I somehow missed a story that appeared in Education Week last February, identifying the background of Biden appointees to the U.S. Department of Education. What is interesting about the story, aside from knowing who the appointees are, is what is not said about DFER, the hedge-fund managers’ lobby for charter schools and high-stakes teachers’ evaluation, and Chiefs for Change, founded by Jeb Bush to promote privatization and high-stakes testing.
Andrew Ujifusa wrote:
The latest round of political appointees to the U.S. Department of Education include a veteran of Capitol Hill and Beltway education groups, the former leader of Democrats for Education Reform’s District of Columbia affiliate, and two former Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation staffers…
Jessica Cardichon, deputy assistant secretary, office of planning, evaluation, and policy development. Cardichon is an education policy veteran in Washington. She comes to the Education Department from the Learning Policy Institute, a K-12 policy and research group founded and led by Linda Darling-Hammond, who led Biden’s transition team for the department. Cardichon was the group’s federal policy director. While at LPI, Cardichon contributed to reports about COVID-19 relief, how to “reimagine schooling,” and student access to certified teachers.
She’s also worked as education counsel to Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., on the Senate education committee; the Alliance for Excellent Education, a research and advocacy group, and at Teachers College, Columbia University. A long-time ally of teachers’ unions and a critic of standardized testing, Sanders has taken on a big role in the Senate during the creation of a new COVID-19 relief package.
I was invited to serve on the federal policy transition team, which Cardichon chaired. The members were asked to offer recommendations for Biden for Day 1, Day 100, and One Year. I proposed that Biden announce two changes: 1) a halt in the annual mandated standardized testing; 2) a revision of the Every Student Succeeds Act to make the ban on federally mandated annual testing of every child permanent; 3) a halt in the funding of the federal Charter Schools Program, which spends $440 million every year to fund charters, almost 40% of which either never open or close soon after opening. Cardichon offered no support for any of these proposals. They were never discussed by the committee. After being stonewalled repeatedly, I resigned from the committee. Not surprisingly, none of those three recommendations has been on the Biden agenda.
Ramin Taheri, chief of staff, office for civil rights. Taheri comes to the department after serving as the District of Columbia chapter director of Democrats for Education Reform, a group that promotes charter schools, K-12 education funding, test-based teacher and school accountability, and other policies. The group divides opinion in the left-leaning K-12 policy space. Some have championed the group for focusing on issues they say will better served students of color and disadvantaged learners, while other claim DFER undermines teachers’ unions and traditional public schools. News that DFER was backing certain big-city superintendents to be Biden’s education secretary provoked pushback from union supporters and others skeptical of DFER. (Cardona was not on DFER’s list of preferred choices.) Taheri has also worked at Chiefs for Change, a group of district superintendents that provokes similar, if not identical, political sentiments.
Ujifusa does not explain that DFER was created by hedge-funders who are passionate about charter schools, high-stakes teacher evaluations, merit pay, and union-busting. Nor does he mention that Chiefs for Change is a rightwing group founded by Jeb Bush to promote the Florida “model” of privatization and high-stakes testing. The agenda of DFER and Chiefs for Change is not centrist; it is rightwing.
Nick Lee, deputy assistant secretary, office of planning, evaluation, and policy development; Sara Garcia, special assistant, office of planning, evaluation, and policy development. Both Lee and Garcia come to the department from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, where Lee was a senior program officer and Garcia was a program officer....
The Gates Foundation has had a long, complex, and controversial involvement in education policy. For many years, it focused its considerable grant-making power on teacher effectiveness, teacher-performance systems, and support for the Common Core State Standards; by 2015, the foundation estimated it had put $900 million in grants toward teacher policy and programs. Previously, it had focused on supporting small high schools. These efforts became more politically controversial over time.
Supporters have applauded its focus on educators and improving instruction, while critics say its outsized influence has had a detrimental effect on policymakers. A 2018 study of one of its biggest teacher-effectiveness efforts in three districts showed no gains for students.
A few years back, a reporter at Education Week wrote an article about the outsized role of the Gates Foundation in shaping federal education policy; the reporter said it was almost impossible to find anyone to criticize the foundation’s role because almost every organization in D.C. was funded by Gates.
Being very serious, how does the current Education Department differ from that of DeVos and Duncan?
Being very serious, the name of the person who heads it does not start with the letter “D”.
saddest and harshest reality
Nailed it, SDP.
same ol’ insane ol’
HAAAAAA! Perfect!!!!!
Thank you for the candor about the Biden DOE. You show the direct links between policy and money. Change is so difficult is this country because those with money are pulling the strings of policy. You showed great restraint in not revealing what you knew about the Biden DOE. No matter what is discovered, revealed, researched and published, it is always business as usual in Washington, D.C.
“You showed great restraint in not revealing what you knew about the Biden DOE.”
I don’t understand what you are trying to get at. If one knows of serious issues with our supposed “public servants” isn’t it one’s responsibility to let the world know about those issues?
I hope Cindy Marten has great influence.
https://www.nbcsandiego.com/news/local/senate-confirms-san-diego-unified-superintendent-cindy-marten-as-u-s-deputy-education-secretary/2601649/
“The truth of the matter is, you all,
you all know, you all know in your gut
what has to be done. We can disagree in
the margins but the truth of the matter
is it’s all within our wheelhouse and
nobody has to be punished. No one’s
standard of living will change,
nothing would fundamentally change…”
“I love Bernie, but I’m not Bernie Sanders.
I don’t think 500 billionaires are the
reason why we’re in trouble,”
Despite all the bleating about the
“existential crisis ”, Build Back Better bill,
voting rights legislation, the minimum wage,
student debt, DC statehood, expanding the
Supreme Court, the environment, ending
reform-blocking filibuster…
Joe wasn’t kidding…
“nothing would fundamentally change…”
“the reporter said it was almost impossible to find anyone to criticize the foundation’s role because almost every organization in D.C. was funded by Gates.”
Ordinary people can try this themselves. Try to find any substantive criticism of any of the big ed reform funders programs anywhere in ed reform- it doesn’t exist.
Here’s an ed reform article in the ed reform outlet The 74:
https://www.the74million.org/article/indianapolis-enrollment-innovation-network-increase-pandemic/
Big blaring headline with an exaggerated stat used to promote The Mind Trust’s efforts to privatize Indianapolis schools, written by the Mind Trust with no quote or input from public schools in the city at all.
At the end of the article promoting the Mind Trust’s work and the Mind Trust’s charter schools, is this:
“Disclosure: The Walton Family Foundation and City Fund provide financial support to The Mind Trust and The 74. City Fund partner Kevin Shafer sits on The 74’s board of directors”
It’s completely incestious. A closed circle. Walton (or Gates or Bloomberg- doesn’t matter- they’re all exactly the same) hires and funds the ed reform groups, who promote ed reform, then Walton hires and funds a “news” outlet to print positive articles about the same set of people and policies.
No real analysis, no criticism, ever, of any kind, and the same overhyped and exaggerated claims of success we’ve seen for the last 20 years.
It would really be a shame if the United States abolished their public school system based on the claims of an echo chamber composed exclusively of people hired and paid by 5 billionaires who are hired because they recite the ed reform mantras. We desperately need some other opinions. Ed reform is an echo chamber. There’s no diversity of opinion at all.
Looks like Virginia got an ed reform echo chamber member to “reinvent” their schools:
“Henry Graff
Dec 20
NOW: Governor-elect @GlennYoungkin announced he has chosen Aimee Rogstad Guidera to serve as the next Secretary of Education of the Commonwealth of Virginia”
It’ll be 100% promotion of charters and vouchers and nothing for public schools or public school students, other than whatever gimmick or fad is fashionable in the echo chamber right now. Public schools should prepare for an influx of punishing, negative new mandates. Charter and private schools, on the other hand, will be promoted and nurtured and marketed heavily.
Rah Rah for charters and vouchers! Boo hiss for public schools! That’s about the extent of the “rigorous data based analysis” in the echo chamber.
The celebration of this appointment in the echo chamber is unanimous, but that’s always the case. There are never, ever any dissenters. Not permitted.
Aie yie yie!
Guidera led the Gates-funded Data Quality Project. She was an Aspen-Pahara fellow. Also Gates-funded.
I believe it’s spelled Piranha.
And here’s what the Aspen-Piranha fellow looks like
https://media.hswstatic.com/eyJidWNrZXQiOiJjb250ZW50Lmhzd3N0YXRpYy5jb20iLCJrZXkiOiJnaWZcL3BpcmFuaGEtMS5qcGciLCJlZGl0cyI6eyJyZXNpemUiOnsid2lkdGgiOjgyOH0sInRvRm9ybWF0IjoiYXZpZiJ9fQ==
Familiar faces indeed.
Has anyone who worked in the Obama Administration ever been able to draw any meaningful distinction between their agenda and that of Jeb Bush?
Because I’ve been reading national ed reformers and the agendas are identical.
The echo chamber has no political party. It’s exactly the same no matter which individual one elects or hires. It hasn’t changed at all in 20 years. Michelle Rhee is the same as Arne Duncan who is the same as Jeb Bush who is the same as Betsy DeVos. No matter which one you hire you get the same thing.
I guess we blindly follow this anti-public school echo chamber another 20 years- there’s no alternative and there are more paid ed reformers every single year. They add one or another echo chamber group each and every year. We must be well into tens of thousands of full time echo chamber members by now. The salaries alone have to be tens of millions of dollars.
Biden’s 2020 education policy committee was a dog and pony show. The committee, with all its numerous subcommittees and members, was not intended to affect policy. The last couple meetings revealed the purpose. They begged us to make phone calls to registered Democrats in swing states. The final meeting after you quit in frustration consisted of one half phone call time. It wasn’t a policy committee. It was a sham wherein you, Diane, (and Steve and I) were supposed to declare your love for standardized testing to help Biden win, and make campaign calls. They wanted you to invite the Network for PE, your network to make phone calls using a computerized system. That’s how Biden won, not with policy but with political chicanery. And that is, in my opinion, also how he governs.
It was a dog and pony show to provide gravitas and a sense of legitimacy to the committee. Supporters of public education were “window dressing.”
I would be inviting Jessica Cardichon to listen to us today if I thought she would. Instead, all there is to do is grumble that failed corporatism continues blindly in the halls of power. None of the policy committee recommendations were published or acted on. That was not the intention. It was a sham. Many highly respected people’s energies were wasted.
I thought Jessica Cardichon was Bernie Sanders’ person?
I don’t get this comment.
She wasn’t there when the Sanders team reached out to Diane to inform them about the movement to save public education brought to light by the teachers strikes a few years ago. Bernie supported Obama’s education positions back when. That’s all about that. Senator Sanders changed when he saw the company man behind the curtain, just as Diane did long ago.
The ability to change is rare. Not to self-aggrandize, but I changed. I used to be paid a stipend as a standardized testing coordinator, you know. I was all in on testing and standardized instruction. I was one of a small handful on a committee that met regularly with the local district superintendent to create lesson plans intended to be mandatory. Then one night, I watched Michelle Rhee fire a principal on the PBS Newshour because of test scores, and I realized I was dead wrong. I changed. I rebelled against test prep and eventually became a union rep. Jessica knows the players and the game better than I do, and can change if she wants to.
So who is Bernie Sanders’ person now and given Bernie’s powerful position in the Senate, why isn’t that person wielding more influence or at least speaking out publicly?
That’s what I don’t get. How to change that?
I’ve been fighting standardized testing since 1970. I saw how devastating it was to my poor ELLs even then. I saw students wrongly classified because they could not show their abilities on a biased test that was given in a language students had not yet mastered, namely, English. Back then, they didn’t have psychological tests in languages other than English. We’ve come a long way, but there is still much work to do.