Gayle Green is a professor emeritus at Scripps College. In this post, she rages about the stupidity of the Biden testing mandate. In other areas of American life, we learn from our mistakes and move forward. But our policymakers are stuck in the past, so in love with failed ideas that they can’t let go of them.
She writes:
There’s hope in the air, a scent of spring, anticipation of change, democracy may pull through. Why, then, with K-12 public schools, the broken promise, the dismay?
Biden raised hopes when he promised, Dec 16, 2019, that he’d “commit to ending the use of standardized testing in public schools,” saying (rightly) that “teaching to a test underestimates and discounts the things that are most important for students to know.” Yet on Feb 22, his Department of Education did an about-face, announcing, “we need to understand the impact COVID-19 has had on learning …parents need information on how their children are doing.”
How the children are doing? They’re struggling, that’s how, doing their best, and so are teachers and parents. And it’s the least advantaged who are struggling the most, who, in the transition to online teaching, are likeliest to be without access to the internet, whose families are most vulnerable to loss of jobs, health care, lives. Now this? It costs $1.7 billion to administer these tests, but the toll on kids— the tears, terrors, alienation— is incalculable.
Most people have no idea what a blight these exams are, how they’ve stripped K-12 curricula of civics, history, literature, the arts, languages, even the sciences. Since schools live or die on the basis of test scores, what does not get tested does not get taught, and education is reduced to a mindless drill of math and English skills. No wonder kids come out of school wanting never to read another book, knowing nothing about science, the past, how to read their world. No wonder teachers are leaving in droves; the teacher shortage was dire even before the pandemic. When Betsy DeVos waived these tests last spring, teachers were so relieved that some said it had been worth the move online, to have 6-8 weeks liberated for teaching.
The high-stakes standardized testing regime began with George W. Bush’s No Child Left Behind (NCLB, 2002). The program arrived in a cloud of rhetoric about “access” and “civil rights,” describing itself as “an act to close the achievement gap… so that no child is left behind.” NCLB was, by 2009, an acknowledged failure, but the Obama administration took it over, renaming it Race to the Top, and requiring that states adopt, as a condition for federal funds, the Common Core State Standards, a set of national standards nailed into place in 2010 by the billions and boosterism of Bill Gates. Gates promised that the Core would “unleash powerful market forces,” which it did, and would level the playing field, which it did not.
And how could it? The only thing testing has ever done for the disadvantaged is to communicate a message of failure and lay waste to public schools. What test scores measure is family income; they correlate so closely that there’s a term for it—the zip code effect. When test scores have shown “low performance,” schools have been closed by the hundreds, mainly in low-income, minority neighborhoods, and replaced with privately-run, profit-generating charters.
Despite twenty years of failure, despite the waste of time and money, the standardized testing must go on. More broken promises.
Open the link and read the rest of the post.
“Along with everything else in the lives of Americans, the Covid-19 pandemic has grievously interrupted both ESSA-mandated state assessments and states’ own testing regimes (including EOCs, reading guarantees, high school exit exams, etc.) ”
Another ed reform echo chamber promotion of testing. It’s good to see the various ed reform testing regimes listed- there are many more than just annual standardized tests.
I do wonder though, how these mandates on public schools work with the OTHER ed reform promotions on privatization. They’re also pushing unregulated voucher schemes all over the country, where people are given a low value voucher payment to spend on educational services.
When they reach the goal of abolishing public education systems and transitioning to the voucher system, how are they planning on mandating all these tests? How will they manage to test all 3rd graders when “3rd graders” are just an unidentified group of children who receive a voucher to purchase services from various contractors?
The only reason they can do these massive testing programs is they inherited public education systems. They’re dismantling all the public education systems, fragmenting them, and selling them off in pieces.
When the ed reform “commitment” to standardized testing crashes into the only OTHER ed reform commitment, their lockstep, ideological devotion to privatization, I predict they jettison the tests. They’ll have to. Can’t do a high school exit exam without a high school!
Oh, but they’ll always have a diminished cadre of traditional public schools to fall back on, Chiara. What would they do without us? They need a place for the newly-moved-in to land, who they can quickly frighten off with high-stakes-testing-all the time, not to mention the ever-higher proportion of SpEd/ ESL students & ever-increasing class-sizes… from there they can siphon off enrollees, and they’re not done: they need a place where they can bounce back rejects.
It’s already happening in Ohio. Their lobbying for private school vouchers ended with voucher schools being excepted from the standardized tests they insist every public school student must take.
Standardized testing was “essential for equity” right up until it ran into their ideological commitment to privatization, and when it did they jettisoned the testing in fealty to the ideological goal of privatization.
Apparently we don’t need to worry about “equity” in the privatized systems they’re all working for- the free market will take care of it.
Everyone will get the same low value voucher and we won’t measure anything, because how can we? Are they planning on testing every 17 year old when they don’t even know where the 17 year olds are, or where they go to school, or if they go to school?
The state legislatures, whose GOP leaders are heavily funded by right wingers, don’t want kids in voucher schools to take the same tests as those in public schools as the comparison would embarrass the voucher crowd. Meanwhile, charters boost their scores by excluding kids who might or do get low scores.
yes
You’ve put your finger on it, Chiara: the school-choice end-game, and its issues. Issue #1 is, once you disseminate kids from traditional publics into charters and vouchers, you haven’t a chance in hell of figuring out where they went or whether they even finished school. Just check out NOLA, they haven’t got a clue. So much for the state constitutions’ various ed clauses claiming to provide an education to the public.
“No system can function well without data showing the effectiveness of its own functioning. That’s as true of education systems as of transportation systems, manufacturing systems, delivery services, vaccine distributions and others. Attempting to run a state or local school system, a charter school network, even an individual school, without reliable information about student achievement, achievement gains and learning gaps is like trying to drive between two unfamiliar towns with neither GPS nor road maps; in fact, it’s more like attempting to do that at night without street lamps, road signs or headlights. This has never been more true than when schools across the country struggle to reopen after the protracted pandemic-forced shutdowns, a year and more during which children have had radically different education experiences and during which we have ample evidence of stalled achievement, severe learning losses, widening gaps and growing inequities, in addition to major threats to children’s social, emotional and physical well-being.”
So say the same people who work tirelessly every day to abolish public school systems and replace them with an unregulated group of private contractors.
The absolute incoherence of this “movement” is really something. Designing “systems” on the fly, based wholly on ideological beliefs, with no thought or analysis AT ALL about how the ed reform obsession with measures MIGHT interact with the twin ed reform obsession with fragmenting existing public school systems and selling them off to contractors in pieces.
They must already be running into it in Florida. They can’t be testing all those kids who are in the unregulated, fly by night private “voucher schools”, let alone all the “home schools” they’re publicly funding.
The only students who will be subject to the ed reform testing mandates will be students in the public schools they all oppose.
Chiara, what is the source of that quote?
https://www.educationnext.org/education-exchange-pandemic-is-killing-standardized-testing-accountability-that-comes-with-it/
Thank you.
As someone that apparently taught in the “dark ages,” the period in education prior to NCLB was far better. Educators were considered professionals with legitimate degrees that provided lots of guiding light to education. They simply used formative assessments to guide instruction, a cheap and highly effective way to help design instruction. Teachers and administrators with master and doctoral degrees are far better prepared to understand what is the best way to teach young people than MBAs, TFAs or billionaires.
and when the goal became “let business decide…” — Well, here we are
I don’t know what provoked that, retired teacher, but I second the motion!!
I would like to see American education return to its better past when teachers had a voice and public schools were valued. When I first started teaching, it was a contentious period of economic recession and labor problems that continued from the 1970s into the mid 1980s. While conservatives were concocting a poisonous brew of lies from “A Nation at Risk,” schools did not feel its impact. The late ’80 and ’90s were like a golden age in public education. Budgets were passed, and lots of money flowed into schools from the Dot Com bubble. Teachers had agency, and labor strife was minimal. Many public schools embraced alternative assessments. While standardized testing existed, it was low stakes. The curriculum was not driven by the testing juggernaut. Teachers had access to technology, but they could decide how to use it or not. The curriculum was mostly free from outside influences, and students benefited from a content rich and varied program. There was little privatization of public education, and most students in suburban and rural schools were better off. Urban schools suffered from under funding, but they were not under siege from the Charter/Voucher lobby backed by billionaire dark money that diverts public funds into private pockets.
This was the time period that I decided to become a teacher – early 2000’s. When I first started teaching, it was still somewhat as you described but beginning to slowly change. I watched/experienced slow, then rapid change. The last 6 or so years, where I teach, one year looks completely different from just a year before. It’s unsustainable.
You’re describing the education my 3 sons thankfully got. They attended public school in NJ between 1992-2010. They were a really motley lot, with talents that didn’t fit the academic pigeonholes, but were well served by our pubschsys, thanks to their terrific teachers. NCLB testing was working its way through the pubschsys starting in elemsch, and just missed them.
I got a peek at how it played out, as a for-lang tutor to a few younger kids. For-langs weren’t tested, but I was well aware of testing periods, & they elicited a combination of angst and tedium, exacerbated by too-concerned parents. These were smarter-than-average students, and I swear I saw them converted to cynics at the age of 9yo.
I could even see public schools suing to get out from under ed reform mandates.
After all, if the private schools and private programs ed reformers prefer are publicly funded and don’t have to go along with ed reform mandates, why should public schools?
The justification for ed reformers policing public schools is “they’re publicly funded”. But the ed reform echo chamber now promote a system of universal vouchers where families can buy any education program or service with public funding.
Are they planning on policing 15,000 private contractors and imposing the roster of mandates on THOSE schools or programs like they do on public schools?
Why should public schools accept it if the ed reform contractors aren’t bound by it? Are the standardized testing scores even going to be valid if they succeed in their universal voucher? What if 25% of students in educational programs that are private contractors “opt out”? They’ll just be testing children in public schools?
This is already happening with the voucher programs in Ohio- the ed reform mandates don’t apply to publicly funded private schools. Why, then, should public schools accept programs and policies and mandates pushed by ed reformers- people who don’t even support the existence of public schools?
It is time to bring in the lawyers and protesters. We need to get the corporate interlopers out of our schools. Public schools belong to us, and we must claim them. They are a key element in a functioning democracy. Testing is a tool to hustle poor students into separate and unequal privatized schools. Once young people are in these schools there is no further interest in accountability or regulation. Public schools are public, not private assets. They require our investment. There is no practical reason to send tax dollars to unscrupulous private operators. More poor performing schools are not the answer. We should invest in the public schools that serve all students. The public is being scammed by profit seeking hucksters.
I agree. But bringing in lawyers and protesting against testing….. gets twisted around, by those with deep pockets, to the narrative of “teachers just don’t want to be held accountable to doing their job.” And lots of voters believe that.
The message about testing must be that it is useless, it provides no useful information, it’s a waste of time and money.
We learn the same thing every year: kids whose parents are wealthy get the highest scores, and kids whose families are impoverished get the lowest scores.
Nothing new.
Now that ed reformers have redefined “public education” as “anything that is ‘educational’ and publicly funded, doesn’t the logical basis for their policing of public schools disappear?
We’re going to have two sets of publicly funded schools? The private schools and companies ed reformers prefer and DON’T police or regulate and the public schools they oppose on ideological grounds but DO police and regulate, subjecting our students to whatever gimmick or fad is currently fashionable in think tanks?
Why would public schools put up with that? They made the rules. They redefined “public” to mean “publicly funded”. Public schools can play by the ed reform definitions and opt out of ed reformer’s interference completely.
Public schools get the worst of both with this “movement”. They’re subjected to ed reform mandates but get no ed reform support. It’s a great deal for private schools and companies- all the funding but none of the regulation or duties to the public.
What if public schools want the private school funding deal? All the public money but none of the duty to the broader public?
American schools are actually mired in the future.
The testing of the last 20 years is just a transition to so called “personalized learning”
And with “personalized learning”, it’s going to be all testing all the time.
There will be no opting out because the testing will be an inherent part of the program.
Teachers leaving is just part of the plan.
Mission Accomplished
Mission Accomplished!
Send in computers
Teachers are vanquished
Bots are our suitors
Contracts are written
For soft-ware and hard-
Teachers are bitten
By Gates and his guard
I’m catching up on yesterday and the day before…my wife and I both had our second vaccine shots and we’re dealing with the aftershocks. Never thought I’d feel this happy about being physically miserable, ha,ha. Go, immune system, go! (I imagine cheerleaders dressed up like antibodies and T cells.)
Meanwhile, there’s been a lot of great stuff on this blog the past week.
It’s got me to wondering….can people really call themselves “liberal”….describe themselves as “progressive”, if they’re not fighting standardized testing tooth and nail? The testing obsession is a deal breaker right from the get-go.
And, the mindless embrace of any and all high tech options, no matter how stupid and dehumanizing they might be (to wit: SomeDAM’s prescient verse above) is a whole other issue, too.
Gayle Greene couldn’t be more right. It’s time to do some spring cleaning and toss out all the crap that’s cluttering our schools….conservative and liberal. Winter is about done,
Enjoy this Easter Sunday, all.
The Reform School Testocracy had to come up with a justification for testing this year so the money would keep flowing into their bank accounts, and this lame crap is what they came up with.