During the mayoral campaign in New York City, Eric Adams won the support of many leaders of the city’s orthodox Jewish community, which often votes as a bloc for the candidate who promises to protect their insular world and the flow of government funds. In a recent speech to a Modern Orthodox Jewish audience, Mayor Adams said that the city’s public schools should try to duplicate the “achievements” of the city’s yeshivas (most of which are run by Hasidim, not Modern Orthodox). The Hasidic yeshivas have been heavily criticized for their failure to teach a secular education.
This is astonishing.
Mayor Adams was probably just pandering to his audience, but he revealed profound ignorance about the failure of yeshivas, as well as profound ignorance about his own city’s public schools, which have produced Nobel Prize winners and generations of scientists, scholars, business leaders, performers, professionals, and other successful people.
The private yeshivas for the children of Hasidic Orthodox Jews have been criticized by an organization of some of their graduates called Young Advocates for a Fair Education for failing to teach English and other subjects, leaving graduates unprepared for life.
The New York Times reported that the city’s yeshivas had received over $1 billion in public funding but were academic failures. Typically, they don’t take state tests, but when one of the larger Hasidic schools administered the state tests in reading and math, every student failed.
This was “failure “by design,” said the Times.
The leaders of New York’s Hasidic community have built scores of private schools to educate children in Jewish law, prayer and tradition — and to wall them off from the secular world. Offering little English and math, and virtually no science or history, they drill students relentlessly, sometimes brutally, during hours of religious lessons conducted in Yiddish.
The result, a New York Times investigation has found, is that generations of children have been systematically denied a basic education, trapping many of them in a cycle of joblessness and dependency.
Segregated by gender, the Hasidic system fails most starkly in its more than 100 schools for boys. Spread across Brooklyn and the lower Hudson Valley, the schools turn out thousands of students each year who are unprepared to navigate the outside world, helping to push poverty rates in Hasidic neighborhoods to some of the highest in New York.
The story about Mayor Adams’ obsequious speech to Modern Orthodox leaders was reported by a newspaper called Shtetl:
In a speech given Wednesday night, mayor Eric Adams suggested that yeshiva students are better off than public school students, and that religion should be in schools “anywhere possible.”
The speech was given at an event for Teach NYS, which is part of the Orthodox Union, which represents Modern Orthodox Jews. In it, Adams condemned yeshiva critics, but made no distinction between Hasidic and Modern Orthodox schools. A September report from the New York Times found that many Hasidic yeshivas fail to provide an adequate secular education, to the point where some boys graduate high school without speaking fluent English. The Times also found that teachers at some Hasidic yeshivas regularly use corporal punishment.
In 2015, New York City’s education department announced it would investigate complaints about the quality of secular education in Hasidic schools. (The complaint did not include Modern Orthodox schools, which generally provide a thorough secular education.) In January, the state education department ordered that the city complete its investigation no later than June 30, including specific reviews of individual schools.
The mayor began his speech by painting a grim picture of the secular world. He described problems that children across the city and country face, such as cannabis and fentanyl use, harmful use of social media, and mental illness, suggesting that yeshiva students don’t have these problems.
“The children are in a state of despair at an epic proportion, but instead of us focusing on how do we duplicate the success of improving our children, we attack the yeshivas that are providing a quality education that is embracing our children,” he said.
“I saw numbers just the other day, asking questions about what is happening at our yeshivas across the city and state. At the same time, 65% of Black and brown children never reach proficiency in the public school system,” Adams said, citing a statistic that he uses often in speeches. “We’re asking what are you doing in your schools. We need to ask, what are we doing wrong in our schools, and learn what you are doing in yeshivas to improve education.”
“We need to be duplicating what you are achieving,” he said.
Adams also discussed the role of religion in government.
“Let’s embrace those that believe in the quality of this country and the quality of this state, and uplift families, and children, and education, and that appreciate the religious philosophies that are a part of the educational opportunities,” he said. “I don’t apologize for believing in God.”
“Faith is who we are,” Adams added. “We are a country of faith and belief, and we should have it anywhere possible to educate and to help uplift our children in the process.”
“You were there for me when I ran for mayor,” Adams concluded, to loud applause. “I’m going to be there for you as your mayor.”
In City Council District 44, which includes most of Hasidic Boro Park, 56% of voters picked Republican Curtis Sliwa in the 2021 mayoral election.
On election night in 2021, Mayor-elect Adams was surrounded by prominent supporters on the podium, including leaders of the Hasidic community.
A man who knows so little about yeshivas or public schools or the reasons for separation of church and state should not be in control of the New York City public school system.
I am not a resident of NYC, but have a daughter who lives in West Harlem. She often shares how she is gobsmacked by a mayor who advocates a police state while promoting corporate free will ( The religious mixed metaphor is purposeful here). I think Eric Adams has spent significant time modeling his politics after the fictional Mayors of Gotham City. He has claimed in front of NYC Police that it is us, fellow police, against them while now advocating dissolution of the First Amendment. Good luck New York.
Adams doesn’t “advocate a police state,” for God’s sake. Melodrama.
There are nmany minority communities who would disagree.
Sure, Paul, and there are more who would agree. Anyway it’s nice to see two white guys making bold claims about what “the minority community” thinks.
He was elected on the “clean up the streets” platform that is the Republicans’ bread and butter. Police state might be a touch hyperbolic, but over-policing is Adams’ policy.
“Over-policing” is your term. And he was elected by “minority communities” with whom his platform resonated.
FLERP!
He was elected with 30.7% of the electorate in the primary. Which after 7 rounds in a convoluted rank choice voting system gives him less than a 4/10s of 1% lead over his next opponent. This after the leading candidate was taken down by a phony allegation of sexual harassment orchestrated by Steve Ross a Trumpanzee billionaire, Real Estate mogul.
Further the question of crime in NYC was voted on again in 2022. Voted on in the Congressional races and Governors race. The Republicans ran on a 24/7 message of out of control crime. That message resonated very well in the White suburbs where crime is almost non existent. Cow tipping in Rockland county costing Sean Patrick Maloney his seat in Congress. However in NYC, excluding the garbage dump in the harbor, between 67% and 80% of the voters in the 4 other larger Boroughs rejected the message that crime was out of control in NYC.
Adams himself had to backtrack a little bit before the election. After running around the City pretending to be Curtis Sliwa minus the red beret. Drawing media attention by highlighting every disturbing crime incident for the better part of his first year . Adams goes to the media in late October 2022, to claim that the perception of out of control crime, that he created ,was not as bad as it is perceived to be. Not as bad. NYC was as safe as it was near the end of the Bloomberg administration when no one thought it was bad. And strangely as crime dropped under deBlasio to levels not seen since records started being reliably kept after WW2,the safest big city in America was perceived as going to hell. Back to the “bad old days”, the tabloids would not be denied revenue.
Murders started falling in the Summer and fall of 2021 before Adams was in office. . Murders were down 12% in 2022 and continue to drop 10% this year. Shootings down 25% +- YTD.
I am sure Adams will credit his religious revival. I credit what the NY Post headlines claim is a ” mass exodus of cops”.
Praise the Lord that it should continue.
Paul, there’s a new Sienna poll showing support for Mayor Adams at 59% among black New Yorkers. Either black New Yorkers really like living in a “police state” or Adams is not, in fact, ruling over a police state.
Don’t believe everything white people tell you about black people, even if the white people are family.
Mayor Adams is housing migrants in the gyms of 20 elementary schools. Parents, whatever their race, are not happy.
He’s running out of options. There is no mayor who could make everyone happy with the migrant situation in NYC.
Flerp, I didn’t mean to put you on the defensive about Adams and his pro police position, but there is significant evidence that we have inclinations toward an actual police state across the country. The national and NYC police unions endorsed Donald Trump in 2020 along with a plethora of others in a country of around 15,000 independent police departments. The man who told governors they have to dominate the streets is a big favorite of many of the police departments across the country. Most police departments have armed military vehicles and other military hardware that they like to parade periodically for effect. When Kyle Rittenhouse walked the streets of Kenosha during protests with his AR 15 he was encouraged by police who drove in the streets with armored cars. During the protests in Portland Oregon, protestors were abducted by police wearing military style uniforms without official organizational markings while driving unmarked mini-vans. Police cleared the Square in Washington, DC for Trump’s photo op using military gear and assaulted journalists. There are now dozens of “constitutional Sheriffs” across the country who openly claim that they are not beholden to local, state or federal laws they disagree with in regard to their jurisdiction (https://www.splcenter.org/fighting-hate/extremist-files/ideology/constitutional-sheriffs). I participated in the George Floyd protests in Huntsville, Alabama where police circled the County Courthouse armed with long rifles, flash bang guns, and tear gas wearing personal armor. At one corner of the city square a line of police with shields and tear gas fired on a few thousand protesters who were loud, but not violent. A second wave of police went down sidewalks ((they were not clearing streets for traffic) where they hit, shoved and arrested protestors who were on these sidewalks when the protestors didn’t disperse fast enough. So it may seem hyperbole to refer to our “police state”, but for many this is reality. I have served most of my time in education in majority minority schools. I do not write this as some kind of badge of honor. I had many conversations with black parents and staff who feared for the safety of their sons and daughters because of the history of policing in this country, and, yes, New York City. I have a daughter who has a Puerto Rican partner and they live in an hispanic neighborhood in Harlem where most are leery of the police. The fact is that everyone is concerned about our safety. There is always a growing tension about force versus freedom. Police are in a very difficult position and put their lives on the line very day. Many in minority communities want more police. I get it. However, when a former Captain of the NYC Police Department stands in front of his fraternity of police as Mayor and proclaims it is us against them, resolving issues of crime, mental health, and safety becomes more confrontational than resolution oriented.
Adams is more like a law and order member of the GOP than a Democrat. If he believes that schools that can hire uncredentialed teachers and under prepare students for tomorrow’s demands are something to extol he is obviously out of touch. If Adams values education, his policies do not reflect it. He has been siphoning funds from public education and diverting them to shore up the police force. What Adams admires about Yeshivas is their low price tag while he can turn a blind eye to their failure. Education costs can be cut if almost anyone can be hired to teach students in buildings that ignore the fire code with a curriculum from The Middle Ages. If this is Adams’ vision for the future, he should not be leading NYC.https://truthout.org/articles/mayor-eric-adams-is-siphoning-funds-from-public-schools-to-fortify-nypd/
Right, as usual. There’s no daylight between Duncan and DeVos, and no daylight between Adams and Bloomberg. Don’t be surprised if school voucher conversations surface soon.
And I see that when he spoke at the CUNY Law School commencement, many of the graduates turned their backs on him and a few shot the finger. No wonder he favors the private yashivas over public schools.
I cut him a lot of slack because the alternatives are so much worse in my view. But the man is a complete idiot.
FLERP, I too cut him a lot of slack. I want the mayor to succeed. But his remarks to this group were outrageous. In every way. He should not be in charge of the schools.
The alternatives in the primary were not worse . Three of them were better.
I agree, but we probably don’t agree on which three (except maybe Kathryn Garcia). Luckily I got a vote and you didn’t!
I wish there had been a runoff. Adams probably would have lost. But who knows?
It’s due time that NYC ends mayoral control over schools. DeBlasio’s 3K was a great initiative, but the overwhelming political-centered interference by NYC’s mayors has been detrimental to the city’s public education policy. Adams should be a one term mayor, but I am both skeptical and underwhelmed by who might be in line to primary him…
Scott Stringer, the City Comptroller, would have been the mayor except for an allegation that he sexually harassed a woman. He denied it, but it doomed his candidacy.
Do you know the dirty little secret about those allegations.
Simply when the lawyer representing the women making those allegations, has her name scrubbed from the web page of the firm she had been working
for. Alarm bells should have gone off in the NY media market. But hell they didn’t go off about George Santos, why would they go off about Steve Ross, CEO of the largest Real estate corporation in the country.
https://theintercept.com/2021/06/02/nyc-mayor-scott-stringer-jean-kim-patricia-pastor/
Adam Zucker,
“Mayoral control” doesn’t mean that the Mayor has any control over yeshivas. As far as I can tell, the DOE can’t just tell yeshivas what to do. Mayoral control is about PUBLIC schools. Yeshivas, private, parochial and ESPECIALLY charters can do whatever they want and the Mayor has a very hard time stopping them.
In fact, when DeBlasio tried to limit the harm charters did by a teeny, tiny little bit, the news media and Republicans attacked him for not giving charters everything they want. In fact, they passed a law that OBLIGATED DeBlasio to give the charters what they want (an expensive gift of running schools where all the space is free!), no questions asked, and if the city couldn’t provide it, the city would take money from public school students to pay for it because the charters wanted it to be free.
Correct, I was referring to public schools and not Yeshivas. Adams has been a detriment to NYC’s public school system. Not too mention libraries, which are public schools in their own right.
Now he’s housing migrants in elementary school gyms. What a terrible idea.
Before Adams, Bill de Blasio and his chancellors stonewalled the yet-to-be released yeshiva investigation. https://nypost.com/2020/05/09/internal-emails-reveal-mayor-bill-de-blasio-helped-stall-yeshiva-probe/
Yes, many mayors and governors and legislators have covered up the failure and profiteering of the yeshivas.
But Adams said something new: he said the public schools should try to copy the “success” of the yeshivas. Which success? Not their test scores. Not the ability of their graduates to enter colleges where English is required. The politicking? The profiteering?
The upside is that there won’t be any actual policy to do this. It’s just him saying idiotic stuff to pander. But it’s bad enough to even say it.
It’s bad enough to praise the failing yeshivas, even worse to actually believe —as he seems to—that they should be emulated and that religion should permeate everything.
We elected a mayor, not a public pastor, I thought.
True. And it’s so ironic he would say this on the eve of the deadline to release the DOE’s investigation of yeshivas. Wonder if his comments foretell a whitewash.
Susan Edelman,
I read your article – written more than 3 years ago – and you wrote “The DOE finally released a damning report on the yeshivas last December — nearly 4-1/2 years after the probe began — which found only two of 28 schools investigated provided adequate secular education to students.”
At worst, the report was delayed and came out in late 2019.
Does the power to punish those 26 or 28 yeshivas come from the city or the state? Because my understanding is that it is the state officials in the education department that have been stonewalling giving yeshivas any consequences for the “damning report” that came out in 2020 thanks to DeBlasio’s DOE finally doing something that Bloomberg’s much more corrupt DOE refused to do in 12 years. It should not have been delayed, but the report finally came out, and in 3 years, what has been done?
It seems to me that in 2023, it’s odd to be more concerned about a report that was delayed but did come out, than why the state hasn’t done anything about it in the more than 3 years since the report came out. If this was so urgent that the delay was an “abuse of power”, then who would you say has been abusing their power not to have already shut down those yeshivas?
Now that DeBlasio can’t be a scapegoat, who is at fault?
Is Mayor Adams “stonewalling” fixing the yeshivas? is the state “stonewalling”?
Or are they as excellent as Mayor Adams says because once that “stonewalled” report came out more than 3 years ago, all problems were fixed?