The New York Times reported that the billionaires are investing in the leading candidates, and that their biggest issue is the expansion of charter schools. Although many people have already voted, Tuesday is the official election.
When Andrew Yang led the pack, he received big contributions to his super PAC. When Eric Adams surged ahead of Yang, the big money flowed to him.
With the exception of George Soros, who is backing Maya Wiley, the leading progressive in the race, the billionaires are all connected to charter schools. You might notice that the story doesn’t raise the question of why some of the richest people in the nation are committed to private management of public money.
The NY Times reports:
Together, billionaires have spent more than $16 million this year on super PACs that are primarily focused on the mayoral primary campaign that ends on Tuesday — the first mayoral election in the city’s history to feature such loosely regulated organizations devoted to individual candidates.
Overall, super PAC spending in the mayor’s race has exceeded $24 million, according to the New York City Campaign Finance Board, making up roughly 30 percent of the $79 million spent on the campaign.
The impact has been dramatic: a deluge of campaign mailers and political ads on radio, television and the internet, especially in recent weeks, as the unusually large field of Democratic candidates vied to win over an electorate distracted by the pandemic.
Dedicated super PACs exist for all but one of the eight major Democratic candidates, but half of the billionaires’ spending has benefited just three of the field’s more moderate contenders: Eric Adams, the Brooklyn borough president who is considered the front-runner; Andrew Yang, the 2020 presidential candidate and a top rival; and Raymond J. McGuire, a former Citigroup executive who trails in the polls.
At least 14 individuals that Forbes magazine has identified as billionaires have donated to mayoral-related super PACs. Several run companies that are headquartered in New York City, while others have interests that would benefit from a good relationship with City Hall, and they are hedging their bets in an apparent effort to improve their chances of backing the winner.
Steven A. Cohen, the hedge fund billionaire who owns the Mets, donated $500,000 to Mr. Yang’s super PAC and $500,000 to Mr. Adams’s in mid-May, when the two candidates were leading the polls. But as Mr. Yang’s support appeared to wane and Mr. Adams’s grew, Mr. Cohen cut off Mr. Yang and donated another $1 million to Mr. Adams.
A similar trajectory characterizes the giving patterns of Daniel S. Loeb, another hedge fund billionaire and an outspoken supporter of charter schools and former chairman of Success Academy Charter Schools. He donated $500,000 to Mr. Adams’s super PAC and $500,000 to Mr. Yang’s super PAC in mid-May. Three weeks later, as Mr. Adams was cementing his front-runner status, Mr. Loeb gave Mr. Adams’s super PAC another $500,000.
Both Mr. Adams and Mr. Yang have expressed support for charter schools.
The flood of money — which has also affected other key contests like the Manhattan district attorney’s race — comes as the pandemic has illuminated the stark differences between the city’s have and have-nots even as the mayor’s race has been more focused on gun crime and public safety than on inequality.
The super PACs also threaten to undermine New York City’s campaign finance system, which is designed to combat the power of big money in politics by using city funds to match small donations.
This year, the city rolled out an enhanced version of that system, offering richer rewards for small donations, and has thus far handed out more than $39 million to the mayoral candidates. But it is far from clear that New York City’s campaign finance system — considered a national model — can withstand the big-money onslaught wrought by the Supreme Court’s Citizens Uniteddecision of 2010, which allowed outside groups to spend an unlimited amount of money in elections.
A super PAC played a small role in the last competitive mayoral primary in 2013, when an animal rights group helped fund a super PAC that attacked Christine Quinn, then the City Council speaker who had been a favorite in the race, because of her support for horse-drawn carriages in Central Park.
The following year, the courts struck down a state cap on the size of contributions to super PACs.
“Now in 2021, New York City has a term-limited Democratic incumbent with no heir apparent, which has led to a wide open mayoral race run with campaigns run by consultants with deep experience using candidate super PACs in federal campaigns,” said John Kaehny, the executive director of Reinvent Albany.
Super PACs are theoretically independent of the political campaigns, and their spending is not supposed to be coordinated with individual candidates. But questions of the funds’ independence emerged in April, when New York City’s Campaign Finance Board withheld the release of public matching funds to the campaign of Shaun Donovan, who served as the Obama administration’s housing secretary and budget director.
The board wanted to delve into the relationship between Mr. Donovan’s campaign and the super PAC supporting him, New Start N.Y.C., which is largely funded by his father. The board eventually released the matching funds.
“Who’s going to be mayor matters to a lot of people with a lot of money,” said Lawrence Norden, the director of the electoral reform program at the Brennan Center for Justice. “You have to ask yourself when people are spending tens of thousands of dollars or hundreds of thousands of dollars to support a candidate, why are they doing it and what do they hope to get out of it?”
Yes, indeed. Why are the billionaires so eager to expand charter schools (NYC has almost 300 of them, attended by 12% of the city’s students)? Surely they don’t expect to turn the city’s 1.1 million student school system into a large-scale New Orleans. What is their plan? No one asked.

Thank you for this post. This is why I just don’t think I can rank Kathryn Garcia anywhere on my list – her determination to “lift the cap” is one of the most ill-conceived, ignorant platforms of any candidate. She is too smart not to know exactly what that will do to public schools. Even Yang and Adams haven’t gone that far, despite their funding, and I wonder how much funding her campaign gets, too, especially now that she and Yang seems to be so cozy.
“Why are the billionaires so eager to expand charter schools (NYC has almost 300 of them, attended by 12% of the city’s students)? ”
Those billionaires who are supporting charters also seem to give a lot more money to Republicans in national elections so their aim is clear and they haven’t been able to bring many national Democrats to their side. They want to undermine public schools.
No one who gives generously to right wing Republican candidates or PACs — which many of those billionaires donating to the Mayoral campaign do — cares about poor kids. If they did, they would care that their families are struggling, not just fund privately operated charters to undermine their public schools with their oft-repeating falsehoods about their “success”.
LikeLike
The number of charter schools in NYC is capped by state law, it is unlikely that the cap will be increased, the opposition to charters, especially in the State Senate, is outspoken and firm. The billionaires are more interested in land use decisions- developers rule!!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I hope you are right about it being unlikely that the charter cap will increase (or just be lifted altogether).
Although the fact that a candidate is advocating for the charter cap to be lifted gives some insight into that candidate’s integrity and desire to run public schools. It basically says that the candidate has no interest in education and is happy to have a huge portion of the NYC education budget – an unlimited amount – be given to schools that the candidate will not have any power over.
LikeLike
That’s the irony. When the mayor opens more charter schools, it’s an admission that the mayor has no plan but hopes that charter managers might. It’s an abdication of the mayor’s responsibility.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Peter Goodman
Absolutely true. Steve Ross whose Related Industries is the largest Developer in the Country is leading and coordinating that effort .
Charters come into the story as part of a neo liberal assault that seeks to privatize Government services and limit regulation . From infrastructure to education.
And sadly Adams is in the lead because of a media hyped crime problem ,that doesn’t exist . If you felt safe in 2011 when Bloomberg was calling NYC the safest big City in the Country; the NYPD crime stats say you are safer today.
LikeLike
important point: a developers’ game
LikeLike
Excellent point—and precisely what’s going on in FL. Here is Jax, two beloved neighborhood schools were closed—but shiny new KIPP & IDEA schools will soon replace them. Our state laws squarely prefer charters, development & management companies over locally-controlled districts. Their leaders stalled a 1/2-cent referendum to repair old schools (mainly in depressed areas) for over a year. Same ol’…
LikeLiked by 1 person
CRIME and defunding police. The former police Captain will get it.
LikeLike
What crime. If you remember the bad old days in 2011 or 12 when Bloombucket called this the safest big City in America , you are safer today.
The NYPD / PBA runs a great Willie Horton campaign .
Click to access seven-major-felony-offenses-2000-2020.pdf
LikeLike
April Featherkile,
But the NYPD is all in for Andrew Yang, who is NOT a former police captain.
How do you explain the NYPD’s dislike of Eric Adams, the former police captain, in favor of the guy who got rich running a test prep company?
LikeLike
I know NYC race is tightening up as it takes turns to certain issue. I still can’t get why NYC comptroller Scott Stringer got screwed by questionable sexual harassment allegation. It came from his former volunteer named Jean Kim, who used to work for his campaign, and the NYT spun that story. Neither the NYT nor Kim was able to corroborate the allegation, yet the smear campaign eventually cost Stringer’s bid.
I know this is water under bridge, but I personally would not let this pass because it’s quite upsetting. The left literally bought into the allegation and destroyed his reputation.
Here’s the scoop written by Andrea Gabor.
https://www.cjr.org/criticism/scott-stringer-new-york-mayoral-race-allegations.php
LikeLike
It is worse than that. Patricia Pastor the lawyer who represented Kim had spent much of her career as a union buster in the employ of NYC Developers including Steve Ross and Non Union Construction Companies. Stringer was set up because of his support for Unions . Pastor’s career as a Sexual Harassment Attorney was spent mostly defending those companies against complaints of sexual harassment .
LikeLike
Yes.
I realized today that the rich and powerful billionaires saw Scott Stringer as their biggest threat — much as the Trump White House saw Biden as their biggest threat. The far right attempts to smear Biden did not work because of the accuser’s credibility problems.
The NYT has simply stopped all reporting on the far more serious and credible allegations against Gov. Cuomo as if they simply never happened, but the accusation against Stringer reminds me of the one against Aziz Ansari.
LikeLike
Thanks for reading!
LikeLike
The sad part to me is how they totally dominate any debate.
I looked for one of the charter candidates proposals for public schools, might be important considering the vast majority of students attend one, and this is what I got:
Developing a whole-child approach
Expanding learning options in the summer
Increasing job training in high schools
Creating the best remote learning experience in the world
“Developing a whole child approach”. LOL. Can any of you tell me in plain language what this candidate plans for PUBLIC schools?
NYC is about to find out what we learned in Ohio- when ed reformers dominates the discussion, public schools drop off the agenda.
Why would NYC need to vastly expand remote learning anyway? This huge city doesn’t have enough real life experiences for students? They have to sit in front of a screen?
LikeLiked by 1 person
“when ed reformers dominate the discussion, public schools drop off the agenda”
LikeLiked by 1 person
YES
LikeLike
It is obscene the way the super-rich use their weaponized wealth against democracy. The only hope for a fair election is to limit spending in some way or only allow verified residents to contribute to candidates.
LikeLike
I’m with you on that, @retired teacher. I would also like to add that many NYC public school parents are tired of the poor coverage of education issues in the NYT. There seems to be no journalism going on at the NYT anymore when it comes to education. It’s like they are an arm of the super-rich’s weaponized wealth against democracy.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I have read that education journals/sites have been bombarded with big money from sources like the Koch Brothers and Gates: take over the narrative
LikeLike