An anonymous tipster at the Internal Revenue Service gave Pro Publica the tax returns of America’s richest people. This act was illegal. But it showed how little the billionaires paid, in some years, nothing at all.
The Washington Post, which is owned by billionaire Jefff Bezos, published the story without pulling punches.
The wealthiest Americans — including Warren Buffett, Elon Musk and Jeff Bezos — paid little in federal income taxes at times in recent years despite soaring fortunes, according to Internal Revenue Service data obtained by ProPublica.
The release of the records sent shock waves through Washington, with the federal government referring the unauthorized disclosure to investigators and some Democrats saying the revelations affirmed their long-held view that the richest Americans are able to shield much of their wealth from taxation.
The information published Tuesday shows how billionaires are able to legally reduce their tax burden, highlighting how the American tax system can hit ordinary wage earners harder than the richest people in the country. That’s often because the richest Americans tend to have their wealth tied up in stocks and real estate, allowing them to avoid taxes on unrealized profits….
ProPublica analyzed the data by focusing on the soaring fortunes of the country’s wealthiest people in recent years and asserted they were paying a “true tax rate” of just 3.4 percent. The news organization came up with that rate by calculating estimates of the value of their stock portfolios and other assets and then how much they paid in federal income taxes. That is not how tax rates are normally measured.
The core issue for many of these billionaires is how their income grows compared with how their wealth grows. The U.S. tax system focuses on income, not what is known as unrealized gains from unsold stocks, real estate or other assets….
Biden has rejected a so-called wealth tax, such as the one proposed during the presidential campaign by Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), which would institute a tax on unsold assets for the ultrarich.
Biden has also proposed raising taxes on corporations, a number of which pay little if any corporate income taxes, according to some estimates. The president has also pushed to require wealthy people to pay taxes on all previously untaxed capital gains when they die, a change from current policy.
Another way of taxing wealth has been floated by Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), who has proposed an annual tax on unrealized gains on stocks and bonds for wealthy individuals.
Warren said the new details about wealthy taxpayers supported her proposal for an annual tax on assets above $50 million for ultrarich individuals, undercutting criticism that valuing nonliquid investments would be too complex. Those people appear to hold the majority of their wealth in public-company stock, which is easy to value, she said.
“What this shows is, actually, it’s not that hard to value hundreds of billions of dollars of wealth and tax it on an annual basis,” Warren said…
The IRS publishes a report on the taxes paid by the top 400 taxpayers based on adjusted gross income. The most recent version, which uses anonymous data, showed that in 2014 these richest Americans paid an average 23.13 percent federal income tax rate…
The records, though, purport to show Buffett, head of Berkshire Hathaway, as having paid $23.7 million in federal income taxes on total income of $125 million from 2014 to 2018, which would indicate a personal income tax rate of 19 percent. ProPublica estimated that Buffett saw his wealth soar by $24.3 billion during that period and so his “true tax rate” was 0.10 percent.
Buffett has in the past called for tougher restrictions on the wealthy to prevent them avoiding taxes.
Likewise, Musk, chief executive of Tesla, paid $455 million on $1.52 billion in income during the same period, when his wealth grew by $13.9 billion, accounting for a “true tax rate” of 3.27 percent, according to ProPublica.
Bezos, chief executive of Amazon and the owner of The Washington Post, paid $973 million in taxes on $4.22 billion in income, as his wealth soared by $99 billion, resulting in a 0.98 percent “true tax rate.”

Leaked IRS Files: Billionaires Bezos, Musk, Bloomberg, Buffett Avoided Taxes as Wealth Soared:
https://www.democracynow.org/2021/6/9/propublica_irs_docs_wealthy_tax_avoidance?utm_source=Democracy+Now%21&utm_campaign=19813005b6-Daily_Digest_COPY_01&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_fa2346a853-19813005b6-192272069
LikeLiked by 1 person
Last year Trump’s tax cuts for the wealthy artificially “juiced” the stock market as the wealthy were buying stocks with their additional revenue. My husband had a very good year in the stock market last year. Unlike billionaires we do not have tax write-offs and loopholes that are available to the super-wealthy. They have lobbied so much they pay a much lower rate than the rest of us. Working people have no loopholes, and they pay a graduated amount based on income. Our rate last year was about 17%, a much higher percentage than many billionaires. I don’t object to paying taxes, but the system should be fairly applied to all including billionaires.
LikeLiked by 1 person
We can start by eliminating the Capital Gaines rate and Dividend rate . Treating all income the same.
LikeLike
It’s good to be a king in America
LikeLike
Said the Queen of Mean, Leona Helmsley, “ONLY the little people pay taxes . . . !”
LikeLike
Maybe we should change the name of the country to Rajasthan.
LikeLike
There was nothing surprising in this report. That extremely wealthy people, who are the ones who benefit the most from our economic systems, pay less to maintain these systems is old news. Candidate Trump derided taxpayers openly as “chumps” who were not smart enough to take advantage of the system. It was part of his trash the government philosophy.
That discussion of this matter is not a political death sentence for anyone wanting to sustain it is a savage indictment of the competence of the American voter. Have we lost all sense of fairness? Why can no political leader unite disparate parts of the electorate around the issue of who pays for services?
LikeLike
My husband works part-time for the Census Bureau, but not for the ten year survey. He mostly does health surveys for the NIH and the CDC. We live in a conservative part of Florida. Before Trump the right of refusal to participate was about 15%. Now the refusal rate is about 50% due to the mistrust in government that Trump promoted, I think.
LikeLike
During the 2016 debates, a candidate accused Trump of paying no taxes. His response: that shows I’m smart. He didn’t explain how our society would pay for Social Security, Medicare, and the military if no one paid their taxes, like him.
LikeLike
The wealthy don’t care about working people. Republicans are too busy figuring out schemes to privatize most government services so working people can be victims of privatization where they pay more for a worse service.
LikeLike
BTW, there is a story out today about the millions of kids, nationwide, who have tested positive for Covid. Now, many of those are dealing (as I am) with the range of complications that go under the umbrella term long Covid.
LikeLike
We need to require that all the older kids be vaccinated, and we need to make sure that they all have N95 or K95 masks.
LikeLike
I wish the government had conducted two trials at the same time. If they had done 12 to 18 and 5 to 11 at the same time, school age children could have had the vaccine before the start of the new school year. According to Dr. Fauci they intend to start with 11 year olds and work their way down year by year. It could take some time to reach most children, and we know some parents will refuse to vaccinate their children.
LikeLiked by 1 person
My son has one shot, but we’re holding off on the second while we look at the research coming out of Israel.
LikeLike
retired teacher,
I think the vaccine testing is designed to do the least harm, which is (in my mind) a good idea. While COVID can be serious for kids 11 and younger, it just wasn’t the same level as with adults, and testing young children before you confirm there aren’t problems with 12-15 year olds doesn’t seem indicated. They did begin testing younger children when it was clear from the testing of 12-15 year olds that the risk of any adverse reactions was likely to be very low.
The argument that children under 12 can spread the virus is a good reason to require vaccines to attend schools when the vaccines are safe. But I don’t think it’s a good enough reason to change reasonable testing protocols designed to minimize the harm done to the youngest children participating in the testing process.
LikeLike
Districts probably won’t even be requiring all teachers and staff to be vaccinated. Given the age stratification of this virus’s risks, it seems a little nuts to require students to be vaccinated if the same requirement isn’t applied to the adults in the building.
LikeLike
As long as Bezos, Musk, Buffett, and Gates are vaccinated, it’s all good. The rest of us are not meritorious of anything.
LikeLike
Wonder how long Bill will wait, after the recent revelations, before he reinvents education for all of us again. Ofc, he has all those astroturf organizations and pretend think tanks that he funds to continue his attack on US education while he lays low for a time.
LikeLike
Heck, I’m surprised the meritocratic billionaire winners even let children who attend public schools breathe air in the first place.
LikeLike
I have two students, rising juniors, that I know of that have long Covid. Both of them are athletes and had no preexisting conditions, and now can’t go up a flight of stairs without wheezing. I expect I have far more students with long Covid. Utah was in school all year and says that it worked “fine,” because few children died, but no one has measured long Covid. FLERP, you are making a mistake by waiting. The vaccine just isn’t as protective after only one dose.
LikeLiked by 1 person
This was the shocker for me, after recovery. It was as though I had aged ten years. I have started an exercise routine to attempt to recover–to get back to where I was, and this is helping, but what this took out of me was breathtaking.
LikeLike
https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/covid-19-vaccines/advice
“Children should not be vaccinated for the moment.
There is not yet enough evidence on the use of vaccines against COVID-19 in children to make recommendations for children to be vaccinated against COVID-19. Children and adolescents tend to have milder disease compared to adults. However, children should continue to have the recommended childhood vaccines.”
LikeLike
FLERP!
The number of teens with vaccine induced Myocarditis would seem to be a mere fraction of those who suffer the same complication from Covid. Of course you would have to do a randomized MRI study to see how many undetected cases there were in vaccinated teens. But even if you used 9/ 1597 it would seem to be the case.
” The study of 1,597 COVID-19 positive Big Ten athletes who had cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) screening found 2.3% were diagnosed with myocarditis and most didn’t exhibit symptoms of the rare disease, a leading cause of sudden death in competitive athletes. Of the 37 athletes diagnosed with myocarditis, 28 didn’t exhibit symptoms. ”
6/7/21
LikeLike
Charter school lobbying shop has some fancy speakers this year:
https://ncsc.publiccharters.org/speakers
It’s funny how all these tech titans promote and market charter schools and bash public schools, yet they’re all more than happy to push their products into our schools.
Public schools are good enough to buy hundreds of millions of dollars of garbage ed tech junk and devices, but they’re not good enough to get a tech billionaire supporter or advocate.
The best reason not to buy this cheap gimmicky junk is it’s cheap gimmicky junk and they’d never dream of pushing it into the exclusive private schools their own children attend, but the second best reason not to buy it is because the sellers don’t support the public schools who are their biggest customers.
LikeLike
It is sad that Cardona is a speaker at this privatization conference. What is he doing for public schools? Authorizing more testing so he can feed the privatization pipeline?
LikeLike
I know this is a pipedream, but maybe if there is enough pressure and publicity it could happen:
It would be amazing if Cardona shocked the pro-charter crowd by making a speech that popped their false narratives. It would be the equivalent of “she who must not be named” (the Dem candidate for president in 2016) appearing at South Carolina town hall with a pro-charter host and crowd and stating loudly and clearly that charters don’t take the most difficult students, and if they do, they do not keep them.
I see that Roland Martin is part of this conference. He was the host of that town hall in South Carolina where “she who must not be named” gave voice to the truth about charters. The look on his face was priceless and he changed the subject as quickly as possible.
I doubt that Cardona will do that, but he MIGHT do that if the prominent progressives ask the right questions (and not just bash the Biden administration). As AOC pointed out, the reason to elect at Democrat is that progressives can lobby them. Republicans don’t care what progressives say. But when prominent progressive leaders in their own party are loudly asking why the franchise to teach only the least expensive students is being given to privately operated schools when public schools could run “magnet schools for good kids” just as easily, the White House has to listen.
Sadly, no progressive politicians seem to have a good handle on this issue. Bernie and Warren could be making it an issue but they don’t seem to care enough.
(FYI, no need to post that “she who must not be named” got pushback in 2015. She did. The point is that progressive politicians are supposedly not afraid of pushback and in 2015 no one had “she who must not be named”‘s back. Just like no one had de blasio’s back when he went up against charters. But times have changed and if prominent progressive leaders did nothing but talk about this for a week, it would pressure the administration not to look like they were endorsing the idea of taking money from public schools and paying to outsource the one thing public schools do well.)
BLM had no support from prominent Dems until it did. Things change.
LikeLike
This is disgusting. And the event’s main sponsor is the Walton Foundation.
This is where there needs to be some loud progressive voices like AOC and Jamaal Bowman and Warren and Sanders. And their voices have to be smart.
It is not helpful at all to hear people who support charter schools yelling “Biden corrupt, charter schools evil”. All that does is make parents tune out because they believe the people saying it just “hate charters”.
What IS helpful is to repeat one message over and over again: Why is the Biden administration supporting privately run schools that demand the right to take taxpayer dollars from our local public schools and give them to privately operated charters that refuse to teach the most expensive students and dump students they don’t want to teach back in the public school system?
And the follow up to whatever nonsensical justification that charter supporters give for why charters should be given the special franchise to educate the easiest to teach students should be:
Is the Biden administration saying that our public school systems are incapable of operating schools that only teach motivated students whose parents have to adhere to certain rules to have them attend? Isn’t the one area where public schools have succeeded?
If public schools start copying the charters “best practices” of charters and dumping students they don’t want to teach for someone else to educate, will the Biden Administration direct extra public dollars to those public schools to reward them for dumping their most expensive to educate students?
Does the Biden Administration agree with the pro-charter folks that the students charters don’t want to teach don’t deserve an education at all and charters don’t have to teach any kid who they don’t want to teach regardless of whether that student wins the lottery?
Should public schools dump all their students that don’t score high enough on exams so that the Biden administration will treat them like charters and reward them with more money?
Critics who have a public platform – like AOC – need to demand answers to questions and follow up if those answers are illogical or based on falsehoods.
LikeLike
^^correction: It is not helpful to hear people who do NOT support charter schools yelling…..
LikeLike
Well said. Great expression. “And the follow up to whatever nonsensical justification that charter supporters give for why charters should be given the special franchise to educate the easiest to teach students should be.”
LikeLike
I will not support taxing someone on their alleged wealth growth from stocks and property when it is not the same as wages. What goes up can also go down as long as it is held in stocks or property.
However, if and when the wealthy sell those stocks and/or property, they should be heavily taxed based on capital gains.
In addition, there should be a massive death tax for the wealthy that is much larger than the capital gains tax when they are still alive. That means when someone like Bill Gates dies every penny linked to him no matter where it is sitting ends up being taxed at 90 percent. Even the money in the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
A 90 percent death tax for the rich. To pay that tax, enough stocks and property must be sold leaving only 10 percent to a billionaire or millionaire’s heirs.
No loopholes or tax shelters allowed.
The death tax for the wealthy should be set at 90-percent of their total gross worth.
LikeLike
The sad thing is that we have pretty much known this for a long time. Nothing really surprising except the details. Warren Buffett himself said years ago that his overall tax rate was lower than his assistant’s. The Republicans are able to convince their supporters that rich people still pay too much. The false narrative that is still being pushed is that raising their taxes hurts the economy and thus everyone — and it doesn’t matter whether that has been categorically proven false in 1993 and 2009 when Democratic presidents raised taxes on the rich and the economy soared. The NYT recently published an article in which it treated as a “both sides” issue the question of whether cutting taxes for the rich would help the economy even though that has been tried and bankrupted the economy. It’s still an open question to them! It might still work! Trickle down might be good! Who knows?
One thing I found odd in this article is that the article could have named the Waltons or the Kochs or Gates or Zuckerberg or the late Sheldon Adelson. Were certain billionaires’ data protected? Warren Buffett? Yes he’s super rich, but there are 3 different mega billionaire Walton siblings whose combined fortunes are astonishing.
LikeLike
Biden’s attorney general, rather than worrying about how it is that the obscenely rich pay no taxes, is instead going after the journalists who let us know that the obscenely rich pay no taxes. https://preaprez.wordpress.com/2021/06/10/attorney-general-garland-promises-to-find-the-whistle-blowers-and-prosecute-them-protecting-bezos-and-musk-is-his-top-priority/
But you only have to worry about freedom of the press when the Orange Man is saying mean things about mainstream stenographers.
LikeLike
Why would Biden’s attorney general spend his time worrying about how it is that the obscenely rich pay no taxes? We all know why already – because the law allows them. And the Republicans who won in 2017 with help from those who were (at the time) unconcerned about the rich paying even lower taxes made sure that their taxes were reduced even more. I didn’t see your regrets back when the Republicans passed their tax cuts for the rich in 2017 without a single Democratic vote and Trump signed it into law.
I guess you don’t understand the connection between empowering lawmakers who believe in low taxes and and empowering lawmakers who want to raise taxes on obscenely rich Americans. There is no difference to you.
And, if you don’t like what the Democrats do, shouldn’t you be really concerned about the Republicans making it as hard as possible for the Americans likely to be most progressive to vote?
Nothing will change if people who might be progressive can’t vote. The Republicans don’t want them to vote. Every single elected Democrat could take their marching orders from you and you still wouldn’t get what you want because the Supreme Court whose right wing composition was enabled by those who refused to vote for the Dem in 2016 would block it. Every single elected Democrat could take their marching orders from you and whatever legislation managed to get pass will be repealed in 2023 because the Republicans in states all over the country have worked in disenfranchse progressive voters so they can achieve a huge victory in the Senate and House.
LikeLike
Excellent response, NYC public school parent!
LikeLike
On an entirely different note: Isn’t it nice to have, for a change, a president whom other world leaders aren’t laughing at during summits?
LikeLike