Maria Mendez of The Texas Tribune summarizes what has been learned since the massacre of 19 students and two teachers at Robb Elementary School in Uvalde, Texas, one year ago.
What we know for sure: 376 armed officers converged on the school, knowing that a gunman was killing children and teachers inside two conjoined classrooms, where there were 33 children and three teachers.
For 77 minutes, none of the officers entered the classroom to confront the killer. They were afraid of the killer’s AR-15.
What we have learned since: there was a catastrophic breakdown in leadership and communications. No one was sure who was in charge.
Law enforcement across the nation has been trained to confront and neutralize the killer as quickly as possible. When one officer started to enter the killing zone, none of his colleagues backed him up. When a dying teacher called her husband, who was a police officer at the scene, he tried to rush to her aid but he was stopped and disarmed.
In two and a half minutes, before any police officer set foot inside the school, the gunman fired more than 100 rounds at students and teachers from point-blank range. Upon breach, 18 of the 21 victims were already dead.
Had the officers followed standard protocol and entered the classrooms immediately, some of those who were grievously wounded might have survived.
Inside the school, some police officers attempted to approach the classrooms the gunman took over, but they weren’t backed up by colleagues, according to records and footage reviewed by The Texas Tribune.
Another frustrated state trooper urged officers to enter but was told by a police officer that they hadn’t received those orders….
The disjointed medical response, which also included lapses in communication and muddled lines of authority, frustrated medics while delaying efforts to get ambulances, air transport and other emergency services to victims.
For example, medical helicopters with critical supplies of blood tried to land at the school, but an unidentified fire department official told them to wait at an airport 3 miles away. And only two ambulances were seen outside the school in police camera footage, while dozens of parked police vehicles blocked other ambulances’ paths.
What’s happened since: Congress passed a bill introduced by Republican Senator Jon Cornyn of Texas. Texas has spent money on security.
Within weeks of the shooting, federal lawmakers passed the Bipartisan Safer Communities Act. Republican U.S. Sen. John Cornyn helped negotiate passage of the legislation, which contained modest provisions but which was also the most significant federal gun measure passed in nearly three decades. But rather than pass gun measures of their own, state leaders have largely focused on improving school safety and access to mental health care.
Texas Republicans hold a supermajority, and they oppose restrictions on gun ownership.
Abbott and other Texas Republicans have mostly ignored calls for increased gun restrictions since the Uvalde shooting, instead focusing on mental health funding and school safety.
In late June, Abbott and state leaders announced they would dedicate $100 million in state funds to boost school safety and mental health services through August 2023. Most of the funds went toward bullet-resistant shields for school police officers and for school districts to buy silent panic alert technology to alert police of an intruder.
Cornyn negotiated a federal bill signed into law last June with modest gun control measures that addressed a “boyfriend loophole,” which previously exempted some dating partners from a federal ban on firearm purchases for those convicted of domestic violence. The bill also included incentives for states to impose “red flag laws,” which allow for the temporary confiscation of guns from people found by a judge to be dangerous. Texas has not moved to impose such a law.
Texas lawmakers also appear unlikely to raise the minimum age to buy semi-automatic rifles like the AR-15 from 18 to 21 after a bill to do so missed key legislative deadlines. But gun safety advocates say they still see incremental progress through two gun-related bills passed by both chambers of the Legislature.
Senate Bill 728 requires courts to report involuntary mental health hospitalizations of juveniles 16 and older for inclusion in the federal background check system to purchase firearms. The bill, sent to the governor’s desk, addresses a loophole exposed by The Texas Tribune and ProPublica following the shooting in Uvalde.
House Bill 2454 would restrict a person from buying a gun for another person not allowed to have one. It has passed both chambers, but the House must accept or negotiate amendments made to the bill by the Senate before the legislative session ends May 29.
Lawmakers have also advanced legislation to fund campus security upgrades, add requirements such as silent panic buttons in classrooms and create a new safety and security department within the Texas Education Agency. The department would have the authority to compel school districts to establish active-shooter protocols — something about half of the state’s school districts failed to have, according to an audit in 2020.
None of these changes at the state and federal levels would have prevented the Uvalde massacre. Children and teachers called 911, as they lay dying. Would a silent panic button have given the officers the nerve to enter the classroom sooner? Would the killer have signed up for mental health services?
America sure does love itself some death and destruction as epitomized by its love affair with the US Military. Until that beast is slain, we will see more mass killings.
The shooting in Uvalde was not carried out by the U.S. military. It was carried out by an 18-year-old boy who LEGALLY bought two AR-style rifles in the only Western democracy that allows ordinary citizens to purchase military-style weapons and ammunition.
“Nothing to be done about gun violence says ONLY country where mass shootings are a daily occurrence.”
Gee. Wonder how that could be possible.
We are also the only country with 800+ military bases encircling the world. We are the country that has the most invasions, coups, bombings and other attacks on other countries. I think it’s naive to pretend those factors are unrelated to the prevalence and use of guns domestically. If our country’s solution to every problem is violence, why should citizens not use violence to solve their problems? When you glorify violence, you can’t be shocked when violence is the method of choice.
Not going too well in Ukraine for your old pal Vladimir the Conqueror, Dienne.
First, just as a point of fact for your edification, Russian forces just took Bakhmut this past weekend. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/russia-captures-bakhmut-putin-ukraine-counteroffensive-rcna72615 (Note how they now claim it’s only a “symbolic victory” when just a few months ago Elensky claimed that the fall of Bakhmut would threaten all of ukraine.)
But second, how is that remotely related to the topic of conversation at hand, and how is this anything other than an ad hominem? Is this the way you behave in Diane’s living room?
Taking Bakhmut is a hollow victory. There is nothing left. It has been obliterated. Ukraine strategy was to tie down Russian forces there. Ukraine has encircled Bakhmut and Russia controls a wasteland. Most analysts estimate that Russia lost 100,000 troops—killed or wounded—in Bakhmut.
So funny how the narrative changes after the fact.
BTW, how many ukrainian soldiers died?
The Washington Post, 2 days ago:
“The battle for Bakhmut, the most protracted of the war so far, could also have been the bloodiest. The Russian occupation authorities estimated Ukrainian losses at 15,000 to 20,000 dead last month, though propaganda outlets have cited numbers up to 40,000. U.S. President Joe Biden has said that Russia has “suffered over 100,000 casualties in Bakhmut.” In any case, it’s likely that more people died or were wounded in the fighting than the 70,000 residents of Bakhmut before the war — a population now almost completely gone, save for a few dozen desperate souls hiding out in basements.”
Dienne, why are you always defending Putin and his war of choice?
Zero would have had to die if it weren’t for the illegal invasion of the country by Putin the imperalist indicted war criminal. All that blood is on his hands.
We took Bakhmut!
I am reminded of the cartoon from the 1960s that pictured Lyndon Johnson standing on top of a pile of bodies, captioned, “Another village saved from Communism.” All those dead on both sides. For what? For nothing. Some victory.
Oh, and lest I forget, thanks for edifying me, Dienne. ROFL.
diene— it’s a logical & philosophical question from satellite-camera view, but doubt it really connects on the ground. I seriously doubt that 2A gun fanatics, much less the few among them like this boy who was able to pick up a couple of AR15’s at a local store to carry out some addle-brained vendetta have the slightest knowledge of the facts you present here.
I do think however there is some connection there that is worth pondering.
Your missing my point. Of course, duh and double duh, the US Military did not do the Uvalde mass murders. The death and destruction as done by the US Military is the background/precursor for America’s love affair with that death and destruction. Americans have been so propagandized by that death and destruction machine that Americans seem think that “collateral damage” is acceptable. Uvalde is an example of one type of “collateral damage”.
I got your point, Duane. I just thought it was far fetched. Thus the comment.
Some of the most far fetched ideas of today will be the future’s truths.
But like almost all Americans, you too are blinded by patriotism. It’s very hard not to be that way in this country.
So, in the news today, Russia bombs psychiatric clinic, veternary clinic, and children’s recreational park in Ukraine, killing kids. Another day of war crimes and crimes against humanity conducted by indicted international war criminal Tsar Vladimir.
Sadly so. But it’s no excuse for death and destruction this country has wrought/continues to spread around the world for the last 22 years (actually at least since the Korean War.)
veterinary
In other news, Ron DeSantis kicked off his campaign by giving us all a really good reason why we SHOULDN”T vote for Ron DeSantis (or any other Repuglican) for president: a 7-to-2 extreme reich-wing Supreme Court majority.
In response to questions… “Would a silent panic button… ?”
The answer is “All of the above”
First – you never know which of the many common sense and tactical actions could prevent a school shooting. But any one of them can buy minutes or even seconds that save lives.
Second – every strategy possible should be to slow the shooter down and keep him/her separate from children and adults as quickly as possible!
It’s “you never know which ones helps so it’s all of the above” – – – single driveway entrance, outside cameras, single-door entry, no exterior doors accidently propped open, lock-down alarms (like fire) in every hallway, immediate communication to police and office from anyone anywhere in the building when person does get in, automatically shutting corridor doors, locks on classroom doors, hallway cameras…
Of course, in “all of the above” it also takes politicians willing to get their heads out of the sand, stop the “guns don’t kill people” crud, and pass mounds of prevention legislation.
And, when they get their heads out of the sand, the first thing they should be required to do is to look into the eyes of these parents, explain their votes and tweets, and say “I should have done more”
Nothing helps when the guys with the guns are afraid to go into the classroom and confront the shooter.
This is really shocking–that all those armed grownups stood outside while children were being murdered and did nothing. Shameful, cowardly, disgusting.
The whole thing is so awful. The response was obviously terrible. But even yet, I pause before calling men cowards when I myself have never rushed into a building with the knowledge that I could be shot to death by a madman armed to the teeth. Blame must be assigned at the top.
I couldn’t do it either but that’s their job. Across the country, police are trained to run to the shooter and stop him from killing. That’s what the police did at the school in Nashville. Six people, including three children, died but it could have been much worse if the police had waited outside of the building. I watched the video. They ran into the building and stopped the killing. At Parkland, the armed guard didn’t go inside. At the recent mall shooting, the killer was stopped by a policeman who didn’t stand by.
I often wonder why the police are not more vocal about the need to remove AR-15 type weapons from the general population. After all, it’s the police who are expected to confront these shooters often without knowing if they will be at a disadvantage in terms of weaponry and ammunition.
I was proud of the Nashville police who went into Covenant. It was textbook. Still, we have a lot of soul searching to do. There were plenty of automatic weapons in the hands of gangsters in the thirties, but few school shootings.
While I believe we should ban military weapons, I am not so naive as to believe that a ban would cure the mass shooting epidemic. We live in a culture that adores violence at every level. The foolish drive about with bumper stickers that say “God Guns and Guts” and crosses made with two assault weapons. The handgun is a symbol of toughness in shows and video games. Peaceful people are seen as weak. Mental instability abounds within this poison cultural soup.
We have a lot of work to do.
Roy,
This is a much longer conversation. The gangsters had guns in the 30s. Probably some regular people had rifles for hunting and pistols for protection. My father had one.
Nobody had anything like military weapons. The AR 15 didn’t exist. Regular people didn’t have machine guns like mobsters.
There is a lot of mental illness these days but I still think that easy access to AR15 s is part of the problem.
The mass killing is in schools but also in nightclubs—Pulse in Orlando; movie theaters —Aurora, Colorado. Looking down in a music festival—Las Vegas, 58 dead.
I don’t recall all this Michigan about the right to bear AR15-type guns.
There was a federal ban from 1995-2005.
I assume other advanced societies have crazy people but they have a harder time getting weapons
‘“God Guns and Guts” and crosses made with two assault weapons. ‘
Doesn’t that just trumpet, “Jesus loves you!”?
So much for the “The only way to stop a bad guy with a gun is with a good guy with a gun” crap (or however it is the gun nuts express this) that the NRA retails every time a mass shooting occurs. Sickening.
There were 376 good guys and one very bad guy with a gun. The bad guy was 18. In a sane society, he would have to be 21, pass background tests, have safe locked storage, training, etc. A sane society would not allow civilians to buy military-grade weapons.
How many kids have to be so badly mutilated that there parents can’t even identify them before we ban weapons intended for the battlefield?
Who was the invited guest at DeSatan’s musked-up announcement on Twitter of his presidential candidacy for Glorious Leader? Representative Thomas Massie of Kentucky–the guy with the Christmas card showing his family, including all the children, armed to the teeth with assault weapons.