Marty Levine recalls the famous saying by Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. that the arc of the moral universe bends towards justice. He read a new book about police killings of Black men and wonders if Dr. King was overly optimistic. Consider this to be a validation of critical race theory.
He begins:
In 1968, shortly before he was murdered, Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr, was still giving us hope that we would overcome. Speaking at the National Cathedral, he said we needed to keep not become despondent when things seem to be stuck because “the arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends toward justice.”

I am now wondering if he was correct.
I’m reading “America on Fire”, a recently published book looking at police and community violence written by Elizabeth Hinton, a Yale Associate Professor of History & African American Studies and Law. Spurred to write by the series of police murders of Black men and women and the protests and violence that arose in response, Professor Hinton has found a history of a national failure to learn and unwillingness to confront reality. Time after time police violence was the match that set off violent uprisings in Black communities which had been marginalized and systematically kept in poverty and neglect. Time after time she found we said we knew that we needed to invest in people and communities. And time after time, she found, that we ignored these lessons and turned our resources to defending the built-in bias, expanding our police forces, and expanding our prison systems.
Hinton’s conclusion, formed after she analyzed more than 2,200 separate community outbreaks between 1964 (Harlem, New York) and 2001 (Cincinnati, Ohio) was that the conflict is more than just a symptom of racism and poverty. “They happened when police seemed to be there for no reason, or when the police intervened in matters that could be resolved internally (disputes among friends and family). Rebellions began when the police enforced laws that would almost never be applied in white neighborhoods (laws against gathering in groups of a certain size or acting like a “suspicious person”). Likewise, they erupted when police failed to extend to residents the common courtesies afforded to whites (allowing white teenagers to drink in a park but arresting Mexican American teens for the same behavior).”
Those in power were interested in protecting their power and the status quo rather than bringing the changes they promised. They listened to the voices of the hurting communities, said pious words about their now seeing the pain of those left out of the American Dream, vowed to take on the underlying and systemic problems that had been ignored, and then did little beyond strengthening the police.

“The arc of the imoral universe bends towards ju$t u$”
LikeLike
LikeLike
http://web.archive.org/web/20200302045624/https://books.google.com/books?id=eHgYAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA48#v=onepage&q&f=false
LikeLike
…and the BEAT goes on! (Pun intended) …and our work must go on in pursuit of that justice!
LikeLike
Police shootings of unarmed men, including unarmed black men, are extremely rare.
LikeLike
They aren’t nearly as rare as 17 year olds who are irreparably damaged because they elected to take an AP class in their high school that included reading a book by Toni Morrison.
Which one of those things is more important to stop right now? Ban Toni Morrison in the name of “freedom” in the fight against the supposedly “dangerous” CRT that puts Toni Morrison in the classrooms of high school seniors. When you are more outraged over CRT than police shootings of unarmed black men, that says something.
Shooting up synagogues is also extremely rare, which has nothing to do with whether we should be outraged that a white Trump supporter decided that he needed to kill Jews in Squirrel Hill.
Or maybe we should just keep pointing out, as you do, that shooting of unarmed Jews by white supremacists are extremely rare.
But not as rare as the white 17 year olds damaged by reading Toni Morrison.
LikeLike
I should hope they are extremely rare!! How rare are the shootings of unarmed white men? Talk %s not #s. How many white men are stopped for looking suspicious? % not #. In the cities? In rural communities? Suburbs. Wealthy communities? Working class? Poor? I should hope that all forms of abuse and/or discrimination are rare, but I suspect that if you walk through a predominantly white community, any abuse is more likely to be against those who don’t “fit.” Minority communities do not adopt behaviors to protect themselves from abuse for no reason. Saying shootings of unarmed men are rare adds nothing to the discussion. I know the police are not going around shooting people in my community. So what? I live in a high end largely white suburb. The crimes involving residents here are more likely to be white collar crimes that typically do not lead to armed confrontations.
LikeLike
They’re extremely rare on percentage bases for all races, especially when you look at them on a “per police encounter” basis. There’s a lot of data on this that you can look up. The idea that there is an epidemic of shootings of unarmed black men is a myth.
I can’t afford to live in a “high-end suburb,” and I’m not a suburb kind of guy, but it would must be a wonderful thing to be able to live in an area where you don’t have to fear crime.
LikeLike
Flerp
What about encounters with police. No stop and frisk ever set up at my Long Island HS . How about traffic stops of Black drivers and subsequent searches of those vehicles . Amazing how they drop at night , simply amazing. Black people must drive less at night? Or is it Police need a better vision plan.
Were you worried about crime when Bloombucket was mayor and Crime was higher for almost his entire term.
To ease your fears Murders and Shootings dropped again in October in NYC . Down now 5 months in a row since the City eased Covid restrictions. And of course Mid Town South is not exactly a high crime precinct.
Speaking about Crime . Bail reform became a critical issue on Long Island . Of course the cast of Characters pushing back on it is the same as the CRT crowd , the same as the anti vaxx crowd, the same
as the anti max crowd.
So Democrats in NY and Long Island were routed because of ” Bail Reform ” I am told .
Nassau Exec in trouble trailing waiting for the absentee vote .District attorney defeated .
Except one thing before you hide under your bed.
https://www.longisland.com/news/10-03-21/nassau-county-executive-laura-curran-announces-nassau-named-safest-community-in-america-for-second-straight-year.html
LikeLike
anti mask .
LikeLike
Why is FLERP! so casual about “rare” police shootings of unarmed black men and outraged about the extreme distress he feels about CRT theory invading our schools and about Black Lives Matters protests?
LikeLike
speduktr,
Read FLERP!’s reply carefully:
“especially when you look at them on a “per police encounter” basis”
In other words, racist folks are good with police stopping and manhandling lots of black folks as long as only a small percentage of those manhandlings end up with the police killing the person. Then they can cite how low the rate of killing is “on a per police encounter basis”.
LikeLike
Take a look at this data source: https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/investigations/police-shootings-database/
LikeLike
Unfortunately, we put so much effort into keeping the lid on with over policing, we fail to address racism and poverty. It is much easier less expensive to hire more police than enact laws that create a fair and just society. We have largely abandoned “the war on poverty.” Change will only come when enough educated black and brown people step up and have the power to address and redress systemic racism. People like Elizabeth Hinton give me hope for a better future.
LikeLike
If there is a moral universe, Wall Street is in another dimension, another universe. Fortune 500 companies form a black hole that sucks all moral matter into the Wall Street dimension and crushes it into anti moral anti matter. In the mid-twentieth century, the arc bent toward Main Street. After at least 40 years of forming monopolies and deregulating everything in sight, in the 21st century, the arc bends toward the hole.
LikeLike
I just finished Walter Johnson’s The Broken Heart of America and his conclusions seem to fit nicely with those of Hinton. I would only add to the first sentence of the final paragraph quoted in the post: …even if it meant bringing down the American system of governing to maintain power. They were willing allies and patrons…
LikeLike
The current move by many police departments toward fielding crisis intervention teams (CITs) trained to de-escalate incidents involving mental illness and domestic disputes is admirable and deserves support. This is an important part of bringing about systemic change. These need to be funded.
Serve and protect. It cannot be said often enough that those are the goals.
LikeLike
Another good thing that de Blasio is piloting in NYC.
I hope Eric Adams is able to use his “former police officer” cred to reform the police without the right wing propaganda accusing him of being pro-criminal.
LikeLike
“Rebellions began when the police enforced laws that would almost never be applied in white neighborhoods (laws against gathering in groups of a certain size or acting like a “suspicious person”). Likewise, they erupted when police failed to extend to residents the common courtesies afforded to whites…”
This, to me, has always been the real issue. Most of us occasionally “break the law” — we might drive 60 mph when the speed limit is 55. We might walk across the street at a red light instead of waiting for a walk signal because there is nary a car in sight.
I have seen this in education, also. In a classroom with 25 or 30 2nd graders, teachers “see” when a student they view as a problem whispers to a friend or unclasps her hands and punish them but “don’t see” when a child they view as a model student whispers to a friend or unclasps her hands.
And unfortunately, race can play a big role in this.
The sure way to end bad policing is to start policing white folks the very same way that non-whites in this country are policed.
Stop and frisk wealthy white teens coming out of private schools or driving in cars. Throw them on the ground, twisting their arms painfully and increase that pain because the white teen won’t “stop moving”. When the increased pain causes them to move in agony, have the police respond by using physical violence that puts those white teens in the hospital or worse. When the permanently disabled white teen’s family complains, explain that the white teen should have remained perfectly still while his shoulders were being agonizingly wrenched, just like non-white teens are supposed to be. It is the fault of the white teens that they just “look” dangerous and needed to be thrown on the ground and they should have known that if they moved a single muscle in agony at the pain, they would be rightfully shot by the police.
When police kill an unarmed white person, the “he did something that looked dangerous to me” defense is much less successful.
If white people were policed like many white people believe is okay, those white people would immediately be shouting to reform the police, stat.
There is always one law for white folks who believe they should be able to point assault weapons at law enforcement that they don’t like and no one better touch them, and one law for other people who those same white folks insist deserve to be gunned down for just “looking” dangerous.
Ruby Ridge was overreach to those white folks who are “pro-police” because white people who break the law have the right to shoot guns at law enforcement and law enforcement needs to stand down and not respond. White people are allowed to point assault weapons at law enforcement they don’t like and not be treated as if they are “dangerous”. But law enforcement has every right to view other folks – especially black ones — as dangerous and hurt them.
If white people were policed like others, the call for police reform would be immediate.
The pro-police voters want police that treat all white folks with respect but are free to treat other folks as if they are dangerous criminals.
The defund police voters want police that treat all people the way that police treat white folks.
LikeLike
Beautifully, movingly said!
LikeLike
Bingo .
Stat! politically it would never happen . As I pointed out to Flerp; never was a stop and frisk set up to deal with the rampant drug abuse at my kids award winning LI, HS . Never ever will there ever be. There would be a whole lot of Public officials looking for a Job.
LikeLike
Which is why I find it outrageous when smug parents whose kids will never be subject to that kind of treatment by police keep saying they have no problem with it.
Their snowflake children are supposedly irreparably harmed by having to wear a mask in middle or high school — can you imagine if their kid spent their teenage years not being sure if and when a policeman will put them in a painful hold and tell them if they move a muscle in response to that pain they will die?
How many teens have died because they were required to wear masks in middle school? I bet it is not nearly as many as were shot by police.
LikeLike
Surely MLK knew about Wilmington, Tulsa, and the thousands of his lynched and terrorized forebears. Like so many statements, including the ones rendered in this piece, our statements are a window into our selves. Are we optimistic? We will find the silver lining, no matter how bleak the world is. Are we pessimistic? We will snatch misery from the jaws of triumph.
Few Americans admitted that there was a problem in 1885, when white supremacy was slowly taking over the destitute South and Black southerners were beginning to think out the exodous that would turn into the Great Migration. Mark Twain castigated his fellow Americans for ignoring the plight of American Blacks and victims of the Rape of the Congo, but most people just lived in ignorance.
How will we see our time?
LikeLike
Thanks, Roy, for the reminder that we haven’t moved far from where we were back then.
LikeLike
From the article:
“[…] Professor Hinton has found a history of a national failure to learn and unwillingness to confront reality.”
Then later in the article:
“We seem trapped in an endless loop. We are more comfortable investing in another ‘new’ approach to policing even after the last ‘new’ approach got us the same bad results. We are unwilling to take a different path. That is how entrenched the America of institutionalized racism and privilege is.”
Not until we come to see, learn, and confront the reality that racism is a vicious and insidious way of thinking that invented the competition called “race,” so as to justify its rigged win-lose, superior-inferior positioning of human beings in the competition, we will remain trapped in an endless loop.
But why are we so unwilling to see, let alone learn and confront, this aspect of “the interrelated structure of reality” (MLK Jr.)? Why is it we so readily see and rail against racism’s effects, except race as racism’s root product?
For if we did, we just might have to see aspects of ourselves we prefer not to see. We just might have to see no one’s skin color bestows naturally immunity to racism nor aversion to privilege. We just might have to see we really contribute to propping up racism when we stand up for antiracism, the oppositional competition.
I recently received a letter from The King Center’s CEO, Dr. Rev. Bernice King. It speaks to fostering “Beloved Community,” given the context of policing and crime. I’ve been sitting with the letter for a while now, unsure how to respond. In any case, this is certain: No competition, whether racism or antiracism, can possibly lead to “Beloved Community.”
And that’s simply because “what affects one directly, affects all indirectly” (MLK Jr.), for the better or for the worse in many ways near and far in space and time. Competition generally affects all—both winners and losers—for the worse.
So, yes, just now, a seemingly reasonable question is: “Does the Arc of the Moral Universe Really Bend Toward Justice?” Again, seemingly reasonable.
LikeLike
Arbiters of morality- John Eastman, Trump’s man, stated, “There is no compelling state interest that permits the government to coerce people to to compel their complicity in conduct they deem to be contrary to their religious faith”.
Nations have followed Christ for more than 2,000 years. This year, once again, a church’s overt discrimination against women, was explained, “Jesus chose only men in selecting the twelve apostles. The church feels bound by Jesus’ choice. Some argue that it was the custom of the day. The rebuttal answer is, Jesus broke all kinds of cultural barriers and regularly rejected societal norms.”
Morality is whatever the people in power say it is.
LikeLike
“Jesus chose only men in selecting the twelve apostles”
Jesus needed backstabbing traitors like Judas to fulfill God’s purpose.
That’s the real reason he chose men.
LikeLike
I always enjoy the surprising twists that frequent your observations, Poet.
LikeLike
I can relate to the subject mainly as an adolescent/ young adult during 1960’s/ ‘70’s anti-VNW protests. Luckily I never encountered violence despite attending some of the most massive protests, but there were many instances of police cracking heads of peaceful protestors which transformed an initially sign-carrying, chanting crowd into chaos & worse. Often the trigger seemed to be police trying to contain/ herd the crowd into a certain preferred paradigm— crowd responding too slowly or perhaps fringe refusing to comply—followed by random violence by police, members of crowd outraged or simply dazed & not responding [appearing to police as non-compliant], hence further unjustified police violence.
MLK & kindred civil rights marches were exemplary: the corps had been schooled in non-violence à la Gandhi, & would simply go limp or lie down in street when accosted by police. That led to lots of photo ops featuring police responding in a draconian manner. That really raised consciousness.
I am stymied by rw callers-in to the CSPAN daily a.m. show, who have imagined summer 2020 BLM protests as a conflagration. They often speak of ‘burning our cities down.’ I am aware of some issues: I’m sure there was a rampant fringe looting/ vandalizing in the earliest NYC BLM protests, and we’ve all followed the goings-on in Portland. But in my own state (NJ), there were huge but peaceful protests in our major cities—I wonder if those folks even realize that? And… was any city “burned down”? The summer 2020 BLM protests seemed quite tame compared to what went on in many inner cities post-MLK assassination in the summer of ’67.
I recognize nothing I have said relates to the biased treatment of police toward blacks vs whites. It’s only about how policing of protests [black or white or mixed] seems to go bad, so often, & long has—perhaps worse now that police are decked out with surplus army eqpt, tho I don’t see much difference between now & 70 yrs ago.
That there is racial bias in policing is so obvious it goes without saying. Right here on the nearest big highway to our town, we regularly get reports of police pulling upstanding citizens over for DWB, & it happens often right in our town—police accosting people for being black while driving through a mostly-white town [which is hard to avoid while commuting]…
We also get lots of pull-overs for DWbeing a young white male, & illegal demands to step out of vehicle while they conduct a search [for drugs] on no basis [unless you count bogus claims of ‘driving erratically’]. Seems the cops here have nothing else to do. We long ago acquired a lawyer who specialized in this stuff, & taught our boys to roll the window down a few inches & flash his card. [It worked].
LikeLike
BeThree – regarding your comment in the thread of a different post… if
religious schools don’t benefit from school choice legislation, who are the state Catholic Conferences working for?
Jefferson said In every country in every age, the priest aligns with the despot.
Why do public education’s defenders exclude scrutiny of politicking (or, minimize its impact) when it’s the religious doing it?
LikeLike
“Why do public education’s defenders exclude scrutiny of politicking (or, minimize its impact) when it’s the religious doing it?”
Maybe some do but I say with Certainty not all do because I’m one of the not all do…
https://mailchi.mp/f8e06a22d998/breaking-re-open-letter-to-atlanta-faith-community-on-becoming-complicit-in-education-reform
LikeLike
Ed-
Thanks for your comment and for exposing charter schools and tax money spent on religious schools as the oligarchy’s scheme to destroy democracy.
3-13-2008
“Lobbyists for the Georgia Catholic Conference are getting behind a proposal…to use state ed. vouchers (so that students can) transfer to other schools including parochial schools.” (The Georgia Bulletin, the Newspaper of the Catholic Diocese of Atlanta)
LikeLike