Nancy MacLean, professor of history at Duke University, and Lisa Graves, board president of the Center for Media and Democracy, warn readers not to be fooled by billionaire Charles Koch’s efforts to rebrand himself as a nice guy who has mellowed, who no longer wants to fund divisive, hateful organizations. A nice guy.
The media fell for it. The new, nice Charles Koch.
MacLean and Graves write: Don’t believe it. Koch won’t stop until democracy is dead.
They write:
Koch, the single most influential billionaire shaping American political life, never changed course. And the head fake he pulled off in 2020 succeeded in securing for his vast donor network—and the hundreds of organizations they underwrite—the freedom to operate, virtually without scrutiny, over the two years since. In that time, far from ceasing their efforts to divide the country, they have ramped them up. Like a snake shedding its skin as it grows, Koch was merely rebranding—yet again after exposure—and grouping his numerous operations under a sunny new name: Stand Together.
In August, the Center for Media and Democracy (CMD) reported that Koch-funded organizations spent over $1.1 billion in the 2020 election cycle. At the same time his book claiming to have changed course was in press, Koch spent almost 50 percent more than the record amount the Koch network had raised in the 2016 cycle: $750 million. Koch did not endorse Trump, though his spending buoyed the top of the ticket and helped maintain a GOP Senate majority to secure Koch-backed policies and judicial nominees embraced by Trump.
One of these organizations, Koch’s Americans for Prosperity (AFP), a 501(c)(4) tax-exempt organization, claimed it was involved in more than 270 races in the 2020 election, reaching almost 60 million voters with door-knocking, phone calls, postcards, digital ads, and more. AFP also played heavily in the battle for U.S. Senate seats in Georgia, in January 2021—even as Koch was still getting favorable coverage for his supposed withdrawal from divisive electoral politics. AFP Action, the super PAC arm, alone raised and spent $60 million nationwide in that election cycle.
Meanwhile, other key organizing enterprises, think tanks, litigation outfits, campus centers, and more that were previously backed by the Koch network continue operating today, sometimes under new names, and with expanded funding. These include endeavors we consider unethical, only some of which we have the space to highlight here.
Take, for example, Koch’s longest running quest: enchaining democracy by rigging the rules of governance to free corporations from customary oversight and to prevent the will of the vast majority of Americans from securing federal, state, and local policies to improve their lives. With the connivance of Trump, the generalship of Federalist Society leader Leonard Leo, and the well-funded campaigning of Leo’s Judicial Crisis Network, the arch-right billionaire succeeded in capturing a supermajority in the U.S. Supreme Court. Koch had told his allied billionaire backers that this was one of his top priorities for the Trump Administration—along with the dramatic tax cuts for corporations and the wealthy that he also secured.
Senator Sheldon Whitehouse, Democrat from Rhode Island, a climate hero and senior member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, exposes how they did it in a recently published book, The Scheme: How the Right Wing Used Dark Money to Capture the Supreme Court. The long effort to reshape the judicial system, going back to the notorious Lewis Powell Memo of 1971, culminated in the Trump Administration’s appointment of more than 230 “business-friendly” federal judges, including three Supreme Court Justices, in a project overseen by longtime Koch allies Leo and Donald McGahn, who served as Trump’s legal counsel until 2018. The 6-3 stacked court is already delivering bombshell decisions for the coalition that put it in power, from undermining our options for mitigating devastating climate change and limiting the power of agencies to regulate corporations, to revoking people’s Constitutional freedom to decide whether and when to bear children. The current court term with the Koch-backed faction in control is expected to soon overthrow affirmative action and other hard-won reforms.
The Koch-funded American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) also continues its long campaign to shackle democracy on behalf of its corporate backers. Passing voter ID restrictions that make it harder for Americans to exercise their right to vote became a top ALEC priority after the United States elected its first Black President, Barack Obama. That measure was first voted on at an ALEC task force meeting co-chaired by the National Rifle Association in 2009.
ALEC is one of the nation’s leading promoters of charter schools, vouchers, and anti-union legislation. You can learn more about ALEC by reading Gordon Lafer’s The One Percent Solution.
Please open the link and read the article. Learn about the “new” Charles Koch, same as the old one.
If you are looking for a good read, read Nancy MacLean’s Democracy in Chains, which provides the context for understanding the links between the Koch brothers, Milton Friedman, and free-market economics. Suffice it to say that one of their goals was to privatize Social Security. Still working on that.
“Koch, the single most influential billionaire shaping American political life….”
I think that statement needs some defense as it’s not at all obvious that that’s true. Jeff Bezos owns the Washington Post, one of the most influential newspapers in the country. Musk and Zuckerberg own the biggest social media platforms. Hastings owns Netflix, which I believe is the largest streaming service (I could be wrong about that, but it’s certainly in the top five). In what way does Koch have more influence than at least those four billionaires (and probably others I’m not thinking about)? Not to say that Koch isn’t influential or that I’m not concerned about his influence, but it seems kind of ludicrous to single him out as the biggest billionaire threat to American political life.
I think they are correct to name Koch as the most influential billionaire because he is the most dangerous. Musk owns Twitter but many use Twitter to ridicule. Bezos owns the Washington Post but he does not interfere in its editorial independence.
Koch, as they show, underwrites organizations and people whose goal is to destroy democracy and lower his taxes. Read MacLean’s book “Democracy in Chains.” Koch funds efforts to privatize Social Security and Medicare. That’s not the case with Musk or Bezos, to my knowledge.
“Bezos owns the Washington Post but he does not interfere in its editorial independence”
You believe that? Because he says so? Because WaPo says so? Bezos is a CIA contractor and a world-wide e-commerce monopolist. He most definitely has an agenda and I really can’t believe that agenda is not reflected in the paper. WaPo has, for instance, cheered every war/military engagement since Bezos took it over and dissent about military matters has become increasingly disallowed.
And the evidence for Zuckerberg/Fakebook manipulating the algorithms and suppressing dissenting voices (often at the request of high level government/military officials) is heavily documented, and is now being documented in the same way with Twitter (Dorsey, who controlled Twitter before Musk, is also a billionaire). Those two platforms have huge influence over American discourse and thought.
I believe that Bezos does not interfere in editorial decisions because reporters at the Washington Post, whom I have known for many years, have told me so.
The pro- Russia votes of the anti-Kevin McCarthy caucus members are detailed in a recent Raw Story article. IMO, Koch and Russian authoritarianism are a likely axis. The downplaying of Koch’s influence, by Dienne 77, is not surprising.
Dienne7 Google “UnKoch My Campus” at George Mason University in Virginia, which could read as “un-woke America’s campuses.”
Also, do your homework: Koch’s interest spreads to influencing and funding economics programs at universities in other states while having a powerful ($$$) hand in choosing new professors and eliminating those who don’t teach the Koch ultra-conservative ideology. CBK
Do your homework. The billionaires worth hundreds of billions who own our mainstream and social media are far more powerful than one guy worth $50 billion who messes with universities.
Again, not to say Koch isn’t a bad guy. But he’s one guy and relatively far down the list of bad guys. If you focus all your energies on him, you’re missing the grand scheme of what’s going on. The fact is that all the billionaires basically work together to protect their class interests to the detriment of all of us. It’s not just a conservative/right-wing/Republican thing.
Please explain what groups are funded by Bezos and Musk that are comparable to ALEC. Do you know about ALEC?
Diane, as you well know, I’ve been reading your blog nearly since inception, so of course I know about ALEC. Again, not denying that they’re influential. But the billionaires who own the six media corporations that provide nearly every scrap of news, entertainment and information that Americans consume are at least as powerful if not more so. If you only focus on Koch, you’re missing the bigger picture.
Koch’s efforts go far beyond higher education. ALEC supports charters, vouchers, and opposes gun control, environmental action. Whatever is good for society, his groups oppose.
I don’t know what else to say. People on this blog are so focused on Republicans and Russia that you miss half the picture, which kind of proves my point about media influence, but you will probably never see it. Cult members don’t know they’re in a cult and will resist all evidence of how they are being controlled.
“Do your homework” writes the person who only consumes information that confirms her weird ideology. 😂 Let me catch my breath. No need to send for the clowns. We’ve already got one here.
Project much, Greg? I read media from all sources. In fact, I’ve posted links from a very wide range of sources. You’re the one who seems to think mainstream liberal media is infallible.
The tell that exposes Dienne-
Her use of the term “mainstream liberal media.”
All liberals/progressives understand mainstream media is corporate and that they selectively shut out info. that threatens control by the richest 0.1%.
Wow, Linda, I hope you didn’t strain yourself on that reach. I’m the one who’s been saying on this blog for years now that all mainstream news is corporate owned and serves the interests of the powerful. There is, however, a distinction between mainstream liberal media like NYT, WaPo and MSDNC vs. Conservative mainstream media like Fox, etc. They all serve the same ends, they just appeal to different audiences.
Dienne-
Your comment at 8:06 landed as a failure. There’s no backtracking after you deliver right wing talking points.
LOL, Linda. “Mainstream liberal media” is now a right-wing talking point. Seriously, do you people even hear yourselves anymore???
Actually, you know what, Linda, okay, I give up. I confess. I’m a right-winger. What gave it away? My anti-capitalism? Anti-imperialism? Support for trans rights? Abortion rights? Disabled rights? Open borders? Housing the homeless? Single-payer healthcare? Defunding the police? Which one tipped you off?
Good catch – us right-wingers are slippery creatures.
d77 @ 1/11 6:43pm– It was your tendency to promote conspiracy theories. That’s a sort of dead-zone where the very far right and very far left join hands, and cease to be distinguishable.
By “conspiracy theory”, you mean, of course, documented history as everyone outside the U.S. knows.
Dienne, have you noticed that the U.S. is not alone in supporting Ukraine. The EU is doing the same. Finland and Sweden, despite decades of neutrality, have asked to join NATO.
Why do you think you know more than the Finns and the Swedes?
Yes, all the U.S. vassal states – Europe, Canada,
Australia. Most of the rest of the world – comprising most of the world’s population – either supports Russia or is carefully nuetral. The BRICS alliance is growing too. The days of U.S. unipolarity are slowly waning.
Why do you admire Tussia so much when it’s a dictator state with no freedoms and many oligarchs?
Russia, not Tussia. Where there is no dissent, no free press, no free speech. And an all-powerful dictator.
dienne77
Time to do your homework. What makes Koch so dangerous is that he is not one billionaire with 50 Billion.
He is a well coordinated Network of 100s of Billionaires with similar world views acting in near concert. Much like the Business Round Table 300 CEOs. (Some of whom are also in the Koch Network.) Look that history up as part of your Homework. Let us know how they changed America.
Do tell us when Bezos met directly with individual Congressman to deliver his message. Or held a meeting with 100s of Billionaires, members of Congress and State Elected Officials to lay out objectives, strategy and how they can help to achieve them. As well as how to send a message to those Politicians of the consequences of not towing the line. The threat of a Primary challenge with unlimited finances is understood.
I seem to miss the Bezos version of Americans for Prosperity. I suppose you missed it too. Undoubtedly WaPo has a Political Bias as does every Newspaper since Upton Sinclair described American journalism as a brothel in “The Brass Check ” you get what you pay for. It is inconceivable that the editors at WaPo are not cognoscente of who the Boss is without having to receive a phone call. So yes Bezos has influence on the content of WaPo . How does that influence compare to 6 members of the Supreme Court being chosen by Kochs !!!!!! Federalist Society .
Thanks, Diane, for circulating this. Koch and a handful of other billionaires have far more influence than most Americans know.
harrowing report, as worrisome as Democracy in Chains. much appreciated. what to do [apart from the usual efforts]? Thanks.
Most of the public is uninformed. Most don’t know who Charles Koch is. We need a public education campaign. Senator Sheldon Whitehouse is all over the rule of the oligarchs.
And that is the saddest statement of the day. We have had a Public Education Campaign for over 30 years about the Kochs. No matter which side of the spectrum one is on.
I agree, most Americans (63% in one survey )can not name their Congressman. Only 46% know each State has 2 US Senators. Which means even fewer can name them .
And a 2014 WaPo!!!!!!!! study said only 36% could name which Party Controls Congress.
Which brings us back to 77. I haven’t done drugs since the early 70s. Whatever Dienne is on that makes her think Bezos has more influence than Koch “pass some over to me”
Now you could assert that some policy members read WaPo but I don’t think that was her point.
I wish the Washington Post had more influence than Charles Koch. Koch gives millions every year to group that oppose public schools, that want to privatize healthcare and Social Security, that want to restrict voting rights, that want to block any effort to reduce our reliance on fossil fuels.
What has Bezos or even Musk done that compares to Koch’s assault on democracy?
10 years ago there was a popular Ted Talk where billionaire Nick Hanauer tried to warn fellow billionaires that the general populous would be coming with pitchforks due to their greedy and onerous behavior. In one sense, Hanauer was right. They did come with pitchforks on January 6th, and are now doing so in Brazil, but that motivation was to protect the very billionaires who are screwing them. People like Gaetz, Boebert, and MTG would have no platform in Congress if they weren’t benefiting from the actions of Corporate Oligarchs. Trump himself would be yesterdays tale if the press was not being directed by wealthy CEOs to follow the chaos for ratings and money. My experience with most wealthy individuals is they think that the Charles Koch’s of the world are succeeding for prosperity because these privileged are prospering. Therefore, why does anyone else really matter? With a Wall Street culture that bases success on investors, the quality or popularity of product is never the priority. We consumers only matter to grease the wheel of wealth. Long ago, as a freshman at a private university, I was embroiled in a common room debate with other dorm mates over the role of government when a classmate stood up and proclaimed sincerely, “What we need is a revolution for the rich!”(He was from a wealthy family). Well, guess what; that is exactly what the American economy has been experiencing over the last 40+ years. As troublesome as Koch is, our struggle for social and economic justice would not be near as cumbersome if there weren’t many others there to pick up his banner and lead this charge.
Diane I don’t remember voting for anyone named “Koch.” Do you?
And BTW, is he spending any of his wealth cleaning up the plastics and other chemicals that have penetrated every aspect of life on this planet? CBK
The Kochs are also big investors in oil and gas. They were big funders of denying climate change because they do not want to be held accountable for their contribution to the problem. Renewables are outperforming fossil fuels, and the Koch network wants to turn back the hands of time on so many social and economic issues. Bribing politicians is their preferred path in order to to impose their policies on the populace and undermine democracy.
America needs to start treating the fossil fuel industry like Big Tobacco.
The Koch’s are deeply invested in fossil fuels. They oppose any transition away from them. Although, even if fossil fuels were phased out, the Koch family would still be multi billionaires.
And stupidity. Never forget the stupidity. Or bigotry. Or cruelty. Or lying. Or absence of basic decency. But mainly it’s about the stupidity, as this expression of Koch principles prove:
Nice clip! Love that MA Congressman Jim McGovern, he’s on the ball.
When Charles Koch follows his brother David into death (the sooner the better), the horrors he has caused for the United States may not end.
I read that Charles dedicated his life to raise, brainwashing and programming, his children to continue his goal to destroy the United States and turn it into a dystopian, libertarian nightmare to rival the worst dystopian movies and SF novels. His son has been taking over the family’s business including the end of the U.S. as we have known it for more than 200 years.
It’s the legacy of evil from the Trumps to the Kochs.