional public school districts and opposes charter schools, and has written reports in recent years chronicling waste and abuse of public funding of charter schools.
The network’s newest report looks at charter schools that it says are designed to attract Christian nationalists with specific imagery and curriculum. The student bodies of these schools are largely Whiter and wealthier than in other schools — in the charter sector and in traditional public districts — and have deep connections to people within conservative Christian movements, the report says.
Former U.S. education secretary Betsy DeVos, a leader in the movement to expand charter schools and school vouchers — which use public funds for private and religious school education — has acknowledged that her work in the education sphere is driven by desire to advance school choice as a path to “advance God’s kingdom.” Her husband, Amway heir Richard DeVos, who worked with her for decades in the school choice movement, said he was sorry that public schools “displaced” churches as the center of communities.
The charter school movement moved into new territory Monday when the Oklahoma Statewide Virtual Charter School Board approved, on a 3-2 vote, an application for the opening of a virtual school to be named St. Isidore of Seville Catholic Virtual School and run by the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Oklahoma City and the Diocese of Tulsa. The vote will be challenged in court, and as attorney and education policy scholar Kevin Welner wrote on this blog last year, we can expect to see litigation around whether church-run charters can “successfully assert their Free Exercise rights in an attempt to run the school without restrictions on proselytizing and religiously motivated discrimination.” You can read here about howthe Supreme Court has been laying the groundwork for religious charter schools.
The new report by the Network for Public Education focuses on two types of charter schools: classical charters — which use the word “classical” in their names — and those offering “back to basics” curriculum. Diane Ravitch, an education historian and co-founder of the Network for Public Education, said in an introduction to the report that these charter schools are “the lesser-known third part” of a strategy by right-wing Christians to undermine secular public education; the others are vouchers and similar programs that use public funding for private and religious education, and book/curricular bans.
While private classical schools have a long history — emphasizing Eurocentric texts and the study of Latin and Greek — what is new is “the use of taxpayer dollars to fund them when they become or are established as charter schools,” the report said. Founders of classical charters generally reject modern instructional practices and accuse Progressive Era educational leaders such as John Dewey for removing Christian ideals from curriculum.
The Network for Public Education’s report notes that in classical private Christian schools, the curriculum focuses not only on the Western canon — Homer, C.S. Lewis and beyond — but also on scripture. “Classical charter schools emphasize ‘values’ or ‘virtues,’ which stand as shorthand for quoted scripture,” it says, which is especially true of classical charters that have opened since Donald Trump became president in 2017. “From videos posted on websites to crosses shown on the top of the school, we found example after example of charter schools presenting themselves as free private Christian schools,” the report says. It cited Liberty Common High School in Fort Collins, Colo., which celebrates “capstones” representing the “highest order of virtue and character,” including “prudence, temperance, and patriotism,” and the American Classical Charter Academy in St. Cloud, Fla., which promotes eight “pillars of character” and four “classical virtues.”
“Back to basic” schools use red, white, and blue school colors, patriotic logos and pictures of the Founding Fathers, along with terms such as virtue, patriotism and sometimes outright references to religion, the report says, citing as an example the website of the four-campus Advantage Academy in Texas, which boasts of educating students in a “faith-friendly environment.” The Cincinnati Classical Academy, another charter school, does not advertise its charter status on its website, while offering a free education with instruction in “moral character.” The American Leadership Academy in Utah posts videos its choir singing religious songs; one includes the note, “We want to help kids and adults turn to Jesus, or become Jesus people.
The fastest-growing sector of right-wing charters combines both a classical “virtuous” curriculum with “hyper-patriotism,” exemplified by charter schools that adopt the Hillsdale 1776 curriculum, which is centered on Western civilization and designed to help “students acquire a mature love for America,” its organizers say. The curriculum comes from Hillsdale College in Michigan, whose longtime president, Larry Arnn, is an ally of Trump’s and is aligned with DeVos. A Hillsdale K-12 civics and U.S. history curriculum released in 2021 extols conservative values, attacks liberal ones and distorts civil rights history, saying, for example: “The civil rights movement was almost immediately turned into programs that ran counter to the lofty ideals of the Founders.”
The Network for Public Education said that it had identified 273 open charter schools that offer a classical curriculum and/or have websites designed to attract White conservative families with for-profit management corporations running 29 percent of them, a percentage nearly twice as high as the entire charter school sector.
The new report looks at Roger Bacon Academy charter schools, run by Baker A. Mitchell Jr., which prohibit girls from wearing pants or jeans to school in order, according to a lawsuit, to ensure they are regarded as “fragile vessels” that men are supposed to take care of and honor, based on a quote from the Bible’s New Testament. (A ruling in a lawsuit challenging the dress code is on appeal to the Supreme Court after a federal judge ruled in favor of Bonnie Peltier, who objected to the unequal treatment of her daughter.) Students are also required to recite a daily oath committing them to be “morally straight” and guard “against the stains of falsehood from the fascination with experts,” while also avoiding the “temptation of vanity” and “overreliance on rational argument.”
“A Sharp Turn Right” also says one purpose of these schools is “to raise the next generation of right-wing warriors” to fight culture wars. Kyle Shideler, a senior analyst at the Center for Security Policy, an anti-Muslim organization classified as a hate group by the Southern Poverty Law Center, wrote in a recent article in the Federalist that donors should fund boot camps to train right-wingers in “the political dark arts” of organizing. In the article, he praises Hillsdale College for “the growing Christian classical school movement … for the purpose of forming young minds.”
Shideler is referring to Hillsdale’s Barney Charter School Initiative, which stems from the Barney Family Foundation, established by Stephen Barney and his wife, Lynne, in 1998. The report says it identified 59 charter schools that are open or will soon open that claim affiliation to the initiative. While Hillsdale College’s mission is to maintain “by precept and example the immemorial teachings and practices of the Christian faith,” the mission of their K-12 charter schools includes a call for “moral virtue.”
The foundation’s 990s tax forms show that in addition to its health and child-centered charities, it funds right-wing think tanks, foundations and organizations that create conservative legislation on various issued used as models by Republican-led states. One recipient has been Hillsdale College, where Stephen Barney is a trustee emeritus on the Board of Trustees. Between 2010 and 2019, the Network for Public Education identified more than $4 million earmarked for the college from his foundation. In 2010, the Barney Charter School Initiative began with a half-million-dollar contribution from the foundation, and contributions in that range have been recorded every year for which records are available, the report says.
“A Sharp Turn Right” discusses examples of Republican officeholders and party chairs who, like Oklahoma Gov. Kevin Stitt (R), aggressively push the conservative charter school agenda. Republican Heidi Ganahl, who lost to Colorado Gov. Jared Polis (D) in the 2022 gubernatorial election, is a founder of the Golden View Classical Academy. She also advocates for one of the fastest-growing Hillsdale-affiliated charter chains, Ascent Classical Academies, which operates two schools in Colorado, with plans to open four more in South Carolina, three in Colorado and at least one in North Carolina.

There are two Catholic doctrines
https://prospect.org/culture/koch-brothers-latest-target-pope-francis/
LikeLike
If it’s a “collision course,” in the U.S., it’s Pope Francis in a Popemobile against a convoy of wealthy libertarian semi-trucks promoting right wing Catholicism.
The lawyer at the epicenter of current Trump litigation (Walt Nauta’s attorney) was the President of Catholic University’s Columbus School of Law Alumni Association (2016-2021). At the other major Catholic University in the Washington D.C. seat of power, Georgetown, Koch’s Ilya Shapiro was hired for a top position in Constitutional Law. And, even after public outrage, the school reaffirmed the hiring.
After Trump’s embarrassing walkabout holding an upside down Bible, an occasion that Gen. Milley later apologized for being a part of, Trump was welcomed at the John Paul II shrine in D.C. for a photo op.
The state Catholic Conferences that lobby (spend the Church’s money) against rights for people who are gay and women, who take credit for school choice legislation, who facilitate Republican politicians and who erode the separation in church and state, reflect the wins of Catholic loyalists and tribalists. They aided the usurpation of government functions by the Church which fills Church coffers with tax money and creates a theocracy where Catholic organizations are the nation’s 3rd largest employer.
LikeLike
I have never understood the alliance between libertarians and Christian conservatives. Nothing could be farther philosophically from fundamentalism or Catholicism than libertarians. Ayn Rand herself was a notorious atheist, and is now next to St Joseph as the patron of the Right. The pretzel logic of the right wing is breathtaking.
LikeLike
Roy The glue apparently is a poisonous mixture of greed, power, and in many cases, fear and bias-filled hate that have overtaken whatever conscience, and political or religious foundation, they may have once had.
Whatever else this present movement is, it’s clearly seditious of the Constitution and the concrete institution of democracy (small d). And from what we now know about Trump, and whatever his policies, to vote for him again is de facto a seditious act. CBK
LikeLike
Ayn Rand was notorious. She was also an atheist.
LikeLike
The contradiction can be examined through the lens of the aforementioned Roger Bacon Academy, which requires a daily oath against rational thought. If it’s sense and reason you want, religious charter schools are simply not the places to look.
LikeLike
Rand wasn’t an atheist.
The Capitalist was her God and she believed and worshipped just like every other religious person.
She was a religious fanatic.
LikeLike
Who is John Galt?
God, of course.
John God
LikeLike
SDP: Forgive my ignorance. Are you referring to John Galt, the late medieval friend of Geoffrey Chaucer and English kingmaker?
LikeLike
“article in the Federalist”
The Center for Media and Democracy identified the funders of the Federalist- Uihlein and Donors Trust. CMD reported that in 2019, Donors Trust made a “major donation to the White nationalist group VDARE.”
LikeLike
Thank you, Lloyd The article clearly shows the Koch high jacking machine of both secular Universities’ economics departments (BTW, as in George Mason University/and their “Un-Koch My Campus” drive) and those that are religiously founded but also academically sound, e.g., my own: Georgetown University, Washington, D.C. (within walking distance of the White House).
I had a little trouble getting to the article, but then was able to read it. I hope I don’t get into trouble copying it here, but I thought it showed in clear terms how insidious capitalist interests have become . . . and gotten worse since 2016 when the article was written.
The Catholic Church is far from perfect (duh). And Koch et al ARE attaching Pope Francis’s teachings; but those teachings have a thousands year history fundamentally as Christian and First Testament teachings, which are clearly under assault via capitalist/fascist powers here and across the globe. I think the article speaks well of the problems the Church is “on its heels” about today.
The whole article is quoted below without change, however, except that the pictures in the article are not copied in the text. CBK
The American Prospect
Koch Brothers Latest Target: Pope Francis
By John Gehring, Oct 14, 2016
ALL QUOTED BELOW
On a spring night in downtown Washington earlier this year, hedge fund managers and CEOs mingled with religious scholars and priests at a cigar reception on the 11th floor of the Renaissance Hotel. The occasion was a $1,700-a-person conference, hosted by The Catholic University of America, focused on integrating Catholic social teaching and business.
Among the well-heeled guests was a lobbyist from Freedom Partners Chamber of Commerce, a $130 million trade group aligned with the powerful industrialists Charles and David Koch. As the cocktail chatter turned to complaints about government regulations and the power of markets to help the poor, the scene felt more fitting to a conservative political fundraiser than a conference at the nation’s only Vatican-chartered university.
But free market orthodoxy is becoming a familiar staple at Catholic University’s business school, which has accepted nearly $13 million from the Charles Koch Foundation over the last three years. The money has gone to the Busch School of Business & Economics and has been a source of consternation and controversy among some Catholic scholars. The billionaire brothers aren’t known for making public statements about faith, but rather for their defining creed of “economic liberty,” which they promote with missionary zeal by spending millions to lower corporate taxes, chip away at environmental safeguards, and erode worker’s rights.
It’s a libertarian agenda that stands in stark contrast with the communitarian tradition of Catholicism, and that is also hard to square with the priorities of Pope Francis. The first Jesuit pope and the first from Latin America, Francis has used his pulpit to challenge the moral failings of contemporary global capitalism. He has described inequality as the “root of social evil,” and has called climate change “one of the principal challenges facing humanity in our day.”
By contrast, the Kochs champion a far-right ideology that scoffs at climate change and workers’ rights. After the business school at Catholic University announced its first $1 million donation from the Koch Foundation three years ago, 50 Catholic theologians and scholars raised alarms. The Kochs help “advance public policies that directly contradict Catholic teaching on a range of moral issues from economic justice to environmental stewardship,” the scholars stated in an open letter to the university. Another letter from Catholic Scholars for Worker Justice criticized the university’s “potentially misleading message” regarding the church’s commitment to unions and workers’ rights.
University officials fired back that critics had set out to “manufacture controversy and score political points.” (Full disclosure: I work for Faith in Public Life, which helped promote the Catholic scholars’ letter.) In a Wall Street Journal op-ed, the university’s president, John Garvey, and the business school’s founding dean, Andrew Abela, declared that they would not “cave to demands made by the liberal social justice movement,” and wrote that it would be a “mistake to stifle debate by pretending that genuinely controversial positions are official church teaching.”
Catholic is not the only university to take money from the Koch Foundation, which is efficiently building a free-market “talent pipeline” in the nation’s colleges and universities. According to an investigation last year by the nonpartisan Center for Public Integrity, the foundation gave $19.3 million to 210 colleges in 2013 alone. More than two dozen Catholic universities receive funding from the Koch Foundation. Compared with the nearly $13 million Catholic University has hauled in over the past three years, most are relatively small grants. Creighton University, a Catholic, Jesuit institution in Nebraska, has brought in more than $4 million from the Koch Foundation and from the family of an Omaha entrepreneur named C.L. Werner. The money funds the university’s Institute for Economic Inquiry, which cranks out research that advocates for the privatization of state services and touts an economic philosophy more in line with the U.S. Chamber of Commerce than traditional Catholic teaching.
But the influence of the Kochs merits special scrutiny at Catholic University, founded by the U.S. bishops in 1887 with the support of Pope Leo XIII to be the national university of the Catholic Church in America. As one of the wealthiest men in the world, Charles Koch is promoting an agenda that is on a collision course with Pope Francis’s teachings about Catholic stewardship. Francis has sharply challenged what he describes as the “dictatorship of an impersonal economy” and calls for “a legitimate redistribution of economic benefits by the state.”
“Some people continue to defend trickle-down theories, which assume that economic growth, encouraged by a free market, will inevitably succeed in bringing about greater justice and inclusiveness in the world,” the pope wrote in his first major teaching document, The Joy of the Gospel, released in 2013. “This opinion, which has never been confirmed by the facts, expresses a crude and naïve trust in the goodness of those wielding economic power.”
Francis directly links what he calls “an economy of exclusion” to the global climate crisis, saying that the “cry of the earth and the cry of the poor” are inseparable. In an encyclical last June-the first-ever devoted entirely to ecology-Francis assailed climate deniers and called for a transition away from oil dependency.
Koch Industries, meanwhile, is notorious for its abysmal record of covering up toxic spills, and for underwriting well-funded lobbying and disinformation campaigns to cast doubt on the overwhelming scientific consensus about the severe risks of human-induced climate change.
The Chicago-based Heartland Institute, which has received Koch funding over the years, spearheaded a press conference before the pope’s first visit to the U.S. last fall to disseminate the message that “Pope Francis’ views on global warming are scientifically in error, and his views on capitalism are outdated and wrong.”
IN “LITTLE ROME,” THE Brookland neighborhood of northeast Washington that houses the university’s campus, a theological college for Dominican friars and headquarters of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, the Kochs have some influential fans. The university’s business school is named for Tim Busch, a Catholic CEO and Orange County, California, attorney who specializes in estate planning for wealthy clients. Busch, a philanthropist who owns several luxury hotels and founded the Napa-based winery Trinitas Cellars, sits on the university’s board of trustees, and recently gave the university $15 million, its largest-ever donation.
“I’ve learned a lot from the Koch family,” Busch acknowledged in an interview with The Catholic World Report. “Koch shouldn’t be attacked, but applauded.”
In a Wall Street Journal op-ed, Busch explained why the university accepted the Koch funding and gushed about the “compatibility of capitalism and Catholicism.” His own economic views-like those of the Kochs- are often in tension with Catholic tradition. One bedrock principle of Catholic social teaching is that workers should receive a living wage. It’s a position that the Catholic Church has officially supported since at least 1891, when Pope Leo XIII affirmed that right and also the right of workers to organize. The U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops explicitly supports raising the federal minimum wage. Busch, in contrast, has called the minimum wage “an anti-market regulation that leads to unemployment” and claims it does “great harm” to workers.
He’s not the only prominent Catholic in the university’s circles philosophically allied with the Kochs. Abela, the founding dean of the business school, struck a less than Francis-like note when he told a Catholic news outlet that while Catholic teaching requires respect for the environment, “it doesn’t say if you question global warming or climate change that’s a sin.” In fact, just last month, the pope’s message for the “World Day of Prayer for the Care of Creation” specifically noted that 2015 was the warmest year on record. He quoted Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew, the leader of the Eastern Orthodox Church, saying that environmental degradation and the impact of climate change are “a sin against ourselves and a sin against God.”
The glaring contrast between the Kochs’ ideology and both Pope Francis’s priorities and traditional Catholic social teaching is apparently lost on some wealthy conservative Catholics.
A year after controversy first erupted around the Koch donations at Catholic University in 2013, two financial contributors to the Freedom Partners Chamber of Commerce wrote a Washington Post op-ed that unconvincingly attempted to link the Kochs with the pope. “For us, promoting limited government alongside the Kochs is an important part of heeding Pope Francis’ call to love and serve the poor,” they wrote in a column that went on to parrot a litany of Republican talking points about the “insatiable growth” of government.
If some conservatives have tried to identify themselves with a popular pope even as they undermine his message, others have directly attacked Francis. Among the speakers to address Creighton University’s Koch-backed Institute for Economic Inquiry is Stephen Moore, an economist at the Heritage Foundation in Washington, D.C., and a campaign adviser to Donald Trump. Moore, a Catholic, last year blasted Pope Francis in Forbes magazine as “a complete disaster when it comes to his policy pronouncements.” The pope, Moore wrote, “has allied himself with the far left and has embraced an ideology that would make people poorer and less free.” On environmental issues, he accuses the pope of aligning himself with a “radical green movement that at its core is anti-Christian, anti-people and anti-progress.”
Creighton’s institute invited Moore last fall to give an address about economic issues in the 2016 election.
Some scholars say the Kochs’ ideology can’t be justified in Catholic terms. Stephen Schneck, a professor at Catholic University who organized a conference two years ago at the campus, which highlighted the incompatibility of Catholic teachings and economic libertarianism, says efforts to demonize government and sanctify markets are antithetical to the Catholic moral tradition.
“Radical market ideologies really are heretical,” Schneck, the director of the university’s Institute for Policy Research & Catholic Studies, told the Prospect. “To yoke human freedom to the same market competition that has given rise to consumerism, materialism, value relativism, and the commodification of labor can’t be squared with the Catholic ideal of human dignity.”
THE KOCHS ARE ONLY TWO of the players in a broader movement spreading a free-market gospel at Catholic institutions. A well-financed network of conservative clergy and Catholic intellectuals on the right churns out research and books, and hosts conferences that often send a decidedly different message than Pope Francis does when it comes to the economy and climate change. One influential figure in this effort is the Reverend Robert Sirico, a Catholic priest who founded the Koch-linked Acton Institute. Based in Grand Rapids, Michigan, the institute has a Rome office near the Vatican, and also has ties to Catholic University’s business and economics school.
Abela is one of several faculty members who have won Acton’s $10,000 top award for studying the “relationship between religion and economic liberty.” The author of Defending the Free Market: The Moral Case for A Free Economy, Sirico is a Brooklyn native with a sharp wit who is as comfortable dishing commentary on Fox News as he is waxing philosophical about Saint Augustine. A onetime activist on the left in the 1960s, Sirico has built a formidable base of operations with the help of the Koch Foundation and the Christian conservative DeVos family, the billionaire heirs to the Amway fortune who are well known for bankrolling Republican candidates, and anti-tax and anti-union campaigns.
When adjunct professors at a Catholic university in Pittsburgh, who make near-poverty wages and often lack health insurance, launched an organizing drive, Sirico argued in The New York Times that the church’s historic support for unions was conditional. “In the industrial revolution, the church was concerned about communism and not just capitalism but savage capitalism,” he told The Times. “People were being brutalized. That’s just not the case in Pittsburgh today.”
At a four-day Acton conference in Grand Rapids in June-an annual gathering dubbed “Acton University” that attracts more than a thousand participants from 50 countries-one of the featured lecturers was Jay Richards, a research professor in Catholic University’s business school.
Richards, who goes by “Free Market Jay” on Twitter and is the executive editor of the right-wing news outlet The Stream, delivered an environmental message that went over well with the business leaders, libertarian-leaning college students and aspiring entrepreneurs in the room. “Because God told us to be good stewards, that doesn’t mean we have to drive a Prius or support the Paris climate accords,” Richards quipped. He went on to argue that carbon dioxide has “very positive effects” on the atmosphere, and that many scientists and research organizations are misguided alarmists on climate change.
“The nature of Big Science leads to groupthink,” Richards told the group. “There are no global policies to date that make any sense at all.” He warned of the “expensive public policies” promoted by organizations that have been “co-opted” by radical leftists. Richards finished his lecture by touting the Cornwall Alliance, a Christian evangelical coalition that makes a “moral case” for fossil fuels. As people left, Cornwall pamphlets bearing the message “Forget ‘Climate Change’-Energy Empowers the Poor” were handed out at the door.
It’s striking that over the course of several days Pope Francis rarely came up. Asked directly about the pope’s persistent challenges to the “new tyranny” of unfettered capitalism during one lecture, Acton research director Samuel Gregg, author of the book Tea Party Catholic, offered a dismissive retort. “It’s one thing to critique, but you need to know something about what you’re critiquing,” Gregg said. In National Review, Gregg has described the pope’s arguments about inequality as “less than convincing.” In another conference seminar, Todd Flanders, the headmaster of a pre-K–12 Catholic school in Minnesota, criticized efforts to raise the minimum wage, complained about the “regulatory state” and breezily said of Francis, “Catholics are not required to agree with popes on particular policy questions.”
While officials at Catholic university’s business school and the Acton Institute have tried to dismiss those who raise concerns about the influx of Koch funding at Catholic institutions, some educators warn that big money from right-wing billionaires comes with a cost.
“The Kochs are influential and have money to throw around,” says Thomas Kelly, a Creighton University theology professor. “They put libertarian thought in front of young people, which is very attractive because it’s based on self-interest and individualism. Their dispersion of money into universities is part of a unified, effective political strategy. They want to form a generation that thinks they are only responsible for themselves. At a foundational level, this is the exact opposite of what Catholic teaching says about the common good.” END QUOTED ARTICLE
LikeLike
Thanks CBK. An interesting article. Political struggles in the church are as old as the church itself. I was reminded of Bartolemeo de Las Casas, who called out the Spanish crown for its treatment of the indigenous people in the colonies. The British took that and ran with it, despite engaging in their own genocide during colonialism.
LikeLike
Roy Turrentine Whatever else anyone thinks of the Catholic Church, and for all its flaws, its long-term history and the specifics of it, put it in its own category. Like Judaism and Islam, and some others, its power is worldwide and many generational. Those who lump these religious orders together with protestant, and especially American protestant religions, not to mention their schools, only reveal their ignorance of history.
It’s a difference between having existed for 300-plus years and having been a part of world history for thousands of years. To understand history takes time and serious study; and the more you understand about it, the more you can see when others “have no clue,” and how that ignorance influences their understanding in discussions, of their own lives, and how things are in the present. And it’s not something you cannot convey in brief notes or snippet conversations.
I had an aunt who knitted some of the most intricate and beautiful sweaters and bed covers. She made an early mistake in the pattern of a sweater once and didn’t catch it until she had come close to finishing. Trying to explain historical meaning to someone who doesn’t already “have a clue” is like that . . . my aunt realizing how much work she would have to do to fix that flaw in her sweater pattern.
Now imagine millions of sweaters with flaws knitted-in to their patterns and you probably have a good picture of insular and historically ignorant Americans.
Thanks again for posting that article. It really brought clear the outlines of the whole ongoing problem. CBK
LikeLike
Thank you, Lloyd My note went to moderation. CBK
LikeLike
The right wing extremists in red states are using states rights to relitigate The Civil War. We should not be sending public dollars to schools that with religious and political agendas, particularly when the agenda is, frankly, Un-American. We should not be spending public money to support private schools that actually indoctrinate students to believe in white supremacy, inaccurate history and science, and no equal justice for people of color and other vulnerable groups. Should non-religious taxpayers be compelled to pay for schools with anti-democratic and specific religious beliefs? To illustrate just how polarized we have become as a nation, a current poll of GOP voters shows that 80% of them believe that Trump should be able to serve if he wins the election EVEN IF CONVICTED OF THE CHARGES AGAINST HIM! https://news.yahoo.com/80-percent-likely-gop-voters-175209423.html#:~:text=Eighty%20percent%20of%20likely%20Republican,in%20the%20classified%20documents%20case.
LikeLike
Diane In the article, she writes: “* . . . which, if it is actually allowed to open as planned in 2024 for grades K-12, will weave Catholic doctrine into every single subject that students take.*”
Briefly, from my experience in teaching in Catholic schools (briefly as a sub, awhile back) and in graduating from Georgetown University, that statement is not a given.
I call that to your attention, even though (1) I believe such a statement is probably true if said about today’s evangelical/protestant churches as well as home schooling; and (2) as a general rule, I think charters are a wrong-headed idea in the first place precisely because it reeks of “slippery slope” especially in K12 schools, and for all of the other reasons put forth so often and so well on this site. It’s just too-too much of a moral hazard for overly-doctrinaire e.g., totalitarians, for people who never got the memo about the difference between church and state and, again, for predatory capitalists to hook their wagons to, e.g., both their bank accounts and their political ideologies.
But in my experience with Catholic schools, they have distinct religious classes, but in other classes and aspects of the curriculum they stay with good material gleaned from the sciences, social and otherwise, from excellent and well-known historians, and all the other aspects of secular education. Basically, the statement MAY reflect the reality as things go along, but as it stands, it’s a bad wrap based on fear and, in the worse case, bias. I hope that article I posted shows up. It went into moderation. CBK
LikeLike
“Briefly, from my experience in teaching in Catholic schools (briefly as a sub, awhile back) and in graduating from Georgetown University, that statement is not a given.”
That was my experience as well as a teacher in a Catholic girls’ high school years ago, though that experience was limited to the one school. Yes, the school took its religious mission seriously. It had morning and evening prayers over the PA. There were religion classes. Many of my colleagues were nuns. One was a priest. We had a monthly mass given by a priest from the Chicago diocese. But the English classes focused on English, the history classes on history, and so on. I did not see any difference between these and the ones in the public schools that I taught in, with this exception: the classes were MUCH more orderly, perhaps because troublemakers could easily be kicked out.
Has this approach to curricula changed? I would like to think that in most Catholic schools it hasn’t, even as the percentage of teachers in those schools who have a religious vocation has plummeted. This, however, is certainly true: if there are Catholic schools that have adopted the Hillsdale curriculum, then the approach has changed. That Hillsdale 1776 curriculum is extremely rightwing and falsifying.
And thank you, Carol and Diane, for this important work!
LikeLike
Thanks Bob for highlighting the Hillsdale connection.
LikeLike
Bob My experience was the same . . . and being a substitute, I was able to see the big difference in the respect given teachers and to their fellow students between Catholic and SOME public schools where the students SOMETIMES broke up the furniture–literally.
Also, at Georgetown, the humanities, literature, and art courses were exceptional, American and European literature of all sorts, and some others. I took a “science for the humanities” course that was taught by a physicist who worked at the Pentagon. It was ALL science.
I do think there is this stereotypical idea floating around out there that assumes that “Catholic” or “religious” schools must be dogmatic and doctrinaire. NADA. Catholic education has been around a long time and probably was able to do so precisely because of the quality of its general curriculum.
That is not to say that the red flags that are out there now, and over the last 20+ or so years, are not seriously threatening not only to the United States as a working democracy, but also to the authenticity of the Catholic Church itself.
Finally, “Christian nationalism” is a gross contradiction in terms. CBK
LikeLike
” guarding against the stains of falsehood from the fascination with experts”
What on earth does that even mean?
So bizarre. Let’s unpack it a bit. First, the statement is obviously not ungrammatical and contains obvious violations of standard usage. Second, it demonstrates the woo-woo-weird obsession of fundamentalist fanatics with purity and its opposite, “stains.” There’s something deeply Freudian going on there. Third, it asserts that holding a false idea (one contrary to the school’s dogmas and doctrines, one supposes) is a stain. Fourth, it discloses the fear that these superstitious morons have that students will encounter folks who actually know something (experts) and learn from them that the dogmas and doctrines of the school are superstitious hoodoo contradicted by actual natural science and history. And so it perpetuates the antipathy for knowledge that is key to the foundational myth of Christianity: oh no! they ate a fruit from the Tree of Knowledge! So, they and their progeny forever will be forced into hard labor and will die painfully and then, most of them, suffer in hell for all eternity. ROFLMAO.
Here we are in the 21st century, and some people still believe this nonsense from the infancy of human civilization.
LikeLike
It means science is wrong; the literal Bible is right. Nothing new there. Echoes of the Scopes trial. Echoes of burnings at the stake. The Puritan double standard is foundational.
LikeLike
Having kids pledge each day to ignore facts and embrace superstition. Just what schools should do, huh?
LikeLike
cx: is obviously ungrammatical
LikeLike
Obviously the stain of falsehood can only be erased by the Tide of truthhood! Tide also makes a handy pen-like container for traveling. Essential when reading most NYT or WSJ fifth columnists.
LikeLiked by 1 person
HAAAAA!!!!
LikeLike
I’ve also heard that the stain of falsehood can be removed by being “warshed in the blood,” though I cannot see how this might be possible.
LikeLike
Bob: Are you choosing which metaphor to literalize? You might be interested in my organization.
While in college I conceived of NOLME, the National Organization for the Literalization of Metaphorical Expression. Unfortunately we were at loggerheads over the bylaws. I revived NOLME when I taught, because a door from my room led outside where there was a bush, around which the club would beat. I never suggested literalizing the blood of Jesus metaphor, desiring not to offend the group that was perfectly satisfied with the church being the bride of Christ, but took other Biblical metaphor quite literally.
LikeLike
What a breathtaking, fascinating report. Other visitors to this blog: take the time to read this. It’s important and interesting.
LikeLike
The Crusades are coming for your schools now. These murderous religions and their myopic masters never quit.
LikeLike