Donald Cohen, executive director of “In the Public Interest” and author of The Privatization of Everything discovered an important insight about public attitudes. Many people assume that private business is invariably more efficient than the public sector. But, as he shows here, the private sector’s highest goal is profit, and the pursuit of profit leads to cost-cutting that is inefficient and actually, in the case of a train derailment in East Palestine, Ohio, dangerous.
Here is an excerpt:
Let’s dig into the basic “mathematics of efficiency.” It’s about spending or doing less to get the same or better (cost/time + efficiency = same or better.) In that formula, “efficiency” could either be “smarter” or “cheaper.”
The problem is that far too often it equals cheaper. Efficiency could mean fewer workers than are needed to ensure high quality or safe production on the shop floor. Efficiency could mean lower wage workers. Efficiency could be using lower-quality supplies and equipment. And sometimes, efficiency means fewer inspectors and less monitoring of safety protocols.
Sometimes “same or better” means outsized profits, expensive stock buybacks, high-dividend payments, and high executive compensation packages–in other words, the fruits of high productivity built upon a package of “efficiencies.”
So, I’ve come up with a new term. When efficiency means cutting corners for increased profits, we should call it: “Extractive Efficiency.”
That’s what happened in East Palestine and could happen again if the underlying extractive efficiency isn’t dealt with. In fact, over the last few years, all the railroad companies have focused on efficiency to increase profits, cheering Wall Street, but not the residents of East Palestine. Less than two weeks before the derailment, it was reported that Norfolk Southern, the train operator, had improved the average speed of its trains from 17.5 miles per hour to 20.7 between the second and fourth quarter of 2022, and by January was at 22.2 miles per hour.
Here are a few of Norfolk Southern’s “efficiencies.”
Fewer workers: Norfolk Southern removed a senior type of inspector from the track division that runs through East Palestine, making more work for signal maintainers. Over the past five years, employment among the nation’s largest freight rail carriers has fallen about 18 percent. With fewer workers doing more work, they may miss telltale signs of safety failures.
Harder work and more hours per worker: The industry, including Norfolk Southern, implemented “Precision Scheduled Railroading” that, according to The American Prospect“means no excess engines, no track not under constant use, no downtime in the yards, no employees not busy driving the trains or maintaining the tracks, and never have three one-mile-long trains when one three-mile-long train can be assembled.” Shockingly, railroad workers get no paid sick days.
The people who live near the derailment are paying the price of Norfolk Southern’s “efficiencies.” They will be dealing with the consequences of the toxic spill for years to come, affecting their health, the value of their homes, and the quality of their water.
But the railroad is returning handsome profits to its top executives and shareholders.
Absolutely NO public services should be in private hands. NONE! Already years ago it became known, at least to me, that private enterprise only looks after itself – NOT after the public’s interests.
But all the public services in Russia create oligarchs, some of whom, it seems, get dizzy around open windows on high floors. So which is it? And what other sites do you pester?
Yes, the privatization of basic industries in Russia created an oligarch class. But those who defied Putin ended up in prison, impoverished, or dead.
This would be you, would it?
https://crooksandliars.com/2023/03/pro-russia-accounts-tried-steer-ohio-train
It’s Donald Cohen.
Thanks for the correction.
I think you mean Donald Cohen?
Fixed. Thank you.
Yes! My dad was a railroader who worked in his final years as a safety inspector. He told of the pressures to keep the trains rolling–for profit. And, when the whole system is about profit, to not make a profit is to go out of business–costing not only profit, but jobs. So, rails were in competition with the trailer trucks on the newly developed interstate highways and air-transport as well. Obviously, for-profit schools–or schools endowed by folks who only understand profit as a motive, are unlikely to serve as well as public schools, paid for by all, that are motivated only by teaching kids what they need and want.
According to the Economic Policy Institute, “productivity and pay once climbed together. But in recent decades, productivity and pay have diverged: Net productivity grew 59.7% from 1979-2019 while a typical worker’s compensation grew by 15.8%.” Productivity has grown 3.5 times as much as pay for the typical worker. Between 1971 and today income inequality has risen due to the policies that keep the money at the top of corporations while stock buy backs inflate the value of stocks. At the same time union membership has declined to a little over 10%. This country does not have a labor shortage; it has too many workers that are tired of working for low wages and reduced benefits. In order for capitalism to be more equitable, we need to vote for political leaders that believe corporations should be regulated so that workers’ wages reflect the fair value they provide to the company and laws that ensure that all workers can do their jobs safely.
The Economic Policy Institute is the only think tank in DC that is on the side of working people. Their analyses are always carefully researched and documented.
Other think tanks rely on gifts from the super-rich and they don’t criticize their donors.
There are at least two the EPI and the CEPR . Dean Baker co director was a former director of EPI. Josh Bivens Chief economist of EPI and Dean Baker seldom disagree.
https://cepr.net/about-us/
retired teacher
Fundamentally I can not disagree with you much on Labor shortages . We must have done “a heck of a job” training truck drivers because the shortage of 1 million drivers seems to have evaporated.
Except the Idea that workers are just sitting home because they are tired of low wages may not be quite right. That is a twist on a right wing trope (the lazy worker )that with constant repetition has been accepted even by those of us who support workers.
The prime age worker participation rate 25-54 years old stands 1.7%+- below its 2000 peak. It had steadily rose from 64 % in 1950 to 84.4% in 2000 as women entered the labor force. Workers seldom have the luxury of being able to decide to just sit home . More likely ,economically be it men or women things like the cost of child care make it economically unfeasible for both partners to work or a Single Mother. No matter how tired they are they would work if it payed well enough. A slight difference in the interpretation. The higher wages go the more workers are drawn into the labor force.
It also dismisses the underground economy both non criminal and criminal which is not measured by the Labor Department. One explanation for the Nationwide spike in crime during Covid is that workers in the non criminal underground economy (off the books) were left with no means of support. If a small number of those people joined the criminal underground economy (ie the Drug Trade ) that explains the turf wars that caused a small tick up in murders.
As soon as things started opening up in the Summer of 2021 and people went back to work Murders started dropping.
“But the railroad is returning handsome profits to its top executives and shareholders.”
This is the norm in a country where cutthroat capitalism is on steroids, where CEOs often get a seven figure raise/bonus even when the corporation they run doesn’t earn as much as it did the year before or suffers a loss, and the job comes with what’s known as a golden parachute that pays them millions just to be fired.
I worked for the railroads for 15 years. Teaching came at forty. I could go on. Here’s a start:
https://www.rutgers.edu/news/why-did-government-step-prevent-rail-strike-and-what-does-it-mean-unions
“ At the urging of President Biden, the U.S. Senate passed legislation today that would force a tentative contract agreement between the rail unions and their employers. The deal, approved by the House Wednesday, calls for a 24 percent raise over five years, immediate payouts averaging $11,000 and an extra paid day off.
In a separate resolution addressing one of the workers’ primary demands, the House approved seven days of paid sick leave – a provision that failed to advance in the Senate.”
Zero paid sick days. Just the tip of the iceberg.
Excellent article. “Extractive Efficiency”. Perfect.
Seeing it everywhere. Healthcare. Every professional in the field who I know, personally, says there’s no place for profit in health care. Yet here we are. My close friend/father-in-law is on his death bed at Sloan Kettering. He was referred to hospice almost two weeks ago, but the privately managed Medicare Advantage plan (aka: profit driven) has dragged its feet. Unreal.
It’s too big. Too much money in the hands of too few.
gitapik
A slightly different perspective. .
While it is true that the Railroad contract is for 5 years the those five years include 3 retroactive years. So it is actually expiring in 2 years with a 24% raise. over the contract period from December 2022 -2024. (Or 2020-2024) . Plus an additional day off and the removal of disciplinary actions for taking non paid sick days.
The RLA gives these Unions a tremendous advantage over Unions covered by the NLRA . It gives them the option of secondary boycotts. The most powerful tool Labor ever had even if it was seldom used. Private Sector Unions lost that tool in 1947 with Taft Hartley. They continued to use it till 1959 when Landrum Griffin closed loopholes.
There are 11 unions in that coalition that have agreed to unanimously use Secondary Boycots .If one goes out they all honor the picket line. But with that power comes obligations to other workers which is why the leadership of all of these Unions recommended the previous contracts that was rejected by only 3 of the 11 . It was not perfect but it was damn good . The largest Union to reject the contract was the Locomotive Engineers but that vote was 50.3% nay 49.7% Yes with a large number not even returning the ballot. One can safely say that the majority of workers in the coalition voted for the contract.
If they went on strike and a settlement was not reached rapidly with the railroad what type of an agreement do you think would have been imposed by Congress after a devastating strike with a Republican Congress coming in Jan 1 2023. After a strike action would they have gotten the settlement they did or would a pound of flesh have been extracted. No Union Leader in his right mind would have willing sent his members out on strike under the circumstances I described.
History has shown how rapidly Public Opinion turns against workers. With congress imposing penalties on them. Starting with Haymarket Sq and even the Bread and Roses strike, with calls to deport foriegn Radicals and Socialists and increased anti immigrant hysteria. Taft Hartley gets passed after a wave of strikes post WW2 gave Republicans enough support to override a Truman Veto . It has been down hill ever since. And who can forget the outpouring of Public support that PATCO got in 1981 . Well it had me blocking traffic at LaGuardia airport in any event. After an orgy of Union Busting nurtured by that treasonous S________Reagan, he defeats Mondale with a 100% rating from the AFL-CIO in a landslide . Doing so with a not insignificant number Working Class and Union members voting for Reagan.
Besides the fact that the Biden Administration has been negotiating additional sick days with several Railroads since the settlement.
One of the leaders of dissident faction in an interview with Labor Notes criticized the Union Leadership (and the apathy of his fellow members.) for their reliance on a Nuclear Option. Which left Biden and Congress no choice but to impose calling off periods and then a contract. . As well as the fact that no one demanded increasing the staffing levels that had caused the discontent. What he proposed is that they went about it all wrong. Calling for the leadership to take a lesson from another Union covered by the RLA the AFA and bleed the Railroads to death as the AFA did with Alaska Airlines,” CHAOS” . Hitting Railroads early in 2025 (LEGALLY ) where it hurts with random job actions at random locations and different carriers . For a day or two at a time. That would drive their costumer base to other carriers and other modes of transport till they break. Settling one at a time.
“And who can forget the outpouring of Public support that PATCO got in 1981”
I remember it so well. Ronnie to the rescue. Ugh.
Helluva post, Joel. Yeah: the union busters would’ve had a field day if the leaders had bucked it. Thanks for the info.
Love this site. Informative and non-threatening. All about getting it right. Not BEING right. 🥂
gitapik
Sadly the Union busters would have had a field day. A few late toys under the Tree added to existing supply chain and inflation issues and it would have set them free.