This article by Ed Montini in the Arizona Republic explains the childish behavior of Republican leaders, who engage in taunts instead of reasoned discourse about their agenda. They don’t want to expand Medicare. They don’t want universal pre-K. They don’t support efforts to combat climate change. They oppose paid family leave for families in need after surgery or childhood. They are against a federal guarantee of two years tuition-free community college. They oppose higher taxes on billionaires. They don’t care about voting rights. They don’t want to expand opportunity. They don’t want to reduce inequality. They don’t invest in the future.
What are they for? Tax breaks for the rich.
Since they have no agenda, their goal is to make sure Biden can’t succeed. After blocking everything he proposes (with the help of Senator Manchin of West Virginia and Senator Krysten Sinema), they have nothing to offer other than the schoolyard chant.
Ed Mancini was walking his dog early one morning, and he saw two other dog owners engage in conversation, a man and a woman. As they part ways, the man says to the woman, “Let’s go, Brandon!” then turning away.
The woman is puzzled and asks Montini if he knows what that phrase means.
So, first thing in the morning I am called upon to explain this recent cultural phenomenon to one of the few American grown-ups who has managed to remain a fully functioning adult, while most of the rest of us have been transformed by social media into crude, smart-alecky 8-year-olds.
There’s that Southwest Airlines pilot
This particular sign was a the Boston College-Syracuse football game Oct. 30. A fan’s juvenile jab at President Joe Biden.Joshua Bessex
For instance, the woman had not heard about the Southwest Airlines pilot who recently signed off on a flight, telling passengers, “Let’s go, Brandon.”
Or about how the whole thing began when a race car driver named Brandon Brown won a NASCAR race and, while being interviewed on TV, the crowd started chanting, “F–k Joe Biden.” The flummoxed interviewer suggested they might be saying, “Let’s go, Brandon.”
After that, the phrase became a way for grown-up 8-year-olds to say the f-word about Biden without actually using it.
Really.
Elected Republican politicians in Washington, D.C., started using the phrase.
Donald Trump began selling “Let’s go Brandon” T-shirts through his Save America PAC for $45, and grown-up 8-year-olds in America actually purchased them.
$45.
There are adults who channel their 8-year-old selves by bringing signs saying, “Let’s go, Brandon” to public events, as well as some who scribble the message in paint on the rear window of their automobiles….
How to answer someone who says such a thing
Of course, we all learned as children that infantile behavior tends to draw some type of backlash….
After I explain the whole “Let’s go, Brandon” thing to the woman who’d been walking her dog she says, “That seems incredibly childish. How are you supposed to answer someone who says such a thing?”
I tell her that, as a grown-up, she would be best served simply ignoring it.
As for the rest of us, suffering as we do from social-media-induced age regression, I’d respond, “I’m rubber and you’re glue …”
Reach Montini at ed.montini@arizonarepublic.com.
Problem viewing email? View in browser
Odd, I guess I’m not up to date. I could have sworn that Democrats controlled the presidency and both houses of Congress. Can someone tell me when that changed?
Let’s talk “odds”, dienne. What percent of Republican politicians are ill-informed, infantile-like bullies carrying freight for men like Charles Koch as contrasted with the number of Democratic politicians?
The next generation of women, in terms of protection of their rights, are they better off with the GOP or with mainstream and progressive Democrats?
Linda, this reply is a perfect example of Republican defender who engage in taunts instead of reasoned discourse about their agenda.
If Sinema and Manchin were Republicans, even the small victories Biden has been able to achieve would have been prevented. If the Democrat had won in 2016, the big and harmful “victories” of the far right that were cheered on by white folks would not have happened. I doubt anyone who thinks the right wing policies and right wing judicial court packing of the previous administration are no worse than the first 10 months of the Biden Administration wants to engage in reasoned discourse about why they feel that way. Taunting is their only defense.
Even when we are angry that Manchin and Sinema are holding up much better legislation, most of us feel some relief that if Biden can fight the Republicans’ desire to dismantle democracy, there is a chance to elect better Democrats so those two lose their power.
And those who prefer to work to defeat as many Dems as possible are never interested in reasoned discourse, whether they are loud and proud right wing Republicans or pretend to be progressives.
^^Linda, I am referring to the reply you are responding to, not your own reply. You are posing questions that Republicans who engage in taunts instead of reasoned discourse have no interest in engaging with.
NYC
I understood.
Why of course, D-77 would have been perfectly happy with another 4 years of the orange horror clown from hell; as opposed to a moderate Democrat who actually admits that we do have climate change, which Trump and the GOP mock and sneer at.
Dienne, I think there’s a certain amount of fear & under-doggism in play regardless of who’s holding the three branches, when it’s by a slim majority which can hardly be called a mandate, with elections being won by small margins. I think your advice is salubrious, i.e., Dem voters should not acknowledge/ angst about Rep catcalls when they hold all three houses. OTOH, our “hold” on the Senate is by fingernails.
What is just as disturbing is the prominent use of skull imagery on so many Trump signs. What are we, the “brave pirate Robert?” This has to a scary degree become a death cult. Our justice system seems to have no way to counter this. Some people relish the prospect fo violence. It doesn’t bode well.
weirdly exact: death cult. Rather than care for the planet and its residents, we are looking at a growing movement toward greedy authoritarianism as a solution, which will do nothing to save us.
I remember seeing a lot of the same thing by conservatives during the late ‘60’s/ early-‘70’s, often a skeleton with hair afire riding a motorcycle—sported by folks [including biker gangs] during the time of massive public demonstrations pro-MLK in wake of assassination, & anti-VNW. I take it as a logo of culture-warriors, i.e., people who feel their way of life is threatened by political developments, & a message they won’t go down easy.
The Democratic Party (and, also the pseudo-left DINO, Center for American Progress), needs to rid itself of any links to Tom Daschle (he’s a CAP board member).
Tom and his son, Nathan, a lobbyist working for the Daschle Group, each gave Sinema’s campaign $1,000. Nathan said in July, he “likes what she stands for.”
Spoiler alert-
Daschle opposes Medicare for All. The Daschle Group was founded as an advisory to Baker Donelson according to the Tom Daschle page posted at the BiPartisan Policy Center site. Daschle provides Baker “with strategic advice on healthcare,…”. Baker Donelson’s touted role in legislation for charter schools (“our attorneys are integrally involved”) is posted on their webpage found through an internet search of, Baker Donelson charter schools.
In 2009, U.S. News reported Tom failed to pay $100,000 in taxes.
John Podesto chairs the CAP Board. It wouldn’t be surprising to learn that he and Daschle think alike.
WaPo, 10-18, 2021, “Manchinema Become K Street Darlings.”
We’re in significant trouble because rich democrats don’t want to pay taxes either…
Thanks for updating me on Tom Daschle, I had thought he was one of the more decent Democrats when he was still in Congress. He’s just another sell-out corporate Democrat money sucking machine.
It’s John Podesta.
Two of the most dangerous men in American history are Daschle and Podesto. Their efforts deny Americans a true two-party system. Their mechanizations for self-interest facilitated Trump’s win. And, they are instrumental in creating and maintaining America’s plutocracy.
Have at it . Just don’t tell us about sympathy for the feelings of Trumpanzees.
Superb details and I am very happy to see this.
From stooped to Stupid
One small step
From whence we’ve stooped
To probe the depth
Of endless stupid
Republicans are more prone to attention getting antics than any presenting any platform or ideology. Several are more known for juvenile antics than policy. This includes anti-vaxxer Rand Paul, the obnoxious Marjorie Taylor Greene, anti-masker Ron DeSantis and the crown jewel of arrested development, Matt Gaetz. We can expect continued lies and outlandish antics from the party of Trump.
I agree. When you do not really have a belief system, yo call attention to inane behavior, even gong so far as altering your own behavior to gain attention, diverting attention from the ill effects of your own policy, or lack thereof.
I fail to see how the Brandon thing is much different from complaining about Trump’s hair and orange complexion, although needing a code to get around using the F bomb in public seems a bit unnecessary when you have attached the capital building.
Of course the Republicans are being obstructionist, that is their only cogent belief: that government is evil. Thus anything that can blunt its operation is good. On this rather shaky ground is constructed the platform of the GOP, which has become the modern No Party.
I didn’t remember seeing any member of Congress making those comments about Trump in public.
You are right that Democrats shaved similarly toward Trump.
And actually, childishness is nothing new in American politics and certainly not always (or even usually) something to get upset about.
The only caveat I would make is that there is a time and place for it.
I’d say when pilots do it to their captive passengers on an airplane, they have crossed the line of what is acceptable. People don’t pay to hear their airplane pilots and dentists make political statements (although they may pay their hair stylist or barber to do so)
Absolutely agreed about the pilot should have refrained from sharing his opinions. I have noticed the lack of a filter in most of the people who voted for Trump (many are friends and relatives).
Given the research about the lesser educational levels of the Republican voters contrasted with that of the Democratic voters, the pilot’s comment creates the public impression that the airline hires poorer quality staff. I’d be legitimately nervous about my safety.
I understand that Republicans wouldn’t be concerned, they don’t read research or, …read.
I agree with you about the Republicans’ only cogent belief. But I don’t agree with your perception that this is a “both sides” issue. As I recall, the person who regularly referred to Trump’s orange hair on here is the person who wants to defeat Democrats and taunts and crows that there is no difference between the parties. If you know anyone else who referred to Trump’s orange hair AND refused to actually have conversations when someone who liked Trump tried to have a real discussion about issues, I would be interested in seeing that. Because I am doubtful that it regularly happens.
Have you tried to have reasonable discussions with Republicans who refer to “the Brandon thing” or repeat other childish bullying memes? Because what I often see is that even other Republicans who similarly oppose “big government” but believe in truth and facts who try to have a discussion with friends are shouted down, taunted, and insulted. At best, the taunters don’t directly insult and bully their Republican friend who is trying to have a fact-based conversation, but instead just direct their taunts and insults at Biden and other democrats. It is simply impossible to get them to defend their view because as soon as it is challenged, they resort to insults. You see that here as well.
I have seen this during Facebook conversations between those who have embraced the right wing Republican ideology and friends they know who voted for Republicans in the past and share some values. The conversation devolves into the right wing Republican insulting and taunting Democrats, while those who try to reason with them aren’t insulting and attacking.
The equivalent would be a democrat referring to Trump as “orange-haired” and then when someone who supports Trump wanted to have a discussion about policies Trump supported or his actions, that person just shouted “orange haired idiot! Orange haired idiot!”
It just doesn’t happen. Another example of the false equivalency that causes journalists to bend over backward to normalize our pre-fascist country and causes those who believe some of the most hateful things to feel as if their actions are okay because the media and even some on the left have normalized it with false equivalency.
Those voters need to be marginalized. There is no getting through to them but right now all the efforts to bend over backward to “understand” them and normalize their hate and anger just makes them feel justified.
In the old days, when David Duke tried to run as a Republican, the media did not normalize his supporters as folks who had very important things to say that Americans needed to listen to. But today those are exactly the people who the media has now raised up so that they feel good about their hate — they feel empowered. Because the media and some on the left who despise the Democrats have said that the hate and irrationality of Americans who embrace the Republican David Duke agenda is the fault of the Democrats and not the Republicans! It is frightening because the more those people are empowered to impose their neo-fascist view, the more that the media and some on the left say that Democrats must be punished because it’s their fault that these people are so irrational and full of hate and believe in white supremacy. They blame the Democrats and not the Republican party who encourages and rewards those people.
I, for one, have been ever reluctant, as you have no doubt noticed because I do this ONLY in every other comment, to refer to Glorious Leader Who Shines More Orange Than Does the Sun, he of the troll-doll yellow hair and the Cuckoo Coup, he Man with No Plan and the Tan in the Can, as
IQ45, Trumpty Dumpty, The Idiot, Teflon Don: the Sequel, Vlad’s Agent Orange, Moscow’s Agent Governing Amercia (MAGA), Jabba the Trump, Don Cheeto “Little Fingers” Trumpbalone, the Posterboy for Malignant Pathological Narcissism, Dog-Whistle Don, the Bloated Bloviator, and so on,
not for fear of degrading the current ideological food fight even further (not possible) but because none of these epithets fully captures the lowness/vileness of this Childman in the Promised Land. Thus the slight pang of regret with which I drop them into writing and conversation.
O, for a Muse of Fire, that would be equal to the task! My mother, when texting about him, has hit on a wise solution to this vexing problem. She just uses a pile of doo emoji in place of the name.
Donnie Doo.
Yikes! I left Don the Con off my list.
Bob,
I did think of you, which is why I wrote “If you know anyone else who referred to Trump’s orange hair AND refused to actually have conversations when someone who liked Trump tried to have a real discussion about issues…” Because the entirety of what you post is not that and I have seen you thoughtfully engage with people who disagree.
You may originally post those things, but you engage if you get a response like: “Is there anything beside the color of his hair and his obnoxious behavior that you dislike about Trump? Would you agree that aside from his orange hair and his obnoxiousness, Trump has a sincere desire to make the lives of his working class supporters better? Haven’t all Trump’s policy proposals been about helping the non-college educated blue collar workers who adore him?
If someone replied to the above post like that, would you reply “IQ45, Trumpty Dumpty, The Idiot, Teflon Don: the Sequel, Vlad’s Agent Orange, Moscow’s Agent Governing Amercia (MAGA), Jabba the Trump, Don Cheeto “Little Fingers” Trumpbalone, the Posterboy for Malignant Pathological Narcissism, Dog-Whistle Don, the Bloated Bloviator”?
Because I have seen you reply quite thoughtfully when people disagree, and I have seen others who are constantly posting Trump-defending attacks on Dems who only want to repeat their talking points.
Maybe it’s because I have seen so many Facebook interactions between people I grew up with which are quite revealing. People who are moderate, progressive and conservative (long time Republicans who see what has happened to the Republican party) try to have a conversation with Trump voters and only one side actually wants a conversation and is polite and it isn’t the Trump voters, who truly seem full of anger and hate toward the “other” (although they often refrain from directly attacking their conservative friends in quite nasty replies but hurl insults at lots of other people).
Thanks, NYC PSP. I didn’t think you were talking about me, but I’m a culprit on the Asset Orange front. No question about it. Sorry I didn’t make it plain that I didn’t consider this attack on me. Seriously. My apologies.
I engage in satire a lot, and I do understand why some of my talk upsets people sometimes. When I was a kid, Lenny Bruce was one of my major heroes. I still have a strong belief in the power of social sanction, positive and negative, to effect change, even though those monologues by Bruce certainly haven’t aged well.
Diane Ravitch almost always takes the high road-attempting to maintain civil public discourse while at the same time being a staunch defender of free speech and opponent of censorship, and I admire her DEEPLY. I would avoid such language myself in OFFICIAL public forums (or fora, as you prefer) such as school board meetings and the like. And even in social media threads, I think that the things I say are relatively tame in contrast to, for example, sanding in front of the Presidential seal and inciting a lunatic mob to attack the Capitol.
nycpsp– It’s actually encouraging to watch Congressional discussions/ hearings etc on CSPAN. There are certain Reps who stand out in their absurdly hostile, argumentative & misleading [fact-wise] engagement [Jordan, Grassley, McCarthy, Scalise, Hawley come to mind]. There are many other GAGA Reps who start off that way (to establish their partisan bona fides) but then progress into a reasonable exchange. And other Reps who eschew that kind of talk altogether. I often end up feeling that the fault lies with the Congressional minority whip & Senate Minority Leader, who exercise a sort of cold & calculating chess.
Same can be said for SCOTUS: those conversations are on a much higher level, and are surprisingly rational.
Nycpsp— The media’s attempt to “understand”/ acknowledge antisocial, anti-public-good actions is indeed dicey. They attempt to be MSM—“mainstream”—because the Rep/ Dem vote has been so close, virtually 50-50, since 2000. Yet in the Trump era (which I fear we’re still in)– & even before, since the Tea Party in 2009– the Rep side has gone over the top to embrace what was long considered fringe libertarian philosophy. So MSM finds itself in the position of wishing to appeal to the broad middle of the spectrum—but the “broad middle” has been disappearing! I understand opinion columns attempting to suss out the motivations of Tea Party/ Trump era Reps, so as to help the rest of us find ways to bring them to their senses & grasp how they’re chipping away at democracy. But one longs for simple truths & sanity in our MSM editorial voices.
Proposed new Joe Manchin campaign song
Hey, Joe, where you goin’ with that bill in your hand?
I say, hey, Joe, where you goin’ with that bill in your hand?
Goin’ down to get me some scissors.
Throw help for poor folks in the can.
Buy me one more Maserati.
By trashing hope for the common man.
Brilliant satire
Thanks, Roy. That’s generous of you.
What bothers me is not the KIND of thing that the Repugnicans are doing with Let’s Go, Brandon, but how extremely effective it is in the day of the meme. These folks know how to create and spread a viral slogan–death taxes, government schools, blah blah blah. Democrats have a history of being above this, much to the detriment of their agendas on healthcare, more steeply progressive taxes, parental leave, and much else. I understand WHY many want to be above this. I really do. But negative social sanction via a catchy slogan is powerful, and the other side is much better at this.
On our side we have late night comedians and SNL. Fortunately, Republicans commit legions more gaffes because the majority are none too bright and they double down by rejecting info. processing.
It tips the scales toward thinking people i.e. Democrats.
Kudos to the person who started the memes by introducing, “Karen” to our vocab.
Yes! Exactly what I am talking about, Linda! More of that!
I so agree, Linda. The appropriate Dem response is humor. And it doesn’t need to be snarky and intellectual. We get plenty of openings from Reps whose natural response is simply underlining the absurdity of their position!
Bethree-
Cecily Strong’s “clown abortion” segment on SNL last Sat. has been viewed millions of times. Strong portrays deftly, the profound American sadness about what the right wing power brokers plot.
“We don’t want a bunch of dead clowns in a back alley.”
The segment is an anthem for history.
The Republicans are definitely brilliant at finding effective memes, but “Let’s Go Brandon” is actually a failure. And the reason it is a failure is a good object lesson for Democrats trying to come up with a catchy slogan.
The “Let’s Go Brandon” meme is an insider thing. The average independent – even those who lean right – don’t even understand it. I will even go out on a limb and surmise that it actually kind of hurts Republicans because if you aren’t an insider but perhaps some right-leaning independent, you either don’t know what it means, or when told what it means still don’t get why it’s particularly funny. The independents who vote for Republicans aren’t drawn to the party because they want to “own the libs”. So these kind of “be one of us who laugh at libs” appeals aren’t really successful. I think a lot of memes on the left probably are like this as well, and they don’t work.
The successful Republican memes scare people. People think that their schools will teach their white kids to hate themselves or their job is endangered or police won’t be able to protect them against scary criminals anymore and they won’t have guns to do it themselves. Illegal immigrants are coming for their jobs.
The Democrats have so many good issues that they could run on to scare people and they had great success in the past with it. Republicans want to take away your Social Security. Republicans want to take away your Medicare. Republicans want to lower your wages. Republicans want to repeal Obamacare.
The right wing successfully brainwashed the media pundits and leaders of the democrat party into forgetting that.
A few get it — most notably Stacey Abrams. Republicans won the Virginia statehouse this year using scare tactics and the Democrats failed to follow in kind.
Here’s the ad that McAuliffe should have run:
Virginia mom: ‘I’m scared – I have a Trump supporting neighbor who thinks COVID is just like the flu and can be cured by injecting bleach, thinks the election was stolen from Trump, wants teachers in my public school to be required to carry assault weapons and says if Youngkin is elected, Youngkin will make sure that public high schools in Virginia will be banned from having any books by Toni Morrison or any other author that the people who say the election was stolen from Trump don’t like.
I don’t want the people who say that the election was stolen from Trump who stormed the Capitol and hurt so many police officers because of that lie deciding what MY kids have to learn in school — but Glenn Youngkin has promised that those parents who still say Trump won the election — even though he didn’t — can tell my public school that teachers have to teach my kids that the election was stolen from Trump. That scares me because I want my public school teachers to teach the truth, not what the people who want to inject bleach to cure COVID want them to teach. We parents need to vote against Youngkin because if teachers have to teach that the election was stolen from Trump just because the people who vote for Trump and Youngkin want them to teach that, our kids are not going to know the difference between truth and lies anymore.”
Or something like that.
It’s possible that some of the wealthy funders of Democratic candidates who have representatives in the party for the purpose of tamping down a progressive view, don’t want Dems to message effectively.
I can speculate Podesto and Daschle would listen to your ad and worry about which entities could profit from the platform issues that it creates. They also could be concerned that the ad positions the parties too far apart for the BiPartisan Policy Center to achieve its goals.
I really don’t think two people control the entire Democratic party. That’s the kind of rhetoric that really hurts the Dems and ends up helping folks like Podesta and Daschle to make sure Republican policies prevail. It’s like saying that Bernie campaigned hard to get an anti-public school DFER Democrat Gov. elected in the 2017 Virginia primary because he was taking marching orders from the rich billionaires who hate public schools. Smears everyone and isn’t true.
Podesta and Daschle have too much power. But that doesn’t mean that they call all the shots. They have some powerful Democratic politicians in their pocket, but there are a lot who don’t care what those 2 say, even if those who don’t sometimes wrongly campaign for DFER candidates who happen to also be supported by Podesta and Daschle! Sometimes a democrat will agree with those 2 on one issue but not another.
Although the progressives have a lot less money, they can set their own message. Bernie Sanders is not very good at messaging but AOC is brilliant. So is Pete Buttigeig who is more moderate but still excellent on many other progressive issues.
And I do think the Democrats are at a disadvantage because the Republicans can say the most outrageously false things and the media presents it as the same kind of “lie” as a Democrat saying the Republicans want to cut Social Security payments by 20% but “it’s a lie because Republicans only want to cut Social Security by 19.4%”. (Not a real example but it’s the type of “fact-checking” Dems get).
But Dems have to be a lot more willing to go on the attack, especially when Republicans’ actions should be attacked by all right thinking people — which I know is true when I see friends who have been Republicans all their lives who are absolutely appalled at their lies.
Would some Dems want to know if the Daschle Group was a paid lobbyist since Aug. 2020, working for Stride Inc., formerly K12 Inc., and had had lobbying engagements with the U.S. Senate, House of Reps. and the Executive Office of the Pres.? Would some Dems want to know if a Daschle employee had prior congressional employment with the Senate Democratic Committee?
(ProPublica and LegiStorm sites)
nycpsp– I don’t agree that Dems should fight scare tactics with scare tactics. The Rep core is infused with fear & anger, but let’s keep in mind they’re maybe 30+% of the electorate. There are a lot more people out there who are happy to be done with Trump’s daily diet of fear/anger & looking to return to some sort of normalcy where the govt is run by sane people, & politics can recede into just a piece of life– does not have to be keeping your ear to the ground to multiple daily twitters from high-placed pols that could overturn life as you know it. I think this is Biden’s strength. He is in the process of restoring normalcy to DC.
Bethree
The following does not address your main point but, it’s something that merits review. Preliminary research shows many of the self-declared “Independents”, in reality, uniformly vote for candidates of one party during a long period of time, whether it is Dem or GOP.
Deadly Adults Everyone Of Them!
https://www.houstonchronicle.com/politics/texas/article/Gov-Abbott-calls-for-standards-to-rid-school-16603192.php
Republican Gov. Greg Abbott is directing Texas education agencies to develop statewide standards to protect children from being exposed to “pornography or other inappropriate content” in public schools, the latest salvo in an ongoing political battle over books.
“As you are aware, a growing number of parents of Texas students are rightfully outraged about highly inappropriate books and other content in public school libraries,” Abbott wrote in his letter to education officials Monday. “The most disturbing cases include material that is clearly pornographic, which has absolutely no place in the Texas public education system.”
Quick, add the Bible to Governor Abutt’s list!
“As the apple tree among the trees of the wood, so is my beloved among the sons. I sat beneath his shadow with great delight, and his fruit was sweet to my taste.” –Song of Solomon 2:3
An addition to the list:
“As the apple tree among the trees of the wood, so is my beloved among the sons. I sat beneath his shadow with great delight, and his fruit was sweet to my taste.” –Song of Solomon 2:3
LOL. I just tried to post a verse from the Bible. Evidently, this won’t get past the WordPress censor.
Song of Solomon 2:3
Song of Sol 2:3
See also See also Ezekiel 23:20
Couldn’t read the article, I guess it’s behind a paywall. Any details on what books Abbott’s looking to burn now?
Since I was a public school teacher for thirty years, I taught a number of 8 year olds and most if not all of them were more mature and honest than Traitor Trump, Trumpish want-to-be elected GOP reps (think Marjorie Taylor Green types), and his dangerously deplorable MAGA supporters will ever be.
Since there is no one of any age we can compare the Traitor Trump universe to except the traitor and his MAGA minions, then why not just call a Trump-a-Trump instead of comparing them to young children.
Here’s a different suggestion, Lloyd:
But hey, Repugnicans aren’t completely childish. Stalwart warrior Ted Cruz, for example, is defending us all against Big Bird.
This post disturbs me on so many levels. But the most important is in the title of it and the tenor of many of the responses. We cannot use terms like “schoolyard bully” or “childish.” By doing so, we have lost the argument before it begins and legitimize this attitude. There is nothing childish or bullying about what we are seeing right in front of us. It is treason, it is deadly serious, it is sedition, they are paving the way for government-sanctioned violence against its people to maintain power and subject a majority of our citizens to less-than-second-class status. This is serious stuff folks.
One of the lessons of Nazi Germany is that there were signs everywhere about what was to come, but virtually everyone either ignored it, didn’t raise a finger in opposition, and most importantly, did not take the language seriously. Did not take the language seriously. In retrospect, smug Americans used to wonder, “how could this have happened?” when thinking about how the Reich came into being. Pick up a paper or read this post. When serious people use terms like “schoolyard bully” and “childish” about very serious issues like the destruction of our form of governing, it’s going to be easy to anticipate what future generations will say about ours.
Greg,
Cecily Strong makes your case, the absurdity of taking lightly, the deadly serious, in her “clown abortion” segment on SNL last Sat., viewed millions of times.
“We don’t want a bunch a dead clowns in a back alley.”
I was half asleep during that bit, will have to go back and watch.
GregB,
Thank you. Excellent point, and that’s why I have trouble sleeping at night.
But maybe I am more aware of it because I had grandparents murdered by the Nazis and/or their sympathizers.
Greg, suggest a new title.
Republican Strategy to Kill Constitution Advances with Some Democrats’ Support
I’m sure I can come up with a shorter one if given a little time.
Bullying and childish behavior do not equal treason. The actions of Republicans do.
Joe Biden assumed that bipartisanship was possible. Republicans have proved that it isn’t. They reject everything he proposes. The 13 Republicans who voted for the infrastructure legislation are being vilified by Trump and the other Republicans. They are quite willing to deny our nation–and their own constituents– the needed investments in renewing bridges, tunnels, roads, and other infrastructure, just to spite Biden. They want him to fail. Is that a definition of treason? I think it is disgusting and reprehensible, but not treason. I think that their chanting of an insult (Let’s go, Brandon) is childish, stupid, beneath any adult.
I think you missed my point. When one of the two major political parties continue to cast doubt and, worse, declare a legal election to have been illegitimate and refuse to engage in governing, IT IS TREASON. Period. Full stop. There is no way to sugar coat this.
If you don’t think members of Congress who threaten electoral systems and make overt and implicit threats of violence and don’t call it what it is: treason, I can’t help you.
Ben Franklin was prescient. We are proving over and over again that we cannot maintain this republic. We have more than 400 legislative initiatives at the state level that are trying to restrict the right to vote. Voting in this country is very close to Putin-esque death. Trust me, countries around the world figured this out and that’s why they’re making long term military and economic policies in which the U.S. will not be a player. Indeed, we have become as much an enemy of democracy as Putin, Orban, etc. The only people who don’t see it are Americans.
Sorry, Greg, I was responding to a different point. Acting like a schoolyard bully is childish. Refusing to accept the results of a free and fair election endangers our system of government. I agree that it is treasonous.
Yesterday, Pew published, “Beyond Red and Blue”, an analysis of the political divisions among Americans. They present 9 groupings.
Is there reason to think that a midwest judge and prosecutor want state law to confer the right of vigilantes to enforce capital punishment for whatever crimes they, the vigilantes, conclude exist when they ride into a community with their guns loaded?
Scary times.