For the past few weeks, Iran has been rocked by protests over the death in police custody of a twenty-two-year-old Kurdish woman, Mahsi Amini, who was arrested by the infamous Morality Police for wearing her hijab incorrectly. Apparently a few strands of hair were showing, and she was beaten to death for defying the strict law about head covering.
Since then, women and men have joined to protest the harsh “morality” laws that govern women’s dress and hair covering. Led by women, the protests have featured women tearing off their hijabs and throwing them in bonfires. And women cutting their hair. In some demonstrations, young people have ripped down posters of the Ayatollah Homeini, the leader of the revolution that overthrew the secular Shah and created the strictly religious Islamic Republic of Iran.
The New York Times posted dramatic videos of the protests. They are amazing. You will see young women taking off their hijabs, twirling them in the air, then throwing them into the flames, as hundreds of other young people cheer.
The Times wrote:
Protests erupted in more than 80 cities across Iran following the death of Mahsa Amini, known by her first Kurdish surname Jina, after her detention by the morality police under the so-called hijab law. Footage of the demonstrations posted to social media has become one of the primary windows into what is happening on the ground and revealed what is different about this latest show of resistance inside Iran.
The New York Times analyzed dozens of videos and spoke with experts who have followed the country’s protest movements to understand what insights the often blurry, pixelated footage contains about what is propelling the demonstrations.
Attacking Symbols of the State
Now in their third week, protests have continued even as dozens of people have been killed. Many of the videos appeared on social media during the first week of the protests, before Iran’s government began limiting internet access in an effort to silence dissent.
Iran’s bold and bracing protests, stretching across an unsettled nation for more than two weeks, have been marked by defiant acts and daring slogans that challenge the country’s clerical leadership and its stifling restrictions on all aspects of social life.
Government security forces have responded with deadly, uncompromising force. At least 52 people have been killed, according to Amnesty International, including women and children.
The ongoing protests began in response to the death of Mahsa Amini, a 22-year-old woman who fell into a coma after being detained by the country’s hated “morality police.”
Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, claimed Monday that the unrest had been instigated by foreign powers and blamed protesters for the violence: “The ones who attack the police are leaving Iranian citizens defenseless against thugs, robbers and extortionists,” he said.
Khamenei gave his full backing to the security forces, signaling a further wave of repression could be coming.
To understand the extent of the government’s crackdown against protesters, The Washington Post analyzed hundreds of videos and photographs of protests, spoke to human rights activists, interviewed protesters and reviewed data collected by internet monitoring groups. The Post geolocated videos of protests in at least 22 cities — from the Kurdistan region, where the protests began, to Bandar Abbas, a port city on the Persian Gulf, to Rasht on the Caspian coast.

Good luck to these protesters I don’t have much faith in the success of their efforts. But it certainly should serve as a warning about the American Christian Taliban. The airways should be flooded with the comparisons. But they sadly wont be .
LikeLike
Superstition dies in the light.
LikeLike
“Fear is the mind killer,” Heinlein wrote. He could have said the same thing about religion. It’s ready-made answers that stop cold any actual thinking about the questions addressed, interesting questions about ultimate matters, important questions about social organization, morality, politics, and so on. No need to think–the imam, pope, preacher, cult leader, or the invisible friend in the sky, or whoever has done it for you.
LikeLike
Respectfully disagree about religion. Marx thought religion to be the opiate of the masses. It did not work out that way when the Exodus story inspired a generation of African-Americans to aspire to real freedom.
Religion motivated abolitionism in the 1840s and supported Hitler in his rise to power.
It’s hard to know what people are going to do with religion. What has been true in recent centuries is that associating religion and politics ends very poorly for religion and politics after a time.
LikeLike
respectfully disagree with your respectful disagreement about religion. Yes, it is possible to point to a few examples of positive outcomes from someone believing in these superstitions, but in generally, having large numbers of people believing in nonsense is not a good thing. Over the centuries, arguments about religion have been a major source of bloodshed, wars. Millions and millions dead.
LikeLike
cx: in general
LikeLike
the other H …
LikeLike
Bob Shepherd
Marx rightly called religion the opiate of the masses . That Quakers and a few Evangelicals saw slavery as abhorrent does not balance the scales.
“In every country and in every age, the priest has been hostile to liberty. He is always in alliance with the despot, abetting his abuses in return for protection to his own.”
Transferring Jefferson’s quote to modern day America the oligarchy and the despots one and the same. Marx was spot on. One need not search any further than these States to validate Marx. That is not an endorsement of Marxism but an observation of his contribution to social science.
Here are the 10 states with the most religiousity:
Now go find the poorest states in the Union. Correlation may not be causation but I smell a lot of opiate.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks, Joel. Agreed.
LikeLike
I wish them well, but we have enough grief from our own Morality Police.
LikeLike
Indeed!!!
LikeLike
Such a beautiful thing. We’re going to need the same here to combat the backward theocracy that the Trumptilian Extreme Court is trying to bring about in the United States. And theocracies, by definition, are rooted in superstition. I am totally DONE with being accepting of people’s religious superstitions and all the backwardness that goes with these. We are LONG PAST the time when we should have thrown off these superstitions from the infancy of our species.
LikeLike
https://wordpress.com/post/bobshepherdonline.wordpress.com/1798
LikeLike
https://wordpress.com/post/bobshepherdonline.wordpress.com/1043
LikeLike
https://wordpress.com/post/bobshepherdonline.wordpress.com/784
LikeLike
https://wordpress.com/post/bobshepherdonline.wordpress.com/278
LikeLike
https://wordpress.com/post/bobshepherdonline.wordpress.com/2028
LikeLike
My apologies. None of those links work except the first (the link to my essay “Why Is Christianity So Weird”). I accidentally posted WordPress page edit links instead of page links. Diane, if you could simply delete those links, that would be great.
LikeLike
Your essay would be more aptly titled “Why is religion so weird”?
LikeLike
You are spot on, SomeDAM. It illustrates with one example the bizarreness of religion generally.
LikeLike
The only answer I can come up with is that religious ideas were created by guys sitting around a campfire stoned out of their minds on peyote and/or magic mushrooms.
LikeLike
And that would be the explanation for the “reasonable” religious ideas.
LikeLike
I think the most outlandish ideas would have to have been created by people who didn’t require peyote or magic mushrooms.
People from out space or other dimensions , maybe.
LikeLike
Make that “people from other dementia”
LikeLike
lol
I am totally open to wild-___s speculation as long as people call it that and don’t go founding states based on their crazy notions.
LikeLike
“Founding states based on crazy notions”?
That’s nothing.
Some prominent physicists base entire universes on their crazy speculations.
Some even an infinite number of universes.
LikeLike
Religion is weird because of what really happened in the creation of man:
There were two beings called noids. They lived near each other so they got to be friends. It got to where you never saw one without the other.
They gradually became one being. A paranoids, they were called. Over time the s fell away.
LikeLiked by 1 person
lol
LikeLike
LOVE your article, Bob. Thank you.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Gosh, thanks so much, Yvonne!
LikeLike
A specific group of women in the U.S. won’t be a political force because they lack the requisite interest in equality. They are the women in conservative protestant and Catholic churches. Courage may or may not exist in the women but, it’s a moot point. Currently, women who believe in equality and are conservative church members are invisible or their POV’s are expressed so weakly that they are easily rejected by the power structures in their churches who wield power for the GOP. Without women, the churches wouldn’t survive, a point that the women likely understand while remaining in their haze of indifference to women’s rights.
America, the Jesuit Review, reported on Oct. 3, 2022 that “Catholics will have an outsized role in determining this year’s elections.” The headline for the article is retrograde, “Will Catholics Join Evangelicals in the Culture War? 7 questions to understand the 2022 midterms.” (Note that a Catholic magazine acknowledges that “evangelicals” are not Catholic.). The article includes an insert advertising the podcast at America Media, “Catholic Voting”.
Anyone reading this comment in the U.S. lives in a theocracy because conservative church members behave as cowards when it comes to protecting American democracy.
LikeLike
I don’t believe it’s cowardice.
They just don’t believe in democracy.
They believe in rule by a delusional fellow who actually thinks he was chosen by god to be Pope.
LikeLike
yup
LikeLike
You are right Poet and Bob-
Adding, liberal men in the Catholic church know the church has institutionalized discrimination against women and they rationalize, “If women don’t care about their own equal treatment, why should we (assuming that their liberalism doesn’t include an attitude of superiority based on sexual identity). But, the men finding comfort in their purported liberalism should minimally care that their church promotes the Republican Party which is racist and practices social Darwinism. Liberal Catholics sit idly by while their church plots to get tax dollars, legally robbing the government of revenue and usurping government functions. And, they sit idly by while their church supports the party that starves government.
LikeLike
These women are so awesome!!! xoxoxoxo!!!!
LikeLike
I feel sorry for the people that are not particularly religious but are forced to live in a strict theocracy. The right wing fundamentalist Christians would like us to become more like Iran, but we must back against the belief that America is a Christian nation. People in this country have religious freedom, but not a national religion. We need to keep it that way.
The embargo has taken a toll on Iran’s people, many of whom are well educated. However, there are few employment opportunities in such an isolated country.
LikeLike
The religious freedom ship sailed when taxpayers made Catholic organizations the 3rd largest U.S. employer. The ship gained speed away from the shore of religious freedom when conservative Catholics got control of SCOTUS. The ship is accelerating away from religious freedom when the magazine of Jesuits writes that Catholics have an outsized influence in the midterms.
LikeLike
Vice News just did a story on the political influence of right wing home school parents. I didn’t realize home school parents were so active in politics, but apparently they are.
LikeLike
Seeing homeschooling mothers with kids in tow pretending to teach some lesson that is, in reality, the description of a mundane subject, is too frequent an occurrence.
Of course the parents are involved in right wing politics. Some are Republicans who think they know it all. Many are bored like their kids and they internet surf finding fake news
crafted to create grievances for them, to entertain them with outrage and to make them think they and those like them aren’t stupid.
LikeLike
I used to have a much more live and let live attitude toward people’s religious superstitions. After all, we are profoundly ignorant about ultimate matters. But in the last decade, it has become abundantly clear to me that religious superstition is the enemy–that it is the handmaiden of totalitarianism. So, no more. I am not going to pretend to “respect” people’s religions because I don’t. I don’t respect adults believing in childish fantasies.
LikeLike
Look no further than Trump’s use of evangelicals or our current Trumptilian Extreme Court to see what I am referring to.
LikeLike
The Jesuit magazine, America, made it clear in an article on Oct. 3 that Catholics and evangelicals (protestants) are two distinctly different groups. Propaganda that protects the Catholic Church succeeds when it hides its right wing politicking by shifting focus to a group, understood to be protestant.
Bob,
Your argument is correct. Respect for religion has given license to bullying by individuals and groups controlled by wealthy libertarians aligned with conservative churches and MAGA.
LikeLiked by 1 person
People who want to cling to religious beliefs often resort to reinterpretation, to saying, oh, the text doesn’t really mean, literally, this or that. It’s symbolic or allegorical. However, these people don’t understand that allegory is a particular kind of literary form that one finds in particular times, historically. So, it was common in medieval bestiaries and in medieval works like The Divine Comedy and The Romance of the Rose. Allegorical writing appears very late in Judeo-Christian literature, in the book of Daniel and in Revelations. But when the older books say that a snake talked or that Joshua ordered the sun to stop in the sky, that’s because they believed that a snake talked and that the sun was a little ball that crossed the sky each day. Reading the thing in context, as a product of the superstitions of the time, is the sane, parsimonious approach. Genesis talks about God separating the waters above from the waters below because this was a common cosmology of the time, found among the Sumerans, the Babylonians, and so on: The sky was a literal dome, with the stars stuck in it, supported by pillars, and there were waters below this dome and above it, and those waters were the primordial chaos. That’s what people in that time and place, including the authors of that part of the Genesis text believed. An ancient, prescientific superstition.
LikeLike
Bob: I think it to be astounding that people with strange religions (Babylon, in this case) can arrive at such scientific discoveries as they did and such mathematical contributions. We still use their degrees, based on sun motion and 360, the number divisible by more other natural numbers than you can quickly derive.
LikeLike
“strange religion” is redundant
LikeLike
I started to withdraw from organized religion in 2006, shortly after George Bush made it illegal to use fetal tissue from abortions for medical research. For me it was bridge too far to mix religion with science. It didn’t make sense to me that we should discard the tissue instead of using it to advance medical research. We’ve gone down a much larger rabbit hole since that time.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Even Nancy Reagan opposed that–thought it important (it is) to do stem cell research.
LikeLike
Only because she thought Ronny might benefit from it.
LikeLiked by 1 person
INANUINI (It’s Not A Need Until I Need It) — GOP Motto
LikeLike
Ayatolyaso
I ran from religion
I ran from jihad
I run from decision
Of Court that is God
LikeLike
Came back to state my support for these incredibly brave women.
LikeLike
Nice to see you again, FLERP!
LikeLike