The single most notable achievement of Mayor Bill DeBlaio’s eight years as Mayor of New York City was the creation of a free, universal pre-k program.
Marina Toure of Politico reports that new Mayor Eric Adams is cancelling the expansion of the program to include all three-year-olds.
The immensely popular universal prekindergarten program was the brainchild of former Mayor Bill de Blasio in 2014. Three years later, he began expanding it to 3-year-olds. The pioneering education policy remains the single biggest achievement from de Blasio’s two terms in office. It was so successful that it became a national model for other major cities like Seattle and Washington.
Six years ago, New York City hosted leaders from a dozen cities across the U.S. to share lessons learned from its free early childhood education program for over 70,000 4-year-olds.
And yet, in a wildly expensive city where monthly child care costs top $3,500, a staggering 30 percent of free pre-K and “3K” seats were unfilled as of November.
Mayor Eric Adams, who took office in January, is canceling de Blasio’s plan for universal 3K, citing mismanagement of the program that led to the empty seats and budget cuts. Enrollment declines caused by the Covid-19 pandemic combined with a lack of education and outreach led to a striking imbalance where the lowest-income neighborhoods had the greatest number of empty seats and the wealthiest ones had long wait lists.
The result means children whose families are struggling the most will be deprived of a lifeline — a chance at the kind of free, quality education that’s been shown to improve performance in high school mathematics. It could also be a deterrent to other cities looking to replicate New York’s model after President Joe Biden repeatedly failed to get funding for early childhood education in spending bills.
Adams blames DeBlasio for the program’s shortcomings.
Leonie Haimson chimed in on the New York City parents’ blog to say that the program was “horribly implemented.” (Note: CBO=Community Based Organization.)
She wrote:
De Blasio’s preK program was horribly implemented and incredibly wasteful. Under Josh Wallach, the DOE insisted on putting as many kids as possible into elementary schools, including those that were already overcrowded and had waitlists for Kindergarten, contributing to worse overcrowding for about 236,000 students.
Meanwhile CBOs that had been in the preK program for years were starved for students, putting many of them at risk of closing down. There were MANY empty seats in CBOs, who directors begged for more students, to no avail. – despite the fact that their quality is rated more highly in many respects than the preKs in elementary school and provide services till 5 or 6 PM.
The Politico article mentions this [the botched implementation] in passing: “Finally, an application process controlled by the DOE — as opposed to parents being able to enroll their children directly with community providers — has led to access issues.” The CBOs had countless meetings with Wallach where he stubbornly refused to fix these problems
DOE also spent hundreds of millions of dollars in building stand-alone preK centers that stood half empty. The spending included renovating a leased space that previously housed a Dunkin Donuts shop in the basement of a parking garage in Brooklyn, costing six million dollars to create a preK classroom with a capacity of only 18 students, at a cost of $333,000 per student.
I wrote about this in our preK report ; press release here: https://classsizematters.org/the-impact-of-prek-on-school-overcrowding-in-nyc-lack-of-planning-lack-of-space/;
Our full report here. https://3zn338.a2cdn1.secureserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/PreK-report-12.17.18-final-final.pdf
Here is an excerpt: “In recent testimony before the New York City Council, Lisa Caswell, a senior policy analyst with
the Day Care Council of New York, a federation of 91 non-profits which run child care programs,
addressed the fact that DOE had diverted students not only from DOE pre-K centers but also
from CBO centers to public schools. She testified that in previous years, the DOE had been
engaged in the “recruitment of children directly from our [CBO] settings to fill UPK seats,” which
added to public school pre-K enrollment while leaving seats empty in CBOs, causing these
centers loss of students.”
This is an example of the danger of mayoral control. The mayor makes decisions that promote his standing in the polls. A program run by professionals would have been better implemented.

“ . . . the creation of a free, universal pre-k program.
Marina Toure of Politico reports that new Mayor Eric Adams is cancelling the program.”
To be clear, this is about canceling the expansion of the program to children aged 3, not the universal pre-K program that De Blasio started in 2014.
LikeLike
FLERP!,
Though it is completely unacknowledged, thanks for pointing out that the original post was incorrect. As I am sure you noticed, Dr. Ravitch has revised her post in response to your post.
LikeLike
What on Earth is the matter with people? Is it a crime to grow up sane, normal, rational, healthy???
LikeLike
The spending included renovating a leased space that previously housed a Dunkin Donuts shop in the basement of a parking garage in Brooklyn, costing six million dollars to create a preK classroom with a capacity of only 18 students, at a cost of $333,000 per student.
This just SCREAMS corruption. Who owned the Dunkin Donuts building? the parking garage? What connections did this person or persons have to the DOE? Inquiring minds want to know.
LikeLike
Bob, it’s misleading to say $333,000 per student. That’s ONE YEAR. Presumably you would find it misleading if I said “but it cost $0 per student for every year after the first year, so it’s been a crazy bargain for the last 5 years!”
And yes, as most PTAs can tell you, getting any work done connected to a building that houses children under the oversight of the DOE is expensive. Union workers. Tons of safety requirements. COMPLICATED BIDDING REQUIREMENTS!
Ask Joel, and he can probably tell you that the same is true of all construction in NYC — it is very expensive and when folks walk around and see the blow up “rat” and the striking union construction workers because building owners are frustrated by the expense of union labor and all the other restrictions when they can put up a building more cheaply and many buyers are happily enjoying the reduced cost and feel as if they are perfectly safe in a building that didn’t use union labor.
I don’t know why even the most right wing anti-union anti- public school folks never want to take on the Schools Construction Authority, the bureaucracy that makes creating new classrooms so expensive.
Certain unions – like police unions – seem to be beyond criticism by the very folks who jump on teachers’ unions.
LikeLike
Pity those poor developers just trying to scrape out a nickle here and there. By renting new high rise (!!!) Market rate 2 Bed Room apartments for 6k -7k a month (cheap) and affordable apartments for 4k a month . It wasn’t the Unions who sought to kill the 421A tax abatement in 2015 and 2022 but the Tenant groups representing Tenants who could not afford the affordable apartments.
Built with non Union labor and a 35 year tax abatement to provide some affordable housing again at 4k a month .
https://therealdeal.com/2022/03/29/tenant-group-aims-to-draw-albanys-eyes-with-two-more-421a-suits/
86% of construction fatalities in NYC are on non union sites so safety certainly is not their problem . Carlos’s law was just passed in NY State to hold unscrupulous contractors actually liable for deaths and injuries. Rather than just piling the mostly immigrant fatalities at the curb.
https://www.governor.ny.gov/news/governor-hochul-signs-legislation-establishing-carlos-law
Of course the contractor is actually a joint employer subsidized by those poor, poor billionaire developers like Steve Ross a multi billionaire Trump supporter and fund raiser , CEO of Soul Cycle and Related Industries, the largest Real Estate firm in the Country. Poor Steve. can’t afford to pay a teachers salary for construction.
The bidding process is the same whether the Job is done union or non union . Of course even the SCA is subject to privatization schemes that avoid Prevailing wage laws . They simply lease a site rather than directly build it . Or you give the construction funding to supposed non profits like Success Academy to build their own. Although I have no knowledge of this site.
Where you get no argument from me is the deceptive practice of amortizing the cost of a facility with a minimum 30 year life span in 1 year, for shock value in the media.
LikeLike
Joel,
I never disagreed with you. Just pointing out that people are always complaining about the cost of building new schools or any construction regarding public schools and as you point out, the issue is complicated. Yes, the SCA appears to be a hugely complicated and very expensive bureaucracy through which projects go to die but I also understand that it’s more complicated than just corrupt people enriching themselves at the public trough.
LikeLike
If Adams feels the program is mismanaged, he should provide better management and accountability instead of cutting the program. The timing of starting the program was bad due to Covid and the lack of vaccines for young children. Sometimes with poor families it is necessary to meet with parents and present the value of what is being offered so parents will be more willing to have their children participate. Early childhood education is a proven benefit to underserved children, and a better approach would have been to improve the program instead of cutting it before it really had a chance to properly launch.
LikeLike
Thanks for this intelligent, necessary response. This is why it’s so hard to pass any progressive legislation. If it isn’t perfect from the beginning, it gets trashed. In fact, when de Blasio started his universal pre-k program the media and the pro-charter folks like Eva Moskowitz (i.e those who were shouting that money should be spent on charters that cherry picked the cheapest to teach students, not on providing small class sizes or universal pre-k to the students that charters usher out the door as soon as they can) were just waiting to jump on anything that went wrong. It was a testament to the people who designed that first year universal pre-k program under de Blasio – and a lot of luck – that there wasn’t something that the nay sayers could point to to destroy the program.
I suspect a close look would show that most of the empty seats are in community based organizations that use non-union, cheaper to hire teachers.
People here should be complimenting Mayor de Blasio for prioritizing having universal pre-ks that were part of public schools, not putting their funding into privatizing it, using the excuse of needing that space for smaller class sizes AND turning around and bashing the new space that was created as being in some parking garage’s basement (which I suspect is quite an misleading picture of what it really is).
Yeah, it’s cheaper to create a space when you don’t have to worry about using union labor and the safety and bidding requirements of the School Construction Authority. CBOs can do it cheaper and hire non-union labor.
Many years before universal pre-k, my kid benefited from being in a pre-k class located in a public elementary school, where the teachers were excellent union teachers, certified to teach younger students, and the students got the benefit of access to the wonderful art, music, science and phys ed teachers at the elementary school. Even just once/week that introduced the students to wonderful opportunities with the kind of trained teachers that many CBOs did not have.
And it’s much easier to have oversight of a pre-k program in a public school than a CBO.
So ironic that when NYC has lost a lot of elementary school students, folks are still saying there is no room for pre-k.
The question of 3K is more complicated. But the discussion should always include a discussion of subcontracting this service out to private entities or having the program run by the DOE. No matter what, there will be problems that need to be fixed.
LikeLike
Diane, thanks for quoting my critique of how de Blasio implemented the preK program. However, Adams is not cancelling the preK program, nor even 3K, but is halting the further expansion of 3K that was announced the last few months of the de Blasio administration where he said it would be funded by federal Covid grants that will soon run out. Meanwhile, the Chancellor has pointed out that there are 40,000 preK and 3K empty seats – 1/3 of them — so that the distribution and/or recruitment efforts have evidently been faulty.
In our report on the flawed implementation of preK, at https://3zn338.a2cdn1.secureserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/PreK-report-12.17.18-final-final.pdf, we pointed out how thousands of preK students had been assigned to already overcrowded schools in District 11 in the Bronx, Districts 15 and 20 in Brooklyn, and Districts 24, 25, 26 and 27 in Queens, further increasing class size in those schools, or contributing to the loss of cluster rooms and intervention rooms. In each of these districts, nearly three quarters of the pre-K students enrolled in public schools were placed in overcrowded schools. Meanwhile, many of the CBOs were begging for students, despite the fact that they, unlike many public schools, could offer programs till 5 or 6 PM, which working families badly need. Also, on average, CBOs rated better in quality than the district public schools.
Meanwhile, Dr. Dale Farran, a pre-eminent researcher on preK, has said she doesn’t believe that any of these programs should be sited in regular public schools as opposed to community centers, based on her research in NC. This large scale experiment found that kids who had been randomly assigned to preK programs in public schools not only did not show any benefits, but suffered long term negative impacts. The podcast is here: https://talk-out-of-school.simplecast.com/episodes/a-conversation-with-dr-dale-farran-pre-k-study-and-design where she expressed this view.
Her full study is here: https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2022-18712-001 Summary: “Data through sixth grade from state education records showed that the children randomly assigned to attend pre-K had lower state achievement test scores in third through sixth grades than control children, with the strongest negative effects in sixth grade. A negative effect was also found for disciplinary infractions, attendance, and receipt of special education services, with null effects on retention.”
LikeLike
It’s really sad that people on all sides of education questions continue to use the state standardized tests as measurements of achievement despite their obvious invalidity. At some point people need to realize that using invalid test results is NOT better than nothing at all, but worse.
LikeLike
“At some point people need to realize that using invalid test results is NOT better than nothing at all, but worse.”
Doing the wrong thing righter:
The proliferation of educational assessments, evaluations and canned programs belongs in the category of what systems theorist Russ Ackoff describes as “doing the wrong thing righter. The righter we do the wrong thing,” he explains, “the wronger we become. When we make a mistake doing the wrong thing and correct it, we become wronger. When we make a mistake doing the right thing and correct it, we become righter. Therefore, it is better to do the right thing wrong than the wrong thing right.”
Our current neglect of instructional issues are the result of assessment policies that waste resources to do the wrong things, e.g., canned curriculum and standardized testing, right. Instructional central planning and student control doesn’t – can’t – work. But, that never stops people trying.
The result is that each effort to control the uncontrollable does further damage, provoking more efforts to get things in order. So the function of management/administration becomes control rather than creation of resources.
When Peter Drucker lamented that so much of management consists in making it difficult for people to work, he meant it literally. Inherent in obsessive command and control is the assumption that human beings can’t be trusted on their own to do what’s needed. Hierarchy and tight supervision are required to tell them what to do. So, fear-driven, hierarchical organizations turn people into untrustworthy opportunists. Doing the right thing instructionally requires less centralized assessment, less emphasis on evaluation and less fussy interference, not more. The way to improve controls is to eliminate most and reduce all.
LikeLike
Former Green Beret Master Sergeant Donald Duncan (Viet Nam) noted in Sir! No Sir! that:
“I was doing it right but I wasn’t doing right.”
LikeLike
And from one of America’s premier writers:
“The mass of men [and women] serves the state [education powers that be] thus, not as men mainly, but as machines, with their bodies. They are the standing army, and the militia, jailors, constables, posse comitatus, [administrators and teachers], etc. In most cases there is no free exercise whatever of the judgment or of the moral sense; but they put themselves on a level with wood and earth and stones; and wooden men can perhaps be manufactured that will serve the purpose as well. Such command no more respect than men of straw or a lump of dirt.”- Henry David Thoreau (1817-1862), American author and philosopher [my additions]
LikeLiked by 1 person
Speaking of NYC- Republicans elected George Santos to the U.S. House. About the issues, Santos stated a preference for a more competitive field for public education (presumably charter schools) and, he pronounced abortions as barbaric.
Why didn’t interviewers, at a minimum, check Santos’ veracity about his religion?
He appears to have lied about a connection to a minority religion to get elected.
LikeLike
Santos should not be able to hold an office that he acquired through fraud. If he is seated, he should be barred from committee assignments. He has already shown the public that he is a serial liar that does not have the ethics of a flea.
LikeLike
The more I think about this, the happier I am that he will stay in office. That way he and, most importantly, his constituents will have a spotlight on their collective, self-serving idiocy for the next two years at least. I’m guessing he’ll be reelected.
The real culprits here are the people who voted for him. To them all that mattered was that he had an “R” next to his name, that he claimed to be Jewish (or Jew-adjacent), that he claimed to be a gay republican, or that he was “self-made.” Not one of them cared about issues, not one of them cared to spend any time examining anything about him. Plus he had the fortune to be up against a thoroughly unlikeable human being.
We have to quit looking for saviors and leaders and start looking in the mirror and dare to be honest with our families and neighbors. That’s how bad it’s become!
LikeLike
Now THIS is funny!
LikeLike
Gotta love the numerous references to “the journalist.”
LikeLike
Why do you say Zimmerman was thoroughly unlikable. I was redistricted out of the district . By Cuomo appointed Republican Judges. Figure that one out . But I am curious about your source.
The issue was crime not so much in Queens NYC where Zimmerman won and there was a small increase in crime . But in Nassau where 2021 may have been the safest year on record .
But Herman & Chomsky would be proud of their work .
“In New York, coverage of crime has outpaced its rise. New York news outlets have run 58,131 stories about crime so far this year — a 42-percent spike over the 40,665 such stories published in the same period last year, according to data from the tracking service Media Cloud. There were just 28,638 for the period in 2020.”
That is not an accident.
Murders will be right about where they were in 2012 when everyone thought the City was fine Robbery and Burglaries 2013 Bloomberg’s last year.
LikeLike
Greg
Best line in the video, a candidate’s lies would be a vulnerability for Democrats but, not Republican voters. (Btw, media also report that Tom Cotton, according to his neighbors, doesn’t appear to be residing in his state of Ark.) Media reported that a priest allegedly gave congregants’ money to George Santos for his mother’s funeral. A New York publication with Jewish in its title, profiled Santos. What does it say about journalists and their publications when they don’t check the bio of a candidate when he says he wants women’s rights to be taken away from them?
LikeLike
Some ascribe the Santos deception to the death of local journalism. Who else would have reviewed his bio?
LikeLike
dianeravitch
Suozzi for one back in 2020 .When he ran against Santos . Not like Tom was too busy knocking on doors that year.To do some opposition research . The reason Suozzi did not run again was that the Democratic redistricting was going to make his district (my District ) much more vulnerable to a primary challenge from the left. It would have skirted the North Shore all the way into the East Bronx. Instead he ran around the state amplifying Zeldins message on crime. . Between Suozzi and Adams they handed the House to Republicans .
LikeLike
Jewish Insider is local journalism.
LikeLike
I am no expert, but the little I saw of Zimmerman before and after the election did not inspire. He did the Schumer model: demonize “the squad” to demonstrate he is a “moderate” Democrat, fealty to Wall St., act as a quasi-congressman for Israeli right wing politics, etc.
He’s the kind of “Democrat” that, for some reason, New York leadership wants. The slim majority in the U.S. House is due to this ridiculous strategy of Democrats trying to out-republican republicans. Here’s a wild thought: run as a real Democrat who cares about something.
LikeLike
I think the Destroy Public Education Crime Syndicate may have had something to do with the failure of this Pre-K program in NYC. Easy to do if they had someone inside the mayor’s administration’s bubble, that had the ear of the mayor and manipulated him and the program so it would fail.
Who made out? whoever got paid all that money to built those pre-k centers that stood empty or almost empty
There should be an investigation that follows the money.
LikeLike
It’s not sufficiently swaggery enough, evidently. Look at his Twitter. Where’s he gonna get a photo-op out of that?
LikeLike
Not being from New York, this Adams looks like a real piece of work!
LikeLike
I am surprised that folks here think that cancelling expansion of free 3k seats is a bad idea. Given that there are 40,000 unfilled pre-k and 3k seats and yet some locations are oversubscribed, concerns that the current system screams corruption, and research by the “preeminent research in pre-k” suggesting that the program can actually harm children, I would have thought folks would be in favor of improving the current system instead of expanding what appears to be a very flawed system.
LikeLike
Diane Ravitch quotes Leonie above:
“the Politico article mentions this [the botched implementation] in passing: “Finally, an application process controlled by the DOE — as opposed to parents being able to enroll their children directly with community providers — has led to access issues.” The CBOs had countless meetings with Wallach where he stubbornly refused to fix these problems…”
Wow, de Blasio and Wallach must be evil to oppose what is essentially VOUCHERS for pre-k?
How dare Wallach refuse to allow privately operated CBO to get vouchers for the parents who they alloow to enroll in their school?
NY State charters are also “non-profit”, just like CBOs.
And the pro-charter folks use the same words about how the DOE “controls” access to schools and that parents should be free to go where they want and have taxpayers pay for it.
LikeLike
“The pioneering education policy remains the single biggest achievement from de Blasio’s two terms in office. It was so successful that it became a national model for other major cities like Seattle and Washington.”
Big words. I was in free preK already in the 1950’s and 60’s in poor Hungary, so 60+ years ago. Why do we tolerate being so behind the rest of the civilized world? Without free preK, even parents who would make double the min wage are forced to stay home with their children, so they must be on welfare.
Is supporting a family on welfare cheaper than paying for preK for the children? The parent takes away from taxes instead of adding to it and to the economy. We are losing at least $50K on each of these families. I bet the loss can be measured only in the billions.
The opposition to free preK make no economical sense. It’s simply dictated by mean spirit and supported by a life philosophy as sound as the “teachings” of QAnon.
LikeLike
“We are losing at least $50K on each of these families. I bet the loss can be measured only in the billions.”
And this is just the immediate loss. The kids who grow up in welfare very likely will grow up to be adults on welfare.
The shortsightedness in this is really blinding.
LikeLike