Court documents were released about the militia members who planned the January 6 Insurrection, according to the Washington Post, that led to the sacking of the U.S. Capitol, a horrifying sight and a desecration of one of our national monuments by a wild mob. The mob listened to Trump’s incitement and headed for the Capitol, inspired to carry out heinous actions against members of Congress. Some of the videos of the horrendous events showed a line of military-clad people walking through the mob, with a hand on the shoulder of the person in front. Frankly, I wish the FBI had waited another 24 hours to unseal the documents, until Trump was out of office. Supposedly, the FBI watches the communications of would-be terrorists and white supremacists. Why were they not prepared? Why did they not alert the Defense Department (oh, the acting Secretary of Defense is a Trump loyalist)? Will Trump use this information to claim that he did not incite the mob because its leaders came prepared to invade the Capitol? Or did his words inspire the large audience to join in the assault on the Capitol, led by people eager to destroy the seat of our government and to kill members of Congress? And one other question: Why did so many Republicans who were the targets of the mob vote to support their goals after the Insurrection?
Self-styled militia members from Virginia, Ohio and other states made plans to storm the U.S. Capitol days in advance of the Jan. 6 attack, communicating in real time as they breached the building on opposite sides and leading dozens in a hunt for lawmakers to make “citizen’s arrests,” according to new court documents filed Tuesday.
U.S. authorities charged an apparent Oath Keeper leader, Thomas Edward Caldwell, 66, of Clarke County, Va., in the attack, alleging that the U.S. Navy veteran helped organize a ring of what became 30 or 40 people who “stormed the castle” to disrupt the electoral vote confirmation of President-elect Joe Biden’s victory.
“We have about 30-40 of us. We are sticking together and sticking to the plan,” co-defendant Jessica Watkins, 38, a U.S. Army veteran, said while the breach was underway, according to court documents unsealed Tuesday.
“You are executing citizen’s arrest. Arrest this assembly, we have probable cause for acts of treason, election fraud,” a man replied, according to communications recovered from her phone, the FBI alleged.
“We are in the main dome right now. We are rocking it. They are throwing grenades, they are fricking shooting people with paint balls. But we are in here,” a woman believed to be Watkins said, according to court documents.
A man then responds, “Get it, Jess,” adding, “This is … everything we f——trained for!”
The extraordinary real-time narration of parts of the assault on the Capitol came as investigators made public new details of events in unsealed conspiracy charges in which thousands of pro-Trump supporters forced the evacuation of lawmakers and triggered violence that left five people dead.
FBI probes possible connections between extremist groups at heart of Capitol violence
FBI charging papers against Caldwell, Watkins and a third man, former U.S. Marine Donovan Crowl, 50, allege that Caldwell and others coordinated in advance to disrupt Congress, scouted for lodging and recruited Oath Keepers members from North Carolina and like-minded groups from the Shenandoah Valley. Participants both anticipated violence and continued to act in concert after the break-in, investigators said in court documents...
Federal prosecutors in Washington have charged more than 100 defendants in the past 13 days. But arrests this weekend of several people with alleged ties to extremist groups, including the Oath Keepers, Proud Boys and Three Percenters, have offered evidence that the riot was not an entirely impulsive outburst of violence but an event instigated or exploited by organized groups. Hours of video posted on social media and pored over by investigators have focused on individuals in military-style gear moving together...
In New York, a Queens man who worked in the state court system was accused Tuesday of making threats to murder Democratic politicians, including suggesting another attack on the Capitol timed to President-elect Joe Biden’s inauguration.
Brendan Hunt of Queens, N.Y., is described in the documents as a part time actor and full-time employee of the New York State Office of Court Administration. Authorities said Hunt was not at the Jan. 6 riot, but made threatening remarks about Democratic politicians beforehand that intensified in a video he posted two days later, titled, “KILL YOUR SENATORS.”
“We need to go back to the U.S. Capitol,” Hunt said in the video, according to the FBI. “What you need to do is take up arms, get to D.C., probably the inauguration … put some bullets in their f—– heads. If anybody has a gun, give it to me, I’ll go there myself and shoot them and kill them.”
Caldwell’s group appeared motivated by a similar animus. In a Jan. 1 reply to a Facebook comment cited by the FBI, Caldwell referred to the military oath to support and defend the Constitution against all enemies foreign and domestic, saying he had done both, but “they have morphed into pure evil even blatantly rigging an election and paying off the political caste.”
“We must smite them now and drive them down,” Caldwell said. An FBI charging affidavit said Caldwell was recorded outside the Capitol on a YouTube video posted Jan. 8, motioning to the building and shouting “Every single [expletive beeped in original] in there is a traitor. Every single one.
In Caldwell’s charging papers, the FBI said that it is reviewing communications between Caldwell “and other known and unknown Oath Keepers members.”
An FBI agent in court records said Caldwell helped organize a group of eight to 10 individuals led by Watkins, a bartender who founded the “Ohio State Regular Militia” in 2019. Members of the group are seen on video wearing helmets and military-style gear moving purposefully toward the top of the Capitol steps and leading the move against police lines, court records said.
None of what you report lets Trump off the hot seat. For days, weeks, and even months, he prepared his mob by constantly ranting against mail in ballots, claiming fraud, refusing to concede, stirring them up to go to DC on 6 Jan, and many other things now all too familiar.
3 thoughts
He prepared this the very first time in 2016 when he got a response from his “fake media” “you punch them and I’ll pay your legal fees” rants that crowds salivated. His new reality show became a hit and he played to until people died.
How does this come under the second amendment “well regulated militia” – there is nothing well regulated about this, in fact it’s ironic that groups all over the country hate regulations and authority and hide behind the word “regulated” in a document with authority
and…
Uh, if they succeeded, what did they think would happen on January 7?
That’s the thing about stupid people. They can’t think ahead and consider the consequences or options of their actions. Yes, I said every one of the people who took part or were sympathizers of the Jan 6 terror are STUPID. And EVIL. And have no knowledge whatsoever about the American Constitution, history, or anyone who is not exactly like them.
“Uh, if they succeeded, what did they think would happen on January 7?”
For people living in reality there is no logical answer to this question. For some they were whipped into a religious frenzy tand this was a holy war to bring on the apocalypse. The others want to go all the way back to slave times.
I know something about such attacks. For, back in 1967, I too was part of an attack on a federal building, in that case the Pentagon. Some of us, part of a demonstration against the war being carried out by the United States government on Vietnam, left the main demo and charged through the lawns and parking lots outside the Pentagon. When we came upon a line of soldiers with rifles and bayonets, we dodged around then–until we ran into other lines of soldiers, who blocked our progress. We sat down, many of us through the night, as demonstrators often did during the Sixties. Our objective, ill-articulated and vague, was to get into that building. What we might do there, most of us had no idea about, for we had no plan.
Others, however, did have plans, as was the case at the Capitol last Wednesday. I don’t know exactly what the plan at the Pentagon was, since I was not a part of any group trying to carry it out. It might have been to set fires in the building, just as the American military was setting fires all over Vietnam. I don’t know—even though I’ve written about the event in my book, “Our Sixties.” Does my participation in that event make me sympathetic to those who attacked our Capitol last week? In no way! And it is worth thinking about why.
First of all, a significant number of last week’s crowd were, plain and simple, fascists: they wore shirts with anti-Semitic slogans, they carried Confederate flags, they promoted taking over the government by a violent mob organized for power, like the Nazi Brown Shirts of the 1920s and 1930s, and they swore fealty to a leader, a fűhrer, who egged on their viciousness. And what was their cause? The myth that Trump had actually won the presidential election and was being kept from victory by fraud. They sought to maintain this utter fiction, which had been dismissed by courts and voting officials of both parties all across America.
In 1967, we did not need fictions to generate opposition to the American war on Vietnam. Every day newspapers published the names of American soldiers killed in action as well as the awful military claims about “body counts” of dead Vietnamese. Every day brought us photographs of terror: a naked girl burnt by napalm running down the middle of a road, a captive Vietnamese soldier shot in the head by a South Vietnamese officer in front of TV cameras, water buffalo shot from American copters, houses torched by American marines, and women and children butchered at places like My Lai. Nothing was made up; it was plain to see. Indeed, the military boasted of the effects of its firepower.
Many of us there at the Pentagon had learned to confront the reality of racist cruelty in places like Mississippi.
People keep saying Trump will forever be known as the man who destroyed the Republican Party, but I intend to remember him for his failures, not his accomplishments.
–Guy Lodge
LOL! It took me a minute to get it, which is exactly the kind of meme I love. Brilliant.
🤣🤣👍👍
Another meme I enjoyed recently:
No garbage collection on January 18 because this is the day when we pause to honor the Reverend Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.
Besides, America is going to take out its garbage on the 20th of January.
Twelve hours and change to go! The end of the _____ administration is here. It’s here!
You teaser, you. My fear: how much damage can be done to the is nation in the next 10+ hours?
Related. This is and except from the actual language from the press release announcing all of the Idiot’s pardon: “Stephen K. Bannon – President Trump granted a full pardon to Stephen Bannon. Prosecutors pursued Mr. Bannon with charges related to fraud stemming from his involvement in a political project. Mr. Bannon has been an important leader in the conservative movement and is known for his political acumen.”
Discuss. Especially that final sentence.
…an excerpt…
Mate Wierdl posted here a podcast from Steve Bannon, on Youtube, that basically laid out the entire Trump plan for overturning the election–the challenges in the courts, the attempt to get states to appoint Trump electors, the appeal to the Supreme Court, and the martial rhetoric to whip up the base Trump base into a fury.
It was Bannon, Sessions, and Miller who, having noted Trump’s racist birtherism, approached him to run for president and carry their White Supremacist agenda forward. This is all outlined in the superb Frontline documentary Zero Tolerance, which I highly recommend.
Bannon is a deranged and dangerous person, and a lot of the dysfunction of the last few years, including the BIG LIE about election fraud that led to the Capitol insurrection, can be laid at his feet.
And now for something completely different:
Must Reads
How blacklisting silenced progressive queer women artists and intellectuals in mid-20th-century television, film, and theatre; portrayed an ideal of white, cisgendered, straight male dominance, female subservience, and the father-led, upwardly mobile nuclear suburban family; and stopped social and political progress cold, via brainwashing of a largely uneducated American public, for 50+ years.
https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/dawn-television-promised-diversity-heres-why-we-got-leave-it-beaver-instead-180970548/
At one point in the ever-fierce competition over which will be the stupidest legislative body in the United States, a Texas state legislator, with support from members of the State Board of Education, moved to remove gay and bisexual authors from the state’s literature textbooks. I thought, “Well, that would mean throwing out almost the entire canon of classic British and American literature.”
The textbook makers would have had to cut Auden, Baldwin, Aphra Behn, Bentham, Bishop, Burroughs, Butler, Byron, Capote, Cather, Cheever, Noel Coward, Crane, Cullen, Dickinson, Donne, H.D., du Maurier, Eliot, Forster, Ginsberg, Thomas Gray, Gunn, Hopkins, Housman, Langston Hughes, Abraham Lincoln, Isherwood, Sarah Orne Jewett, Kerouac, D. H. Lawrence, Audre Lorde, F. O. Matthiessen, Maugham, McCullers, Melville, Millay, Milton, Frank O’Hara, Orton, Wilfred Owen, Walter Pater, Adrienne Rich, George Santayana, May Sarton, Sendak, Shakespeare, Shelley, Sidney, Sitwell, Sontag, Gertrude Stein, Strachey, Swinburne, Tennyson, Vidal, Alice Walker, Evelyn Waugh, Whitman, Oscar Wilde, Thornton Wilder, Tennessee Williams, Jeanette Winterson, Virginia Woolf. And forget about a slew of Europeans from Socrates and Plato to Proust and beyond.
And I’m sure there are many others I’ve left off the list.
Republican Corporate Donor List:
MyPillow
Chick Fil-A
Aeroflot
Trump can say what he likes, but there’s one constant in all of these reports and videos we’re reading about and seeing:
The “stolen” election.
THAT is on him. And the senators and representatives who supported the claims. It started before the election and just got worse and more ludicrous (a “landslide” victory) and inflammatory as time went on.
He may not have planned the assault…but sitting and enjoying the show on TV and not answering pleas for help says a ton. He created the chaos. Knowingly.
The thug will try to get off on a technicality. How “presidential”.
The stench is almost unbearable.
Whatever else maybe true, we can say one thing for certain: it was not the ” well regulated militia ” referred to in the Second Amendment.
If the QAnon Shaman was what the Framers had in mind when they wrote the Second Amendment, I’d have to say that nothing in the Constitution means what it says.
Then again
Maybe “well” is a just a typo, actually supposed to be “wool”
A “wool regulated militia”
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Jake_Angeli_(Qanon_Shamon),seen_holding_a_Qanon_sign(cropped).jpg
Honestly: I think that one of Trump’s prime objectives throughout his presidency has been to create chaos.
In neural linguistic programming; a “pattern interrupt” is a very effective means of influencing and changing behavior. Chaos on a massive scale is a large scale pattern interrupt. And the more often it’s perpetrated; the more likely the influence on future behavior.
I watched the ’60 Minutes’ interview with Steven Sund, the former head of the Capitol Police. While he is being held accountable for fiasco, he appeared not to have any part in allowing it to happen. Nobody in intelligence gave him any warning about what was to happen. We do not know if this breakdown in information was deliberate or not. With all the money we spend on intelligence and law enforcement, we should be able to do better.
No part?
Wasn’t it his job?
And if he had no idea what might happen, why did he request backup from the National guard?
I don’t hold those Policemen actually trying to do their job at the Capitol under very trying circumstsnces responsible, but the idea that the head of the CP had no part in preparation (or lack thereof) is something I don’t buy.
Maybe there was indeed a “failure” of intelligence , but in my opinion, that does not get this fellow off the hook.
From what I’ve read; it was more about the lack of action regarding the intelligence that had been supplied, days or weeks in advance.
I wouldn’t want to have been an officer on the scene during that riot. They got thrown under the bus in a big way.
Don’t know who to believe. Head of police say there was no intel while the intel community says they provided it. Somebody’s being less than forthcoming on this one.
A major investigation will find out what happened.
I agree that the Capitol Policemen were in a very difficult situation.
Someone is responsible for putting them in that position.
It looks like everyone at the top is now playing
The finger pointing game
The finger pointing game
Will really get you far
Where no one is to blame
Except the ones who are
Someone is being l”ess than forthcoming?”
You mean someone is lying?
Ha ha ha
The poet would ask for a more direct approach?
Yes. Someone (probably more than one) is lying. And I’m so hoping for prosecutions.
Blows me away that anyone would consider anything less. “Representing my constituency” isn’t going to cut it, here.