Quinton Brunson is the writer, producer and star of the award-winning TV series “Abbott Elementary.” Abbott Elementary is a comedy about an urban elementary school, realistically depicting life in a Philadelphia public school. It is a funny, joyful celebration of life in public schools and a song of praise to public school teachers. No matter how silly they are at times, they are heroes!
In season 2, the show turned to the topic of charter schools, because a big charter chain wants to take over Abbott. The staff is mortified. The staff lays bare the unfair practices of the charter school (e.g. pushing out kids they don’t want), and the series lays bare how underfunded Abbott is (in contrast to the charter school, which is equipped with the best of everything).
Jeanne Allen, founder and chief executive officer of the Center for Education Reform, lashed out on Twitter against Quinta Brunson for her negative portrayal of charters when Quinta had gone to charter schools “her entire education” in Philadelphia and had previously praised them.
Quinta responded on Twitter: “you’re wrong and bad at research. I only attended a charter for high school. My public elementary school was transitioned to charter over a decade after I left. I did love my high school. That school is now defunct- which happens to charters often.”
She immediately added: “Loving something doesn’t mean it can’t be critiqued. Thanks for watching the show :)” (Her quotes appear in the article linked above.)
Hundreds of tweets from Quinta’s passionate followers excoriated Allen, supported Quinta and defended her right to say whatever she wanted.
At one point, Jeanne Allen gratuitously claimed “Money talks,” implying that Quinta was paid off by someone to criticize charter schools. On these pages, it’s not surprising to hear a charter lobbyist jeer that critics must have been paid off by the teachers’ unions. But Allen didn’t spell it out, possibly because it was so preposterous on its face.
Quinta’s fans jumped all over the ”she was bought” idea; one said that this Allen person, with not quite 8,000 followers, must be “clout catching”—that is—trying to grab attention by attacking a celebrity—by going after the great Quinta Brunson, who has more 800,000 followers.
It is more than funny reading Jeanne Allen chastise the brilliant, creative Quinta Brunson for taking aim at charter schools because “money talks.” The Center for Education Reform is handsomely funded by conservative billionaires like the Walton Foundation and Jeffrey Yass, as well as billionaire Wall Street charter suporters. Yes indeed, money talks.
The Center for Education Reform serves the goal of right-wing billionaires like Jeff Yass to destroy public education, even though he is a graduate of New York City public schools. Yass funds election deniers and candidates who want to ban critical race theory in the schools. The school-choice lobby says they are deeply devoted to children of color, yet the heavy hitters are funding the candidates and astroturf parent groups that want to ban teaching Black history. Hypocrites!
Since Jeanne is so concerned about hypocrisy, she might ask Jeff Yass why he wants to destroy the very schools that educated him. Why doesn’t he endow state-of-the-art public schools in New York City and Philadelphia to show his gratitude? The great singer Tony Bennett endowed the Frank Sinatra School of the Arts, why not a Jeffrey Yass High School for Financial Success and Ethics?
This contretemps has not worked in favor of the charter lobby. Attacking a beloved TV star is a bad idea. Even TIME magazine used the controversy to explain the shortcomings of charter schools.
For teachers around the U.S., charter schools are a constant concern, beyond an episode of television. They find relief, both comic and real, in Abbott—as well as tangible education and information.
“There’s this myth that charter schools provide more opportunity or their graduation rates are better, but that’s just because they exclude kids,” says Brooklyn public school teacher Frank Marino, who formerly worked at a charter school. Watching Abbott “felt so cathartic, because I was like, yes, it was a public platform where those myths are being busted by parents….”
Abbott Elementary has brought Kathryn Vaughn, an art teacher at a public school in Tennessee, and her husband back to appointment viewing TV like it’s the ‘90s. Vaughn loves the show, but says she was surprised to see it tackle charter schools, a $49.5 billion industry with heavy political sway. She appreciated how the most recent episode hands the power to the parents….
In many states, public schools are mandated to have arts education in each building, and tenure in the arts for someone like Vaughn is possible. Charter schools, however, have more leeway: Some, like Addington Elementary in Abbott, can choose to bring in an art teacher a couple of days a week, often subcontracted out from a company.
“Charter schools make me incredibly uneasy,” Vaughn says. “They don’t have to offer their employees tenure. They don’t have to hire certified staff to teach. So if you’re sending your child to a charter school expecting a great arts education, you might not even be taught by certified staff.”
Abbott Elementary is set in West Philadelphia and Vaughn’s school is in western Tennessee, but no matter where you are in public education right now, she says, you know: the push for privatization is huge.
“That’s really the big connection between urban poor and rural poor, like I’m in, is the funding,” Vaughn says. “Urban schools almost are a little sexier. They get more of the money than us in the rural, poor areas. But we’re all behind where we should be with funding.”
A few episodes ago, at the fictional Pennsylvania Educational Conference for the South East Area (PECSA), Jacob (Chris Perfetti)—a well-meaning history teacher—is hanging out with a group of teachers from Addington Elementary. One of them, Summer (Carolyn Gilroy), tries to convince him to switch schools, telling him, “We’re all about focusing on the kids who have the best chance of making it out.”
“Out?” Jacob asks. “Out of what?”
The scene hit home for Marjahn Finlayson, a climate change educator, researcher, and activist who previously worked at a charter high school in Hartford, Connecticut. While teachers there often took a personal interest in their work, she says, there was little trust in the community.
“In the PECSA conference episode, Addington teachers are talking to Jacob about, like, ‘Oh, we take the best kids, and we try to get them out of the ‘hood,’” Finlayson says. “And Jacob is like, ‘Why are you taking them out?’ That was how the feeling was for me.”
Finlayson noticed disparities in resources between public and charter schools, regardless of the quality and dedication of teachers.
“That’s why it’s easier for these schools like Legendary Schools to get into an inner city space, like where Abbott is, where Hartford is,” she says. “It’s easy to prey on these communities that have a need, based on the fact that public school funding isn’t going to this space, but it’s going to another.”
One of Abbott’s arguments against charter schools is that, as Barbara grimly puts it, “They don’t see students. They see scores.” At Finlayson’s former charter high school, one student was repeatedly pressured into applying to college, despite wanting to pursue a trade career.
“And it wasn’t even the fact that she needed to go, it was just that she had to apply,” Finlayson says. “Because, ‘We have a 100% college acceptance rate, and we’re not going to mess with that number.’”
Note to Jeanne Allen: Don’t attack a beloved celebrity. The blowback will not be good for your cause.
So much reckless “choice” will make the public schools the schools of last resort for those that have nowhere else to go. Choice is a means to defund what should be our common good. How are the schools supposed to fund the neediest, most vulnerable and most expensive students when so much funding is transferred to private interests? How will public schools be able to pay to maintain the buildings, hire qualified teachers and pay for all the fixed costs like insurance, transportation and utilities?
The billionaires and religious groups behind so-called choice would like to see public schools collapse. Choice benefits the ultra-wealthy and segregationists. Choice empowers the schools that do the choosing, not the families trying to find a school for their child. If public schools become the bottom tier of choice, they will become like the insane asylums of the 19th century where the unfortunate were warehoused, ignored and abused. This dystopian outcome would be the opposite of what the founding fathers envisioned. Their vision was one of inclusion where all are welcome, a place serves the interests of the nation, communities and individuals with civil, social and individual benefits. A tiered system of schools is neither ‘thorough or efficient.’ It is a nightmare, and nothing any proponents of democracy should be supporting.
I taught the “lost children” for many years and I traveled to Chicago Arts Institute, Washington, D.C., Boston University to bring my kids a quality education. I have lived this mentality, “…we know what’s best…” I told the kids, “Have you ever seen anyone who knows what we do in this classroom EVER come in and TALK to you about your education? Yet, they know what’s best for you, right? We have to work hard to become educated, to understand the law, to make change.” This “I know” ethnocentrism attitude — so detrimental to our children. “As long as we have a place to put them…” As I have seen it for years, this article explains where we are heading now more than ever. And just because something is “shiny and new” doesn’t mean quality. Yes, keep taking the money and giving to private organizations and those without the means will have nowhere to go. It drove me nuts. https://eduindex.org/2021/09/18/how-caste-continues-to-affect-our-education-system/ We should have an organic system where we use the good, get rid of the bad, and move forward for what is best for ALL children.
There is zero evidence that shows privatization benefits poor students or anyone else for that matter. In recent studies charters performed no better than public schools unless they were selective, and many more perform worse. Vouchers are a total waste. They are the will of a vocal, political minority. The way in which charters are imposed is not democratic at all. It is fascist at its core. Right wing leaders and some so-called liberals rarely put any decisions about privatization up to a public vote because, when they do, it loses. They seek to impose their will on Black and Brown communities and force them into separate and unequal schools where they lose civil rights protections under the law.
The best chance for the most number of students is well funded public schools, that are being undermined in minority majority communities. We need to use our public funds for schools that serve all of us. Private interests should pay for private education, not a public that has no say about the loss of funds in public schools. That’s not how democracies are supposed to work.
It is notable that Jeanne Allen, whose own billionaire-funded organization pays her handsomely to attack Quinton Brunson is taking a page right out of the right wing playbook. Allen is accusing Quinton Brunson (who developed a hit show for a network desperate for one) of being motivated by teacher union money, when it is Jeanne Allen who gets paid an inflated salary by billionaires in order to shill for their anti-public school agenda.
Quinton Brunson is a hot property in Hollywood because of her HIT SHOW (not to mention that she’s also a talented actor). Brunson doesn’t need the teachers union.
But without the anti-public school billionaires propping up her organization that paid her over $300,000 to shill for charters in 2019, what does Jeanne Allen have? Money talks, indeed. Jeanne Allen does what the billionaires who subsidize her outrageously high salary want. She doesn’t care one iota about public school kids – she cares only about the ones who help her agenda. It’s a transactional concern. She went ballistic because the show demonstrated that charters cared about kids ONLY if the kids helped their own agenda, and would toss them aside when they didn’t. She went ballistic because the series plot included the elephant in the room that billionaire charter supporters have convinced complicit education reporters at the NYT and Chalkbeat is not “newsworthy”. The reporters at the NYT and Chalkbeat believe that the fact that charters toss aside children who don’t make them look good has nothing at all to do with their success and they leave the details of that out of their reporting when they amplify the false narrative of “miraculous” charter results.
I watched some episodes of Season 1 of the series before this brouhaha and Quinton Brunson was NOT afraid to have story lines that showed public school administrators and sometimes teachers in a negative light. Abbot Elementary was NEVER about presenting a “perfect” public school system, and yet public school teachers weren’t trying to shut it down, nor accusing Brunson of bias because she herself attended a charter.
Union teachers didn’t go ballistic when there was criticism of public schools in many episodes, but Jeanne Allen did.
Because Jeanne Allen doesn’t have one iota of integrity. She is paid by pro-charter billionaires to demonize and attack any truth that pokes holes in the charter myth that her job depends on. Money talks indeed, especially for those who know they don’t have the talent or ability to find a highly paid job without shilling and lying for very rich people.
Only one person is beholden to folks with money and it isn’t the one with talent. It isn’t the one with integrity who refrained from calling Jeanne Allen out for what she is. It is Jeanne Allen herself who lacks integrity. She rushed to attack Quinta Brunson personally, pushing the false narrative that it was Brunson who was motivated by money and INTENTIONALLY calling into question Brunson’s ethics and morality. What a truly despicable woman, but Jeanne Allen certainly is a perfect example of who gets highly paid in the charter world. People with no ethical compass at all. And the reporters who agree with her that disappearing kids should never be mentioned (something that always struck me as implicitly racist) since the reporters never questioned the charter CEO excuses that those disappearing kids were either horribly violent at age 5 or 6 or they just had parents who after having their kids guaranteed to become “scholars”, decided that their kid was better off as a failure. Yep, those excuses always sounded so outrageously racist and absurd, but somehow reporters never questioned them. The elephant in the room can’t be mentioned. Quina Brunson mentioned the elephant that education reporters pretended did not exist. That’s why Jeanne Allen tried so hard to destroy Brunson.
The charter lobby’s go-to scapegoat is the teachers union which has nothing to do with any TV shows. Being a member of a union is perfectly legal in this country.. Brunson likely belongs to Actors Equity and the Writers Guild
Don’t worry. Jeanne Allen can’t hurt Quinta Brunson. If anything, Allen makes charters look worse by attacking a beloved actress. Having a middle-aged white woman go after a young, talented Black actress is not a good look.
As the saying goes, you have to know when to hold ‘em and know when to fold ‘em.
Quinta did more to inform the public about the downside risks of charters than I have done in 13 years of writing books, articles and posting on this blog.
Boo to Jeanne Allen. Quinta and Abbott rock!
Reblogged this on Politicians Are Poody Heads.