Republicans have whipped up a frenzy in the states and in the conservative media that they control about “critical race theory.” They are blowing up the issue because it benefits their party in two ways:
First, it distracts public attention from the violent and unprecedented assault on the U.S. Capitol on January 6. They want to pretend that day—where their own lives were at risk—never happened. It was like “a normal tourist visit,” as one House Republican member said. It was a day of infamy that should never be forgotten, but Republicans are trying to bury it.
Second, the CRT dispute is the kind of cultural wedge issue that fires up the Republican base. They cheer as legislatures pass laws that would criminalize teaching about racism and sexism, because some students might feel bad to learn what really happened in the past.
Nikole Hannah-Jones is a celebrated journalist who has won major awards for her work. The current controversy was launched in reaction to “The 1619 Project,” which she organized and to which she contributed the introductory essay about the resilience of racism. It waspublished in a full issue of The New York Times magazine.
You know the story by now about how the journalism school at the University of North Carolina offered her the Knight Chair of Race and Investigative Journalism. But when the faculty decision reached the board of the university, they decreed that—unlike her white predecessors—she would not be offered tenure.
In response to ongoing protests by students and faculty, the board took another vote and agreed (9-4) to reverse their original decision and to offer her tenure. Hannah-Jones rejected their grudging offer and will instead create a journalism center at Howard University, the most prominent Historically Black University in the nation.
Mercedes Schneider posts here the story behind the scene, as written by Joe Killian of NC Policy Watch. Killian fills in the blanks about the influence on the original decision by Walter Hussman, the wealthy and conservative magnate who donated $25 million to UNC for the journalism school, which was renamed the Hussman School of Journalism. Initial reports suggested that he did not use his influence to affect the board’s decisions. Killian says otherwise.
Thank you, Mercedes.
Go Howard University!
https://charlotte.axios.com/264520/timeline-how-unc-lost-nikole-hannah-jones-after-all/:
“Why it matters: Hannah-Jones’s decision could ripple through academia. Howard now celebrates becoming the teaching home of two of today’s most decorated Black writers, while UNC’s leadership waits to see how the ordeal will affect its ability to recruit teachers, staff and students. Already several are leaving.
Sibby Anderson-Thompkins, UNC’s interim chief diversity officer, is moving to a Tennessee university in August. She told The Chronicle of Higher Education recently that, “I did not feel comfortable continuing to recruit for UNC.”
In June, Lisa Jones, a renowned chemistry professor UNC hoped to recruit away from a Maryland university, said she wouldn’t come to Chapel Hill because of the Hannah-Jones situation.
Also in June, UNC’s student body president Lamar Richards published an open letter that encouraged historically marginalized students to “look elsewhere” for higher education.
Sounds like UNC is getting battered black and blue over this. It’s hitting where it really hurts: reputation. I’ve taught at several college schools and came to realize schools don’t always care about quality, they just want the reputation for quality. Don’t go with the most passionate, gifted instructor or work out the most effective program. Just have Marketing put out advertising you’re the best. Schools will do anything for reputation to stay intact. I’m guessing the UNC big wigs are chewing their hands off, knowing they’re tarnished for years.
Guskiewics, the UNC Chancellor, should resign.
finally getting the kind of publicity the rest of us have been hoping to see
The background story: How Repugnicans seized upon an obscure academic critical framework to use as an excuse for becoming the Thought Police in U.S. schools:
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2021/05/gops-critical-race-theory-fixation-explained/618828/
Bob Shepherd
So lets ask a critical question. How are Democrats responding to these assaults on Education,to right wing culture wars and assaults on Democracy.
Where is Anthony Wiener when you need him(personal failures aside) . Do Democrats even know how to use language.
In 2016 Steve Bannon said he knew they were going to win because Democrats were fighting with pillows as Trump took head shots. Say what you will about Republicans, since Goldwater they had been willing to spend years in the desert to eventually seize power. No matter how many times they were told of they needed to moderate because of Demographics , they moved further each election cycle to the right. Willing to obstruct everything no matter how popular. While mobilizing their base in higher numbers. .
While Republicans appeal to their base on race and “owning the libs”,Democrats worry about the Squad turning off moderate Republicans with progressive legislation or straight talk on issues.Or worse that Hillary insulted the deplorables in the basket. While of course she took it back in the next sentence.
Democrats can’t even pass a voting rights bill no less call out Christian Nationalists . Meanwhile Oath keepers join Trump at CPAC today.
Agree with the points, Joel. Bannon’s schemes included geofencing the churches of his religion for Republican messaging.
Cameron Hilditch, a critic of the 1619 Project, wrote at National Review, “But, the only real road to religious revival is the one that begins with each parent’s first step out of the public school’s doors.”
It echoes the thinking of Paul Weyrich (Theocracy Watch) who co-founded ALEC, the religious right and the Koch’s Heritage Foundation.
Today at CPAC, a leading anti-vaccine guy was cheered for urging people to refuse the vaccine.
dianeravitch
There is a simple solution to the anti vaxxer’s . If Democrats had the will to make it. Pass a bill that stops Medicare and Medicaid services for paying for treatment of the willingly un vaccinated . And relieve hospitals from the obligation of treating them . Exactly what the Republicans did long ago on women’s health and abortion.
I doubt the private insurance industry would need any coaxing to join in.
It is at that point we would discover who the true believers are.
Ah but we are talking about Democrats .
Great idea, Joel.
Those who don’t get vaccinated should at least sign a waiver for medical care should they get Covid.
Linda
You are preaching to the choir. But then most of us are. Jefferson, Madison and several other framers would loath seeing what has happened and continues to happen to the establishment clause. There is plenty more to come from the ill gotten gains of conspiracy with a foriegn power that has resulted in seating 3 more members of the Federalist Society.
There was an” unholy” alliance under Weyrich , Falwell ,Bryant et-al between the Religious/ Protestant / Nationalist Right opposed to school integration and the economic right opposed to any economic liberal policy. They adopted abortion as a more palatable culture war as well as a war on the women’s movement . Could they say that we don’t want no ——- going to school with little Johnny and Jane. Or that medicare stinks . Adding Catholics like Barr and Leo to the mix along the way.
That alliance has morphed into an authoritarian alliance with Ultra Nationalists of Europe from Hungary to Russia .
Russian interference no problem they were on the same team before the election. Trump a philanderer and a rapist who would not know a Bible from a stack of porn magazines , no problem he gave them everything he could including prayer sessions in the WH . And of course their court picks.
But again what will Democrats do about it. Will they threaten to flood the court unless all 3 Trump appointees
resign and a 2/3s majority be reinstated to replace them?
Don’t hold your breath .
I hear you, Joel. I ask myself these same questions all the time. Too many DINOs? Too many living the life as Dudley Doolittles? Is there lead in the drinking water in the Capitol Building?
Listing the influence of the Catholic church not at all or, as a minor afterthought is popular. I speculate that the bias results from people on the left who know individual Catholics who are politically similar to them.
If progressives regardless of personal faith would step out of their comfort zone and assess the implications of the following, the common good and the rights of women, Black people, and the LGBTQ community could be advanced.
-The prestige and proximity of Georgetown and Catholic University of America to decision making in D.C. gives them outsized influence.
– The conservative Catholic majority on SCOTUS (not a single conservative protestant on SCOTUS) deliver decisions that advance their Church, e.g. Espinosa and Biel decisions.
-The training manual of Paul Weyrich who was Catholic and who co-founded ALEC, the religious right and the Koch’s Heritage Foundation
advances theocracy.
– The sites of state Catholic Conferences show they aggressively back school choice (not just policies for their own schools). Some co-host with the Koch’s AFP rallies in state capitols. At least two publicly take credit for the school choice legislation in their states.
-Steve Bannon’s Catholic faith drives him politically.
-The quote of the right wing’s favorite Pope is quoted at Catholic organization sites, “Good Catholics should meddle in politics…”
-Catholic organizations are the 3rd largest U.S. employer, a position they achieved due to tax dollars given to their schools whose teachers are now exempt from civil rights employment law, to their hospitals some of which have affiliated doctors who use their religious faith in medical decisions for patients, for their social agencies some of which discriminate against gay people, etc
– The head of the world’s largest lay organization, the Knights of Columbus, is a former legislative aide to Jesse Helms. Various media reported the organization politicked for the benefit of a GOP candidate.
Hungary is 54% Catholic.
Great Post! Go read all of it!
I was reminded of an objection from my wife as we noticed a big sign off I40 on our way to Chapel Hill, NC yesterday. It pointed to an exit for Martha Sundquist Forest, named for the wife of a former governor. My wife said she felt mixed feelings for the preservation of the forest near the Great Smoky Mountains. While she loved the preservation of the area, she wondered if it might not have been better named for a biologist who spent a life studying the area and adding to the argument needed for its preservation.
On a related matter, I saw a rather ordinary overpass near Hattiesburg, MS dedicated to the Veterans of the Armed service.
We name stuff for people all the time. Buildings, roads, parks. I know a culvert named for an old acquaintance. I guess this is OK. But the great cathedrals of Europe are not named for humans they knew. Rather, the builders of them were silent artists. I like humility better.
Note to Hussman: shut up.
Thanks, Roy, for your typical wisdom. It’s pretty disgusting that billionaires get buildings and institutes and schools and libraries named for them. The Sackler name was stripped from many—but not all—of the places they endowed with opioid profits.
Despite stripping the names from buildings, I bet the influence still exists behind the façade in many cases.
Some Universities are just trying to appear to have rid themselves of the bad actors when behind the scenes, it’s undoubtedly business as usual.
The only really serious ones are the Universities who donate ALL the money from tainted sources to charities. To their credit, MIT donated all the money they got from Jeffrey Epstein to charities benefitting victims of sex trafficking and other abuse.
But many Universities don’t do that. Harvard refused to donate the millions they got from Epstein. They pretended that they didn’t really know what was going on and that that absolved them of responsibility. The money from Epstein was a drop in the bucket for Harvard, which has an endowment of $40 billion and gets over half a billion in federal research grants every year. That Harvard refused means that the people running the university have no ethical standards to speak of.
This is from a 2006 story in the Harvard Crimson about Epstein’s arrest in July of 2006 for solicitation of prostitution, at which time the” Palm Beach Police Department…said it had probable cause to also charge Epstein with lewd and lascivious molestation and unlawful sexual activity with a minor”
https://www.thecrimson.com/article/2006/9/13/harvard-to-keep-epstein-gift-after/
Harvard officials were not as in the dark as they later claimed
I suspect that UNC was at least as concerned with the reaction of the state legislature. Running a public university in a state with a republican dominated legislature is very difficult. Private universities like Howard have much more room to maneuver.
I expect that the UNC board was uncomfortable with this hire. Their decision to award her tenure was 9-4. That’s like getting a birthday card saying that the board wishes you a happy birthday by a vote of 9-4. NHJ is unusually accomplished. UNC lost a star.
Because the GOP state legislators tilt racist?
Because many republican legislators are Trump supporters. Public universities in states where republicans hold the legislature do not dare require vaccines from employees and students. Private universities are free to require them.
And, they are not Trump supporters in part because of his expressed views about people of color?
Most likely true, but then again I think that a good number of racists have been vaccinated.
I haven’t seen or heard of surveys of how many racists have been vaccinated. But I read that Democrats have been vaccinated at far higher rates than Republicans. If you look at a map where the rates are lowest, they are all states that Trump won.
I am sure UNC touted their work in “diversity” and “unity” and all those good campus words. Then they turned their back on that.
Could charter schools face the same dilemma?
Charter schools and CRT! Hmm, a catch-22 to get funders who want to legislate out crt?
All these charter schools that open on the premise of serving the underserved black students in their areas, hold seminars on diversity and institutional racism and promote all that they do that “the city schools can’t do” – – – must then espouse Critical Race Theory. Yes?
So what do they tell their funders?
We want you billions and deregulation through privatization and a lot of tax money in order to serve children who are black and underserved – but oh no, we don’t believe there is any racism or need to teach white kids (period) about slavery and the truth of U.S. history so please keep sending us money and keep us out of the news in this crt debate.
Actually in states where Trump supporters have been elected to office I think charter schools are in a better position to resist these ant-crt efforts than traditional public schools.
This is a symptom of a much bigger and widespread problem: the influence of big donars on University decisions.
Universities are trading influence for dollars with entirely predictable results.
Some entire University departments at Universities have been bought and are now effectively controlled by big donars.
Especially the Economics departments .
Joel,
I’m curious about your experience with economics departments. I have been a member of a handful of economics departments over my 33 years in the academy but have not seen this. Could you name the departments and how they are controlled by donors?
Read Nancy McLean’s excellent book “Democracy in Chains,” which describes the Koch-funded economics department.
Dr. Ravitch,
Her book is primarily about a single economist (now long dead) and his efforts to get the country to adopt the policies that he thought best.
I had hoped that Joel could provide a list of economics departments that have been bought and are now effectively controlled by big downers.
The economist that Nancy McLean wrote about has many today who agree with his extreme libertarian views. After I reviewed her book favorably in the NY Review of Books, I heard from many of them.
My point exactly in the k-12 world.
Donors own the charter movement. But if that charter happens to teach about systemic racism, free thinking, U.S. history prior to 1776 (as if everything was wonderful after), the works of Ogbu, DuBois, Ellison, Woodson and others… well what’s a billionaire to do?
I don’t think the billionaire funders care about CRT. The Republican legislators do, mostly because it riles up their base when the pols say the teachers are indoctrinating their children and teaching them to ”hate America.” Texas historians have debunked the myths taught about the Alamo. Some of its defenders were fighting to protect slavery. The politicians won’t allow the discussion in public schools. It’s sacrilegious, they think.
dianeravitch
What would John Wayne fans have to say about that. The authors actually pointed out that slavery was banned in Mexico between 1821 and 1829 . The underground railroad ran South as well. Damn learning history was easier from Disney
Speaking of the Alamo, “Forget the Alamo” is the wrong idea. It should be Remember the Real Alamo. “Defund the Police” and “Forget the Alamo” are overly provocative and doom any hope of progress. I see the media purposely picking fights on social issues to avoid economic ones.
Remember the Ammo!
Remember the Ammo!
The AR 15
Remember the cammo!
The tan and the green
Remember Secession!
The War that was just
Remember with passion!
Remember we must!
Poet-
Superb. News sites and political posts should be expanded so that they include political cartoons and your political poems.
I hope you send the Ammo one to the editor of a Texas publication.
Thanks, but no thanks.
The very last thing I desire is to have a cammo wearing , ammo loaded AR 15 toting Texan hunting me down.
And I am being dead serious about not wanting to be dead.
I once ran into the “encampment” of a cammo donned, heavily armed militia on a shooting spree in southern Utah when I was hiking around.
Parts of the West still have the same mentality they had 150 years ago.