IZABELLA TABAROVSKY AND EUGENE FINKEL
Statement on Ukraine by scholars of genocide, Nazism and WWII
At this fateful moment we stand united with free, independent and democratic Ukraine and strongly reject the Russian government’s misuse of history to justify its own violence.
(February 28, 2022 / Jewish Journal) As we write this, the horror of war is unfolding in Ukraine. The last time Kyiv was under heavy artillery fire and saw tanks in its streets was during World War II. If anyone should know it, it’s Russian President Vladimir Putin, who is obsessed with the history of that war.
Russian propaganda has painted the Ukrainian state as Nazi and fascist ever since Russian special forces first entered Ukraine in 2014, annexing the Crimea and fomenting the conflict in the Donbas, which has smoldered for eight long years.
It was propaganda in 2014. It remains propaganda today.
This is why we came together: to protest the use of this false and destructive narrative. Among those who have signed the statement below are some of the most accomplished and celebrated scholars of World War II, Nazism, genocide and the Holocaust. If you are a scholar of this history, please consider adding your name to the list. If you are a journalist, you now have a list of experts you can turn to in order to help your readers better understand Russia’s war against Ukraine.
And if you are a consumer of the news, please share the message of this letter widely. There is no Nazi government for Moscow to root out in Kyiv. There has been no genocide of the Russian people in Ukraine. And Russian troops are not on a liberation mission. After the bloody 20th century, we should all have built enough discernment to know that war is not peace, slavery is not freedom and ignorance offers strength only to autocratic megalomaniacs who seek to exploit it for their personal agendas.
Statement by scholars of genocide, Nazism and World War II
Since Feb. 24, 2022, the armed forces of the Russian Federation have been engaged in an unprovoked military aggression against Ukraine. The attack is a continuation of Russia’s annexation of the Crimean peninsula in 2014 and its heavy involvement in the armed conflict in the Donbas region.
The Russian attack came in the wake of accusations by the Russian president, Vladimir Putin, of crimes against humanity and genocide, allegedly committed by the Ukrainian government in the Donbas. Russian propaganda regularly presents the elected leaders of Ukraine as Nazis and fascists oppressing the local ethnic Russian population, which it claims needs to be liberated. President Putin stated that one of the goals of his “special military operation” against Ukraine is the “denazification” of the country.
We are scholars of genocide, the Holocaust and World War II. We spend our careers studying fascism and Nazism, and commemorating their victims. Many of us are actively engaged in combating contemporary heirs to these evil regimes and those who attempt to deny or cast a veil over their crimes.
We strongly reject the Russian government’s cynical abuse of the term genocide, the memory of World War II and the Holocaust, and the equation of the Ukrainian state with the Nazi regime to justify its unprovoked aggression. This rhetoric is factually wrong, morally repugnant and deeply offensive to the memory of millions of victims of Nazism and those who courageously fought against it, including Russian and Ukrainian soldiers of the Red Army.
We do not idealize the Ukrainian state and society. Like any other country, it has right-wing extremists and violent xenophobic groups. Ukraine also ought to better confront the darker chapters of its painful and complicated history. Yet none of this justifies the Russian aggression and the gross mischaracterization of Ukraine. At this fateful moment we stand united with free, independent and democratic Ukraine and strongly reject the Russian government’s misuse of the history of World War II to justify its own violence.
Signatories:
Eugene Finkel, Johns Hopkins University
Izabella Tabarovsky, Washington D.C.
Aliza Luft, University of California-Los Angeles
Teresa Walch, University of North Carolina at Greensboro
Jared McBride, University of California-Los Angeles
Elissa Bemporad, Queens College and CUNY Graduate Center
Andrea Ruggeri, University of Oxford
Steven Seegel, University of Texas at Austin
Jeffrey Kopstein, University of California, Irvine
Francine Hirsch, University of Wisconsin-Madison
Anna Hájková, University of Warwick
Omer Bartov, Brown University
Barbara Kirshenblatt-Gimblett, New York University and POLIN Museum of the History of Polish Jews
Christoph Dieckmann, Frankfurt am Main
Cary Nelson, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Waitman Wade Beorn, Northumbria University
Jeffrey Herf, University of Maryland
Timothy Snyder, Yale University
Jeffrey Veidlinger, University of Michigan
Hana Kubátová, Charles University
Leslie Waters, University of Texas at El Paso
Norman J.W. Goda, University of Florida
Jazmine Conteras, Goucher College
Laura J. Hilton, Muskingum University
Katarzyna Person, Jewish Historical Institute, Warsaw
Tarik Cyril Amar, Koc University
Sarah Grandke, Neuengamme Concentration Camp Memorial/denk.mal Hannoverscher Bahnhof Hamburg
Jonathan Leader Maynard, King’s College London
Chad Gibbs, College of Charleston
Janine Holc, Loyola University Maryland
Erin Hochman, Southern Methodist University
Edin Hajdarpasic, Loyola University Chicago
David Hirsh, Goldsmiths, University of London
Richard Breitman, American University (Emeritus)
Astrid M. Eckert, Emory University
Anna Holian, Arizona State University
Uma Kumar, University of British Columbia
Frances Tanzer, Clark University
Victoria J. Barnett, US Holocaust Memorial Museum (retired)
David Seymour, City University of London
Jeff Jones, University of North Carolina at Greensboro
András Riedlmayer Harvard University (retired)
Polly Zavadivker, University of Delaware
Aviel Roshwald, Georgetown University
Anne E. Parsons, University of North Carolina at Greensboro
Carole Lemee, Bordeaux University
Scott Denham, Davidson College
Emanuela Grama, Carnegie Mellon University
Christopher R. Browning, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (emeritus)
Katrin Paehler, Illinois State University
Raphael Utz, Deutsches Historisches Museum Berlin
Emre Sencer, Knox College
Stefan Ihrig, University of Haifa
Jeff Rutherford, Xavier University
Jason Hall, The University of Haifa
Christian Ingrao, CNRS École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales, CESPRA Paris
Hannah Wilson, Nottingham Trent University
Jan Lanicek, University of New South Wales
Edward B. Westermann, Texas A&M University-San Antonio
Maris Rowe-McCulloch, University of Regina
Joanna B. Michlic, University College London
Raul Carstocea, Maynooth University
Dieter Steinert, University of Wolverhampton
Christina Morina, Universität Bielefeld
Abbey Steele, University of Amsterdam
Erika Hughes, University of Portsmouth
Lukasz Krzyzanowski, University of Warsaw
Agnieszka Wierzcholska, German Historical Institute, Paris
Martin Cüppers, University of Stuttgart
Matthew Kupfer, Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project
Martin Kragh, Uppsala University
Umit Kurt, Van Leer Institute, Jerusalem
Meron Mendel, Frankfurt University of Applied Science, Anne Frank Center Frankfurt
Nazan Maksudyan, FU Berlin / Centre Marc Bloch
Emanuel-Marius Grec, University of Heidelberg
Khatchig Mouradian, Columbia University
Jan Zbigniew Grabowski, University of Ottawa
Dirk Moses, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Amos Goldberg, Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Amber N. Nickell, Fort Hays State University
Tatjana Tönsmeyer, Wuppertal University
Thomas Kühne, Clark University
Thomas Pegelow Kaplan, Appalachian State University
Amos Morris-Reich, Tel Aviv University
Volha Charnysh, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Stefan Cristian Ionescu, Northwestern University
Donatello Aramini, Sapienza University, Rome
Ofer Ashkenazi, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Roland Clark, University of Liverpool
Mirjam Zadoff, University of Munich & Munich Documentation Centre for the History of National Socialism
John Barruzza, Syracuse University
Cristina A. Bejan, Metropolitan State University of Denver
Isabel Sawkins, University of Exeter
Benjamin Nathans, University of Pennsylvania
Norbert Frei, University of Jena
Stéfanie Prezioso, Université de Lausanne
Olindo De Napoli, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II
Eli Nathans, Western University
Eugenia Mihalcea, University of Haifa
Rebekah Klein-Pejšová, Purdue University
Sergei I. Zhuk, Ball State University
Paola S. Salvatori, Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa – Università degli Studi Roma Tre
Antonio Ferrara, Independent Scholar
Verena Meier, Forschungsstelle Antiziganismus, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg
Frédéric Bonnesoeur, Zentrum für Antisemitismusforschung, TU Berlin
Sara Halpern, St. Olaf College
Irina Nastasa-Matei, University of Bucharest
Michal Aharony, University of Haifa
Michele Sarfatti, Fondazione CDEC Milano
Frank Schumacher, The University of Western Ontario
Thomas Weber, University of Aberdeen
Elizabeth Drummond, Loyola Marymount University
Jennifer Evans, Carleton University
Sayantani Jana, University of Southern California
Gavriel D. Rosenfeld, Fairfield University
Snježana Koren, University of Zagreb
Brunello Mantelli, University of Turin and University of Calabria
Carl Müller-Crepon, University of Oxford
Grzegorz Rossolinski-Liebe, Freie Universität Berlin
Amy Sjoquist, Northwest University
Sebastian Vîrtosu, Universitatea Națională de Arte “G. Enescu”
Stanislao G. Pugliese, Hofstra University
Ronald Grigor Suny, University of Michigan
Antoinette Saxer, University of York
Alon Confino, University of Massachusetts, Amherst
Corry Guttstadt, University of Hamburg
Vadim Altskan, US Holocaust Memorial Museum
Evan B. Bukey, University of Arkansas
Elliot Y Neaman, University of San Francisco
Rebecca Wittmann, University of Toronto Mississauga
Benjamin Rifkin, Hofstra University
Vladimir Tismaneanu, University of Maryland
Walter Reich, George Washington University
Jay Geller, Case Western Reserve University
Atina Grossmann, Cooper Union
Francesco Zavatti, Södertörn University
Eliyana R. Adler, The Pennsylvania State University
Laura María Niewöhner, Bielefeld University
Elena Amaya, University of California-Berkeley
Markus Roth, Fritz Bauer Institut, Frankfurt
Brandon Bloch, University of Wisconsin-Madison
Monica Osborne, The Jewish Journal
Benjamin Hett, Hunter College and the Graduate Center, CUNY
Volker Weiß, Independent Scholar
Manuela Consonni, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Svetlana Suveica, University of Regensburg
Izabella Tabarovsky is a researcher with the Wilson Center’s Kennan Institute, focusing on the politics of historical memory in the former Soviet Union.
Evgeny Finkel is a political scientist and historian at Johns Hopkins University.
This article was first published by the Jewish Journal.
This is a long list of people in academia. Impressive in it inclusion of so many institutions of higher learning.
An interesting discussion we might have on this site is how to inoculate young minds against propaganda. The orthodox view is that we must impart “critical thinking skills” and “media literacy skills”. This is what civics/history guru Sam Wineburg advocates and most professional development in CA hews to this line. Make kids act like professional fact checkers. I don’t buy this. I don’t think any adult, much less a teenager, is going to operate this way, and I don’t think it immunizes a mind from believing falsehoods. As far as I know there are no widely-discussed alternatives to this viewpoint however. It seems to me there is much intellectual work to be done on this topic. Much deeper thinking. My hunch is that the best anti-falsehood software is domain knowledge. Anne Applebaum is better at sussing out nonsense about Ukraine and Russia because she knows a ton about it. She might not be so good at sussing out nonsense about Bolivian politics. If so, our schools need to get serious about imparting knowledge. Currently they’re not.
You have to know a lot of stuff before you can reliably sense when things don’t make sense.
Nailed it!
Ponderosa,
The problem with “knowledge” is exactly what you point out. It is not possible for people to accumulate enough knowledge on enough subjects during their lifetimes, whether they are Anne Applebaum or a Bolivian scholar, to inoculate minds against propaganda.
I had a typically mediocre 1970s public education full of “facts” that I promptly forgot compared to how much my kid is learning in AP classes and other supposedly mind-numbing classes that actually teach students how to think.
The only history knowledge I had was US history from 1620 on. Period. That was the extent of my “knowledge”. Never learned a single “fact” about European history, let alone the history of Asia or Africa. But I went to college and learned how to evaluate sources and whether folks were offering a load of talking points and crap, or actually supporting what they say with facts that I could verify from trustworthy sources and not facts from the National Enquirer. I learned how to find accurate and trustworthy information when there was a subject I wanted to know more about.
The reason students today seem to be a lot more progressive is because the right wing is lying and the students can see the reality for themselves. While apparently the majority of white senior citizens who were taught to memorize facts are Trump voters who seem to be watching Fox News, memorizing the “facts” they are told are true and have no idea how to think. Or what a trustworthy source of information is. Trustworthy sources can be wrong. But trustworthy sources try to get in right, and correct the record — they don’t double down on their lies when the evidence no longer supports the false reality they present as true.
I have seen that belief here as well — some favorite posters who often post false things along with their truthful posts are not marginalized for their lies but are held out as worthwhile people to listen to because sometimes they happen to say things that are true. Which is exactly how Trump supporters view Trump. The many times his supporters acknowledge that Trump is not truthful about something does not detract from their belief that he is a credible source who should be believed when it seems right to believe him.
People who have no interest in “getting it right”, like the pro-Putin posters who are blatantly unwilling to say anything critical of Putin no matter how horrendous his actions, should not be listened to about anything. That is the price one should pay who has no interest in getting it right, but is only here to push whatever propaganda they want to push. I am so glad that Diane has finally marginalized them, which is exactly where they belong. They belong there until they retract the falsehoods they are posting and demonstrate that they have a commitment to truth by criticizing Putin. If they can’t, but post something about public education later, they are no more credible nor believable a source than they were when they were posting propaganda earlier and should always be ignored even if like Trump and Tucker Carlson they happen to be saying something true at that time.
I hope today’s students are taught to completely reject unreliable sources, instead of being taught that a source is reliable or unreliable depending on what they happen to be saying at any given time. Which is nonsense and seems to be what too many folks who are taught to memorize “facts” still seem to believe.
iPhone response:
Many people think the NYT and other trustworthy sources are not trustworthy. How do we solve that problem?
I think you misunderstand how facts interact with the brain. They shape a worldview—the shape who we are. My fairly deep understanding of the horrors of dictatorship inform my horror of Trump. Facts are not superfluous—they are integral to how we think. I believe your kid’s AP teacher may have modeled modes of sifting evidence and habits of thought, but he must also have taught a lot of historical facts that shape the way your son thinks, no?
Don’t we make computers smarter by filling up their memories with data? Isn’t this how humans get smarter too?
Ponderosa: I support your contention that knowledge of an area is of utmost importance. the thing knowledge of something does is to produce a sort of sniff test of factual information. The point of NYC is also of merit, since knowledge of all the tiny parts of diplomacy and all of the current events in foreign lands represent too vast a pool of knowledge for any normal citizen who has to work for a living, even a living that contains some of these current events.
So what are we to do? I think we need to depend on experts in the field to guide our understanding. Given that experts may disagree, this is not foolproof, but it is a start. If you get your knowledge base from Joe down at the coffee shop or Xebar on his facebook page, you are likely to believe a bunch of nonsense. So our knowledge base should lead us to understand who to trust about things. And our skill set should include a healthy sense of being wary about information that is commonly asserted to be factual.
I see lots of suspicion of media. If suspiciousness is the aim, mission accomplished! But clearly crazy beliefs still abound. So clearly wariness alone isn’t the cure. What else is needed?
Ponderosa,
Those on the right are NOT “suspicious” of media. They are suspicious of some media, and wholeheartedly believe other media – that’s where they get their information.
The problem is that they are getting their information by media that is not credible.
They don’t seem to have ever been taught the difference between reliable and unreliable media and credible and non-credible sources.
For example, the boy who cried wolf was NOT a credible or believable source the 4th time he cried wolf when he happened to be telling the truth.
But in this country, and even sometimes on this blog, I see folks giving the benefit of the doubt to people who have posted unreliable and misleading information and when it was called to their attention, doubled down on it instead of correcting it. Because some other time the person happened to post something that wasn’t false.
Imagine if a teacher taught her class that the boy who cried wolf wasn’t lying because somewhere in the country there was a wolf, and the boy was just saying that a wolf existed, and it’s their own fault that the townspeople thought the boy meant that a wolf was near the sheep. Those townsfolks should always consider that boy to be a reliable source, and the lesson of the story is that the townspeople were at fault because they didn’t understand what the boy intended by what he said. (FYI, that’s gaslighting).
Honestly, I feel as if that is what journalists now believe. That every source who tries to mislead the public must be presented as reliable and credible because that source does on occasion say something that is true.
Ponderosa, I think some portion of media distrust can be attributed to the seemingly endless supply of articles like this:
Ponderosa,
More likely it is Fox News articles like this one that cause the far right folks to distrust the Washington Post and be certain that they can find the only real “truth” at the Washington Post:
“Ketanji Brown Jackson serves on board of school that promotes critical race theory”
Probably those people are like flerp and believe that Georgetown Day – alma mater of Brett Kavanaugh and the place where CRT-lover Glenn Youngkin sends HIS children to be brainwashed by CRT – is truly a bastion of evil and Jackson should be barred from the Supreme Court for being so evil as to support having the white children at Georgetown Day taught to hate themselves.
This is exactly the kind of thing I am talking about, where folks on here are dishonest and posting right wing takes and have no interest in a truthful debate.
Ponderosa,
You just had to watch some of the Ketanji Brown Jackson hearings to see the difference between Republicans and Democrats and those who believe in truth, and those who believe in getting what they want.
It’s like the misleading link to the Washington Post headline above — all heat and no desire to discuss anything but a determined desire to make folks believe there is something really bad about whatever it is they don’t like, and not caring whether they have to mislead folks or get them outraged over meaningless things to “win”. That seems to be their only goal, and it’s sad. It’s also sad that they don’t care who they hurt in their efforts to score points and “win”.
^^One of my earlier comments has not yet posted and I would like to correct an error in it.
During the Ketanji Brown Jackson hearings, the Republican Senators were expressing their faux outrage because she serves on the board of a private school that believes that teaching kids not to be racist is a good thing. That school is Georgetown Day, and I mistakenly confused it with Georgetown Prep, alma mater of Brett Kavanaugh, and where Gov. Youngkin sends his kid.
I’m sorry, I was wrong about which school Jackson serves on the board.
(If that previous comment never posts, this won’t make any sense, so ignore it.)
This post is awesome. Thank you for sharing it, Diane!
I want to have faith in people. To stand up to this horror.